Wikiwand AI

Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Gun show loophole/1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Gun show loophole

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review
Result: Issues have not been resolved within a reasonable amount of time. Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:42, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Two orange banners, the "neutrality" and "weasel words" banners, were added to the article in 2024. Although the editor posted their concerns on the talk page, the issue was not resolved. In April 2025 an orange "undue weight" banner was added to the "Government studies and positions" section. These issues should be resolved for this article to keep its GA status. Z1720 (talk) 20:45, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Speaking as the editor that added these banners, I have tried to reconcile those issues on the talk page, but as one can clearly see, the editors that made these changes have either not responded or refused to discuss them. If the only issues found by the reviewer(s) here are the banners themselves, and they do not share any concerns for the issues I have brought up, do we simply remove the banners? DN (talk) 23:59, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
  • @Darknipples: Well, the banners describe issues that would cause the article to not meet the GA criteria: I would only remove the banners if the issues are resolved or there is a consensus that they should be removed as they are not problems in the article. Perhaps we can wait to additional comments below before determining what to do. Z1720 (talk) 02:44, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
    I made a recent attempt at improving one of the issues and took some time to reassess my original concerns. While I think parts of the article could still be trimmed and improved, the issues I see aren't on a hill I'm interested in dying on, especially if there is no consensus. DN (talk) 01:47, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks