Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 February 23

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). GoldRomean (talk) 19:25, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

• Propose splitting Category:YouTubers from Worcestershire to Category:Mass media people from Worcestershire and Category:English YouTubers

Nominator's rationale: Dual upmerge for now. Underpopulated category ^SMason_Garrison 23:29, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

• Dual merge, this is not helpful for navigation. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:44, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). GoldRomean (talk) 19:25, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

• Propose merging Category:Individual cats in Canada (0) to Category:Individual cats and Category:Individual animals in Canada
• Propose merging Category:Individual cats in South Korea (0) to Category:Individual cats and Category:Individual animals in South Korea
• Propose merging Category:Individual cats in Taiwan (0) to Category:Individual cats and Category:Individual animals in Taiwan
• Propose merging Category:Individual cats in Turkey (0) to Category:Individual cats and Category:Individual animals in Turkey
• Propose merging Category:Individual cats in Scotland (0) to Category:Individual cats in the United Kingdom and Category:Individual animals in Scotland
• Propose merging Category:Individual dogs in Brazil (0) to Category:Individual dogs and Category:Individual animals in Brazil
• Propose merging Category:Individual dogs in Romania (0) to Category:Individual dogs and Category:Individual animals in Romania

Nominator's rationale: WP:NARROWCAT. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:11, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Narrow cats? Say it ain't so. CMD (talk) 02:22, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

• Merge, this is not helpful for navigation between related articles. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:50, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
• support per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 09:33, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
• support, came here from Category:Individual dogs in Romania, not helpful. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:22, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). GoldRomean (talk) 19:25, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

• Propose merging Category:Individual primates by country to Category:Individual primates

Nominator's rationale: Category layer with one subcategory. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:09, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

• Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:52, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
• merge per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 09:33, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). GoldRomean (talk) 19:25, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

• Propose merging Category:Precolonial Mizoram to Category:History of Mizoram

Nominator's rationale: merge for consistency, no other Indian states have a precolonial history category. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:51, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Merge It is anachronistic. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:09, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

• merge per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 09:34, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
• Merge per nom.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:49, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:08, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

• Propose renaming Category:Draft articles by ORES topic classification to Category:Draft articles by topic

Nominator's rationale: "ORES" was never explained on the page, but apparently referred to "Objective Revision Evaluation Service", see https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/ORES#Topic_routing . In mainspace, ORES currently redirects to Artificial intelligence in Wikimedia projects, but the last mention of ORES there was removed in Dec 2025 stating that it's deprecated. Rename and populate with other topic subcats from parent Category:Draft articles. – Fayenatic London 16:51, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

This is a container category where all subcats are automatically populated by MediaWiki:AFC-submit-wizard.js based on ORES predictions. – SD0001 (talk) 17:39, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

• Keep these subcats (populated as SD0001 describes) are meaningfully different from the ones populated manually. And given that the script still makes calls to the API https://ores.wikimedia.org to get this data the current name is correct. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 07:01, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GoldRomean (talk) 21:15, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

• Rename per nom. I don't think it matters whether the draft categories have been populated manually, by a template or by some automated system. There's no reason to stop editors from manually categorising their drafts within the ORES subcategories, because they have normal topic names, and we don't need duplicate categories for automatic vs manual category assignment. We should simply have various draft categories for different topics, and if there is an automated system, it can pick one of those. I'm also highly sceptical of any use of AI on Wikipedia. Mclay1 (talk) 05:53, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
• Rename per Mclay1. Automated and manual classification can sit side by side leading to the same categories. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:18, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:10, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

• Propose renaming Category:Aromanian people in Serbia to Category:Serbian people of Aromanian descent
• Propose renaming Category:Aromanian people in Romania to Category:Romanian people of Aromanian descent
• Propose renaming Category:Aromanian people in Greece to Category:Greek people of Aromanian descent
• Propose renaming Category:Aromanian people in Albania to Category:Albanian people of Aromanian descent
• Propose renaming Category:Aromanian people in Bulgaria to Category:Bulgarian people of Aromanian descent
• Propose renaming Category:Aromanian people in North Macedonia to Category:Macedonian people of Aromanian descent
• Propose renaming Category:Aromanian people in Yugoslavia to Category:Yugoslav people of Aromanian descent

