Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wonderoos
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Complex/Rational 20:00, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
Wonderoos
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Wonderoos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article appears to be completely written by an LLM, due to it being in an AI's writing style. Many information is unsourced, and some is unconfirmed, like the paragraph stating that the original name of Wonderoos is "What-To-Doodles". Although it is sourced, and the source indeed shows that name, and it has a description similar to Wonderoos, there has never been any official confirmation from Netflix or 7ate9 stating that it indeed was the previous name of Wonderoos. RotatingPirateShip (talk) 15:50, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Comics and animation, Suspected AI-generated articles, and Canada. BhikhariInformer 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 15:57, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related AfD discussions. BhikhariInformer 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 16:45, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
- Delete. The amount of unsourced material here is staggering and I see no reason to believe any of it is reliable given its probable origin and the mismatches with sources I checked. If someone wants to write an article on this show (there are enough reviews that it could be reasonable) this material will harm rather than help their efforts. M kuhner (talk) 17:31, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
- Delete as there are WP:AISIGNS. Clearly the LLM hallucinated and came up with unreliable sources. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 18:14, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
- Should it be nominated for speedy deletion? RotatingPirateShip (talk) 20:14, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
- Under G15? RotatingPirateShip (talk) 20:15, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
- I mean WP:G15 RotatingPirateShip (talk) 20:17, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
- I don't see it as reaching G15, because we don't seem to have
Implausible non-existent citations or nonsensical references
as G15 requires. They do, alas, exist. Absolutely clearcut AfD though. M kuhner (talk) 20:46, 28 May 2026 (UTC)- Besides, it is fine to let the AfD run its course. It seems that this article will be deleted anyways. Lovelyfurball (talk) 13:33, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
- I don't see it as reaching G15, because we don't seem to have
- I mean WP:G15 RotatingPirateShip (talk) 20:17, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
- Under G15? RotatingPirateShip (talk) 20:15, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
- Should it be nominated for speedy deletion? RotatingPirateShip (talk) 20:14, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
- Delete: AI slop. GrinningIodize (talk) 23:55, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
- Delete – Per WP:V and WP:AISIGNS. Extensive unsourced content, source mismatches, and apparent AI-generated inaccuracies make the article unreliable in its current form. Accesscrawl (talk) 09:33, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
- Delete as WP:LLM violation without prejudice against a future recreation without LLM use or such extensive amounts of unsourced content. See the discussion on WP:AINB#Possible LLM use found on Wonderoos. Lovelyfurball (talk) 13:38, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
- Came here via ANI discussion, Strong Delete: per WP:LLM violation; an obvious one too. ★ Campssitie (msg) (contribs) 🧋🏖 06:14, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.