Wikiwand AI

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 4

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 4, 2025.

Draft:Please Quit Drinking

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:35, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

The page history of this title is as confusing as its current target as a userspace draft since no mainspace history exists. Only admin shenanigans with regards and respect to notability. What do you think? Intrisit (talk) 22:07, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom. //Lollipoplollipoplollipop::talk 17:15, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Draft:Please Stop Drinking

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:35, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

No mainspace history exists. Only admin shenanigans with regards and respect to notability. What do you think? Intrisit (talk) 22:07, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom. //Lollipoplollipoplollipop::talk 17:15, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Connair

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Connellan Airways. ✗plicit 12:03, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

I think it would be better if this targeted Connellan Airways, later known as Connair – as originally intended in 2006 – rather than a misspelling, as retargeted in 2008. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:21, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:54, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

  • Retarget per nom. A correct usage is a better target than a misspelling. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 03:43, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Retarget per nom and place a hatnote at the Connellan Airways page. Carguychris (talk) 14:32, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Retarget per nom --Lenticel (talk) 02:26, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Attempted takeover of US federal agencies by Elon Musk

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 22#Attempted takeover of US federal agencies by Elon Musk

Trump calls followers to save America if he is arrested

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:36, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

phrase (or anything like it) not mentioned at target, unlikely to be useful as a search term. Delete. Mdewman6 (talk) 22:16, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom. //Lollipoplollipoplollipop::talk 23:04, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Delete As the original SPEEDY proposer on the grounds mentioned above, I support deletion per the nomination. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 06:36, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
Delete per nom. M.C. (talk) 10:46, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

T:CN

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:58, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Deprecated pseudo-namespace. M.C. (talk) 21:49, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Beyond this nomination, the template is transcluded nowhere, and only used in five places. User:Trialpears/sandbox/4 and User:Hex/Notes/PNRs both list uses of the T: pseudo-namespace, User talk:Shanewatson859 is a user warning for a user editing that very redirect, and the last two are noticeboard archives: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1149#IPs seems to be WP:NOTHERE (the only place it's actually used as a shortcut and not used to talk about the redirect itself) and Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 212#Template namespace alias: Second survey. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 17:44, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
Comment Are you sure it actually isn't used? I would not be surprised to learn if there is a bot that replaces uses of template cn with template citation needed when it dates it - and its super handy to type less when chucking cns around. Assuming the bot works on this namespace, lets try it.[citation needed] //Lollipoplollipoplollipop::talk 17:08, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
My bad, I didn't realise it was capitalised, here[citation needed] //Lollipoplollipoplollipop::talk 17:12, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
When I used the template cn here for example, should it not be included in the transclusions? //Lollipoplollipoplollipop::talk 17:18, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
This is about the redirect T:CN in mainspace, not the redirect TM:CN in templatespace. jlwoodwa (talk) 07:02, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
Delete. The TM: alternative (TM:CN) doesn't require any real additional effort. Deleting this removes an unnecessary cross-namespace redirect Gonnym (talk) 14:24, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

LGBTQ topics and Judaism

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Template:LGBTQ topics and Judaism. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 01:06, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

There are many LGBTQ topics other than homosexuality. The current target article doesn't even cover the full scope of the "LG" part of "LGBTQ", as there's much to lesbian and gay Jewish culture that doesn't fit under "views on homosexuality", like the existence of LGBTQ synagogues or organizations like Keshet. That's before getting into the "B" and particularly the "T", the latter of which is covered somewhere completely different, Transgender people and religion § Judaism. That's currently linked by hatnote, but that is an incomplete solution. "LGBTQ topics and Judaism" is not just a viable topic, it's an FAäble one, so I suggest we either delete per WP:RETURNTORED or—a bit unconventional, but allowed—retarget to {{LGBTQ topics and Judaism}}, a navbox I just created, and mark as an {{r with possibilities}}. This is a strong opinion regarding the "LGBT(Q)" redirects, and a normal-strength opinion regarding the "Lesbian and gay" ones. Gender and Jewish studies is another possible target, but it actually doesn't say much about LGBTQ topics as currently written -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|🤷) 00:06, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Retarget - I agree that the nominated redirects are poorly targetted, yet they do have some utility and are therefore better than dead (red) or no links at all. The guiding light here is to fulfill Wikipedia's purpose. Our mission is to provide knowledge, and linking to that knowledge is often the first step. In regard to the mission, it's better to have on-target redirects, even if the destination is a navigation template and not an article. And therefore, I support retargetting to {{LGBTQ topics and Judaism}}.    — The Transhumanist   03:37, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 19:03, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