Nominator's rationale: To restore the status quo altered by this CfD . Nominator Johnpacklambert claimed This is not a grouping of people by where their ancestors came from, but a grouping of people by their ethnicity. However that is precisely what the categories were and still are about: people of Aromanian ancestry, full or partial, are included in these categories. Nominator claimed but by and large these are people who are Aromanian by ethnicity., but the Serbian one for instance features three times more people of partial Aromanian descent than of full one. Under the previous names, this scheme caused no issues, but the current names imply a fully Aromanian ethnic background for all the individuals listed in the categories. Immediately after the rename, two different editors removed the renamed categories from the articles of individuals who were only of partial Aromanian descent . The latter case erupted into a user dispute . The Aromanians are an ethnic group in the Balkans, the Balkan topic area being a sensitive one. These disputes are completely unnecessary and avoidable.

I am not opposed in essence to the existence of two sets of categories: a "people in" for people of full Aromanian ancestry and a "descent" one for people of partial Aromanian ancestry. The nominator too recognized this: There might be potential for a few cases of people who did identify as being of this descent but not of this ethnicity being in a seperate category scheme. However they have straight-up refused to create a second set of categories and deal with the hassle they've created . This is direct WP:Disruptive editing, and I don't see how it is fair that other users deal with it.

We can revisit the issue of creating two separate sets of categories in the future. But this nomination intends to revert a problem created by a user firstly unaware of the scope of the categories, and secondly unwilling to deal with the problem they have caused. Please recognize that the nature of this problem goes beyond content. The categories should be renamed to their former, broader and less controversial names. Logically, any future WP:DIFFUSING will be easier from a broader category to a more specific one, than from a more specific one that has lost some listed articles amid accuracy issues. Super Ψ Dro 16:04, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

• Split the categories. However we need to ensure with the descent categories A. We are limiting them to those who were nationals or permanent residents of the country. For example people living in Bohemia in 1850 of German descent are not Czech people of German descent. B. We need to ensure that those placed in the descent category are cases that are reliably sourced and that the listed ancestry is actually defining. The demand that a nominator create a whole skew of catrgories, especially when A. He has injured his back and spent several hours in the hospital and B. Is in the midst of splitting up a category at specific request that involves sorting over 200 articles into very long named categories that it takes a lot of thought to decide which or the two or both to put the articles in, comes off as very rude. I informed this other editor of this issue and he just attacked me for evidently being at fault for making a nomination I was not prepared to fully implement on my own. The way I was treated was very ride and jnconsiderate. Editors need to be more respectful in the way they communicate with others.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:45, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

The fact is that your actions caused disruption and two disputes in under 24 hours. That's how it is. I did say I was open to wait amid your situation. However you said you were directly unwilling to tackle the problem, so your personal conditions would not be a factor. If you said that under distress and were willing to deal with this case later, I couldn't know that, so I simply acted to have the renames reverted.

Wishing you good health and a fast recovery. Regards, Super Ψ Dro 01:14, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

• I support the idea and share the nominator's rationale. — Sadko (words are wind) 17:19, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

• Support nominator rationale, the new categories only made more confusion than it actually solved anything. Theonewithreason (talk) 17:42, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
• Split, e.g. Constantin Belimace properly belongs in the categories as they are currently named. Marcocapelle (talk) 23:03, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Just to emphazise again: I am not opposed to a split. But we're talking about something like 200 articles. And they all need individual reading to determine if ancestry is full or partial. In the case, which seems to be, that there is nobody willing to enforce this split or they lack the time, it'll be much easier to do it, slowly and article by article and avoiding disruption in other articles meanwhile, once the categories are renamed back to the broader title. Super Ψ Dro 01:14, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

