Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Black Act 1723/1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Black Act 1723
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Issues have been resolved Bgsu98 (Talk) 05:42, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
Tthe "Aftermath" section has a lot of uncited statements of short, one sentence paragraphs. I think this section needs to be reformatted with inline citations added. Z1720 (talk) 03:08, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
- These are rather recent additions; you could just revert to the February 2025 version of the article. But, to be clear, the sentences are cited (to primary sources), they just use a different citation format to the rest of the article. Josh Milburn (talk) 09:26, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
- I have removed the additions. I don't see any particular reason why purely clerical information about procedural continuations should be in the article anyways. Ladtrack (talk) 19:48, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.