Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 June 14

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) 9ninety (talk) 09:07, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

• Jane kellyJane kelly → Jane Kelly  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Is a this a redirect or a name list? Thepharoah17 (talk) 23:50, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

• Remove list items and keep redirect. The list on the nominated redirect is unnecessary because Jane Kelly is a working name list that already includes the two people that were listed and two more. Jane Kelly is also capitalized properly, so the list should stay there. Justjourney (talk | contribs) 00:29, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
• I have boldly removed the "list"; speedy keep the redirect, as there is no other reason not to. BD2412 T 00:56, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
• Apparently we just needed to revert a single edit breaking the redirect. Even if it was old, an error is just an error. --Joy (talk) 08:54, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget. (non-admin closure) feminist🩸 (talk) 05:45, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

• TEACHERTEACHER → Teacher  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• MONSTERMONSTER → Monster  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No use in all caps, TEACHER was originally created as vandalism. Thepharoah17 (talk) 23:39, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
I think retarget to the dab pages per Thryduulf makes the most sense here. Thepharoah17 (talk) 01:58, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Keep. Not that unlikely, there are several of those already; for example, JESUSJESUS, DONALD TRUMPDONALD TRUMP, JOE BIDENJOE BIDEN, CANADACANADA, UNITED STATESUNITED STATES, CHEESECHEESE. Since these two redirects already exist, I see no reason to delete them. 🌳 Balsam Cottonwood (talk) ✝ 02:11, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Retarget per below. I came across Thryduulf's comment after and it makes more sense. 🌳 Balsam Cottonwood (talk) ✝ 02:49, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

• Retarget to Monster (disambiguation) and Teacher (disambiguation) respectively. Multiple of the entries on the dab pages are stylised in all caps in the logo/marketing (at least Monster Energy, Monster Cable, Monster.com, Monster (1980 film), Monster (2008 film), Monster (2018 film), Monster (2022 film) and Monster (2023 Indonesian film), I stopped looking at that point) and at least three entries on the Teacher dab page are also rendered in all caps. These have greater affinity to this capitalisation than the common nouns at the base titles, Thryduulf (talk) 01:52, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Retarget per Thryduulf. --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 22:25, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:12, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

• Sp0rk → Spork  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible spelling Thepharoah17 (talk) 21:52, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:UNHELPFUL. Justjourney (talk | contribs) 00:34, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete. There can't be such a redirect for every title that contains an O. 🌳 Balsam Cottonwood (talk) ✝ 02:05, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 22:25, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete implausible. --Schützenpanzer (Talk) 18:07, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 22:25, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

• Sbirro → Police officer  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Zaptiah → Police officer  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No WP:FORRED. Thepharoah17 (talk) 20:10, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete Thepharoah17 (talk) 21:05, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

• Delete both per nom. Note that a one-sentence unsourced stub at Sbirro was BLARed back in 2007; a bot had previously tagged it as to be copied to wiktionary, but wikt:sbirro does not appear to have retained the relevant content or edit history. Rusalkii (talk) 19:54, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:13, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

• Healthcareers → Physician  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Useless, was apparently originally created as an ad. Thepharoah17 (talk) 20:03, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

• delete, less per nom and more as a bad pun redirecting to an article that isn't necessarily related. i'm a little more willing to argue that that was someone's homework than an actual ad, as it wasn't advertising any specific entity consarn _{(grave) (obituary)} 20:22, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Was hoping to find a good retargeting option for this, but the lack of a space between the two words, in addition to titles like Health career and Health careers not existing, I am out of ideas for alternatives to deletion. Steel1943 (talk) 23:14, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:13, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

• Rollago → Onion ring  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Rollagos → Onion ring  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

been a while, hasn't it? as usual, a weird case. results for "rollagos" got me a great big pile of nothing coherent, while "rollago" got me more or less the same thing... but also one reddit thread (yucky!!) that seems to imply that "rollago" is a word that originates from some guy's dream, and is probably a synonym for "onion ring". even in the creator's talk page, someone nominated some misspellings for speedy deletion and stated that they didn't know what exactly that was supposed to be, so what do? consarn _{(grave) (obituary)} 18:55, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

• Delete. No evidence it has this meaning outside a bizarre Reddit thread. Apparently it is the name of a winery. Google mostly thinks it's a typo and turns up a bunch of unrelated hits. --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 22:44, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete. Besides search engines wanting to assume I meant to type "Rollga" (doesn't exist), my finds mirror Myceteae's. Steel1943 (talk) 23:16, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:14, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

• Wikipedia:WikiProject Canlaw → Wikipedia:WikiProject Canadian law  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Recently created by a now-blocked editor. WP:CANLAW already exists as a redirect, but I believe that WP:WikiProject Canlaw is too long to be a useful shortcut. Moreover, it redirects to WP:WikiProject Canadian law, which is inactive for years now. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 18:12, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

• There are similar redirects that are long (as you claim above) like WP:Wikiproject us, WP:WikiProject WIR, and WP:WikiProject UK. But the redirects mention go to well known WikiProjects so no issue there. But this redirect leads to an inactive project, not watched by many users. Also adding to the fact that users will less likely use this term, I will default to delete unless there is justification that this needs to be kept. ToadetteEdit (talk) 18:28, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom. —Alalch E. 13:23, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:14, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

• Yankeeball → American football  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Does not appear to be an alternative name for football. Searching on Google doesn't return anything helpful and it's not even on Urban Dictionary. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 16:25, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

• crack it open like a maine lobstah and rip it apaht per nom. sorry, i don't know a lot of yankee jokes consarn _{(grave) (obituary)} 19:01, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete. I would have assumed it meant something to do with New York Yankees baseball. BD2412 T 01:07, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per BD2412. Steel1943 (talk) 23:17, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:14, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

• Gridball → American football  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not an actual synonym for football. Googling it returns a board game or something about Stardew Valley. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 16:17, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

• delete per nom. it's an in-universe sport played by resident inferior non-emily being alex, that has an american football-shaped non-ball object. not important or notable beyond the funny name, and i'm not sure it's part of the board game based on stardew valey, so i don't see much point in keeping consarn _{(grave) (obituary)} 18:59, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 15:41, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

• The Moon LandingThe Moon Landing → Apollo 11  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The moon landing redirects to Moon landing. Should these have the same target? मल्ल (talk) 15:28, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

• Keep When I search for "The Moon Landing" on Google, including Google Books, results are overwhelmingly for Apollo 11. This suggests Apollo 11 would be the primary topic here. Perhaps the lowercase version should actually be retargeted. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 18:30, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
• keep, and retarget the sentence case one to apollo 11, maybe even per nom. i do think they should have the same target, but i also think there could very easily be an argument for this being "the" moon landing consarn _{(grave) (obituary)} 19:04, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
• Keep. It definitely is the primary topic, and Apollo 11 already includes a hatnote to Moon landing. Also retarget the sentence case version as well. Justjourney (talk | contribs) 00:38, 15 June 2025 (UTC) (Edited 00:40, 15 June 2025 (UTC))

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:30, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

• Dav public school kusmunda → DAV Public School, Kusmunda  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Bad redirect; unhelpful styling. CptViraj (talk) 11:05, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

• I have tagged it as a {{R from alternate capitalization}}. Jay 💬 15:47, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 22:26, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 09:03, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

• George Bush (2000) → George W. Bush  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Seems ambitious, might also referred to George W. Bush 2000 presidential campaign A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

• Delete. Implausible and, per nom, not the necessarily the obvious target. --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 06:02, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Delete – an implausible search term, too vague a term to be targeted to any one article. Drdpw (talk) 16:46, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

• Delete. The formatting of the redirect also makes a sound like it may refer to media by the same or artistic subjects created by George W. Bush ... who has been known to be a painter. Steel1943 (talk) 23:20, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to List of Late Night with Conan O'Brien sketches#Chip Whitley. After the restoration of material in List of Late Night with Conan O'Brien sketches, the concern voiced by the "delete" vote is satisfied. Refining to a {{Visible anchor}} I just placed on the page prior to closing this discussion for clarity. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 17:51, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

• Chip WhitleyChip Whitley → Conan O'Brien  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Did a google search, and Conan O'Brien wasn't mentioned for Chip Whitley searches. Appears to be fake. It is in page history of him having to do something with the actor. Don't know if the actor is notable enough or whether this redirect is legit or is fake. The user that created this also created a fake one called Dora The Ex-Toader. I think either Delete as one option, second option would be Draftify and crate article on actor or another one would be Keep. I am honestly neutral and I should let people who know about this and what it means debate and argue. Servite et contribuere (talk) 17:46, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

• The talk page comment by Ardric47 asked to look at the beginning of the target article, and the redirect creator agreed. This was 7-9 July 2005, and I don't find anything on Chip Whitley at the target around this time. Whereas in October 2005, Chip Whitley was merged to the target under the O’Brien's style section. The unsourced content, even if not fake, needn't be kept as it's minor, and may have been recentism for that time. Jay 💬 19:59, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rusalkii (talk) 22:16, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

More history: The entire "Comedy and mannerisms" section (which included Chip Whitley) was moved from Conan O'Brien to Late Night with Conan O'Brien in 2006. In 2007, a vandal 207.160.40.253, removed 4 sections from Late Night with Conan O'Brien in 4 edits within one minute. Three of those were reverted immediately by three different editors, but the fourth and largest vandalism of 20,098 bytes, that included Chip Whitley, was missed by all editors. The removed content was unsourced though, so we cannot just bring it back. Jay 💬 19:53, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

• Retarget to List of Late Night with Conan O'Brien sketches Seems to be a long-running gag from Conan, including a sketch on his TBS show where he used the alias on Tinder, so it's definitely a plausible (though very insider) redirect. Nathannah • 📮 00:59, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 01:51, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

• Delete not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 22:28, 26 June 2025 (UTC)
• Retarget to List of Late Night with Conan O'Brien sketches per Nathannah. I've readded the content that Jay found there. Somehow it was a notable enough bit for The LA Times to cover... -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:42, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to History of Monopoly. There seemed to be consensus to not keep the status quo, but no consensus on retargeting to the refined section History of Monopoly#Localizations, licenses, and spin-offs; I do not see another relist making this situation any clearer. (For WP:CCC purposes though, this close can be considered a "no consensus" if there is a desire to renominate this to refine to a section, etc.) (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 17:03, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

• Monopoly: The Card GameMonopoly: The Card Game → Monopoly (game)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I originally redirected this to Monopoly (game) because it failed notability guidelines for products and services, and was filled with original research. The target article used to have some substantive coverage of the topic, but I removed it because it was unreliably sourced. Therefore, this redirect serves no navigational purpose and should be deleted. (There is now only a trivial mention on the target page, though, and some disambiguation pages still have it listed.) 1isall (talk) 02:31, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

Relevant policies, guidelines, and revisions that I forgot to link to:

• WP:PRODUCT
• WP:NOR
• The revision of the redirected article before I decided to redirect it (I initially proposed the deletion, but withdrew it and chose to redirect it instead.)
• Revision of the target article with the unreliably sourced mention of the topic before I removed it

1isall (talk) 02:53, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

• Retarget to History of Monopoly, where it is mentioned. If sources are discovered in the future, the article can be restored from this version, which will be easier to do than if the edit history is deleted. Pinging User:Cunard to see if more sources can be found at this time. BOZ (talk) 07:16, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

  Thanks for that recommendation, BOZ. However, in the article History of Monopoly, the only mention of Monopoly: The Card Game appears in the section History of Monopoly#Localizations, licenses, and spin-offs as a single, passing reference. It's not substantive and lacks a citation. I believe the redirect would therefore be unsuitable for retargeting there. 1isall (talk) 02:52, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: These are the only sources I can find:
  1. "Harvard Business Review article". Harvard Business Review. Vol. 80. 2001. p. 54. Retrieved 2025-05-26 – via Google Books.

     The source notes: "It’s very tough to make a game that can satisfy both those who prefer casual games of luck and those who prefer to use their heads. In 1999, my company developed Monopoly: The Card Game with the aim of providing the emotional high points of the original game but in much less time. Given Monopoly’s wide appeal, we knew we had to design a game that kids could find fun to play but that adults could also approach with sophisticated reasoning and decision making. I think we succeeded, despite having such a tough act to follow."

  2. Beaumon-Clay, Tina (2001-02-11). "Monopoly now a card game". Montgomery Advertiser. Archived from the original on 2025-05-26. Retrieved 2025-05-26 – via Newspapers.com.

     The article notes: "I called our friends at Hasbro, maker of Monopoly in (almost) all its incarna-tions, and found that Monopoly The Card Game has been licensed to a company called Winning Moves. It's just as you've described. The object is to be the first player to accumulate $10,000."

  Cunard (talk) 21:33, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

  OK, thank you for taking a look @Cunard. I don't think that's enough to restore the article at this time, but I do feel the content should be retained in some form (under the redirect, most likely) in case more sources are found in the future. BOZ (talk) 22:42, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

  I don't think the sources are enough to verify content like the official rules of the game. 1isall (talk) 13:53, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

  We would probably need a primary source like the instructions to do so. 1isall (talk) 13:55, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

  So, what's the result of this discussion? 1isall (talk) 19:56, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

  I think the redirect is valid, and a brief mention of the game can be restored to the article, based on the sources found above. I'll also note that Monopoly Deal, for example, mentioned there, is a card game (and so are few others). So the very generic term used here can be also plausibly used for other games mentioned there. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:58, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 19:33, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

• Retarget to History of Monopoly#Localizations, licenses, and spin-offs. We should probably remove the link there. But for now, it's the best we can do, and it will also deliver on similarly named topics. For example, I remember playing Monopoly Deal and enjoying it, but not the name, and I wouldn't have batted an eye if you had told me it was called Monopoly: The Card Game. So even if the 1999 game had an article, I'd recommend a hatnote to cover the other games. --BDD (talk) 20:33, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

  Hello, BDD. Retargeting the redirect to that section would be weak. I already told @BOZ this, and I'll tell you, too. The only mention of Monopoly: The Card Game appears in that section as a single, passing reference, not going into depth and lacking a citation. That's why the redirect would therefore be unsuitable for retargeting there. 1isall (talk/contribs) 01:51, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 01:50, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Disambiguation was a choice alongwith deletion, however participants tried and could not come up with a disambiguation page. No prejudice against another attempt at creating it. Jay 💬 11:52, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

• Community government → List of municipalities in the Northwest Territories#Tlicho community governments  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The current target doesn't explain what a community government is, and the term likely has a broader scope beyond the context of a specific Canadian territory. It could also refer to one of the community governments of Belgium, for example. Perhaps this could be converted into a dab page or retargeted to a more defining location. 9ninety (talk) 16:11, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

• Delete or disambig per nom. Government of the Community of Madrid implies this is not an implausible search term for the Spanish community administrations and Local government in Australia#Types of local government includes "community government" in the list of styles used in that country. Thryduulf (talk) 11:30, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
• Disambiguate to make it easier to find the relevant articles. Peter James (talk) 13:04, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete or disamb or turn into own page. Per the above. Thepharoah17 (talk) 17:41, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
• Weak delete I started to draft a disambiguation page but struggled to make one I felt alright about. We might also consider Local government as a rough synonym. Local governance sounds very similar, but probably wouldn't have anything actually called "Community government". --BDD (talk) 20:29, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 01:50, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

• Delete. There is no specific referent and countless loosely related topics that could conceivably fit the description but nothing to constitute a coherent DAB page, per discussion above. --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 06:11, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Rusalkii (talk) 21:18, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

• War 2 → YRF Spy Universe#War 2 (2025)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

"War 2" could be potentially ambiguous, given the existence of War II (comics) and BusterD's comment at Draft:War 2 (2025). So, this redirect should probably be converted into a disambiguation page. GTrang (talk) 00:41, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

• Disambiguate—such a generic phrase doesn't seem to have a primary topic. Also notified Talk:War (Marvel Comics)#"War 2" listed at Redirects for discussion given War II (comics). (Here via request by Kailash29792 at WP:RMT.) Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 19:14, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
• Dabify per nom. Very ambiguous. good god why did they have to make a sequel the og was already bad enough mwwv ^converse∫_edits 01:51, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
• Disambiguate. It could even, with ambiguity, refer to World War II. 🌳 Balsam Cottonwood (talk) ✝ 02:45, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
• Disambig per all above. Thryduulf (talk) 10:51, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
• Disambiguation draft requested (done). Steel1943 (talk) 17:13, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).