• • No it will be easier to do it with a clear CfD mandate in support of doing so. Which is what would be created by a decision to create the split.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:28, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
• Rename per nom and status quo ante. The old category names are a better descriptor for these people, as they do not imply a degree to which their identification or ancestry is partially or fully Aromanian. They only imply that Aromanian heritage is defining for them per reliable sources. Splitting categories would mean that we differentiate pure-bred and half-bred people, which is practically and ethically wrong. However, the categories should be purged of people for whom Aromanian descent is not defining according to reliable sources, per WP:EGRS. Place Clichy (talk) 12:13, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
• Comment 2 of the 5 articles currently in Category:Aromanians in Bulgaria are on people lived their entire lived in the Ottoman Empire. I am not convinced they belong in this category under either name. We do not have Category:African-American peiple of Irish deacent or any similar category. All the descent categories we have are for people in cases where it can be seen and seems to in general be interpreted nationals of a country of such a descent. For example Category:American people of French descent or Category:Australian people of German deacent. I do not think we want to use these categories to categorize people who identified with one what is essentially an ethnic group but had ancestry in another.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:18, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

  But these categories are used for ethnic groups. Place Clichy (talk) 02:43, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

  In the case of these Fooian people of Booian descent Fooian I believe means the country that the person is a national or permanent resident of. Otherwise we would have to determine which of multiple ethnicities a person identifies with is his primary one and which is his secondary one. If we have a subject of the Ottoman Empire who idenfied as both Bulgarian and Aromanian I do not think we should try to parse which is more important to that person. If we are going to try to do that we would need to also have Category:Aromanian people of Bulgarian descent. John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:13, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

  These categories discuss Fooian people of Aromanian descent, which is I believe a good way to characterize people who have that heritage, when justified. I don't think someone suggests Aromanian people of Fooian descent. Place Clichy (talk) 20:14, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

  Some of these people in these categories are for example residents of the Ottoman Empire who identified as being both Bulgarian and Aromanian. It appears that the only reason we prefer one of these identities over the other in categorization is because later events lead to the creation of a distinct country of Bulgaria but did not lead to a distinct country of Aromania. At best this is anachronistic imposing a modern understanding on categorization of people in the past. I do not think the way the categories are being applied in these cases is justifiable or makes any sense.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:58, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

  First off, that doesn't make sense: "Bulgarian descent" would/should likewise refer to ethnicity, regardless of whether a nation-state emerged from it. Second: multiple descents should result in multiple categories, in the same article. From a vague recollection I have regarding Vladimir Cavarnali, whom RSes describe as both Bulgarian and Gagauz, it was some users stealthly intervening in articles who kept suggesting, against valid sources and decades of consensus, that we absolutely must have only one descent category per article; this may be the only reason why Bulgarian-Aromanian Ottomans are sometimes classified just as Bulgarians. A non-issue if I ever saw one. Dahn (talk) 13:37, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: to those who support a rename, thoughts on the merit of a split (either instead of or in addition to the rename)? And vice versa. Also, thoughts on a purge?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GoldRomean (talk) 21:08, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

• Answering to the relisting comment: oppose split. I am not as opposed if someone takes the time to split the categories in the around 200 affected biographies. Which require case-to-case reading. So far no editor has declared willingness to do the split. Furthermore, we would be ending with some sparsely populated categories in some cases. Why bother? Previous status quo was comfortable. Super Ψ Dro 21:23, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
• Support rename, oppose split -- I see no reason to ever again distinguish between (full) ethnicity and descent, as the very exercise is absurd, implicitly POV. All people whose X descent was noted in RSes are of notable X descent, and any distinction between the degree to which they are more X than a "full-blooded" or "self-identified" X is something that readers can dissect in their own minds, with their own subjective criteria, rather than making this entire project a victim to their whims, and rather than creating an endless back and forth. I came to note this dispute after adding the category on Jean Constantin, which article is incidentally educational as regards the absurdities imposed on us: Jean was widely perceived as a Rom, and described himself as Greek, but in one instance clearly indicated that his father was Aromanian; am I to exclude him from a valid category, based on his own statement, just because he was not "as" Aromanian as Gheorghe Hagi? Am I to accept as legally binding that some other user proclaimed we "must" either only have the category for the Hagis, and at most include the Jeans in a "lesser" category? All this when having both in the same category neatly addresses all definitions! Dahn (talk) 13:17, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
• Support rename to restore status quo ante as this was an ill-thought initiative in the first place. I don't really see the interest in a split. Of course if a more precise scope is identified nothing prevents a user to create a new category and populate it with care. However the key defining characteristic behind this category is Aromanian heritage regardless of its nature, and that was overlooked by the nominator of the original renaming in favour of other general considerations not adapted to the specifics of these categories. Place Clichy (talk) 16:43, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Consensus is clear. For how much longer should this discussion still be left open? We benefit from restoring the status quo as soon as possible. Super Ψ Dro 00:16, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 19:41, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

• Propose deleting Category:Nawabs of Balochistan, Pakistan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: delete, Nawab is a royal title but the articles are mostly about modern politicians. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:05, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:10, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Rename all Timrollpickering (talk) 20:07, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

• Propose renaming Category:Industry in Afghanistan to Category:Industries of Afghanistan
• Propose renaming Category:Industry in Albania to Category:Industries of Albania
• Propose renaming Category:Industry in Algeria to Category:Industries of Algeria
• Propose renaming Category:Industry in Andorra to Category:Industries of Andorra
• Propose renaming Category:Industry in Angola to Category:Industries of Angola
• Propose renaming Category:Industry in Argentina to Category:Industries of Argentina
• Propose renaming Category:Industry in Armenia to Category:Industries of Armenia
• Propose renaming Category:Industry in Australia to Category:Industries of Australia
• Propose renaming Category:Industry in Austria to Category:Industries of Austria
• Propose renaming Category:Industry in Azerbaijan to Category:Industries of Azerbaijan

Nominator's rationale: rename, these are mostly set categories about Industries (economics) rather than topic categories about Industry (manufacturing). After renaming, the categories should mildly be purged, by e.g. moving Category:Industrial buildings in Algeria under Category:Economy of Algeria. This is follow-up on this earlier discussion.

• Rename per nom and per precedent. Clearer names. We have separate categories for manufacturing. Mclay1 (talk) 22:47, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 19:42, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

• Propose merging Category:Architects in government to Category:Architects

Nominator's rationale: Selective merge. Non-defining intersection between occupation and employer ^SMason_Garrison 17:45, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

• If not kept then delete instead of merge. All articles are already in the tree of Category:Architects by nationality. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:01, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
• Delete a non-defining intersection category.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:06, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
• Keep. It's fruitless to look at 'defining' in this case. Building houses and building state welfare development is a legitimate special interesting connection. Wikipedia should be built for our users! -- Just N. (talk) 12:50, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GoldRomean (talk) 20:41, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per JPL. Just N.'s comment relies on appeal to emotion instead of explaining why it meets WP:DEFINING (which relies on which traits are likely to be identified in lead sections and by secondary sources introducing a topic). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:12, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Isla de la Juventud. (non-admin closure) GoldRomean (talk) 19:26, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

• Propose deleting Category:Geography of Isla de la Juventud (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Contains one subcategory. Contains no articles. ~2026-36939-5 (talk) 11:48, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

• Support in principle, but merge to Category:Isla de la Juventud. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:33, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GoldRomean (talk) 20:37, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

• Upmerge to Category:Isla de la Juventud. Obviously we shouldn't orphan the subcategory from that tree. Mclay1 (talk) 22:43, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Companies based in Lancashire. (non-admin closure) GoldRomean (talk) 19:26, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

• Propose merging Category:Companies based in the City of Preston, Lancashire to Category:Companies based in Preston, Lancashire

Nominator's rationale: Redundant and unnecessary category layer. AusLondonder (talk) 13:43, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

• Support in principle per nom, but upmerge to Category:Companies based in Lancashire in order to avoid unnecessary manual work. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:14, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GoldRomean (talk) 20:36, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

• Upmerge to Category:Companies based in Lancashire, which will result in the correct categorisation of the subcategory. Downmerging is messy. Mclay1 (talk) 22:46, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 19:43, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

• Rename Category:Almoravid generals to Category:Generals of the Almoravid Empire
• Nominstor's rationale Most sub-categories of Category:Generals by former country use the format Generals of [country name]. I think that is the best form here. What matters with Generals is the country of the military they held that rank in.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:31, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
• Lean oppose. former country includes former nation states. I don't think that's a good reason to change the name. ^SMason_Garrison 16:27, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
• I am not sure if Almoravid Empire is really a thing. Technically it would be an emirate rather than an empire. Possibly alt rename to Category:Generals under the Almoravid dynasty, similar to Category:People under the Almoravid dynasty. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:47, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
  • The article on the dynasty says "It established an empire that stretched over the western Maghreb and al-Andalus," so are article says they ruled an empire.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:02, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
    • As a noun, not as a proper name. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:06, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
• Support generals under form for now. There may be space to reconsider the wording more broadly but that would need to be done probably first by analyzing the article name.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:43, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

  You can't vote on your own nomination ^SMason_Garrison 16:25, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

  • It is actually a support on the alternative Category:Generals under the Almoravid dynasty. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:28, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GoldRomean (talk) 20:35, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. Unambiguous, better is the enemy of good. Especially, the Almoravids were originally not a dynasty in the family sense such as the Ottomans but a religious brotherhood, so the present name can't be understood to refer to only members of the family of the ruler as had been argued in other apparently similar cases. Place Clichy (talk) 19:12, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). GoldRomean (talk) 19:27, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

• Propose merging Category:Squares in Karachi to Category:Squares in Pakistan

Nominator's rationale: 1-article category, over-categorization Gjs238 (talk) 20:20, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

• Merge per nom. Mclay1 (talk) 22:40, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
• Merge, this is not helpful for navigation. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:25, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Shire of Cook. (non-admin closure) GothicGolem29 (Talk) 19:01, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

• Propose merging Category:Archer River, Queensland to Category:Shire of Cook

Nominator's rationale: Eponymous category for a small village of 27 people, containing only the main article and an article about a heritage-listed former mine. Both articles already interlinked. AusLondonder (talk) 18:29, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

• Delete Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:16, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
• Merge per nom. Mclay1 (talk) 22:41, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:15, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

• Propose deleting Category:Scottish people of Zambian descent (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Category containing only a single article about a person who was born in, and now lives in, England, and whose article describes them as British. Category useless for navigation. AusLondonder (talk) 17:23, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. Probably not every British category needs to be split between E/NI/S/W. Zambian ancestry is irrelevant to which part of the UK you are in or from. Place Clichy (talk) 20:27, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
• Keep. Part of an extensive and detailed category tree. Deleting categories here and there "just because" is not helpful to anybody. Emeli Sandé was born in England but grew up in Scotland, has a Scottish accent and is generally regarded by everybody as Scottish. -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:07, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

  Yes, we do delete categories "here and there" which are not useful. Categories containing only a single article are not useful. I disagree with your claims about Sandé and broad, unsupported statements like "generally regarded by everybody as Scottish" are not helpful. AusLondonder (talk) 08:53, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

  Re generally regarded by everybody as Scottish in this edit you placed her in Category:English people of Zambian descent and 5 other English categories, as well as 7 British categories. Place Clichy (talk) 23:52, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

  That is ridiculous over-categorisation. AusLondonder (talk) 08:31, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

  Not really. Regardless of the merits of this category, people can be both English and Scottish. Mclay1 (talk) 05:46, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

  When they were different countries, maybe. But when someone of mixed English and Scottish background is called British, English, and Scottish at the same time, we may call them just British. I don't think it is offensive for anyone to do that. Place Clichy (talk) 19:18, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

  But it's also unnecessarily imprecise. England and Scotland are more like countries than regions. If someone was both French and German, we wouldn't just categorise them under European for the sake of using fewer categories. Adding more categories to an article helps navigation. But again, that's a general comment rather than a specific comment on this case. Mclay1 (talk) 06:27, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

  British is a nationality, while European is not. The article gives the example of someone born in England of one English parent, who moved to Scotland at an early age (four). [BTW calling her mother English is not supported by RS, as the given sources only mention her birth date.] Although the English, Scottish and Welsh identities are important, and like all national identities can describe people not born in or descending from these places, moving within the same country does not reflect the same king of national identity change as international migration or naturalization. Moving within the same country is trivial. That's a general comment as well, but I think there are strong arguments to call such people just British, especially for descent categories. Place Clichy (talk) 07:18, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Agree with Place Clichy on this point. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:23, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

• I would suggest to replace all "Scottish" and "English" category links in the article by "British". That would empty the nominated category. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:46, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
• Delete the one article in here is already in Category:British people of Zambian deacent. She was born in England so her placement it the Scottish Category seems irregular. We should avoid too narrow categories.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:46, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Cassowary Coast Region. (non-admin closure) GothicGolem29 (Talk) 19:01, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

