Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 September 14
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
September 14
File:2012iPhone5.png
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
- The phone will be released to the public in two weeks time. Therefore it is both premature and bizarre to suggest that a fair use image is justifiable and necessary. Biker Biker (talk) 05:28, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Plaque.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete and salt. This is a mess, and we don't know what text goes with what revisions, and so if we can't figure it out, then we need to dispense with all of it. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:37, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
- File:Plaque.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Lots of different plaques. The one about Thomas Collins is probably {{PD-ineligible}} at least in the United States but maybe not in the source country. The one about Robert Lochner is maybe also {{PD-ineligible}}, but it is harder to tell. The other ones fail Commons:COM:FOP#United Kingdom, Commons:COM:FOP#United States and Commons:COM:FOP#Australia. Stefan2 (talk) 12:51, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
- I'm sure there are many, many files called 'plaque.jpg' out there, however, I took the picture of the plaque myself in a church in Tourouvre, France in 2004. I posted it on Wikipedia in February of 2007. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.78.8.4 (talk • contribs) 2012-09-14T13:24:26
- Comment this should be salted as overly generic and bound to be overwritten over and over again. Any images from the history of this name should be moved to other names. -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 21:57, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:A hazel eye.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:11, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
- Upload by User:Aarynne is licensed but has a bad source, pointing at File:Eye S1NN3R.jpg which was deleted as "no source".
Uploads by User:Nishnosh have a source but no licence. At some point, a reference to File:Arielseye.jpg was added to the file information page. I'm not sure if the image is related to any of the images under this file name, but that file was also deleted as having neither source nor licence. Stefan2 (talk) 13:02, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:RJAV-Graduation-Day.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: copyvio revision deleted, leaving remaining versions in place. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:29, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:RJAV-Graduation-HS.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: old revisions deleted. You may wish to check on any articles that this file was in previously, as I fixed this through outright deletion and then selective restoration, and so bots may have removed any usages of this file, as it currently indicates that it's not used anywhere, and I didn't remember to check articles before I processed it, and I fear that the bots might have gotten it in the minute that it took to do this. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:29, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
- Old revision is copyvio.
- Current revision looks like a TV screenshot or something. Stefan2 (talk) 13:26, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.