Wikipedia:Peer review/Southern Vectis/archive1

I've listed this article for peer review because… It has seen vast improvement in recent months. It is now sizeable, with a good range of facts, clearly laid out and offers easy readability.

Thanks,

Simon898 (talk) 16:10, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

• A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR _t 12:28, 14 January 2008 (UTC)