Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Bridgwater/1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Bridgwater
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Issues appear to have been resolved. Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:20, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
Uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. Z1720 (talk) 02:19, 25 March 2026 (UTC)
- Hold. Looks like there are significant edits being made to the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:32, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
- I think that all the obvious uncited text has been resolved, either a citation found or the text removed. Please tag the article text if anything has been missed, or discuss here if there is other work to be done. Geof Sheppard (talk) 17:11, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Geof Sheppard: I added a citation needed tag to the article, and there are two more in "notable people" to resolve. I also think the lead needs to be expanded a little bit to cover all major aspects of the article. Z1720 (talk) 03:28, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for spotting the one that I missed in the religion section. The notable people were very recent additions; I was hoping that the editor who added them would finish adding citations but they left those two. I have fixed one today and removed the other. I've had a go at updating the lead section too, so I think everything is good now. Geof Sheppard (talk) 17:51, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
User:Z1720: What is your evaluation of this article now? Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:06, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
- Keep. Uncited statements seem resolved. I think the lead could be expanded, but seems OK for a good article. Z1720 (talk) 18:31, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.