• Propose merging Category:South Johnstone, Queensland to Category:Cassowary Coast Region

Nominator's rationale: Eponymous category for a small town of less than 500 people containing only the main article and an article about a historic church, already linked in the main article. Better categorised within the parent. AusLondonder (talk) 07:49, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

• Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:56, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
• Merge per nom. Mclay1 (talk) 22:37, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
• merge per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 09:34, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Rename * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 19:43, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

• Propose renaming Category:Herberton, Queensland to Category:Herberton

Nominator's rationale: To match the article, renamed today to Herberton. AusLondonder (talk) 07:42, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

• Presumably the article rename was incorrect because all articles about populated places in Queensland contain ", Queensland" in the title. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:59, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

@Marcocapelle: If you look at Category:Wikipedia categories named after populated places in Queensland a decent proportion don't contain the state in the title. It appears many were created with this unnecessary pre-emptive disambiguation, although for many other places the disambiguation is necessary. AusLondonder (talk) 17:31, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

• Ok, it is almost all instead of all. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:43, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

• Rename. I don't know why some editors choose to add the state name to every place even when disambiguation is unneeded. Possibly they're copying the way American places are named, but people in other countries such as Australia don't tend to refer to places that way in speech or writing unless needed for clarity. Mclay1 (talk) 22:36, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Containerize * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 19:43, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

• Propose containerizing Category:People associated with Mount Athos (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: containerize per WP:OCASSOC, it is not a defining characteristic of the articles directly in this category. Monks on Mount Athos are already in a subcategory. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:03, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GoldRomean (talk) 01:20, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No votes or comments (Besides the previous re list and the nom) here yet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Servite et contribuere (talk) 06:21, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

• Containerize per nom. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:16, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete/merge Timrollpickering (talk) 20:19, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

• Propose deleting Category:Australian soccer by year
• Propose merging Category:1990 in Australian soccer to Category:1989–90 in Australian soccer and Category:1990–91 in Australian soccer
• Propose merging Category:1991 in Australian soccer to Category:1990–91 in Australian soccer and Category:1991–92 in Australian soccer
• Propose merging Category:1992 in Australian soccer to Category:1991–92 in Australian soccer and Category:1992–93 in Australian soccer
• Propose merging Category:1993 in Australian soccer to Category:1992–93 in Australian soccer and Category:1993–94 in Australian soccer
• Propose merging Category:1994 in Australian soccer to Category:1993–94 in Australian soccer and Category:1994–95 in Australian soccer
• Propose merging Category:1995 in Australian soccer to Category:1994–95 in Australian soccer and Category:1995–96 in Australian soccer
• Propose merging Category:1998 in Australian soccer to Category:1997–98 in Australian soccer and Category:1998–99 in Australian soccer
• Propose merging Category:1999 in Australian soccer to Category:1998–99 in Australian soccer and Category:1999–2000 in Australian soccer
• Propose merging Category:2000 in Australian soccer to Category:1999–2000 in Australian soccer and Category:2000–01 in Australian soccer
• Propose merging Category:2001 in Australian soccer to Category:2000–01 in Australian soccer and Category:2001–02 in Australian soccer
• Propose merging Category:2002 in Australian soccer to Category:2001–02 in Australian soccer and Category:2002–03 in Australian soccer
• Propose merging Category:2003 in Australian soccer to Category:2002–03 in Australian soccer and Category:2003–04 in Australian soccer
• Propose merging Category:2004 in Australian soccer to Category:2003–04 in Australian soccer and Category:2004–05 in Australian soccer
• Propose merging Category:2005 in Australian soccer to Category:2004–05 in Australian soccer and Category:2005–06 in Australian soccer
• Propose merging Category:2006 in Australian soccer to Category:2005–06 in Australian soccer and Category:2006–07 in Australian soccer
• Propose merging Category:2007 in Australian soccer to Category:2006–07 in Australian soccer and Category:2007–08 in Australian soccer
• Propose merging Category:2008 in Australian soccer to Category:2007–08 in Australian soccer and Category:2008–09 in Australian soccer
• Propose merging Category:2009 in Australian soccer to Category:2008–09 in Australian soccer and Category:2009–10 in Australian soccer
• Propose merging Category:2010 in Australian soccer to Category:2009–10 in Australian soccer and Category:2010–11 in Australian soccer
• Propose merging Category:2011 in Australian soccer to Category:2010–11 in Australian soccer and Category:2011–12 in Australian soccer
• Propose merging Category:2012 in Australian soccer to Category:2011–12 in Australian soccer and Category:2012–13 in Australian soccer
• Propose merging Category:2013 in Australian soccer to Category:2012–13 in Australian soccer and Category:2013–14 in Australian soccer
• Propose merging Category:2014 in Australian soccer to Category:2013–14 in Australian soccer and Category:2014–15 in Australian soccer
• Propose merging Category:2015 in Australian soccer to Category:2014–15 in Australian soccer and Category:2015–16 in Australian soccer
• Propose merging Category:2016 in Australian soccer to Category:2015–16 in Australian soccer and Category:2016–17 in Australian soccer
• Propose merging Category:2017 in Australian soccer to Category:2016–17 in Australian soccer and Category:2017–18 in Australian soccer
• Propose merging Category:2018 in Australian soccer to Category:2017–18 in Australian soccer and Category:2018–19 in Australian soccer
• Propose merging Category:2019 in Australian soccer to Category:2018–19 in Australian soccer and Category:2019–20 in Australian soccer
• Propose merging Category:2020 in Australian soccer to Category:2019–20 in Australian soccer and Category:2020–21 in Australian soccer
• Propose merging Category:2021 in Australian soccer to Category:2020–21 in Australian soccer and Category:2021–22 in Australian soccer
• Propose merging Category:2022 in Australian soccer to Category:2021–22 in Australian soccer and Category:2022–23 in Australian soccer
• Propose merging Category:2023 in Australian soccer to Category:2022–23 in Australian soccer and Category:2023–24 in Australian soccer
• Propose merging Category:2024 in Australian soccer to Category:2023–24 in Australian soccer and Category:2024–25 in Australian soccer
• Propose merging Category:2025 in Australian soccer to Category:2024–25 in Australian soccer and Category:2025–26 in Australian soccer
• Propose merging Category:2026 in Australian soccer to Category:2025–26 in Australian soccer

