Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 22

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:35, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

• Moose State → Michigan  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Contenders for this title include Alaska, Vermont, and Maine. None of them seem to use it often enough to merit a disambig page and none of them seem to be the primary topic. Rusalkii (talk) 22:57, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

• Delete. My research completely agrees with the nomination with the exception that New Hampshire should also be in the list of states that this can refer to. Thryduulf (talk) 11:30, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, extremely ambiguous. Senior Captain Thrawn (talk) 03:02, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G7. The creator has requested deletion. Thryduulf (talk) 01:25, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

• Twisted Eminium → Eminium intortum  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target. Only place on the internet I can find this used at all is this one agricultural marketplace website, which doesn't strike me as a good enough source to include this as a common name in the article. Rusalkii (talk) 22:33, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Please do delete. I am the creator of the redirect and agree it was a poor source. Ivan (talk) 22:42, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:36, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

• Azov campaigns (1695–1696-1697) → Azov campaigns (1695–1697)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Very unlikely disambiguation; page was at this title for under a day. Rusalkii (talk) 21:21, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

• Delete. The likeliness of this redirect is disrupted by the fact that it uses two different types of dashes. Steel1943 (talk) 22:28, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Enix150 (talk) 02:22, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
• Delete Support per nom. Kajmer05 (talk) 14:32, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 21:05, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

• Common Sense Soapbox → Foundation for Economic Education  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target, and I don't see the coverage to merit a mention in the target either. Rusalkii (talk) 20:48, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

• Delete. This redirect is confusing if there's no mention at the target. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:54, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:37, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

• Eusebia (Q959947) → Eusebia of Hamage  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This redirect appears to have been created on purpose, so speedy criterion G6 is not applicable, however this fact doesn't exempt it from normal deletion. Wikidata's Q identifiers are never plausible terms, they are only arbitrary numbers that happen to be assigned to any random topic by chance in chronological order. "Q959947" is an obscure reference to this person. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 17:52, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. We've had several previous discussions about Q numbers, all of them ending in deletion, but I can't immediately find any to link to. Thryduulf (talk) 18:15, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

  Looking at the logs, these seem to mostly get speedied per G6 or R3, or moved without leaving a redirect by a page mover. This one somehow got missed for long enough to no longer be recently-created, so is correctly at RfD. Most recent prior discussion: Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_November_12#Johan_(Q2055105), which links to a chain of others. We should probably title blacklist this prefix pattern so we don't have to keep cleaning up after these mistakes. And Delete. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:22, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

  A title blacklist was discussed previously and there are titles that legitimately include this pattern in them (particularly French submarines), per this 2019 query run by Cryptic. If it's reasonably possible (I don't know) then excluding pages with either "French submarine" in the title or which redirect to a page with "French submarine" in the title might bring the false positive rate down to an acceptable level (admins can bypass the blacklist), I'm not sure. Thryduulf (talk) 01:44, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

  Q[more than 3 numbers] seems like it'll neatly handle all the false positives there. Rusalkii (talk) 01:53, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

  .*\s\([QP]\d{5}.* (space, open paren, Q or P, then 5 numbers) was what was proposed in 2019. This is currently the only mainspace hit. All other mainspace titles with four digits look like false positives; I didn't bother trying with three. Current data: mainspace titles, 4+ and 5+ digits; non-mainspace titles, 5+ digits only.

  The blacklist proposal in 2019 failed for what read to me now as completely spurious reasons - there's clearly been no progress getting the bot making these malformed redlinks to stop and no reason to think there ever will be; and the proper solution to keep it from confusing good-faith editors (old or new) is to add a custom error message - so if these are still regularly getting created and then having to be deleted at RFD, then I'd suggest taking it back there. —Cryptic 03:17, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

  At the very least we should make edit filter 1012 (hist · log) give a warning that encourages people to pick a different title. Thryduulf (talk) 11:36, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

  The latest discussions that I've found are Nov 2024, Nov 2024, Oct 2024, Oct 2024 and Apr 2024, though I may have missed some. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 18:32, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 21:35, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

