Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 25

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:29, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

• Draft:Tropical Disturbance AL98 → Tropical Storm Melissa (2025)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Since the article it points to (Tropical Storm Melissa (2025)) has been moved to mainspace, I don't think this redirect should exist anymore. As invest names are rotated, the number 98 will certainly be used in the next season, if not this one, and having this point to a specific storm is not needed. Previous storms have also been designated as 98L/AL98 as well. HurricaneZeta (T) (C) 23:36, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Strong and speedy delete – as unnecessary and highly ambiguous. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 23:39, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

I tried to speedy delete (R3), but apparently it doesn't meet the requirements as it's a correct name (see edit history). HurricaneZeta (T) (C) 00:52, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Doesn't matter if its speedy or not. Still strongly support deletion. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 03:04, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Strong sypport: Ambiguous titles, applicable to multiple systems this season, and not useful as redirects. Drdpw (talk) 00:28, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Strong support - AL98 is a designation that will be reused NomzEditingWikis (talk) 20:08, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete permanent protection; the other listed redirects should be discussed in greater detail in separate RfDs. ^Complex/_Rational 23:32, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

• Permanent protection → Wikipedia:Protection policy#Permanent protection  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This cross-namespace redirect has existed for 3 years, but I believe there is also a reason to delete: See this. Additionally, moving this redirect to the project space is not a reason to keep because there is already a project space page with the same title. - BᴏᴅʜıHᴀᴙᴩ (talk, contributions) 22:26, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

• Comment There also exists Protect a page which targets the same target from mainspace. BodhiHarp, could I bundle that into this nomination as it has a very similar rationale for deletion? Casablanca 🪨^(T) 22:30, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

  @Casablanca Rock I'm not sure about that one. - BᴏᴅʜıHᴀᴙᴩ (talk, contributions) 22:33, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

That's fine! Upon research, there are a lot of mainspace redirects to Wikipedia:Protection policy, they are:

• Protect a page
• 30/500 Protection
• Creation ProtectionCreation Protection
• Creation ProtectedCreation Protected
• Move Protection
• Move ProtectedMove Protected
• Upload protectionUpload protection
• Upload ProtectedUpload Protected
• Template protectionTemplate protection
• Template protectedTemplate protected
• Permanently protected
• Office protectedOffice protected
• Office protectionOffice protection
• Cascading protectionCascading protection
• Cascade protectedCascade protected
• Cascade protectionCascade protection
• Cascading protectedCascading protected

Casablanca 🪨^(T) 22:34, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

• Delete. I'd like to see all these deleted as unnecessary and undesirable WP:cross-namespace redirects. Even where they are not ambiguous, it seems unlikely that someone who knows enough about Wikipedia to know that pages can be protected, would not know about project space. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:55, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
• Delete no Google results appear to be for the policy. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:50, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
• Delete. In the non-Wikipedia namespace world, this phrase is far too vague. Steel1943 (talk) 21:08, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ^Complex/_Rational 23:31, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

• Sprunki Phase 3 → Incredibox  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:30, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Thanks, 1isall (he/him) (talk | contribs) 21:49, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

• Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:02, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ^Complex/_Rational 23:31, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

• Sexual laws in the United States → Sodomy laws in the United States  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Sexuality laws in the United States → Sodomy laws in the United States  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

"Sexual laws" could be laws on rape, selling sex, the age of consent, etc. Personally I'd prefer deletion as this seems like a rather strange construction but I could see a dab as well. Sexual law redirects to Sex and the law, which contains very minimal country-specific content. Rusalkii (talk) 21:00, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. The subject is far broader than 'sodomy' and specific laws in the United States are not discussed in any detail at Sex and the law. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 20:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

• Delete - Agree, Sex and the Law is really a broad topic, there are US specific articles but because law varies state by state, it would be hard to make an equivalent "US" article, the more specific ones like Child sexual abuse laws in the United States are too specific. Denaar (talk) 23:19, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Readded to {{Fornax}}. (non-admin closure) J947 ‡ ^edits 03:05, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

• Upsilon FornacisUpsilon Fornacis → List of stars in Fornax  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Apparently the star doesn’t exist. It doesn’t appear anywhere on the web, not even the redirected page, so deletion seems very reasonable. Astronomical Editor (talk) 14:06, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

The designation exists. It appears on this chart from Bode's Urangraphia and is shown in Uranometria Argentina. Gould lists it as HD 17627, magnitude 6.9, although it seems to me more likely that it would be magnitude-5.9 HD 16975. Lacaillie's planisphere seems too simple to determine for sure and Bode's star positions are somewhat fanciful. Either way, the name has dropped out of use. Lithopsian (talk) 16:51, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

