Wikiwand AI

Wikipedia:Featured topic removal candidates/Mother series/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mother series

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


On one point, Development of Mother 3 no longer exists, and thus should be removed. However, part of the merge discussion that saw this happen involved the recreation of EarthBound 64, which would be relevant, as it is a fork of Mother 3, and thus fails 1d (though with clarification that this was not an issue of cherrypicking but instead a new ddevelopment). Being that EarthBound 64's article is based on a >10 year old version and has myriad sourcing that needs implementing on the talk page, I believe that this topic should be delisted for the time being. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 16:36, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

@Cukie Gherkin What would need to be done to get it up to the GA status? I'm currently busy with finals but in a few weeks' time I can probably get working on this. I'd hate to see an otherwise quality topic get demoted because of one article. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 19:29, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
I believe it'd need a full copyedit and the sources on the talk page (not ref ideas but a talk page section) need to be looked through to ensure that any info found within is included - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 22:20, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
That is... a lot of sources. Shouldn't be impossible, though. I'll take it on but will keep you posted on my progress. Will let you know in a few weeks' time once I start. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 22:38, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
  • Alas, delist – The article is not currently of GA-status, and I think it would be best to give the article time to be improved. There's no indication it will reach GA status soon, but I have no doubt it will eventually. This is merely a slight bump in the history of our Mother coverage, I'm sure. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 08:12, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
  • Delist Until Earthbound 64 is improved to Good Article status. Earthbound 64 is a quite indepth topic on its own as a cancelled video game, and in my opinion deserved a standalone page, so this is ultimately a good thing as it will ensure that it hopefully gets the attention it deserves. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:30, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
  • Delist per Maplestrip and Zxcvbnm. JHD0919 (talk) 22:02, 1 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Hold to let Pokelego999 have an attempt at getting EarthBound 64 ready for a GAN. -- ZooBlazer 17:08, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
    how Long would you propose we hold it? I'm not opposed, just would like a schedule for at least a GAN if @Pokelego999: was interested. Cukie Gherkin (talk) 21:20, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
    I'd say it should be held for a couple weeks if meaningful progress is started on the article in that time. -- ZooBlazer 21:34, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
    I may have some time this week to get started; I will keep you updated on any further updates with this. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 22:17, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
    Pokelego999 Any update on this matter now please? K. Peake 06:51, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
  • BTW just noticed that there are five character articles that should be part of this topic too (Category:Mother (video game series) characters), and only one of them is GA currently. I don't think that could be fixed in a timely fashion, so delist for that reason. Armbrust The Homunculus 12:10, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Comment I do not have an opinion on whether it should be put on hold or delisted, but I just want to note that while there are a lot of sources listed on the talk page of EarthBound 64, not all have to be used to achieve GA status. Comprehensibility is after all a FAC criteria. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 17:39, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks