Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roobee
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Dr vulpes (Talk) 03:56, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
Roobee
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Roobee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unclear if there's enough to demonstrate WP:CORPDEPTH KH-1 (talk) 10:08, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, Technology, and Caribbean. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:17, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
- Comment: Though not insurmountable (and I haven't looked closely enough to see if the current text is even at fault), this has been tagged for UPE issues since 2021. (No opinion.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:58, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency and Artificial intelligence. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:59, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 03:48, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Source review against WP:NCORP / WP:ORGIND: the two Forbes citations (Pollock 2019, Fenech 2018) are both
forbes.com/sites/contributor pieces and so fail WP:RS for establishing corporate notability; the Entrepreneur piece is the same category of contributor content. FinSMEs, Equities.com, Born2invest, and Changelly are startup-PR or affiliated-promotional sources. The Seeking Alpha citation is an Instablog, which is explicitly user-generated. The Bloomberg Businessweek "200M_trader" piece is about the anonymous trader rather than about Roobee, so it does not satisfy WP:ORGIND. BankingTech, Snob.ru, and Rusbase contain only routine mentions. The remaining items are funding-round announcements, which are WP:ORGTRIV. Combined with the{{Undisclosed paid}}tag in place since January 2021, nothing here meets WP:CORPDEPTH for independent in-depth coverage. Sparks19923 (talk) 10:22, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.