It is now listed at the redirect target. Lithopsian (talk) 21:01, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

In Fornax#Stars, there is a line mentioning Upsilon as two stars. So if these designations are confirmed, it could mean it is a binary star or an optical double. Astronomical Editor (talk) 09:38, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

HD 17627 is a double star, probably a wide binary, component magnitudes about 7 and 8 separated by 5". Wagman lists υ¹ at magnitude 6.7 and υ² at magnitude 8.5. It isn't clear who else, if anyone, used the superscripted designations. Lithopsian (talk) 15:33, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

• I have removed it from {{Fornax}}. Jay 💬 18:32, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Does the newly-claimed existence of this designation warrant keeping the redirect? Or should it still be deleted?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 19:44, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

• Keep per WP:HEY. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:23, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
• Keep Looks to have been satisfactorily resolved. I assume that means it can be added back to the navbox too. --BDD (talk) 03:27, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 18:19, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

• Faye Huo → Australia national badminton team  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No information on subject on redirected article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:07, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Katiedevi (talk) 00:54, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
• Delete to encourage article creation, WP:RFD#D10. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:58, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 18:30, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

• Aahna Bhatia → England national badminton team  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No information on subject on redirected article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:02, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Katiedevi (talk) 00:55, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

  There are few articles about her, would be worth deleting the redirect and adding her to the WiR list instead. Katiedevi (talk) 00:58, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

• Delete to encourage article creation, WP:RFD#D10. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:58, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:21, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 18:31, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

• Olga Szwarnowiecka → Poland national badminton team  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No information on subject on redirected article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:00, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Katiedevi (talk) 00:58, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
• Delete to encourage article creation, WP:RFD#D10. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:58, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:21, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 18:36, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

• Lucy Yang → Canada national badminton team  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No information on subject on redirected article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:55, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. There are 2 articles mentioning her so it would also be worth adding her name to the WiR list. Katiedevi (talk) 01:00, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
• Delete to encourage article creation, WP:RFD#D10. Ambiguous IRL with a journalist with several citations in Enwiki. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:01, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:21, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 18:40, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

• Ip Sum Yau → Hong Kong national badminton team  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No information on subject on redirected article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:55, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Katiedevi (talk) 01:01, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
• Delete to encourage article creation, WP:RFD#D10. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:02, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:22, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 15:56, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

• Temple Mills depotTemple Mills depot → Temple Mills Depot  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete. Just a small capitalization difference. The extra lemma is useless and disturbing when searching, the article can be found without problems with the search engine DovaModaal (talk) 12:11, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Keep. Plausible and useful search term, even though capitalization doesn't matter with the search function in MediaWiki. Thanks, 1isall (he/him) (talk | contribs) 17:06, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

• Keep, has had a use since 2009. Geschichte (talk) 09:19, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ^Complex/_Rational 13:59, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

• Zendaya's Hat Theory → Zendaya  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

not mentioned in the target page -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:52, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

• Delete. No mention of her hat here. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:06, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:22, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
• Create entry and {{Visible anchor}} under List of Internet phenomena#Other phenomena or #Images and retarget to the entry's anchor. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 17:21, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
• Delete. The "Hat Theory" is non-notable. There is only a smattering of coverage online in reliable sources. This is a very minor phenomenon whose inclusion is WP:UNDUE at Zendaya or List of Internet phenomena. Despite the AfD conclusion, the content was never actually merged into Zendaya. There were several days, and several edits to Zendaya's Hat Theory, between May 18, 2025 when the AfD closed and the eventual redirect creation with the edit summary "redirect, merge can be discussed on Talk:Zendaya"(Special:Diff/1291986137). An edit request at Talk:Zendaya#Semi-protected edit request on 11 May 2025 was initiated the day the AfD was listed and addressed after its close. The result was that content regarding "Zendaya Hat Theory" was not added to Zendaya. I concur with the conclusion of multiple editors that this content should not be added. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 21:26, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Paper hanger. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 06:50, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

• PaperhangerPaperhanger → Cheque fraud  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• PaperhangersPaperhangers → Cheque fraud  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Paper hangingPaper hanging → Cheque fraud  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I'm unsure about this redirect. A paperhanger refers to someone who lays wallpaper, although we do not appear to have an article on this. Someone encountering the term in that context will be confused to end up here. I think wallpaper might be a suitable target but the page doesn't discuss those who lay wallpaper. Of the 3 mainspace uses of this redirect all are not referring to the criminal activity but instead wallpaper hanging. Traumnovelle (talk) 06:41, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Katiedevi (talk) 00:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
• Added PaperhangersPaperhangers. @Traumnovelle: did you also want to include Paper hangingPaper hanging? Retarget to Paper hanger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views); will notify its talk of this discussion. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 01:55, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