Nominator's rationale: Unneeded double-up of chronological periods of soccer in Australia. They aren't generally meant to be sorted by calendar year, and rather by season (Category:Soccer in Australia by season) and proved for all countries (e.g. all in Category:Association football by country and season). FastCube (talk) 03:46, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). GoldRomean (talk) 19:27, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

• Propose merging Category:Chairmen of Paramount Global to Category:Paramount Global

Nominator's rationale: this is a father-daughter pair that are already interlinked. Merge for now ^SMason_Garrison 02:51, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

• Merge we do not need this as a 2 article category.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:33, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
• Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:39, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). GoldRomean (talk) 19:27, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

• Propose merging Category:Internet company founders by nationality to Category:Internet company founders

Nominator's rationale: underpoplated category tree. there are currently only two nationalities in this category, and I can't really see enough to populate a third. upmerge for now ^SMason_Garrison 02:45, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

• Merge per nom.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:34, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
• Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:40, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: dual merge. (non-admin closure) GoldRomean (talk) 19:27, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

• Propose merging Category:Chile–Kenya relations to Category:Bilateral relations of Chile

Nominator's rationale: Merge also to Category:Bilateral relations of Kenya. Category containing only the main article. AusLondonder (talk) 00:53, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Speedy merge per C2F. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:54, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

• Dual merge per WP:C2F, this could have been listed at speedy. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:42, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

  Yes, that was an oversight. I listed the next one at speedy. AusLondonder (talk) 05:09, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:18, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

• Propose deleting Category:High commissioners of Cyprus to Jamaica (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Propose deleting Category:Ambassadors of Cyprus to Brazil (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Propose deleting Category:High commissioners of Cyprus to Guyana (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Propose deleting Category:Ambassadors of Cyprus to Finland (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Propose deleting Category:Ambassadors of Cyprus to Norway (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Propose deleting Category:Ambassadors of Cyprus to Denmark (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Propose deleting Category:Ambassadors of Cyprus to Iceland (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Propose deleting Category:Ambassadors of Cyprus to Latvia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Propose deleting Category:Ambassadors of Cyprus to Estonia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Propose deleting Category:Ambassadors of Cyprus to Jordan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Propose deleting Category:Ambassadors of Latvia to Algeria (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Propose deleting Category:Ambassadors of Latvia to Morocco (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Propose deleting Category:Ambassadors of Latvia to Monaco (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Propose deleting Category:Ambassadors of Latvia to Luxembourg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Propose deleting Category:Ambassadors of Algeria to Luxembourg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Propose deleting Category:Ambassadors of Latvia to Slovakia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Propose deleting Category:Ambassadors of Algeria to Monaco (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Propose deleting Category:Ambassadors of Belarus to Monaco (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Propose deleting Category:Ambassadors of El Salvador to Portugal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Propose deleting Category:Ambassadors of El Salvador to Monaco (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Propose deleting Category:Ambassadors of El Salvador to Algeria (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Propose deleting Category:Ambassadors of Qatar to Finland (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Propose deleting Category:High commissioners of Jamaica to Namibia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Propose deleting Category:High commissioners of Jamaica to Ghana (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Propose deleting Category:High commissioners of Jamaica to Sierra Leone (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Propose deleting Category:Ambassadors of Jamaica to Laos (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Propose deleting Category:Ambassadors of Jamaica to Thailand (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Propose deleting Category:Ambassadors of Bolivia to Trinidad and Tobago (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Propose deleting Category:High commissioners of Jamaica to Singapore (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Propose deleting Category:Ambassadors of Bolivia to Jamaica (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Propose deleting Category:Ambassadors of Bolivia to Dominica (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Propose deleting Category:Ambassadors of Bolivia to the Bahamas (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Propose deleting Category:Ambassadors of Qatar to Lithuania (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: As per usual, many of these categories have been created to contain a single article. All of the Cypriot categories, for example, are for one person. This is obviously over-categorisation. AusLondonder (talk) 00:46, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

• Delete when we have one article in 10 or more ambassador categories we have gone too far in making narrow categories.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:36, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
• Delete, we do not categorize as non-resident ambassadors. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:44, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
• Merge to Category:Ambassadors to Brazil etc. to prevent loss of information. This is overkill for non-resident ambassadors. However one-article categories can be kept for extant countries for resident ambassadors. Place Clichy (talk) 07:20, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

  Some other categories with only non-resident ambassadors: Category:Ambassadors of Latvia to Switzerland, Category:Ambassadors of Latvia to Liechtenstein, Category:Ambassadors of Latvia to Slovenia, Category:Ambassadors of Belarus to Spain, Category:Ambassadors of Belarus to Portugal, Category:Ambassadors of Jamaica to North Korea, Category:Ambassadors of Jamaica to Vietnam, Category:High commissioners of Jamaica to Bangladesh, Category:High commissioners of Jamaica to Pakistan, Category:Ambassadors of Qatar to Estonia, Category:Ambassadors of Qatar to Latvia, Category:Ambassadors of Qatar to Switzerland, Category:Ambassadors of Qatar to Albania, Category:Ambassadors of Qatar to Croatia, Category:Ambassadors of Qatar to San Marino, Category:Ambassadors of Qatar to North Macedonia, Category:Ambassadors of Qatar to Slovenia, Category:Ambassadors of Qatar to Greece, Category:Ambassadors of Qatar to Venezuela, Category:Ambassadors of Qatar to Mexico, Category:Ambassadors of Qatar to Bosnia and Herzegovina, Category:Ambassadors of Qatar to the Holy See, Category:Ambassadors of Qatar to Denmark, Category:Ambassadors of Qatar to Iceland, Category:Ambassadors of Qatar to Ireland, Category:Ambassadors of Qatar to Argentina, Category:Ambassadors of Qatar to Brazil, Category:Ambassadors of Qatar to Canada, Category:Ambassadors of Qatar to Venezuela, Category:Ambassadors of Qatar to Colombia, Category:Ambassadors of Qatar to Cuba, Category:Ambassadors of Qatar to Malta, Category:Ambassadors of Qatar to Venezuela. Place Clichy (talk) 08:25, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

  • • I would support deleting all those categories as well.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:15, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.