Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UnboxingBLR Foundation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Goldsztajn (talk) 10:41, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
UnboxingBLR Foundation
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- UnboxingBLR Foundation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This non profit is not Notable, fails WP:NORG. Reference#1 is a self published source. Reference#2 is about the cultural festival BLR Hubba organised by this organization. Reference#3 is a partnership type press release and Reference#4 is also a press release. Naanu65 (talk) 07:07, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, India, and Karnataka. Naanu65 (talk) 07:07, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dafootballguy | Want to talk? 23:18, 24 May 2026 (UTC) - Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 02:05, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
- Delete: Per Nom. I could not find any significnt coverage in reliable and independent sources. -- Otr500 (talk) 07:06, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Felinaex (purr / pawprints) 14:58, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
- Delete – does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. The two Hindu sources cover events where the organisation shows up as a participant or partner. Neither piece is about UnboxingBLR itself. The Week piece is a PTI agency feed. Three years old, two passing mentions, one wire feed. That is not enough. EmilyR34 (talk) 07:39, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.