  I somehow missed the alternate spacing. The paper hanger dab page is probably the best option and I think the other forms should redirect there too. Traumnovelle (talk) 02:18, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

  Paper_hanging added. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 15:33, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

• Retarget all to Paper hanger. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 21:28, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Retarget all to Paper hanger per Myceteae. Thanks, 1isall (he/him) (talk | contribs) 11:21, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 02:50, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

• No wife, no horse, no mustache → Western esotericism  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This appears to have never been mentioned at the target. I looked. This is a quote from a novel by Robert Anton Wilson, but not mentioned in the article. I don't think he originated the quote since it appears in some older magazines but mostly him. This pops up in like a dozen of his books with no meaning and no context. I added it to Wikiquote, because it's funny, but there is no reason for it to redirect here. PARAKANYAA (talk) 06:28, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

• Delete. The saying isn't explained anywhere and is not unambiguously associated with a single subject. Several sources online indicate it originates from West Point. There is a 1956 episode of TV Reader's Digest about a West Point cadet titled No Horse, No Wife, No Mustache (same phrase just re-ordered). West Point and Wilson are the most common references I found but there's also a seemingly non-notable album with this name. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 19:18, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

  The impression I have is Wilson read the Reader's Digest piece or something like it and then just started inserting the phrase in all of his books like his own personal Occult Hand. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:12, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

  I think it could be something like that. I didn't attempt a thorough source analysis but references I found were about 60–40 in favor of the original West Point meaning vs. Wilson. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 21:34, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 02:51, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

• Woke elite → Liberal elite  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete? Not mentioned at the target and I'm not sure it's entirely synonymous nor is it common. Woke is listed under 'See also' but otherwise not mentioned. --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 04:44, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: Could this be considered RNEUTRAL? Drunk Experiter (she/her) (talk) 07:47, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

  I think it could. Liberal elite isn't exactly used favoringly. A search for woke elite mostly turns up references to a book by Musa al-Gharbi. May be point there and add a mention? His usage doesn't perfectly map to how I understand liberal elite; I've skimmed through a couple interviews and haven't found concise definition. I'm sure he's not the only person to have come up with the phrase. --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 15:21, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

  I've added a mention of "woke elite" to Musa al-Gharbi#Career. It's kinda buried. Poking around a bit, it seems he doesn't ever give a concise definition. I'm not yet convinced this is a strong redirect target. --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 15:47, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 05:17, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 06:21, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

• Delete as a a pejorative unlikely to ever be used in Wikipedia's voice, or to be useful for linking when we can simply say "[[woke]] elite". Term has been used by several authors since around 2019 (but received little scholarly treatment), therefore no obvious target even as a non-neutral redirect. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 08:45, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
• (nominator) Delete. I agree with Sangdeboeuf and my findings are consistent. The term has been independently coined multiple times without a clearly defined, consistent meaning. Coverage of al-Gharbi's 2024 book dominates recent search results but he did not originate the term nor has his usage taken hold elsewhere. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 19:50, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy retarget to Offenders (2017 film) There is unanimous consensus including the nominator and it has been called for it speedily. No point in keep the discussion open any longer. (non-admin closure) Casablanca 🪨^(T) 22:23, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

• IzgredniciIzgrednici → Crime  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Fails WP:RLANG (Serbian) PARAKANYAA (talk) 05:57, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

• Speedy retarget to Offenders (2017 film) which was its original target. Thepharoah17 (talk) 07:05, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
• Speedy retarget to Offenders (2017 film) per Thepharoah17. The film article was originally at Offenders, which is where this redirect pointed when it was created in 2018. The film article was moved to Offenders (2017 film) in 2022. Offender and Offenders were both redirects to Crime and when Offender became a dab page following this RfD it appears Izgrednici got lost in the shuffle. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 19:27, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

  Ah, fine by me. Usually I notice these things. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:14, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 18:47, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

• Racisme anti-maghrébin → Islamophobia  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Fails WP:RLANG. Also, not all racism against this group is based on Islam. PARAKANYAA (talk) 05:52, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Problematic for multiple reasons. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 23:03, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ^Complex/_Rational 14:00, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

• Dirty Jew → Antisemitism  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. Has history. Could be redirected somewhere, but no clue where. PARAKANYAA (talk) 05:49, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

• Delete it. Redirects are to help people find articles, but exactly which people are going to find antisemitism this way? Directs are not a way to list offensive epithets. Zero^talk 06:13, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and Zero. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 21:50, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ^Complex/_Rational 14:00, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

• Linnea Holmedal → Norway national badminton team  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No information on subject on redirected article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 05:37, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

• Delete. Since the makeup of teams change, individuals should never redirect there, at least in 99% of the cases. Geschichte (talk) 10:35, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:03, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ^Complex/_Rational 14:00, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

• Sakshi Kurbkhelgi → United Arab Emirates national badminton team  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No information on subject on redirected article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 05:35, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

• Delete. Since the makeup of teams change, individuals should never redirect there, at least in 99% of the cases. Geschichte (talk) 10:35, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:05, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ^Complex/_Rational 14:00, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

• Vivian Nalule → Uganda national badminton team  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No information on subject on redirected article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 05:34, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

• Delete. Since the makeup of teams change, individuals should never redirect there, at least in 99% of the cases. Geschichte (talk) 10:35, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:05, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ^Complex/_Rational 14:01, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

• Zsófi Szabó → Hungary national badminton team  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No information on subject on redirected article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 05:34, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

• Delete. Since the makeup of teams change, individuals should never redirect there, at least in 99% of the cases. Geschichte (talk) 10:35, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:05, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ^Complex/_Rational 14:01, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

• Katharina Nilges → Germany national badminton team  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No information on subject on redirected article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 05:33, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

• Delete. Since the makeup of teams change, individuals should never redirect there, at least in 99% of the cases. Geschichte (talk) 10:35, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:05, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ^Complex/_Rational 14:01, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

• Nguyễn Thị Thu Huyền → Vietnam national badminton team  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No information on subject on redirected article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 05:32, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

• Delete. Since the makeup of teams change, individuals should never redirect there, at least in 99% of the cases. Geschichte (talk) 10:35, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:05, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ^Complex/_Rational 14:06, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

• Terrorist (ethnic slur) → Terrorism#Pejorative use  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This section does not mention anything about the term being used as an ethnic slur. PARAKANYAA (talk) 05:20, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

• Delete. While I see the connection, simply characterizing such usage as an "ethnic slur" is not quite right. This redirect was used only once in article space, at Arabology (album), as a piped link to the word "terrorist" in scare quotes. I have replaced the redirect there with the direct link to Terrorism#Pejorative use. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 23:20, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Delete Terrorist is a classification, not an ethnic slur. - OmegaAOL (talk page, and contribs) 03:11, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to List of Legend of the Galactic Heroes characters#Terraism. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 05:18, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

• TerraistTerraist → Terrorism  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not a word used to refer to terrorism, and the page history refers to something else. This is a type of environmentalism . Could be retargeted somewhere related to that but this is never in reference to terrorism. PARAKANYAA (talk) 05:16, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

• Retarget to List of Legend of the Galactic Heroes characters#Terraism. Several characters are described as "Terraist" and the term is defined in this section. "Terraist" also appears multiple times at List of Legend of the Galactic Heroes episodes but without a concise definition. It appears once at Kangchenjunga in reference to Legend of the Galactic Heroes. I don't find any content on the type of environmentalism on-wiki. If it's ever added, Terraist could be converted to a dab page or brought back to RfD for redetermination. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 22:02, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

  Note: Terraism already redirects to List of Legend of the Galactic Heroes characters#Terraism. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 22:03, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

  • Good idea, redirect to LOGH. It's a term used in that universe. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:05, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
• Retarget per Myceteae --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:11, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:39, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

• Terrorism in Asia → Terrorism  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Article does not address terrorism in asia. PARAKANYAA (talk) 05:13, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:RETURNTORED. We have already have an article on Terrorism in Europe so it shouldn't be too hard to make a new article. 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 21:44, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:REDLINK --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:06, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
• Retarget to Category:Terrorism in Asia. This looks like a useful starting point to finding relevant articles, including a handy {{Asia topic}} template. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:58, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

  It's an unfortunate cross namespace redirect, so I would oppose that. Also WP:RETURNTORED. PARAKANYAA (talk) 19:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

  What's unfortunate about it? Also, what's the purpose of pointing out WP:RETURNTORED in response to me? Do you think I missed it when it was referenced above? -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:47, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

  The reader, expecting an article, would be directed towards a category and no content on the topic they looked for. PARAKANYAA (talk) 20:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

  The reader will instead be directed to several articles that encompass parts of the topic, which is far superior to nothing at all. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:57, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

  To send the reader to a misleading target that does not show them what they want is inferior to a redlink, which encourages the creation of an article. PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:33, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

  You're saying that like it's a completely different topic but the redirect is "Terrorism in Asia" to a category called "Terrorism in Asia". That's an exact match so there's nothing misleading about it. The content would therefore be highly relevant to what is sought. -- Tavix ^(talk) 02:57, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

  If we had a redlink on terrorism and instead of redlinking it and waiting for someone to write an article on it, we redirected to the category for per-country incidents, that would obviously be misleading. PARAKANYAA (talk) 23:21, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

  If you want an article on the subject, why not write one? I'm still not following how or why it could be misleading. -- Tavix ^(talk) 03:21, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:RETURNTORED. I don't see a compelling justification for the standard avoidance of WP:XNRs; I thus reject the suggestion to retarget to the category. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 00:01, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ^Complex/_Rational 03:20, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

• Cipher machine → Cipher  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This should be deleted per WP:REDLINK as an unhelpful redirect with potential. Its target doesn't explain much about it and it's a potentially viable place for an article. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 02:46, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:REDLINK/WP:RETURNTORED. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 00:02, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Razorback (disambiguation). (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:56, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

• RazorbacksRazorbacks → Feral pig  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I can understand the redirect Razorback to Feral pig as an obvious primary target. But I feel like people who type Razorbacks instead of Razorback are likely searching for the College Team. At bare minimum, this search with the s at the end likely has no primary topic. Either retarget to Razorback (disambiguation) #Sports or Arkansas Razorbacks. Servite et contribuere (talk) 01:03, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

• Retarget to Arkansas Razorbacks. Between being a pluralization and razorback in reference to an animal itself being ambiguous between feral pigs and boar–pig hybrids. I think that Arkansas has enough of an edge on West Sydney to be WP:PTOPIC, but if not Razorback (disambiguation) § Sports works fine as well. Casablanca 🪨^(T) 01:24, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

  Casablanca Rock I would say Arkansas has a significant edge over West Sydney. West Sydney even rebranded as Sydney Spirit for their final season. And I say this an Australian myself. Servite et contribuere (talk) 04:51, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

• Keep as is, I don't think the edge is enough to separate the plural from the singular. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:23, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
• Re-target to Razorback (disambiguation), where people can find whichever of the various meanings they're looking for (apart from the standard geological meaning "sharp ridge", which is missing from that page). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:56, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
• Keep. The plural is not so distinct as to make a clear change in primary topic. It's common to refer to a type or species of animal in the plural (e.g., constructions like "Razorbacks are found in…"). Feral pig addresses the ambiguity/inconsistent terminology as applied to pigs. The hatnote first lists Fin whale as the next most likely meaning of "razorback" and then points to the dab page for other uses. As another animal species, the plural is also a common way to refer to the whale. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫‍(talk) 18:37, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
• Retarget to Razorback (disambiguation) per Justlettersandnumbers. Yeah, it doesn't seem as though the plural form has a primary target/topic. Steel1943 (talk) 21:23, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
• Retarget to Razorback (disambiguation) per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:33, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
• Retarget to DAB page. LDW5432 (talk) 18:55, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
• Retarget to Arkansas Razorbacks. As a plural and a search term, I think it's far more likely to be used to refer to a sports team than to those teams' namesake, and of those, Arkansas is by far the PTOPIC. There are a handful of links in article space to this currently, some of which are going to be wrong no matter what's decided, so that's sort of a wash. A hatnote can point people back to the dab page if they were really looking for something else. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 15:36, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Retarget to Razorback (disambiguation)? Or to Arkansas Razorbacks?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:36, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

• Retarget to Razorback (disambiguation), I don't believe there is a WP:PLURALPT here. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 02:48, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
• Razorback (disambiguation) is a better target if consensus is against keeping. At most, the plural introduces more ambiguity by increasing the likelihood that one of the sports teams is the intended target but I maintain that plurals are a common way to search for animals.—Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 22:19, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Pinging @Justlettersandnumbers @Lenticel @LDW5432 @Zxcvbnm @Myceteae. Just to be clear on all of you, to be more specific, is your intent just Razorback (disambiguation) or Razorback (disambiguation) #Sports? Just want to have the consensus being very very clear and specific. That's all. Servite et contribuere (talk) 12:30, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

I don't think it needs to be directed to any specific section, no. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 13:21, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

@Zxcvbnm Sorry but I want to be as clear as possible, you are saying it should be Razorback (disambiguation) and not Razorback (disambiguation) #Sports. Just a simple Yes or No. Servite et contribuere (talk) 13:38, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Yes ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:13, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Just Razorback (disambiguation), not refined to #Sports. Thanks for double checking! —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 14:06, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

• Comment thank you for the ping. Yes just the main dab. No need to refine to #Sports --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:11, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).