Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2009 April 8
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
8 April 2009
- General note: Fish articles are being dealt with separately, at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Gastropods/Subpage for organizing CopyVio Cleanup
- CHiPs (Pilot) (history · last edit) from . Radiant chains (talk) 03:16, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Deleted, as a redirect seemed to serve no purpose and history was entirely corrupt. User restored text in spite of template and advisories at talk page. Now blocked for 72 hours. Will block for a longer term if he persists. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:44, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- Dory Lobel (history · last edit) from . It's a word for word copy from that website. JamesBurns (talk) 03:58, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Duplicative text back to inception. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:48, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- 4/3 Infantry Battalion (history · last edit) from http://kirn.hypermart.net/3rd_US/contact.htm; http://www.aiipowmia.com/histories/histtomb.html; http://www.history.army.mil/books/R&H/R&H-FM.htm. This is a weird one. Large portions of the text are copied+pasted from army.mil subpages. However, other large sections are copied from the above sites. The first was unclear about its copyright status; the second asserts copyright; the third, while a .mil site, is a book written by an outside source and asserts an 1896 copyright. There are also a few sections (notably the one about Mexico) that I couldn't find a source for but believe are also copied from somewhere. There's only a few lines that are probably original work. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:16, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
That is a weird one. While much of the text is public domain (a book published in 1896 is old enough to be free for use by anyone), I wasn't sure about . However, it turns out that was copied from a US military site, and works of the US government (and employees in commission of their duties) are also PD. I've suggested at the talk that the contributors may want to use proper attribution templates to help avoid this confusion in the future. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:06, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Transient response (history · last edit) from . 128.61.26.166 (talk) 15:36, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Although I can't access the whole book, snippet view seems to confirm cause for concern. However, there's insufficient here to represent substantial taking. Nevertheless, I'm revising since the direct use of language doesn't seem to meet WP:NFC. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:40, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- Bizant river shark (history · last edit) (url not detected). Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 15:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Frilled toadfish (history · last edit) (url not detected). Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 15:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Yawning (fish) (history · last edit) (url not detected). Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 15:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Gonorynchus gonorynchus (history · last edit) (url not detected). Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 15:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Chromis notata (history · last edit) (url not detected). Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 15:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Giant stargazer (history · last edit) (url not detected). Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 15:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Secret of Giving (history · last edit) (url not detected). Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 15:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Entire plot section copied. Very little other text; what was there was promotional. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:32, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- Pygmy lanternshark (history · last edit) (url not detected). Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 15:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Elegant wrasse (history · last edit) (url not detected). Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 15:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Natal shyshark (history · last edit) (url not detected). Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 15:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Bluefin gurnard (history · last edit) (url not detected). Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 15:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Longfin boarfish (history · last edit) (url not detected). Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 15:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Kermadec scalyfin (history · last edit) (url not detected). Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 15:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Papuan epaulette shark (history · last edit) (url not detected). Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 15:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Dark shyshark (history · last edit) (url not detected). Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 15:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Australian mottled moray (history · last edit) (url not detected). Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 15:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Mado (fish) (history · last edit) (url not detected). Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 15:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Balbo sabretooth (history · last edit) (url not detected). Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 15:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Bollons' rattail (history · last edit) (url not detected). Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 15:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- British Jamaicans (history · last edit) from http://www.jamaica-gleaner.com/pages/history/story0063.html. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:14, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Scottish Jamaican (history · last edit) from http://www.jamaica-gleaner.com/pages/history/story0063.html. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:14, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Infringement dates back to the article's origin, at which point the only "clean" sentence was essentially a restatement of the title with verb. Pretty article; shame to lose it. But it was never legally ours. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
On request, I've restored the non-infringing material, here. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:03, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- Infringement dates back to the article's origin, at which point the only "clean" sentence was essentially a restatement of the title with verb. Pretty article; shame to lose it. But it was never legally ours. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- Irish Jamaican (history · last edit) from http://www.jamaica-gleaner.com/pages/history/story0058.htm. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:14, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Infringement dates back to the article's origin, at which point the only "clean" sentence was essentially a restatement of the title with verb. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:16, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- Peter Elleray (history · last edit) from http://www.mulsannescorner.com/bentleyelleray.html. IIIVIX (Talk) 20:49, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Copyright reserved at source page. Article clearly duplicates and closely paraphrases that text. No sign of permission. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:58, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- National Dental Association (history · last edit) from http://www.careersindental.com/index.cfm/fuseaction/ShowResourcesLinkDetails/ResourceLinkID/665/National_Dental_Hygienists_Association.htm. Small amount of cleanup done by creator. – Toon(talk) 21:20, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Jupe table (history · last edit) from http://www.pavilionbroadway.co.uk/Articles. Unclear which came first, so not speedying. Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:19, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Prior publication is probably with the external website, since the website (but that page) was cited by the "article". However, the subpage of the website to which the article pointed is telling: . So is the username of the creator, User talk:AdrianEwart, who is the founder of the company. The article has been deleted since the verification process was not followed. Verification for this text may well be forthcoming at some point, but it can't be used as a vehicle for advertisement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:03, 16 April 2009 (UTC)