Wikiwand AI

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 10

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 10

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 10, 2025.

BSoD redirects

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was :( Your discussion ran into a problem and needs to restart. Please try renominating in smaller specific batches (i.e. "delete these three for the same reason", "retarget these two to the same place", etc.) For more information about this and similar issues, see WP:TRAINWRECK. To offer feedback, visit my talk page. (non-admin closure) Cremastra talk 20:53, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

These terms while they could pertain to the blue screen of death are ambiguous. For example, with PAGE_FAULT_IN_NONPAGED_AREA, it might be more helpful to redirect to the more generic term page fault rather than the OS-specific BSoD. Same for IRQL not less or equal, that should redirect to IRQL (Windows). On the other hand, 0x0000007b is not a plausible search term and thus can be deleted. Aasim (話す（はなす）) 22:33, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

Trainwreck; I am not sure why these were bundled but it seems like each needs discussion on its own merits. 0x0000007b is mentioned at the target so I am not sure what the problem is with that one in particular. 1234qwer1234qwer4 23:08, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
I mean, for 0x7b, the top search result is a Microsoft support article at least on Bing.
Oh great, I completely forgot that I nominated this a few years ago. 🙄 Although my opinion has changed a bit, as it is no longer deletion I am seeking (except for one which is a generic hex code) but retargeting.
For all the IRQL redirects I would redirect to IRQL (Windows). For the page fault redirects I would redirect to Page fault. System service exception and Bad pool header I am not sure. There are probably pages to discuss what a "system service" and "pool header" is. Hmm... Aasim (話す（はなす）) 23:37, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
  • speedy close, and then renominate them individually or in smaller groups. learned this one the hard way~ consarn (prison phone) (crime record) 00:52, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Probably just close this... "PAGE_FAULT_IN_NONPAGED_AREA" isn't a generic page fault (AFAIK) it's a specific Windows error code caused by a specific type of page fault which is shown during the BSoD. And page fault is linked from the target article. And I don't think "IRQL not less or equal" is as clear cut since IRQL (Windows) doesn't mention errors so I think both are plausible targets to help a reader get information. And for 0x0000007b BSoD seems like a pretty clear primary topic even if it can once in a great while mean somethign else so I don't see any advantage of deletion, since the only other place it appears on enwiki is in the title of a reference talking about... a BSoD. Also not since the nominator said they're not for deleting all of them, it would have have been useful to know what outcome is desired for each redirect. Skynxnex (talk) 02:09, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Untitled The Exorcist film (2023 film)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. charlotte 👸♥ 00:37, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Per WP:UFILM, this is no longer a necessary redirect given the target work was released in 2023. There is also currently another Untitled The Exorcist film for an upcoming reboot set to release in 2026. Trailblazer101 (talk) 17:08, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete, redirect has served its purpose and is now getting little-to-no pageviews. mwwv converse∫edits 19:12, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Steel1943 (talk) 19:56, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Intrisit (talk) 20:00, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom, they don't get much more cut-and-dried than this. Carguychris (talk) 20:07, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wapoo

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Muscogee#Precontact. Rusalkii (talk) 19:56, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Not mentioned at target, and this is also some sort of Native American tribe, as mentioned in passing at Muscogee#Precontact. 1234qwer1234qwer4 14:42, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

  • Retarget to Muscogee#Precontact where there is a valid mention. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 17:19, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Comment: The first revision of Chipoo (also a redirect now) said: A Chipoo or Wapoo is a mixed-breed dog.... Jay 💬 15:20, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kingsmasher678 (talk) 16:02, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Morkie

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of dog crossbreeds. Thryduulf (talk) 10:59, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

Apart from an image caption at Yorkshire Terrier, we do not seem to have coverage of this in articles. Wiktionary as wikt:morkie. 1234qwer1234qwer4 14:13, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kingsmasher678 (talk) 16:02, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Poogle (dog)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 23#Poogle (dog)

Boodle (dog)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:12, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Does not seem to be mentioned in any enwiki article (wikt:boodle does not have any related meanings either). 1234qwer1234qwer4 14:02, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kingsmasher678 (talk) 16:02, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bernedoodle

