Wikipedia:Peer review/Sydney Ghost Train fire/archive1

Summarize Timeline Top Qs Fact Check

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because - this is something important I've worked hard on for a long time, most of it is to a pretty high standard and I think it could make a good featured article eventually. Would like to hear what other editors think.

Thanks, Thisbe Schultz (talk) 11:57, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Too much text is spent on what seem to be the crankish views of a conspiracy theorist with a financial interest in pushing it, along with the sensationalist soft news piece produced about his conspiracy. Most articles about disasters like this stick to the facts and what is verifiable, with minimal weight given to conspiracy. ~2026-11661-94 (talk) 15:08, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Z1720

@Thisbe Schultz: Comments after a quick skim:

• I would recommend taking this article to WP:GAN before WP:FAC, as GAN is a lower-threshold evaluation (so its easier to be successful) and will give more thorough feedback before an FAC run.
• I added "citation needed" templates to the article: these would need to be resolved before an FAC run.
• I would recommend WP:GOCE take a look at it, as they can help with wording and point out anything that might be missing.

I hope this helps. Z1720 (talk) 17:07, 27 April 2026 (UTC)