• Non-working day → Public holiday  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The target article identifies itself as a type of the subject of the redirect, but not holding in casing the subject of the redirect. In fact, I could argue that this redirect could also represent a Vacation day (odd that doesn't exist, but I'd imagine it may not exist due to potential WP:ENGVAR issues), one's regular days off during a week, or Paid day off. Steel1943 (talk) 16:12, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

• My first thought is to retarget to business day as a {{R avoided double redirect}} and {{R from antonym}} of working day. Workweek and weekend is also a possible target, I think I very slightly prefer business day but this is not a strong preference and the two pages are linked by hatnotes. Thryduulf (talk) 18:22, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
• Delete. This is multiply ambiguous. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 21:01, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
• Delete ambiguous and no better target. It could also refer to non-business days that aren't holidays 𝕒𝕥𝕠𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕕𝕣𝕒𝕘𝕠𝕟𝟙𝟛𝟞 🗨️ 🖊️ 19:12, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
• Delete ambiguous. Could also refer to Sabbath or Shabbat or any other religious non working day. Pinguinn 🐧 11:34, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was procedural keep. No retarget or rationale suggested by the nominator. Rusalkii (talk) 23:10, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

• List of programmes broadcast by Playhouse Disney in the UK and IrelandList of programmes broadcast by Playhouse Disney in the UK and Ireland → Disney Junior (UK & Ireland)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Could be kept but would a retarget be warranted? RanDom 404 (talk) 15:36, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. ✗plicit 05:01, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

• 2027 South Korean presidential election2027 South Korean presidential election → 2025 South Korean presidential election  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The next presidential election of South Korea will be 2025 not 2027 due to impeachment of Yoon Suk Yeol. The redirect is no longer needed. 132.234.228.80 (talk) 09:08, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

• Retarget or Keep. As the election has been scheduled to be held in 2027 since the previous one in 2022 there will remain lots of references to it, so this shouldn't be a redlink. The article about 2025 election does note in the lead that it was scheduled to be held in 2027, so people are not going to be confused by that target. Presidential elections in South Korea, to which I've added a hatnote to the 2025 election, seems likely to be the best alternative target. Thryduulf (talk) 11:00, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
• Lean keep. I agree that this doesn't make much sense to redlink. Adding some mention of the election originally being in 2027 at 2025 South Korean presidential election#Background (or maybe #Electoral system) would probably be best. Esolo5002 (talk) 03:51, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 23:00, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

• Delete No longer necessary for the redirect due to Impeachment of Yoon Suk Yeol. Although i also support for refine the redirect as 2025 South Korean presidential election#Background for alternative option if necessary, giving that this election was scheduled to be held in 2027, not this year. 2404:8000:1037:587:A0D0:7D92:BD86:BC7B (talk) 10:08, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
• Delete as unused and unnecessary. Since it's currently unused, redlinking is not a concern. A redirect could potentially be confusing if a future election is scheduled for 2027. Dan Leonard (talk • contribs) 03:08, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Notified of this discussion at the current and suggested targets.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 14:46, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

• Weak keep could be a search term by someone learning about elections in South Korea, following the typical 5 year term. 𝕒𝕥𝕠𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕕𝕣𝕒𝕘𝕠𝕟𝟙𝟛𝟞 🗨️ 🖊️ 19:15, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:18, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

• AY Youngest → Simplice Himbaza  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

That music producer is nicknamed "AY", not "AY Youngest". Search results for "AY Youngest" are unrelated to this person. I would suggest deletion, even the deleted redirect AY Rwanda seems more intuitive than this one. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 13:36, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

• Delete, I can't find any evidence that this person is called this. Rusalkii (talk) 02:49, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Public holiday. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:42, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

• Federal holidayFederal holiday → Federal holidays in the United States  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Federal holidaysFederal holidays → Federal holidays in the United States  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Federal HolidayFederal Holiday → Federal holidays in the United States  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Federal HolidaysFederal Holidays → Federal holidays in the United States  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Retarget to public holiday. The terminology isn't exclusive to the US. Come on. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 09:25, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

