Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shuyaku Sentai Irem Fighter
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 14:51, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
Shuyaku Sentai Irem Fighter
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Shuyaku Sentai Irem Fighter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is basically empty and very sparse selection of reliable sources for notability. Go D. Usopp (talk) 13:01, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Japan. Go D. Usopp (talk) 13:01, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
- Support doesn't pass WP:GNG. Article cites zero reliable sources. There are only two sources cited (in the external links section) one of which is a wiki which is of course unreliable, and the other of which (Digital Monkey Box) has no indication of reliability as far as I can tell. I could not find any other decent sources on the web. Additionally, the Italian Wikipedia article only cites the Monkey box source, so nothing decent there.
- 𝓕𝓵𝓸𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓷 (Talk to me! · My contribs) 13:39, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
- Delete: I did a cursory search as well and found nothing more than brief mentions and sale listings. The other Wikipedias are no help, like 𝓕𝓵𝓸𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓷 said; the Japanese Wikipedia has no related article either. Irem doesn't even acknowledge the game on their website. I doubt there's much (any?) information out there that would help establish notability and expand the article beyond stub status. Kodning 🌸 (talk) 07:14, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
- Delete: Not notable. Could not find significant coverage in reliable and independent sources. --Otr500 (talk) 11:15, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.