Wikiwand AI

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2026 May 20

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

20 May 2026

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.
Category:Saudi Arabia articles needing expert attention (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (revisions|restore)

It has the {{Empty category}} template. In the future, it's not impossible that pages may populate this category. The category must exist in order for pages to populate it. If the category is deleted and pages later are tagged with Expert Needed (in this specific topic), the category will not show as a redlinked one at the bottom of the article. See aslo CFD. Utfor (talk) 01:36, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Why have you not discussed with the deleting admin? Why have you not notified them of this discussion as is mandatory. Please explain why this category can exist as an empty one when it's policy to delete empty cats? @Liz: Spartaz Humbug! 07:04, 20 May 2026 (UTC)Spartaz Humbug! 07:05, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
I would be happy to see you retract this given evidence below that the notification and discussion was attempted. JMWt (talk) 09:37, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
very happy to do so. Bit disappointed if the admin didn't respond. Spartaz Humbug! 17:17, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Comment - Spartaz is right, and the appellant has not discussed with the closer (which is preferred) and has not notified the closer (which is required in connection with all noticeboard filings) (and is not a nice-to-do because it is required). Robert McClenon (talk) 17:28, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Overturn the C1 closing as an empty category. This was a maintenance category, which may be empty some of them time or even most of the time. This category could have been used by an editor who was a subject matter expert on Saudi Arabia who would check the category to see if any articles had been assigned to them, and address the issues, and remove the articles from the category. The category is not deleted because there are no articles needing expert attention, because another article might need expert attention in the future. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:28, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Re-create looks like a goof, but an empty category has no usable/unique/history data, so there's really nothing to do here. Can/should have been handled on deleting admin's talk page. Jclemens (talk) 23:18, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Utfor did try to discuss with the deleting admin and did notify her of this DRV. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 09:26, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Re-create The nominator reached out to the deleting admin a month ago. This 2021 discussion illustrates why these categories are valuable. --Enos733 (talk) 15:34, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
  • This was tagged as {{Empty category}} before the deletion. MSGJ removed the template with no edit summary in 2023, and it was dutifully deleted seven days later. Unless MSGJ explains their action I'm inclined to agree with Robert McClenon and overturn. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:52, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
    (There was an edit summary.) Anyway, this edit was a result of the request at Template talk:WikiProject Saudi Arabia#Attention parameter. It was stated that Category:Saudi Arabia articles needing attention was unused because the project banner did not support the relevant parameter. Pinging @GoingBatty. I think my edit to Category:Saudi Arabia articles needing expert attention was necessary to remove it from its parent category, but I didn't intend for it to get deleted — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:03, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
    "rmv cat" isn't that useful an edit summary. In any event simply deleting Category:Saudi Arabia articles needing attention would have worked as is - {{expert subject category}} uses #ifexist magic. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:38, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
    I made no comment as to the usefulness of the edit summary. I was only responding to the inaccurate comment that there was no edit summary. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:46, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
    That relies on people knowing about the logic coded into that template. Otherwise it is problematic to delete a category under C1 when it is not empty ... — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:47, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Speedy recreate/restore as contested speedy. If someone disagrees the cat can be taken to CfD. Jumpytoo Talk 05:06, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Category undeleted and required template restored. A shame this was not dealt with by Liz a month ago — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:51, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks