Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 January 4

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:48, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Mitterand03.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Can't locate original source. Kelly ^hi! 06:13, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

• FYIY the original from which it is cropped can be found here.--Muhandes (talk) 06:51, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

• There no authorship/copyright info at that source. Kelly ^hi! 22:56, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

• Clearly non-free - derivative of File:Saha41.jpg, which was deleted after discussion at commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Template:FrenchMinistryOfForeignAffairs Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:02, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:44, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Khaybarrifle.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Does not look like the author's creation, especially based on author's pattern Muhandes (talk) 06:36, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:44, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Raad2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Based on author pattern, all other similar images supposedly by author were from internet sources Muhandes (talk) 06:46, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Max jakob.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• reason given for being PD is incorrect. when was this photo taken/published? Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:22, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

I can't find info about this particular photo, but it's unlikely that its copyright had already expired. I propose retagging it as "fair use". — Yerpo ^Eh? 14:07, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:44, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Bodhisattvadevi Prajnaparamita.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Artwork shown in US - No FOP in US for recent artworks Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:56, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:44, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Blum under construction.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Claimed as Pre-1978 but no date for image given. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:12, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

File:SRI MIDN ANC.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Insignia - Not sure how it can be users own work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:21, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

File:SRI WO ANC.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Insigna - Unlikely users own work in insgina design Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:25, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

File:SRI CPO ANC.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unlikley users own work in Insignia design Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:29, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

File:SRI PO ANC.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unlinkey uploaders own work in Insignia design Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:36, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:44, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

File:AlbertoID.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unsure about this. It is "Alberto Rivera's Spanish ID" and it was tagged for deletion on August 23 and set to be deleted August 31 for lack of a license. Uploader removed the tag saying "As a state issued ID it is public domain". Unused image, still no license tag. Seems to have also been a discussion on the ID where the uploader states "The copywrite license editors disagree with your opinions and have thankfully authorized the ID for use in articles. You should take the issue up with them." Soundvisions1 (talk) 21:04, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
• Delete. Government works aren't PD in Spain unless you're talking about text. This file is an orphan anyway, along with File:AlbertoIDback.jpg, which should also be deleted. Kelly ^hi! 15:42, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Courcelles (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:21, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Shyamcomposer.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Delete: source clearly shows a non-commercial no-derivative Creative Commons licence on their website but the source link does not link to the image, so there is no way to check if the copyright status is different from the generic one mentioned above. ww2censor (talk) 21:20, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:44, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Logan 8547-square.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logan 8547.JPG Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:23, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:44, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Satanismpicture.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Delete: This image has no licence and no permission. It may well be unfree; however, the uploader claims they created the image but around 150 uses are found by tineye, so the uploader's claim appears to be false. ww2censor (talk) 21:28, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:44, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Hm 41 howitzer.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Based on author's pattern - all other similar images were from Internet websites Muhandes (talk) 21:48, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:44, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Karrar.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unlikely to really be by the author, especially considering other ownership claims recently debunked Muhandes (talk) 21:50, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:44, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Mersad ADS.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Considering the angle, most likely a commercial image and not one by the author Muhandes (talk) 21:51, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:44, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Thimbleislands.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Needs sourcing information to establish copyright. Kelly ^hi! 22:55, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
  • apart from the part that says

Scanned by Gerald Zuckier from public domain source at Branford CT hall of records. ...

Licensing

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States Federal Government under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. See Copyright.

This work was previously under Public Domain, or a Free License. It has been digitally enhanced and/or modified. I, the creator of this derivate work, hereby grant the permission to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.

? Gzuckier (talk) 01:44, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

The comment public domain source at Branford CT hall of records is a bit vague it would help if the actual source was detailed so we can see that the original image or work is the work of the federal government. MilborneOne (talk) 12:02, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

ok i'll annotate it some more Gzuckier (talk) 03:39, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

File:600px-Slime.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Can't establish original source. Kelly ^hi!

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.