Wikipedia:Peer review/Xerothamnella parvifolia/archive1

Summarize Timeline Top Qs Fact Check

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

I've listed this article for peer review because... i recently expanded article Xerothamnella parvifoliaand would appreciated feedback on it structure, sourcing and general review.

Thanks, KIVYD (talk) 11:31, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

I have noticed some formatting issues. First, you only need to use boldface text on the first usage of a name of the subject. Second, you might want to consider using Template:Convert on units. Third, you should go through the article with Source Editor to decapitalize non-proper wikilinks. ✶Quxyz✶ (talk) 19:25, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

You seem a bit new; have you given WP:MOS a read through? It might be worth it to run your article against it. ✶Quxyz✶ (talk) 19:26, 20 July 2026 (UTC)