Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Myst (series)/1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Myst (series)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Kept. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 19:01, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
Old GA article has a lot of unsourced statement, poor reception section that needs to be expanded, citation errors, and needs to be copyedited to meet its criteria. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 19:42, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
- Boneless Pizza!, could you go and tag the statements you think need to be sourced? Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 22:11, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
- Done 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 23:14, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Boneless Pizza! and David Fuchs: Any updates on this? Given it has been three weeks, I'm thinking about potentially delisting this article unless either (a) sources are found where needed or (b) the unsourced information is removed. Gommeh (talk! sign!) 18:54, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
- Almost everything is citable to manuals or the like, but I'm working on reduced editing time. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 21:15, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Boneless Pizza! and David Fuchs: Any updates on this? Given it has been three weeks, I'm thinking about potentially delisting this article unless either (a) sources are found where needed or (b) the unsourced information is removed. Gommeh (talk! sign!) 18:54, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
- Done 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 23:14, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
- This needs to be kept open to allow more time for editors to fix the tagged issues. If it is simply a case of switching a few unreliables and finding reliables for unsourced claims. That's quite a simple job. I'll spend the next half hour having a look and seeing what I can find. 11WB (talk) 18:25, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
- Changing to keep as GA, now that sources have been found for all marked uncited information. @Boneless Pizza!, plot sections are not mandated to have sources per WP:PLOTCITE, so I've removed that tag. This article on the whole is fine to stay as GA in my view. The work @David Fuchs has done more than suffices. 11WB (talk) 18:47, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.