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of dog crossbreeds#Bernedoodle. charlotte 👸♥ 00:40, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Only appears as passing mentions in enwiki articles; Wiktionary does have wikt:Bernedoodle, though. 1234qwer1234qwer4 14:04, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Keep: The reason that so many of these exist is that, if they don't, they tend to pop up again...and again... and again... There are a zillion possible invented names and they're not all going to be here in Wikipedia. Dog crossbreed, which discusses the whole portmanteau "designer dog" breed naming thing. We can't nor shouldn't possibly list all of the possible crossbreeds, as there are hundreds of dog breeds and people aren't even consistent in how they refer to the breeds. However, by keeping redirects, we can (hopefully) prevent people from recreating the articles--if you check their history, they pretty much all started with some random person creating a new article for said "name" and we'd catch it and change to a redirect. Annwfwn (talk) 14:25, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
I do not think it is useful to redirect an obscure neologism to such a generic article that barely provides any information to the reader (see also: WP:R#DELETE, #8). Most people searching something like this presumably would know that it is a kind of dog. Now in case they know what particular kind of crossbreed it is and are looking for additional information, they will arrive at the article and learn that we do not have content on it, which is better conveyed by not having a redirect. In case they do not, the article will not provide said information to them (in the case of this particular redirect, Wiktionary would at least answer that question). In neither case this redirect would seem helpful to the reader, and editorial goals such as "preventing from recreation" should not be placed above that – not to mention that a redirect does not actually prevent recreation (in fact, unlike creating a new article, overwriting is even available to anonymous users). And if there are a zillion possible invented names, does that imply you would approve of the creation of such an amount of redirects? 1234qwer1234qwer4 14:40, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Then we should consider WP:Salt. Annwfwn (talk) 14:42, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Retarget to List of dog crossbreeds#Crossbreeds where it is explained. Strongly oppose deleting and/or salting because it's an extremely plausible and widely used search term. See pageviews. Even though it does not give a whole lot of information, it's the best target we have by far. Plant🌱man (talk) 06:54, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Comment see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernedoodle, where it was established that this should be a redirect. Clearly, there isn't enough substance to warrant a whole article, but as I said, there's something. Plant🌱man (talk) 07:00, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Weird that I overlooked this. Thanks for pointing this out; this is clearly the appropriate target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 11:59, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Happy to help! :D Plant🌱man (talk) 14:05, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kingsmasher678 (talk) 16:02, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Retarget to the entry in list of dog crossbreeds Traumnovelle (talk) 20:38, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Malkie

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. charlotte 👸♥ 00:40, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

No mention at target; search results in articles seem to consist of passing mentions of this as a first or last name. 1234qwer1234qwer4 14:17, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kingsmasher678 (talk) 16:01, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Pomapoo

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 24#Pomapoo

Virostatic

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 20#Virostatic

List of Petpets

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. charlotte 👸♥ 00:42, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Luckily, such a list does not exist at the target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 13:17, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kingsmasher678 (talk) 15:59, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

NeoStudios

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:21, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Not mentioned at target; the two search results for this in article space are an unrelated passing mention at Of Rust and Bones, and another unrelated reference at Laško Brewery. 1234qwer1234qwer4 13:15, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kingsmasher678 (talk) 15:59, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Delete per nom. charlotte 👸♥ 00:43, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Neopedia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:21, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Apart from a passing mention at John_Wick_(game_designer)#Neopets, we do not have content on this website. 1234qwer1234qwer4 13:12, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kingsmasher678 (talk) 15:59, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Delete per nom; mention is far too passing to retarget. charlotte 👸♥ 00:44, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Jafaa (TV Series)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. charlotte 👸♥ 00:45, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Errant title that must be deleted! This had no consensus at RM a fortnight ago and Pppery inexplicably reverted my G6 nomination. Intrisit (talk) 15:35, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

  • Keep as a {{R from move}}, as article was at this title for a few weeks. WP:G6 indeed does not seem to apply. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:47, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Keep. The "S" is capitalized, not enough to delete this thing. Pppery made the right call denying the speedy. Steel1943 (talk) 19:02, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Petpetpet

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:09, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Not mentioned in any of enwiki's articles. 1234qwer1234qwer4 13:32, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page histories?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:30, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete, even when those of the Neopet's species are not useful per WP:FANCRUFT.
✴️IcarusThe Astrologer✴️ 13:31, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Gnorbu

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:09, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Not mentioned at target. Passing mention exists at Neopets Trading Card Game, though that article also seems rather WP:FANCRUFTy in its current state. 1234qwer1234qwer4 13:06, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page histories?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:29, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete, while some of the animals that I mentioned from those Neopet's species in Fandom Wiki, its seems that those redirects are implausible and possible for WP:FANCRUFT.
✴️IcarusThe Astrologer✴️ 13:35, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Northern Scandinavia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:09, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Delete. Sápmi is not a general-purpose article about northern Scandinavia, but is focused on the Sámi people. Alternatively retarget to Scandinavia. 130.234.120.6 (talk) 13:02, 10 April 2025 (UTC) 130.234.120.6 (talk) 13:02, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