• Retarget per nom. This was previously a subset of the proposed target, limited to a few countries that are federations, but it was redirected with the comment that it is a term exclusive to the United States. Search results suggest however that the term is also used in, at least, Switzerland and Botswana. Thryduulf (talk) 10:47, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

  Confirming that my recommendation applies to all four redirects. Thryduulf (talk) 17:37, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

• Keep, most Federal holidays in the U.S. are not public holidays in terms of everyone is normally given the day off work. Federal workers are "given" the holiday, not necessarily state or local governmental workers or those employed in the private sector. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:26, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

  The issue is that "Federal holiday" is not a term unique to the United States. Thryduulf (talk) 12:52, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

  The first line of public holiday is A public holiday, national holiday, federal holiday, statutory holiday, bank holiday or legal holiday, implying it's in use outside of the US. Also, I can confirm 100% that "federal holiday" is used in Canada at least, though probably not in a governmental fashion. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 21:34, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

• Retarget all per nom and Thryduulf. Steel1943 (talk) 15:19, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Comment: I have added Federal holidaysFederal holidays, Federal HolidayFederal Holiday, and Federal HolidaysFederal Holidays to this nomination since it seems like the lot of these should be synched. @LilianaUwU, Thryduulf, and Randy Kryn: Pinging current participants in the event this affects their stances. Steel1943 (talk) 16:03, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

• Retarget all per nom. Textbook US-Centrism. There are other countries using the term. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 10:35, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
• Retarget all It's a big world out there. Jessamyn (my talk page) 20:22, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 💬 11:24, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

• Juan Delcán → La Abadía del Crimen  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Artist. Current redirect is to a game he illustrated. Should be a red link, he may be notable, and the current redirect is not very helpful (he worked on other games too). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:08, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:02, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

• Template:S-line/IT-Eurostar left/Frecciabianco → Template:S-line/IT-ICN left/  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Template:S-line/IT-Eurostar right/Frecciarossa → Template:S-line/IT-ICN left/  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Template:S-line/IT-Eurostar right/Frecciargento → Template:S-line/IT-ICN left/  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Template:S-line/IT-Eurostar right/Frecciabianco → Template:S-line/IT-ICN left/  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Template:S-line/IT-Eurostar left/Frecciarossa → Template:S-line/IT-ICN left/  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Template:S-line/IT-Eurostar left/Frecciargento → Template:S-line/IT-ICN left/  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unused redirect Cards84664 01:23, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

• ...And they all should be eligible for {{Db-subpage}} then since Template:S-line/IT-Eurostar left and Template:S-line/IT-Eurostar right do not exist. Let's see what happens... Steel1943 (talk) 01:56, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

  Template:S-line, Template:S-line/IT-Eurostar left/, and Template:S-line/IT-Eurostar right/ all exist, so I've declined. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 05:58, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

  @Theleekycauldron: The forward slash at the end is the hidden culprit! It's at the wrong title! 😣 Steel1943 (talk) 07:56, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

• Delete all per nom. Steel1943 (talk) 15:18, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:03, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

• The Three-Body Problem (upcoming TV series) → 3 Body Problem (TV series)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete, WP:UFILM, target subject was released over a year ago, page views tapering off. Steel1943 (talk) 00:55, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

• Keep and reevaluate in a few weeks. Deletion of "upcoming" redirects is for those whose utility has ended, not for those whose utility looks like it will end soon but hasn't ended yet. Thryduulf (talk) 02:06, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
• Delete. The series was released over a year ago. Is this redirect getting any traffic? cagliost (talk) 06:27, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

  Is this redirect getting any traffic? Yes. See the stats link in the nomination. Thryduulf (talk) 10:48, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

• Delete. that's what I call a taper. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 21:10, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

  ...that hasn't finished. Less that three weeks ago this redirect got 35 views in a single day, its still getting views roughly every other day. Thryduulf (talk) 01:50, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

• Delete per the rationale of WP:UFILM, it was released more than 30 days ago (March 21, 2024). -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:35, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).