List of critical mineral raw materials

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Utopes (talk / cont) 12:33, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Unnecessary redirect pointing to deleted section of article which is not a list — Preceding unsigned comment added by Selfstudier (talk • contribs) 15:57, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Keep - redirect corrected to an active list section of article; still useful! DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 16:17, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This was retargeted to Critical Raw Materials Act#European lists of critical raw materials while the discussion was open - objections? Or are we good here?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 01:56, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more try.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 18:48, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Keep per Presidentman, asilvering, Sonnenfeld. //Lollipoplollipoplollipop::talk 23:09, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Keep per above --Lenticel (talk) 01:18, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Redirects to disambiguation page "Jawi"

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 25#Redirects to disambiguation page "Jawi"

2025 United States coup

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 28#2025 United States coup

Life-lore

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft redirect to Wiktionary:life-lore. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:04, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Seems I missed another one. See below. — Anonymous 16:29, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Comment The only reason I made em is because of another redirect you missed, being Lifelore. Also, go check the second Wiktionary entry if you think it's so hilarious. CheeseyHead (talk) 17:44, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Good catch; if I can find the time I'll bundle all three. The wikt entry says that its usage for biology is archaic. It seems to have an unrelated more recent definition, and search results mainly show a YouTube channel called "RealLifeLore". — Anonymous 17:59, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
It's too late for bundling, but I have started WP:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 15#Lifelore. Jay 💬 11:55, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Retarget to wikt:lifelore. Duckmather (talk) 21:17, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Neutral for now. Going to think about Duckmather's proposal. Delete. The Wiktionary entry is unreferenced and spurious.—Alalch E. 02:41, 6 February 2025
  • Retarget to Wiktionary entry per Duckmather. it's lio! | talk | work 08:18, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Soft retarget with {{Wiktionary redirect}} to Wiktionary:life-lore, NOT Wiktionary:lifelore, given that it exists and is a title match, which is preferred when targeting Wiktionary. Steel1943 (talk) 07:44, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
    Support this, didn't realize that the exact word had an entry on Wiktionary. it's lio! | talk | work 08:43, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Life lore

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft redirect to Wiktionary:life lore. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 23:58, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

We're all cracking up here. But seriously, not a helpful redirect. — Anonymous 15:38, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

  • Retarget to wikt:lifelore, where it's explained. Duckmather (talk) 21:17, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Neutral for now. Going to think about Duckmather's proposal. Delete. The Wiktionary entry is unreferenced and spurious.—Alalch E. 02:41, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
    The Wiktionary entry is not unreferenced and spurious as you claim, because it cites several quotations, which are the usual way of citing things at Wiktionary. They also show that "lifelore" is a real word and not just a neologism. Duckmather (talk) 02:59, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
    Yes, thank you.—Alalch E. 08:43, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Follow the outcome of WP:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 15#Lifelore. Jay 💬 11:56, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
    Per above and Duckmather, retarget to Wiktionary entry. it's lio! | talk | work 08:24, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Soft retarget with {{Wiktionary redirect}} to Wiktionary:life lore, NOT Wiktionary:lifelore, given that it exists and is a title match, which is preferred when targeting Wiktionary. Steel1943 (talk) 07:35, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
    Support this, didn't realize that the exact word had an entry on Wiktionary. it's lio! | talk | work 08:44, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Jefferemm

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:00, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

one of benrey's friends, who wanted to play ps3 games with him but died because of gordon feetman (he did not die, nor did gordon freeman kill him). alas, he's unmentioned, and too minor to cram a mention in consarn (PRESS ALL BUTTONS TO ACTIVATE DEVIL GUN MODE) 14:32, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Delete This is such an obscure character in RTVS canon that its inclusion as a redirect feels more like a joke. I see no world where someone would ever need to use this redirect to try and locate HLVRAI's article. Taffer😊 💬(they/she) 17:32, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Because of what consarn said, I suggest making a new list with the one-time characters that were removed so that it is mentioned. CheeseyHead (talk) 17:53, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
finally, joshua will have his time to shine consarn (speak evil) (see evil) 18:11, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete per Taffer. Jay 💬 17:27, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Cephalobaenida

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 17#Cephalobaenida

🫟

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Splatter. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 03:44, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

This is a "splatter" emoji which could mean any variety of things, not just one genre of painting. My first choice is deletion, since emojis appear differently on different devices and their meaning is contextual and varies from individual to individual. Importantly, this emoji was introduced recently and has not had time to develop a unified "meaning" yet. My second choice is a retarget to splatter, a DAB page, but I don't think this target should stay. Cremastra (talk) 16:49, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:16, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Keep or retarget. Emojis are never deleted. We had a recent RfC on this so this cannot be any outcome from this discussion as WP:LOCALCON cannot override the community. Gonnym (talk) 10:54, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

⛓️‍💥

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Chain#Symbolism. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:38, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Not necessarily the depicted concept – why emancipation as opposed to Berlin (sculpture), for example? Too vague to interpret – I suggest deletion. Cremastra (talk) 16:54, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:15, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Keep or retarget. Emojis should never be deleted as they are valid search terms. Gonnym (talk) 10:59, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

M-Word

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Participants were split on whether Midget is the primary topic of the redirect term. However, there was agreement that a disambiguation page is not feasible / should not be made. Jay 💬 18:49, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

the m-word is more likely to be motherfucker, right, not midget? DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 18:54, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

  • The word is known as the m-word, because it is sometimes viewed as derogatory and it is sometimes called the m-word. The word "Motherfucker" is a related word to "fuck" which is commonly known as the F-word. RaschenTechner (talk) 19:21, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Quick google suggests that "midget" is weakly the primary topic, but there's quite a few of results for "motherfucker" and some weird ones ("mother", The M Word, "Muslim", "menopause" etc). So I suppose weak keep or secondarily delete, but no retarget to motherfucker. Rusalkii (talk) 05:16, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete, no clear primary target. Don't make a disambiguation page for all m-words, Wikipedia is not Urban Dictionary. —Kusma (talk) 12:45, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
  • DABify - We have C-word as a dab, and it seems to be a pretty good and useful DAB to me. I see no reason why M-word can't be the same. We aren't Urban Dictionary... because we aren't any dictionary. But the words people use are of encyclopedic value, and encyclopedic content can be provided. And navigational aides are useful to get people to the information they are looking for. Fieari (talk) 06:36, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Neutral between keeping, retargeting, and deleting but strong oppose DABifying. This isn't the same as C-word, because there are several entries on that DAB page for encyclopedic topics literally called "(the) C-word". It's not the same as making a DAB page for a random, obscure euphemism that isn't particularly common for any of the things it could potentially mean. — Anonymous 03:13, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Notified of this discussion at the target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 17:46, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Oppose DAB per Anonymous. Going through the alphabet, we have DABs for X-word primarily where there are notable topics by that phrase, e.g., The L Word. Otherwise, they redirect to a specific term. K-word and R-word seem to be an outliers, with the latter including R-word index in addition to two perjoratives. It's also worth noting that the W-word redirect closed as delete in 2020 (see here. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:17, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
if there's a DAB page we could re target this to, then do it. style="color #964b00 Cyber the tiger🐯 (talk) 01:05, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Keep as the current target contains sourced content about who calls it the "m-word", why they call it that, and what impact that has had on the real world. The film The M Word should be hatnoted at the current target but is distinguished by WP:SMALLDETAILS. All the other WP:DABMENTION-level films, songs, books, etc. called "The M Word" (let alone any page that doesn't mention the phrase "m-word' at all) don't displace either midget or the film from their respective WP:PRIMARYTOPIC positions. 59.149.117.119 (talk) 01:16, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete per Kusma. Do not disambiguate since the list would essentially be full of potential WP:OR and a predictable vandalism target. Steel1943 (talk) 01:04, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:15, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wincest

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Supernatural (American TV series)#Fandom and popular culture. Jay 💬 14:47, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Not mentioned in target. The fandom name for the relationship between the Winchester brothers in Supernatural, but they aren't twins. Probably notable, I'm getting some Google scholar hits, but I just made Mpreg and should probably stop lest I be pigeonholed into this particular corner of fandom topics. Article idea free to a good home, though:) Rusalkii (talk) 20:04, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

  • comes from the phrase "incest is wincest", referring to just about any kind of incest (mostly when it comes to anime). if unmentioned in incest-related articles, burn to the ground consarn (speak evil) (see evil) 20:11, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
    Mea culpa, it is actually mentioned at Supernatural_(American_TV_series)#Fandom_and_popular_culture, and in fact was targeted there at several points in the history before reverting to Incest between twins. The supernatural target seems obviously correct to me, so I suppose my first preference is to retarget and second to delete per WP:RETURNTORED but definitely not to keep as is. Rusalkii (talk) 20:36, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
    i actually disagree with targeting there as it would be surprising and technically not a pun on incest. i believe someone looking for this specific term would be expecting people whose family trees are stumps, and supernatural looks to me like... something that isn't that general concept consarn (speak evil) (see evil) 20:44, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
    A google search suggests that the Supernatural ship is the primary topic. Rusalkii (talk) 20:51, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete This is "twincest" in slang (twin+incest->tw[in]cest), not "wincest". It is very SURPRISING to lead to this article, as there are other meanings that are not typos. Thus this typo-by-omission spelling is no good as a redirect to the current target. Per the above results (Supernatural, regular incest, etc) -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 21:55, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete or retarget to Supernatural (American TV series)#Fandom and popular culture, where the term is mentioned. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:01, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete per 65.92.246.77. Enix150 (talk) 02:06, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguate between incest between twins (according to wiktionary, wincest [not to be confused with Wincest] is "incest, usually of two siblings") and Supernatural_(American_TV_series)#Fandom and popular culture (according to the same wiktionary, Wincest [not to be confused with wincest] is "The incestuous slash ship of the fictional brothers Dean and Sam Winchester from the television series Supernatural.") User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 04:10, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Disambiguate per Someone-123-321. Enix150 (talk) 20:12, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Supernatural (American TV series)#Fandom and popular culture. I'm skeptical of the wiktionary definition, which doesn't mention twins, only siblings (not to mention the primary definition is an archaic present indicative of wince). The quotes provided don't scream reliable to me either. One is a forum post and the other is a university newspaper, both of which lend support to consarn's statement (i.e "incest is wincest"). VolatileAnomaly (talk) 19:22, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:13, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

it just occurred to me... did the twin thing come from a confusion with twincest? consarn (speak evil) (see evil) 19:05, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Byng Arts Mini School

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 12#Byng Arts Mini School

2025 NCAA Division I FCS football season

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 22:07, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Renomination as the previous RfD in September was closed as a no-participation delete. This has been re-created 4 months later as a redirect to the same target as before.

Previous nomination was: Not mentioned at target and provides no information relevant to the title. Redirect is misleading as a result and is better left as a redlink for the time being. Jay 💬 07:11, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

An article has been drafted (basically a copy and modification of the 2024 article) and I would like to withdraw. Jay 💬 14:23, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
Delete per nom. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 13:18, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Keep. The 2024 season already ended a month ago. Abhiramakella (talk) 16:52, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Build that wall

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 11#Build that wall

Blind Eyes Red

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Her (Minnie EP). (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 08:27, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

The template "R from song" states: Redirecting to the specific album or film in which the song appears is preferable to redirecting to the artist when possible. Blind Eyes Red can be redirected to Her (Minnie EP). 三葉草 San Yeh Tsao 03:11, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

  • Retarget per nom. This should be uncontroversial, especially considering that the album article did not exist when the redirect was created. 三葉草, you should feel free to go ahead and update redirects like this without needing to start an RfD. —Paul_012 (talk) 02:48, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
  • I will keep this in mind for the future. Thank you! 三葉草 San Yeh Tsao 00:12, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Orders, decorations, and medals of North Korea (version 2)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 13:59, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Delete. Not sure how this is "version 2", since it was created as a redirect (not created by a pagemove) and has never had any content in its history. Nobody's going to link it by accident or type it into the URL bar, and the only way you'll find it in the search bar is a search that will also find the target; probably all visitors are people who see it on WhatLinksHere or a list of possible search results and visit it out of curiosity. The only editors in its history are an account last active in 2012, a bot, and a deceased individual. Nyttend (talk) 00:22, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete. Seems there were originally two versions of the article based on a history merge request done by aforementioned deceased user who seemed to be an avid contributor, rest in peace. Since over a decade has passed, I doubt anyone is searching for the link to version 2 in any shape or form. — 🪫Volatile 📲T | ⌨️C 03:15, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Dungatar

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 11#Dungatar

Sapient dinosaurs

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Dinosauroid. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 08:25, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Not mentioned in the article. It was in the original article, but the material was removed. It should either be deleted or restored to its own page. Serendipodous 18:38, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete, but not for navigational reasons. Rather, I don't think we should encourage the recreation of the content targeted by this redirect. Crufty and bordering on WP:SYNTH. — Anonymous 19:22, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Retarget to Dinosauroid. I am not a paleontologist, but the claim that sapient dinosaurs existed sounds extremely fringe, and doesn't seem to be notable for a standalone article. Ca talk to me! 14:23, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:19, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Retarget to Dinosauroid per Ca. Plausible search term --Lenticel (talk) 00:06, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Michael McCann (footballer)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 18:05, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Nobody named "Michael McCann" appears at the target article, rendering this as a misleading redirect. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:28, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Restore article - it was an article before it was turned into a redirect. GiantSnowman 18:34, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete - two sentence unsourced stub created in 2006 and BLARd in 2007. Jay 💬 10:05, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 23:03, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:17, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Delete, don't think you'd be able to get a proper article out of him. Would love to be proven wrong. //Lollipoplollipoplollipop::talk 18:02, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks