Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 June 5

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 17:13, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

• ImmigrationToFinland → Immigration to Finland  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Useless redirect. Implausible typo. Was page’s original title. Thepharoah17 (talk) 22:39, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

• Weak keep as it's unambiguous, and this is also attested (though poorly so, and not always with this exact capitalization) on "immigrationtofinland" google search. Duckmather (talk) 00:05, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete. Target page was at this title for less than a day. Since that day occurred in 2009, this redirect is not old enough to be a valid {{R from CamelCase}}. Steel1943 (talk) 17:38, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
• Weak keep {{R from camel case}} for a redirect created before 2010 per WP:CAMEL, where before 2010, such redirects were still occassionally created (though most stopped in 2005) -- 65.93.183.249 (talk) 19:23, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

  WP:CAMEL has only two years mentioned in it: 2001 & 2002. It's rather unclear how the "...redirect created before 2010 per WP:CAMEL..." stance can be validated or how the arbitrary year "2010" was discovered or cited. Heck, Template:R from CamelCase/doc hints that the cutoff for valid {{R from CamelCase}} redirects ended in 2003: "In 2003, efforts were begun to support the Wikimedia Foundation's goal of increasing access and availability of Wikipedia articles in printed versions. Mainspace redirects from old CamelCase titles are not suitable for a printed version." Steel1943 (talk) 20:05, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

• Delete per Steel1943. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:56, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete as created in error. The creation and subsequent edits of the article under this title on 18 January 2009 were the only edits made by the creator on Wikipedia, except another edit a week later, where he blanked the article. The editor may have been familiar with CamelCase, but not known enwiki titling standards of the time. Jay 💬 10:32, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Cremastra (Go Oilers!) 19:52, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

• BindzsisztánBindzsisztán → Majka (rapper)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I believe this is a satirical reference to a fictional corrupt country mentioned in one of Majka's songs (though I am running the source through Google translate, which isn't always great with non-Indo-European languages). Not mentioned in target, a and confusing without a mention. Rusalkii (talk) 21:35, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

• delete no mention in target. Thepharoah17 (talk) 22:00, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
• Keep. Bindzsisztán is a common Hungarian phrase which stems from a Majka song. It can be useful for Hungarians or anyone interested in Hungarian music or politics. I am even willing to write about Bindzsisztán in the Majka article if the problem is that it isn't mentioned in the target article. Crocusfleur (talk) 09:50, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
• Keep. I added a section to the article discussing the song, mentioning "Bindzsisztán". Kovcszaln6 (talk) 14:41, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
• As nom, happy to keep now that there's a mention. Rusalkii (talk) 17:45, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 08:23, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

• Masahiro Nakai v. Fuji TV → Fuji Television sexual harassment scandal  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I can't find any usage of his phrase anywhere, and it isn't a natural way to refer to it given that the scandal here appears to be Fuji TV covering up Nakai's actions. To me, this redirect strongly implies a lawsuit which does not appear to have happened. Rusalkii (talk) 21:14, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

• delete not useful if there’s no lawsuit. Thepharoah17 (talk) 22:02, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 02:39, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

• Cars 2006 → Cars (film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Too ambiguous. Delete Thepharoah17 (talk) 20:48, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

• At minimum this is ambiguous between Cars (film) and Cars (video game), for which Cars (franchise) is a better target than a dab page. I wondered about a list 2006 car models, but we don't seem to have one. We do have Category:Cars introduced in 2006 but apparently no equivalent list (and nothing about the search term indicates the searcher is wanting only cars introduced in a given year). Further, this is the only title we have starting "Cars 20" and there are none starting "Cars 19" so it's clearly not an established pattern. I'm presently torn between retargetting to Cars (franchise) as ambiguous between only a small number of things we have suitable targets for, and deletion as being too ambiguous when considering possible meanings we don't have articles for too. Thryduulf (talk) 22:32, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
• Weak delete since the redirect in this formation could be confused with attempting to find models of cars for 2006. Steel1943 (talk) 22:58, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete. I agree it's too unclear what someone would be intending to look for. Adumbrativus (talk) 03:57, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to List of songs featured in Shrek. Rusalkii (talk) 02:40, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

• Shrek songShrek song → All Star (song)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Way too ambiguous. Delete Thepharoah17 (talk) 20:44, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
retarget to List of songs featured in Shrek after learning of that page's existence Thepharoah17 (talk) 06:16, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

• Delete. I'm more partial to "Holding Out for a Hero" myself. Steel1943 (talk) 21:55, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

  ...There's the type of page I was looking for, but didn't find earlier: retarget to List of songs featured in Shrek. Steel1943 (talk) 17:39, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

• Retarget to List of songs featured in Shrek. It's admittedly not an article in the greatest shape, but it feels like an appropriate alternative to deletion. Leafy46 (talk) 15:53, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 14:16, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

• Vichy waterVichy water → Mineral water  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mention in the target article. Third-party search results for this phrase are mixed between a potential subtopic of the target article's subject and Vichy Catalán. Steel1943 (talk) 07:48, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

• Remove, Vichy Catalán is the most cogent redirect. Katiedevi (talk) 15:49, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
• Delete There are enough examples of this being used generically to refer to a type of mineral water, e.g. , that I'm not really a fan of redirecting to Vichy Catalán. But it's clearly not covered in mineral water even if it should be. -Elmer Clark (talk) 05:02, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
• Comment: I added Vichy Water Park to Vichy (disambiguation). Jay 💬 10:57, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or retarget to Vichy Catalán or the disambig page?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rusalkii (talk) 20:19, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 17:14, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

• Just Do It (film) → Melissa McCarthy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Cousin Irv from Mars → Melissa McCarthy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Cousin Irv from Mars (film) → Melissa McCarthy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention on target page or Google search results. Looks like a movie that went into production hell. Delete. Thepharoah17 (talk) 19:21, 5 June 2025 (UTC) Actually I did find this: . Ya looks like they went into production hell. Thepharoah17 (talk) 19:37, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

• Delete all per nom. Jay 💬 09:50, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Retarget to Views of Elon Musk#Wikipedia * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 14:14, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

• WokepediaWokepedia → Criticism of Wikipedia#Partisanship  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

"Wokepedia" or "Wokipedia" is not mentioned in the target article. The only thing I know is one of Elon Musk's posts (i.e. tweets) on X [twitter] joking about giving financial compensation if the Wikimedia foundation changes wikipedia to wokepedia (but my statement is completely unsourced and will need searching). Chuterix (talk) 13:53, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

Probably something like this: GoldRomean (talk) 03:38, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: There are secondary sources that mention the "wokepedia" moniker explicitly (e.g. ) so it would be easy to justify adding a sentence to Views of Elon Musk#Science and technology#Wikipedia and retargeting there. Rosbif73 (talk) 08:28, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
• Retarget to Views of Elon Musk#Science and technology#Wikipedia, the "wokipedia" tweet is quoted there and "wokepedia" is a reasonable misrembering. Rusalkii (talk) 20:07, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
• The "properly" spelled Wokipedia also redirects to Criticism_of_Wikipedia#Partisanship, and can be bundled here. Also listed the RfD from last year. Jay 💬 10:33, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 18:07, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

• Retarget per Rusalkii. Thryduulf (talk) 18:25, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
• Comment What about Wookieepedia, Wiccapedia, and Wicapedia? Thepharoah17 (talk) 23:13, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

  Wookieepedia is the only one of those that I could see this maybe being a typo for. --BDD (talk) 20:20, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

  I agree with BDD, this is definitely not a plausible typo or misspelling of the Wiccapedia or Wicapedia. It's not totally implausible as a mispelling of Wookieepedia, but I don't think it's close enough to merit a redirect or dab entry. I might feel differently were it Wokiepedia, Wokeepedia, Wukepedia or something like that (note I'm not encouraging the creation of these) but the redirect we have is much closer to Wokipedia so I see that as the more likely intended destination. Thryduulf (talk) 12:49, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

  Thryduulf, can you clarify on the more likely intended destination? Wokipedia is a redirect itself, so are you suggesting its destination (which is the current target)? Jay 💬 05:43, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

  If someone is using this search therm they are most likely intending "Wokipedia", and the best destination for that is Views of Elon Musk#Wikipedia per the comment from Rusalikii that I explicitly endorse in my !vote. Thryduulf (talk) 09:57, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

• @Chuterix, Rusalkii, and Thryduulf: Do you want to bundle Wokipedia in this discussion? Even though it appears to have been created in 2011, it was actually deleted, and restored only recently by BD2412. Jay 💬 08:13, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

  I am happy with this bundling. Rusalkii (talk) 23:27, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

• Comment, Elon Musk is neither the first nor the last to call Wikipedia "Wokepedia" (or "Wokipedia"), though he is undoubtedly the most prominent. BD2412 T 18:17, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:24, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

• CTGP Revolution → Wiimmfi#CTGP Revolution  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Section at target is deleted (none of the sources were reliable and independent, just fansites), brand new redirect to brand new target serves no purpose. Fram (talk) 09:46, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

• Delete. No mention at GameSpy to where the original target now redirects. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:45, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. There was strong opposition to restoring "defecation". Several !voters were ambivalent between keeping the wiktionary target and deleting; those with an opinion were about evenly split. Rusalkii (talk) 17:19, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

• Taking a load off → Wiktionary:taking a load off  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete this soft redirect. There are no internal links, and very little information in the wiktionary. So this seems to be a kind of bypass. Викидим (talk) 09:29, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

• Retarget: Looking at its history, it's a REALLY old redirect to defecation that recently got changed to a soft redirect instead. So, retarget to defecation since no one objected to it in like a decade. Yelps ᘛ⁠⁐̤⁠ᕐ⁠ᐷ critique me 10:44, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete. Random (inflections of, no less) idiomatic expressions shouldn't have Wikt redirects. Moreover, what the hell? It means to relax or sit down. The very old redirect was probably just vandalism. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 14:28, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete or {{wiktionary redirect}} If I'm going to be honest, I think "Taking a load off" should just use be a {{wiktionary redirect}} template. Wiktionary has a page, but Wikipedia isn't the place for words or phrases. Delete also seems okay. SeaDragon1 (talk) 16:59, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
• Keep Wiktionary or delete. Certainly do not restore "defecation" as the idiom clearly more commonly means "to relax/unburden". Hyphenation Expert (talk) 19:10, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete. Why redirect it to our article about an online dictionary? If I looked for this phrase, I'd be almost as surprised to find it redirected to something about defecation. Nyttend (talk) 06:17, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

  Nobody is suggesting retargetting this to the Wiktionary article, rather they are suggesting soft-redirect to Wikionary's entry wikt:take a load off, which defines the idiom. Thryduulf (talk) 12:54, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

  @Thryduulf: FYI, you may be the only one suggesting the redirect target Wiktionary:take a load off. (Pointing this out since I don't know if you realized Wiktionary:taking a load off exists.) Steel1943 (talk) 19:10, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

  Either are OK, but "take a load off" is more useful as you have to click through to that from "taking a load off" to get any information. Thryduulf (talk) 20:05, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

  I understand what you mean ... but Wikipedia is not equipped to regularly follow activity which occurs on Wikimedia sister projects (with the strong exception of Wikidata). That, and Wiktionary:taking a load off includes an explanation that it is the gerund form of Wiktionary:take a load off and even has it linked to help readers navigate to it. Steel1943 (talk) 20:09, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

• Soft redirect to wikt:take a load off. Where the idiom is explained. The defecation meaning can be added there if it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion (I haven't looked). Thryduulf (talk) 12:55, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Comment: I have fixed the appearance of the nomination: The nomination originally stated that the nominated redirect targeted Wiktionary (an article) when it actually targets Wiktionary:taking a load off (a Wiktionary page). Steel1943 (talk) 15:28, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

• Oppose "retarget to Wiktionary:take a load off". The nominated redirect currently targets Wiktionary:taking a load off, which is a name/title match. (Otherwise, I have no opinion in this.) Steel1943 (talk) 15:31, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
• Keep this soft redirect. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:49, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:57, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

• K.u:K. Armee → Common Army  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

While commonly called the "k.u.k Armee" I believe this format, with the ":", is a typo, as even the edit summary creating it says "K.u.K Armee", and if not is very unlikely. I'd R3 it but it's too old for that. Rusalkii (talk) 22:46, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

It is indeed a typo - it should be visible in the edit history. If this article needs to be deleted, then by all means, go ahead. I just figured it could be useful if someone else made the same spelling mistake I did while typing it in ;) CadiaStands42 (talk) 04:09, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Keep Seems plausible enough to be useful to me. Note that on German keyboards, . and : are on the same key. -Elmer Clark (talk) 03:40, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any further thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:56, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

• Comment is this ever spelled KüK Armee or similar? If so, the umlaut is being spelled using ASCII-formatted text -- 65.93.183.249 (talk) 20:06, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete. Unclear why 'u' gets special preference for the typo, and not the first and second 'k', unless of course if we get an answer to IP65's question. Jay 💬 05:52, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per Jay. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 14:13, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Retarget to Balneotherapy. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 14:12, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

• Sulphur bathSulphur bath → Mineral water  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in the target article, leaving the connection between the redirect and the target unclear. Steel1943 (talk) 07:47, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

• Delete - Not related - WP:R#DELETE "The redirect makes no sense" Asteramellus (talk) 01:41, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
• Delete Retarget to Balneotherapy per Jay below (changed 6/18). The article did sort of obliquely refer to sulfur baths until this edit by User:Livven. I'm not entirely sure about that edit - a lot of cited material cited to journals and CDC articles was removed as "unnecessary and misleading information" - but I don't think this would have been a very useful redirect even to the old version. -Elmer Clark (talk) 05:06, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

  Unrelated to the deletion discussion, but I do want to clarify the reason behind my edit: the previous content would be as if the Multivitamin article had a section "Positive effects of multivitamins" that listed all the vitamins and their positive effects. Which may sound reasonable on the surface, but if you actually look at the article and check research on multivitamins you'll find that evidence for positive effects from multivitamin intake is weak, because most people already get enough from their regular diet.

  So even though vitamins in general are needed for health, a "Positive effects of multivitamins" section would be quite misleading, as it implies positive effects from a specific product (multivitamins) that don't exist. It would also be unnecessary, because the articles for individual vitamins presumably already contain information on their respective positive effects.

  The same logic applies to the Mineral water article. Certainly some of the minerals will have positive effects (which the previous content did have citations for), but that doesn't mean mineral water itself has positive effects, because the amounts are negligible compared to other dietary sources (e.g. calcium) and are often not be higher than tap water in the first place. So the "Positive effects of mineral water" section which I deleted was indeed misleading, and also unnecessary considering that articles for individual minerals already exist. Livven (talk) 18:21, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. And given the activity level on Talk:Mineral water and clear general lack of interest in the article, I understand just unilaterally going for it. -Elmer Clark (talk) 20:49, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

• Retarget to Balneotherapy which is a target better than Mineral spring, target of Sulphur spring. Jay 💬 10:47, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:52, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

• Retarget per Jay and tag with r from subtopic. Cremastra (Go Oilers!) 20:36, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. There was no consensus to delete both. There was an opinion to delete only Infused Water per the capitalization, but there was no consensus for that as well. There was agreement that Drinking water is not an appropriate target, hence retargeting Infused Water to Infusion. Jay 💬 12:44, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

• Infused waterInfused water → Infusion  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Infused WaterInfused Water → Drinking water  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

These redirects should either have their targets synched or should both be deleted. I have no strong stance either way ... but am defaulting to weak delete if by chance there is no participation since I'm not certain these phrases can describe any specific subject. Steel1943 (talk) 07:09, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Note, Infused waterInfused water has a WP:BLAR'ed article hiding in its history, potentially a {{R with history}}. Steel1943 (talk) 07:11, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Delete: Most of the Google results for "Infused water" are references to fruit/herb-infused water, which we don't have a page on at the moment. So it would be unhelpful for the vast majority of people familiar with the term "infused water". --Plantman (talk) 07:21, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

• Comment Infused water wasn't BLARed, it was redirected due to the consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infused water in 2017. Pinging the still-active participants @Bon courage, City of Silver, MjolnirPants, Roxy the dog, Bonadea, JzG, and Bearian:. Thryduulf (talk) 15:35, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

  Thanks, I can't see the deleted content but as I recall it was complete bollocks and nothing was merged. Guy (help! - typo?) 15:38, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

  It's still in the history of the redirect, and you are correct, it's bollocks. Just ad-copy language extolling the benefits of drinking it. Nothing useful to merge, really. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 16:00, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

  Thanks for the ping. I recall this, even though my !vote was rather succinct.

  The capital W page was created, then moved over a redirect to the lowercase w page. The lowercase w was, at some point, a redirect to Drinking water, so a bot came along and fixed the double redirect by changing the capital W's target to the drinking water article. Later, the lowercase w's redirect was removed and it was written up as an article extolling the virtues of drinking fruit and vegatable-infused water. That's where that prior AfD came into play. That resulted in the lowercase w being blanked and redirected to Infusion.

  And now here we are.

  I'm going to be bold and change the capital W's redirect target. If this discussion forms a contrary consensus, feel free to revert me and implement it. 16:11, 28 May 2025 (UTC) ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 16:11, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

  ...Which I have reverted per the hidden note generated by the {{Rfd}} template that states not to do that. If synching needs to occur, that can be performed at the conclusion of this discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 20:42, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

  ...Yep, that's an AfD. Read through the edit history too quickly. (But ... it is still technically a WP:BLAR since nothing was merged...) Steel1943 (talk) 16:57, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

• Smerge - as I write years ago, a few sentences are all they need. Bearian (talk) 16:34, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
• Retarget Infused Water to Infusion (aka the current status quo as of MjolnirPants's boldness). Infusion covers infused water, Drinking water does not. -Elmer Clark (talk) 05:14, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:51, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

• Delete Infused Water which at that capitalisation infers a proper name such as a brand name. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:12, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete Infused Water per Shhhnotsoloud. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 14:11, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
• Target both at Infusion where infused water is covered. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:56, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Rusalkii (talk) 17:23, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

• Miley cryusMiley cryus → Miley Cyrus  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Useless redirect. Swapping the y and the r completely change how you say the word. Cyber the tiger🐯 (talk) 04:41, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Perhaps an attempt at a pejorative name. Mdewman6 (talk) 06:56, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
• Keep as a typo. DrinksOrCoffee_talk^Contribs 08:54, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and Mdewman6. Not plausible enough, and likely created as a pejorative name. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:21, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
• Keep Quick internet search returns only earnest typos but no obvious pejorative uses. Brigandeur (talk) 09:57, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete. Random typos have no WP:AFFINITY to their target and should be neither created nor kept without some case-specific reason. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 15:02, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete. An easy typo is reasonable, as is a non-capitalised version, but the two together don't seem sufficiently plausible. Nyttend (talk) 06:19, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
• Weak keep adjacent character transpositions are a very common category of typo ; and entering it as all lower case (As this is, since Wikipedia does not distinguish for the leading-M between M and m) is a style some people use all the time -- 65.93.183.249 (talk) 20:09, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete for 2 errors. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:13, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
• Keep per Brigandeur - not a pejorative, unless someone explains how it is. Urban Dictionary's definition compares her with Britney Spears, which is fine, for that website. Lowercase is not an issue either, per IP65. This common typo exists within article content as well, (and I haven't fixed it yet), in List of Miley Cyrus live performances and Rachel, Jack and Ashley Too. Jay 💬 06:27, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

  Also listed the 2013 RfD. Jay 💬 06:35, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

  Note that in Rachel, Jack and Ashley Too, the typo is part of a quote from the cited article, present in the original. Another example of how pervasive this variant is. Brigandeur (talk) 18:29, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

• Keep: harmless, common typo. Nothing has changed since the last RfD. Cremastra (Go Oilers!) 20:35, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:25, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

• Miley yrus → Miley Cyrus  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unlikely misspelling. Missing the first letter of a word makes it less likely then say if it misses the u for example. Cyber the tiger🐯 (talk) 04:37, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. We should not have redirects for missing letters of titles with no particular affinity over other missing letters. Mdewman6 (talk) 06:56, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
• Weak keep single character omissions are a very likely category of typo -- 65.93.183.249 (talk) 20:08, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete this error. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:14, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per Mdewman6. I have listed the 2013 RfD, where it was kept at the time as part of a bulk nomination, but there was an opinion that Miley yrus is not a good redirect. Jay 💬 06:49, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 14:25, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

• PenesPenes → Penis  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not a likely misspelling. Although that's how you say "penis" in Spanish, this is not the Spanish Wikipedia. This could also redirect to somewhere else. Cyber the tiger🐯 (talk) 04:24, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

• Keep as it is bolded in the lede as a related term. Mdewman6 (talk) 06:53, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
• Keep as a standard {{R from plural}}. Thryduulf (talk) 11:43, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
• Keep. Unless there's a very good reason, we should never delete plurals. Nyttend (talk) 06:20, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
• Keep: valid plural, see the Latin and English section on Wiktionary. --Schützenpanzer (Talk) 15:19, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
• Keep - yes it is ambiguous, which is why we have Penes (disambiguation), that lists the current target as the primary topic. I have also listed the 2019 RfD. Jay 💬 07:00, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 07:01, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

• Defackating → Defecation  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

not a very likely misspelling Cyber the tiger🐯 (talk) 04:10, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

• Delete as implausible; very few results on google. Duckmather (talk) 00:12, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete Implausible Thepharoah17 (talk) 00:17, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete unlikely typo. --Schützenpanzer (Talk) 15:03, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn, I'm handling this at WP:RM/TR, where a request has been made. (non-admin closure) Toadspike [Talk] 10:38, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

• Prakriti → Prakṛti  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Suggesting to delete this redirect. Prakṛti with IAST in article title should be renamed to the one without IAST (which is this redirect page) as suggested on talk page Talk:Prakṛti similar to Samkhya and Purusha for consistency. Once this page is deleted, Prakṛti can be moved to Prakriti. Asteramellus (talk) 01:41, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

• Possibly wrong forum per the nom's last sentence. Sounds like a move request for moving Prakṛti to Prakriti. Steel1943 (talk) 16:54, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
• Yeah, I agree with Steel; this looks more of a move request rather than a proposal to delete/retarget a redirect. I suggest withdrawing this in the meantime and follow the instructions at WP:RM to start a move discussion on the subject talk page. ToadetteEdit (talk) 17:43, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

  A move discussion was started on the talk page around a month ago. This purpose of this discussion seems to be to just remove the Prakriti redirect. I'm assuming that if the move, which is uncontroversial, takes place then the redirect dissolves? Katiedevi (talk) 15:12, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

• Withdrawn : As suggested by Steel1943 and ToadetteEdit, I have requested a move. Asteramellus (talk) 01:13, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).