Wikiwand AI

Wikipedia:Peer review/Hertz Corp. v. Friend/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hertz Corp. v. Friend

Peer review in preparation for FAC.

Thanks, Eithersummer (talk) 03:24, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

There's been no activity here for two weeks, so I'm going to close this. RoySmith (talk) 11:40, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

theleekycauldron

  • is marc robertson a subject-matter expert? [may chime in with more later, just on a cursory scroll] theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 05:19, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
    I don't think he is an expert on legal education or diversity jurisdiction, but I think he has the requisite general knowledge to say that Hertz is taught in law school. He wrote the Forbes article on behalf of the Washington Legal Foundation and according to Legistorm he worked at the House Judiciary Committee, so he is 100% a lawyer. Plus he got his JD after 2010 so he has to have learned Hertz. Eithersummer (talk) 19:08, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

1brianm7

Could you check the first paragraph for understandability? It took me like a minute to read it and understand it (I think?) and the comma and colon are used in ways that don't seem particularly natural to me. The first sentence is 40-words. 1brianm7 (talk) 09:19, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Z. Patterson

I have some questions and points about the article.

  • Are the quotes in the lead important? Can you try a paraphrase or summary instead?
  • Per WP:FACR criterion 2c, try to make the citations as consistent as possible. If you have optional identifiers in one citation, then the other citations should also have the same identifiers, unless you are unable to provide them. Please see Rei Ayanami as an example of an article with comprehensive citations that try to be as consistent as possible.
  • Why is a news article being cited for footnote b? Can you find an academic monograph or peer-reviewed journal article to replace the news article in footnote b? Repositories such as HeinOnline may be able to provide better sources. I encourage you to use the Wikipedia Library.
  • Can you try to reduce your reliance on quotations and try to paraphrase and summarize in the body? I am sure featured article candidate reviewers may point this out.
  • Can you try to replace Forbes with a peer-reviewed journal article or academic monograph? You can try to look in HeinOnline, as an example.
  • Titles of court cases need to be italicized, even in citations.
  • You may wish to look at footnote c and determine if you need to put a citation in for that footnote.

Even the most minute details will matter at an FAC, so I encourage you to consider these questions and points about the article. Z. Patterson (talk) 03:18, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles