Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2026 July 14

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Replace * Pppery * _{in solidarity} 16:50, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

File:Labradoodle Assistance Dogs.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Oracle7 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

File is clearly taken from elsewhere (note artefacting, lack of metadata, odd resolution). Unlikely to be own work but file is so old that the original is likely long been offline. Traumnovelle (talk) 09:12, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Replace: The US army has another image from the same photoshoot (2008): (image 2 in the slideshow). This could be used as a replacement since it fits {{PD-USGov-Military-Army}}. Oracle7 apparently had a history of copyvio uploads, although they seemingly uploaded genuine dog images as well (for example, 1 and 2). Regardless, since the nominated image's status is disputed, we should use the army image instead. I don't know if it would be better to delete-then-upload or to upload-new-version-then-revdel. Kodning 🌸 (talk) 02:34, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Good find thank you. Traumnovelle (talk) 04:07, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Move to Commons * Pppery * _{in solidarity} 16:51, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

File:BET Her 2021.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 3eanut (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This logo does not meet the WP:TOO, and should therefore be moved to Commons. JHD0919 (talk) 10:36, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Move to Commons: text and simple shapes so {{PD-textlogo}} applies, just like with the other BET logos. Kodning 🌸 (talk) 19:41, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

File:McIGN.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by MantleX (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Fails WP:NFC#CS: there is no commentary on IGN's McBranding and a freely licensed mock example could be created. Sign² (talk) 21:29, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 18:49, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom (WP:NFCC8) and WP:NFCC1. There is no commentary in the article about the image's relevance. The image is just an IGN page with advertisements, not a synthesis of the two, which does not by itself explain what "McIGN" is; it doesn't seem to clearly fit the pejorative associations with the restaurant chain or fast food in general, often for qualities of cheapness, inauthenticity, or the speed and ease of manufacture description. I don't see how the image significantly aids reader understanding of McWord. For WP:NFCC1, a free image of one of the examples in "McWords not officially related to McDonald's", like McMansion, could be used. Kodning 🌸 (talk) 01:55, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ✗plicit 06:57, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

File:Pinocchio-1940-poster.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by FuriousFreddy (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

I don't understand why this was is not PD. It has no copyright notice (the text on the bottom right reads “Distributed by RKD Radio Pictures Inc.”) and was first published before 1978. Nutella lover • [ chat│supervise ] 20:20, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

@Jcb I'll tag you here since you were the one who deleted it from Commons. Nutella lover • [ chat│supervise ] 07:50, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 18:49, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Weak keep as non-free I think most movie posters actually did have a proper copyright notice, including this one (see https://www.posterpalace.com/products/pinocchio-2# but also why is the year on the copyright notice not 1940??? is this even the original poster??). However, most movie posters did not see a copyright renewal, which would be required for continued copyright protection, and a search for such a renewal for the Pinocchio poster does not turn up any results. This, though, is further complicated by the fact that the film itself most certainly did receive a renewal. If this was like the 12 Angry Men poster where the artwork use for the poster is most certainly not from or based on the film, this wouldn't matter. Here, there is a reasonable argument that Disney's character design for Pinnochio remains under copyright and that the artwork on the poster is derivative of said design. If this is the case, Commons would not consider this free enough to host (see also c:Commons:Free depictions of non-free works). Based5290 :3 (talk) 20:38, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.