Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Small Actions

Small Actions

Small Actions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:NBOOK. The only review cited is a link to YouTube (a self-published source). The Business Book Awards is not a prominent literary award. I was not able to find more relevant sources. Mariamnei (talk) 07:51, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Business-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:59, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete, most sources in article are primary sources, no credible review of the book and can't find any other sources out of what are already in article. Santa Saana (talk) 08:22, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: this has also been tagged for potential LLM text. (No opinion.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:05, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Suspected AI-generated articles. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:05, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete, appears to fail WP:NBOOK, can't find any reviews, and no good redirect target. ScalarFactor (talk) 14:52, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. This listing was the best I could find. There's nothing else to establish how the book is notable. The award nomination isn't enough to establish notability and to be honest, mere nominations are typically not seen as a sign of notability unless the award is super notable like an Oscar or Pulitzer. The article mentions reviews, however the links go to a SPS YouTube video and an Overdrive link. The Overdrive link doesn't even have reviews posted, although in my experience when they do it's almost always listing random user reviews on places like Goodreads or Amazon. SoBrief is a site that offers AI summaries of books, so hardly something that would be considered a reliable source. I have to assume that the review summary is based on a sweep of whatever the AI found on Google, meaning that it could be a mix of unusable SPS and even primary sources saying nice things about the book. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 12:24, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete The only thing memorable is that award but still not enough to pass WP:NBOOK. Koshuri ^(あ!) 13:55, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.