FYI: the user who created this redirect is blocked for creating too many unhelpful redirects. 130.234.120.6 (talk) 13:05, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom, not a meaningful or established geographical term, and a possible WP:SOAPBOX violation by a blocked user pushing a self-invented or fringe viewpoint. Carguychris (talk) 20:14, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. No notable google search results for the term other than as a cryptic crossword clue! Wittylama 14:20, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete, doesn't seem to be an established area. CMD (talk) 07:30, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Lapland (region)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Lapland. ✗plicit 14:10, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Retarget to disambiguation page Lapland. The title is ambiguous with the Region of Lapland (Finland). The links to the redirect page have been cleaned of references to Finnish Lapland, and the rest of the links pointing to the redirect can be retargeted to Sápmi. 130.234.120.6 (talk) 12:23, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

If this gets deleted, we will need a new redirect from "Lapland" to Sápmi for search purposes. I suggest Lapland (transnational region). To my understanding, the exact name is not that important, as the disambiguator will not show up in the search bar. 130.234.120.6 (talk) 13:09, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
But the disambiguation does show in searches? Traumnovelle (talk) 07:33, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Retarget to the disambiguation page; multiple regions of different types by the name -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 07:07, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Retarget per nom and ip editor 65.92. Thryduulf (talk) 16:44, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Lerotse

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Bogobe jwa lerotse pending a better target. (non-admin closure) Cremastra talk 21:36, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Appears to be a different type of watermelon that is not mentioned at Watermelon. There is Bogobe jwa lerotse, which seems like it'd be a better target, and which does talk about the lerotse melon itself. However, that feels like it'd be a {{R to subtopic}}; there might be enough for an article here, but I'm just not familiar enough with the subject area. Would like some second opinions here. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 21:35, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

  • I missed Watermelon#Citroides group, which would be where content about Lerotse would go. However, there is none there, nor is there content at Citron melon (which appears to be the same as the Citroides group). If content is added to either of those articles, they would be a better redirect (Citron melon might even be fine without a mention). Skarmory (talk • contribs) 21:47, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Notified of this discussion at the suggested target Citron melon.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 15:02, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, mwwv converse∫edits 12:02, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

List of

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 19#List of

Valinor Hills Station

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Cremastra talk 21:49, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

No sources other than the occasional blog citing wikipedia use the name "Valinor Hills Station" to refer to the Valinor Hills landing site for Ingenuity. This doesn't appear to be a real name used, so the redirect feels artificial. There are a paltry number of references to it/uses, but those don't seem to be from WP:RS sources and may actually be mirroring the mistaken name used on Wikipedia. Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 11:22, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

Keep, "other than the occasional blog...", which means it is used and that seems all that's needed for a redirect. What's the harm in a redirect that has real-world usage? Randy Kryn (talk) 12:08, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Chicken Veniamin

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:10, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Not mentioned in the target page. No relevant hits on google either. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:13, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

Delete. "Veniamin" is the Russian/Ukrainian version of the name "Benjamin", but I can't find any relation to chicken, let alone KFC. 🦬 Beefaloe 🦬 (talk) 08:34, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Pixalmon

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Pokémon fan games#List of individual games. Jay 💬 20:56, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

A misspelling of a game mod that isn't even mentioned at the target article. Don't think there's anything realistically worth retargeting to. ~Liancetalk 03:42, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. Enix150 (talk) 20:08, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Retarget to Pokémon fan games#List of individual games Pixelmon redirects there, and it IS indeed mentioned in the list. Pixalmon DOES see some ghits, which is the only important thing for typo redirects, so I don't see why this should be deleted. User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 03:51, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:46, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Retarget per someone. charlotte 👸♥ 00:46, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Where is Kate?

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 25#Where is Kate?

Hobsonville Corridor

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:11, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Just some term used in a council planning document :

Not mentioned/discussed at target and the redirect has 6 views in 1 year compared to 7,000 a year for the target article. Traumnovelle (talk) 04:40, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Joe Burrus

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:11, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

This redirected to an entry on the page List of entertainers who died during a performance, however the entry did not have a source, so I removed it. Therefore this redirect is moot. ... discospinster talk 04:10, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Community Police Oversight Board

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:11, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Per Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Community_Police_Oversight_Board The name of this board is used by multiple agencies by various municipal corporations of different US States and having it dedicated to the City of Portland in the US State of Oregon is not appropriate, so the title should be changed. Graywalls (talk) 03:08, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom and WP:ROTM, I cannot find anything to suggest that the Portland board is any more notable than myriad others with similar names. This topic probably deserves its own article, but WP:WTAF applies. Carguychris (talk) 14:42, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
    @Carguychris:, if you mean in the sense of high level article on community police oversight, I can see a value in it. However, as originally created as an article on program within a local city police department, it shouldn't exist. Graywalls (talk) 19:19, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
    @Graywalls, yes, that's exactly what I meant. I think there should be an article about the high-level concept of a police oversight board, akin to the municipal council article, but not about the Portland board specifically. Per WP:ROTM, such boards are seldom Wikinotable on an individual basis. Pardon my brevity. Carguychris (talk) 19:47, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks