Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 November 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 1

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 1, 2025.

The Sims 2: Nightlife (old)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:G6. voorts (talk/contributions) 17:06, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

No longer necessary; revision history has been transferred to The Sims 2: Nightlife and other articles. Ionmars10 (talk) 23:09, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Undisturbed

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:41, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

These adjectives are certainly associated with the concept described at the target, but are not mentioned there, and I'm not sure their association with the target is so strong as to justify these redirects. Mdewman6 (talk) 22:17, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete. These are adjectives that could be applied to any number of things. I agree there's some association but not enough to justify these. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 16:46, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Untitled (2024 Beyoncé album)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:41, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

This should be deleted. It is neither useful nor accurate, as Cowboy Carter has a title and was released almost two years ago. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 22:04, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete. There was a time when the album's title was unknown, but the album has never been referred to as "Untitled". WP:G6 probably applies here as this is a relic from a page move. मल्ल (talk) 17:24, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Dolly P

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn. This was a weak nomination. That said, no objection to re-nomination if another editor feels this is an inappropriate redirect. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 20:17, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

There is a song on the album called "Dolly P", featuring one Dolly Parton. The album was, apparently, recorded in part at "Dolly P's Studio", a place that is has all of two hits on Google. (I suspect Dolly recorded her vocals at her home studio and they made up this studio name for the album, or something like that.) Neither the Beyoncé song (ft. Dolly) nor album are likely to be the primary target. I'm inclined to delete since I don't think Dolly Parton really goes by "Dolly P" but that's the obvious target if this is not deleted. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 21:55, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Keep. Unless there's evidence Dolly Parton goes by Dolly P, the topic readers are most likely to be searching for is the song. Additionally, the collaboration between Parton and Beyoncé is described in the Cowboy Carter article. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:58, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Always Fun

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:41, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

The only mention of this phrase at the target is the slogan in the television station's logo (we have tried in recent years to not normally mention slogans in broadcast station articles). Even at that, it seems highly unlikely that anyone actually searching for this phrase on Wikipedia would be looking for KDAF. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:56, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

IHeartTelevision

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:42, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

There has never been any television operation by this name. Clear Channel completed the sale of its television station group (which is the subject of the section this redirects to) before the iHeartRadio platform ever existed, much less the name change of Clear Channel to iHeartMedia. (As far as I am aware the television presentations of iHeart events also do not use "iHeartTelevision" in any form.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:51, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wick flick

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:50, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

This seems to be a variant method of speed reload publicized by Wick, which we don't mention in the target article. Also somewhat ambiguous with "Wick flick" as in "movie about Wick", though the speed reload meaning seems primary after a quick search. Rusalkii (talk) 04:28, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Just trying to understand. Who or what is "Wick"? Is it something about John Wick? Jay 💬 18:53, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Z E T A3 19:30, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete. The listing comment is a little unclear but a web search confirms a "Wick flick" is a speed reloading technique featured in the John Wick movies. There is chatter about it online but it doesn't seem notable enough to warrant coverage at the current target nor at any of the articles about the films. Since readers seeking information won't find any, it should be deleted. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 19:50, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Islamfeindlichkeit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:50, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

Fails WP:RLANG PARAKANYAA (talk) 05:50, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Z E T A3 19:30, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete per RLANG. This is just a straight-up translation, like having Agua redirect to Water. (An overly literal translation is closer to "hostility against Islam", but it's the word used for the same purpose that we use Islamophobia in English.) WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:41, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom and WhatamIdoing. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 19:51, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wokerati

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft redirect to Wikt:wokerati. voorts (talk/contributions) 18:54, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

Delete or maybe soft redirect to wikt:wokerati. The section no longer exists and the term is not used. It's not a synonym for woke or wokeness but is a pejorative for people who might be dismissively referred to as woke SJWs. The meaning is non-obvious on its own. I'd understand it if I read/heard it in context but presumably anyone searching for this has encountered it somewhere and is seeking clarification. Some will be able to infer the meaning it but it seems more helpful to send them somewhere that actually defines it. It does appear in several articles, mostly but not exclusively in reference to the incredible quote "Guardian-reading, tofu-eating wokerati". --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 04:55, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 05:19, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 06:19, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
  • I maintain my original position with a preference for deletion. Search results provide the Wiktionary link plus several articles where "wokerati" appears in direct quotations. This provides a definition and real-world context that is not found at Woke. Note that Woke does appear in the search results because the word "wokerati" appears in the references but is not used in the article body. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 21:45, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Well it looks like one unhappy customer did use the wokerati redirect, if I'm interpreting this correctly: Talk:Wokerati#Is Wikipedia Woke (in a bad way)?. I doubt they would have been satisfied no matter where they landed so this doesn't help us much in determining what is helpful to readers 🤷🏾‍♂️ —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 15:04, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Z E T A3 19:30, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Soft redirect to wikt:wokerati. The dictionary can provide fuller context for a pejorative term than a simple Wikilink could. Rare instances where the word needs to be linked within Wikipedia can use the markup [[woke]]rati. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 09:43, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Fuck It, Lose it All

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:42, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Seems to be a lyric to a song that is not discussed anywhere on wiki. (Other wiki language versions have it listed as a 2012 album, but that doesn't seem to exist.) voorts (talk/contributions) 18:06, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Also the capitalization is odd. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 06:02, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Vināyak Dāmodar Sāvarkar

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 18:25, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

No one searches using macrons. It is way too niche. As seen from its page information, throughout the entirity of the past decade of its existence, the redirect has only gotten barely a hundred views. It has not proven itself to be a useful redirect for most users and should be deleted. — EarthDude (Talk) 17:47, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

  • Keep because Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap. It literally costs us more to delete this kind of thing than to leave it alone. WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:44, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
    Also: Yes, you're right that nobody is likely to manually type macrons into the search box. But people do copy/paste unfamiliar names and words into the search box. WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:45, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Keep, assuming the use of macrons is accurate or at the very least a transliteration variant one might reasonably encounter. It is standard practice to include transliterated/romanized versions of names, sometimes multiple. Note that for many subjects the name is given in native script with common or official transliterations either in the lead or infobox or both. This usually makes verifying the appropriateness of RLANG redirects straightforward. Due to special guidance at WP:INDICSCRIPT, native scripts are omitted from India-related articles (although strictly speaking this doesn't prohibit transcriptions using macrons).—Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 20:02, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Nguyễn Vũ Ngọc Trâm

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:42, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

No information on subject on redirected article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:13, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 23:41, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Lee Song-yeon

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:42, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

No information on subject on redirected article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:12, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 23:41, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Dulanya Karunaratna

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:42, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

No information on subject on redirected article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:11, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 23:41, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Malayka Mohamed

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:42, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

No information on subject on redirected article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:10, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 23:41, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Micah Henares Cruz

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

No information on subject on redirected article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:08, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 23:41, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Nicole Joy

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

No information on subject on redirected article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:07, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 23:41, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Kim Tae-yeon (badminton)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

No information on subject on redirected article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:06, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 23:41, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Mandy Duijndam

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

No information on subject on redirected article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:05, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 23:41, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Eva Sarena

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

No information on subject on redirected article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:03, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 23:41, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Fatema Rabie

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

No information on subject on redirected article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:02, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 23:41, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Anne Pinke

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

No information on subject on redirected article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:02, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 23:41, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Indians in New Jersey

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to New Jersey#Race and ethnicity. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 14:44, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

This article certainly covers the topic of Indians in northern New Jersey, but I feel a bit mislead by this redirect on the whole. I was reading Little India and the article linked to here from the New Jersey section, and I was expecting to read an article about Indians in New Jersey in general, but it's very specific to the New York area. I think this redirect would be best deleted to encourage article creation, possibly being split out of Indians in the New York metropolitan area Casablanca 🪨(T) 15:22, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Looking at this, it could also be ambiguous with Native Americans in New Jersey. Maybe a disambiguation page might be better? – Epicgenius (talk) 20:18, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
      • Two thoughts:

1) The vast majority of (around 85%) of Indian Americans in New Jersey live in Central and Northern New Jersey, within the New York metropolitan area, and the recipient article details a lot about Indian Americans in New Jersey. A far smaller minority (15%) live in South Jersey, within the Philadelphia area. There’s also no separate article for Indians in the Philadelphia area. So it makes practical sense for all intents and purposes to redirect Indians in New Jersey to Indians in the New York metropolitan area, per WP:DUE. 2) The term ‘Indians’ to describe Native Americans is outmoded and deprecated and in fact now considered generally offensive to the Native American community, who have often expressed a preference to be known as the original Americans. Therefore, I don’t believe we should be encouraging at all (via creation of a disambiguation page) the thought process of going backward to a reference to Native Americans as ‘Indians’. Castncoot (talk) 06:45, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

  • Native Americans are still widely referred to as "American Indians" or "Indians". Redirects are meant to guide readers to articles that they may be looking for, even if some in the community may view the term as offensive. voorts (talk/contributions) 16:43, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Keep as is. The general New Jersey article contains almost nothing specific about Indians in New Jersey, even in the Race and ethnicity section; while Indians in the New York metropolitan area contains a tremendous breadth and depth of detail describing the very significant culture of the Indian diaspora in New Jersey, which is ultimately what readers are looking for. Best, Castncoot (talk) 04:20, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Retarget per Voorts. There's lots of Indian Americans in Central Jersey and South Jersey too, so limiting the target to the NYC metro area is incomplete. (I highly recommend Sandalwood Indian Kitchen in Rio Grande.) The section of the New Jersey article has a solid paragraph on Indian Americans in NJ, including a mention that Central Jersey, not the NYC metro area, has the densest population of them. If that isn't enough content, then the solution is to expand the section. (Or maybe it's due for a split?) As to the question of two meanings of "Indians", the sense referring to indigenous Americans is not invalid, and is still used in many context by American Indians themselves—note that the terms "(American) Indian" and "Native American" are not strictly synonymous, and the former has legal significance in the U.S.—but given that "American" is usually prefixed in that case, I would say Indian Americans are weakly the primary topic for "Indians in X". Not that that really matters with this particular proposed target, since it covers both groups. But if a standalone article were to be written, I think Indian Americans would be primary, with a hatnote to content regarding American Indians / Native Americans. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|🤷) 06:27, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Retarget to New Jersey#Race and ethnicity. This target addresses the two major concerns: statewide coverage vs. NYC metro and ambiguity surrounding the meaning of "Indians", and it contains links to the other articles for more detailed coverage. I agree with Tamzin that New Jersey#Race and ethnicity is a suitable place to expand coverage as appropriate. I would also support eventual creation of a standalone article. That can be done at any time using the title Indians in New Jersey or with another title. Details about the content and title of that article may need to be workshopped. If there is rough consensus about what to do with this redirect now, I would not delay closing this discussion based solely on the potential for future article creation. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 17:05, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Operation Strike Fear

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:44, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

I proposed this page for deletion when it was a 2-entry disambiguation page that failed MOS:DABMENTION. The PROD was removed and it was redirected as it stands today, by @Katzrockso:. I posted at Talk:Galactic Empire (Star Wars)#Operation Strike Fear: "if we're going to have Operation Strike Fear redirecting to Galactic Empire (Star Wars)#Galactic Civil War "in accordance with usage online" can we please have a mention of the term at that section?" but no such mention has been added. I therefore think it should be deleted. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:54, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Delete per mom. Redirects like this don’t serve readers. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 15:20, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wikipedia:READABILITY

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Wikipedia:Readability tools. Uncontested WP:SILENT consensus for the nominator's proposal. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 11:14, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Redirect to WP:readability tools, as that new page created by User:WhatamIdoing actually talks about how to make articles readable in the common sense of the word. The user essay it now points to is less focussed, and just a user essay. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 07:47, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Islamophobie

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 18:56, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

Fails WP:RLANG PARAKANYAA (talk) 05:52, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

  • Keep, plausible typo. Geschichte (talk) 10:36, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. I disagree with the assertion that this is a plausible typo or misspelling. "-phobia" is a common suffix in English and a and e are not next to each other and are not typed with the same finger on standard English keyboards. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 21:48, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
    As someone speaking English as a second language, I often typo based on muscle memory. The Dutch word for 'or' is 'of', which is a typo I regularly make when writing English. Similarly, 'phobie' is the suffix in French, and might come out due to muscle memory. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 07:38, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 06:47, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
Delete per nom and Myceteae. drdr150 (they/she) (Yell at me Spy on me) 20:15, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete - we don't need French-sounding equivalents of all phobias on enwiki. Jay 💬 12:49, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Racisme anti-arabe

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 November 9#Racisme anti-arabe

Attentát

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:08, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

Term not mentioned at target. I would redirect it to attentat (the word simply means a criminal attack in French, usually in reference to terrorism), but this word does not have a diacritic in it. PARAKANYAA (talk) 05:35, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Could potentially redirect to Atentát as an R from misspelling as it is only one letter off. Traumnovelle (talk) 06:45, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
I don't feel strongly but I wouldn't object. PARAKANYAA (talk) 06:52, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Per The Battle Against Anarchist Terrorism, the attentat was the French term for the assassinations and bombings carried out by anarchists during the late-19th and early 20th centuries. The term isn't yet included in the article because this is one of countless articles I have on my "get to improving when I'm less burnt out" backlog. --Grnrchst (talk) 09:27, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Yeah, and it doesn’t have the diacritic. This is certainly not the ptopic for the rather common word “attentat” (which is used in many terrorist cases, not just that time) PARAKANYAA (talk) 14:59, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There seems to be a couple of potential retarget ideas mentioned, but I'm not seeing much decisive support for them.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 06:46, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete. I can't determine a suitable target. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:04, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete. The reason for the current target is entirely unclear. We have a couple suggestions as R from misspelling/diacritic but no basis to select any the most likely meaning. The redirect has only 166 "all-time" pageviews and no incoming links. Note that 17 of these views or ≈10% were from a single day in November 2015 and 7 occurred since this nomination. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 20:27, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Blue Jays

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 November 8#Blue Jays

HIPPA

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act#Misspelling as HIPPA with a hatnote to Hippa. Closing this early per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 04:52, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

The only spelling at the DAB that's ever all-caps'd, as far as I can tell, is Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act § Misspelling as HIPPA (currently linked to on the DAB through HIPPA (misspelling)HIPPA (misspelling)). Retarget there as the primary topic for that spelling under WP:DIFFCAPS. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|🤷) 03:58, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

OK, the reason I moved to HIPPA (misspelling)HIPPA (misspelling) was to allow intentional links from misspellings. So if, in the future, if someone links to HIPPAHIPPA, rather than than turning up at the links-to-disambiguation patrol WP:disambiguation pages with links, those will turn up on WP:Database reports/Linked misspellings, where someone (probably me) will either correct the spelling if the link was unintentional or change it to HIPPA (misspelling)HIPPA (misspelling) if the link was intentional (e.g., DIFF). – wbm1058 (talk) 09:18, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
While "HIPPA" is literally a misspelling, I don't think it would actually be correct to categorize it as an {{r from misspelling}}, since it would be pointing to a section about the misspelling as an encyclopedic subject, rather than just the correct spelling of the thing. The fact that it can also be linked by someone who is misspelling the word is annoying, but usually doesn't override PTOPIC. It would be nice if we had some way to track "pages that aren't categorically invalid to link to, but probably aren't what you meant to link to". This also happens with SIAs a lot; for instance I created the SIA self-inflicted wound, and get notifications once every few weeks that someone's linked to it. There are a minority of cases where it really is the best link, but usually someone wants something more precise. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|🤷) 09:52, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
Oh, I see that Trivialist marked it as a misspelling back in 2012 when it was just an article link. Then when it was changed to a section link in 2019, the {{R from misspelling|HIPAA}} could have been removed. That would be another way to solve it. – wbm1058 (talk) 10:45, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Retarget HIPPA to Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and tag as {{R from misspelling}}. This is a pervasive error and the primary topic is the act itself, not a discussion of the misspelling. This error finds its way into published sources and hospital and medical practice sites and is even more common in informal and unedited sources. (The fact that the misspelling is covered in the HIPAA article speaks to its prominence.) wbm1058's solution to have a separate HIPPA (misspelling) redirect to allow for intentional linking to the discussion of the error makes sense and that redirect should not be tagged as {{R from misspelling}}. The misspelled HIPPA should be treated no differently than other common misspellings: redirect to page for the correct spelling and monitor and correct use in articles. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 19:40, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Retarget per nom. {{R from incorrect name}} and R acronym / R section. Hyphenation Expert (talk) 15:39, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Retarget per above and add a hatnote to Hippa. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:56, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
    Also, I removed the redlink entry from the DAB page as well as Hippa Island, which isn't mentioned at Haida Gwaii. I think the DAB page is unnecessary. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:58, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI