Wikiwand AI

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 19

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 19

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 19, 2025.

KiCad 2006-08-28

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:56, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Unmentioned. 1234qwer1234qwer4 23:55, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete all - wikipedia is not a software release history or chagelog. My initial thought was to wonder if these were {{R from file metadata}} redirects. That's not always easy to determine, but none of them are tagged that way and searching for "KiCad" in the file namespace did not produce any examples of that so it seems unlikely. Thryduulf (talk) 00:12, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete all - This are all useless redirects for historical software releases, unlikely search terms. Also see WP:NOTDATABASE. Asteramellus (talk) 00:58, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete all: KiCad alread has a perfectly servicable changelog, and doesn't need another one on Wikipedia that nobody will ever find. --Guy Macon (talk) 03:59, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

War against corruption (El Salvador)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was target was fixed to Presidency_of_Nayib_Bukele#Anti-corruption_campaigns_and_alleged_governmental_corruption. Jay 💬 06:50, 27 September 2025 (UTC)

Seems removed from the target article? Stumbling9655 (talk) 11:41, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

I fixed the redirect target. PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 21:21, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:50, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Altium 10

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:55, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Not mentioned at target. (Apart from 25.8.1, because this is the current version, but that can get outdated at any moment.) 1234qwer1234qwer4 23:39, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

  • @1234qwer1234qwer4: have you checked to see if any of these are {{R from file metadata}} redirects? Thryduulf (talk) 00:15, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
    Altium Designer supports import & export of various PCB and CAD data exchange file formats. Not familiar with the software but it seems unlikely that media that can be uploaded to Commons will have such metadata; even more so that it would get uploaded. There are relatively few files on Commons referencing "Altium" and spot-checks for those stated to be created with that do not have metadata referring to that. (I also note that the creator of these redirects appears to have been rather obsessive with some redirect mass-creations, so metadata links would quite certainly not have been a motivation for creation here.) 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:27, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
    • Delete per the above. File metadata is one reason why redirects for exact versions of software get created, but it doesn't appear that this is the case here. Some individual versions can be good redirects (e.g. Windows 3.11) but that is rare and there is no indication that it applies here. Thryduulf (talk) 10:15, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
      (FTR, I explicitly did not nominate any of the redirects that seem to be covered by the "History" section at the target, although that is partly unsourced, so if anybody thinks something should no be included there, there would be more redirects to consider for deletion as well.) 1234qwer1234qwer4 14:06, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Erin Reed (Haven)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the redirect's undeletion. Rusalkii (talk) 23:14, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

It looks like this redirect was created based on some rumored character name of a TV show in 2014 (added unsourced at that). It looks like the character ended up being named Charlotte Cross] instead and there is no mention of Erin Reed anywhere at the target, so this redirect should be deleted. Raladic (talk) 22:52, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Every Day I Have to Cry

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Move Every Day I Have to Cry (song) to Every Day I Have to Cry. Jay 💬 13:03, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

Malplaced redirect. This used to be a dabpage, but was turned into a redirect without discussion in 2020. ArthananWarcraft (talk) 19:52, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Victor Zangief

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Victor Zangiev. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 20:02, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

victor zangiev is a soviet russian former professional wrestler. he's currently probably best known for being an inspiration for zangief's everything. surprisingly, he is not himself zangief, and i have no idea if this should be redirected to his article as a misspelling (or mishearing or whatever you wanna call it) or deleted over concerns of (more) people thinking his first name is actually victor consarn (grave) (obituary) 19:49, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Fear (from a Moral Standpoint)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Legoktm (talk) 03:10, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

weird use of parentheses and capitalization, right? i thought that, anyway, but as it turns out, this is actually a pretty viable term for certain topics about christianity, though i can't really tell which would be the most fitting target in that area, only that #religion and the two articles mentioned in a hatnote in that section are likely not the best ones consarn (grave) (obituary) 19:40, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom - weird use of parenthesis and capitalization. Jay 💬 07:29, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
    i mean, this is exactly the thing i said might not actually apply in this specific case, but sure? consarn (grave) (obituary) 22:32, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Irrational fear (unknown)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 30#Irrational fear (unknown)

N-legged frame

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Legoktm (talk) 03:12, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

not exclusive to tripods. ignoring results where n is treated as a value to be filled in, the primary topic seemed to be beams with a whopping one result consarn (grave) (obituary) 19:29, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

  • Keep: well defined concept d:Q109154771, exists on 3 other wikis. Feel free to propose a better name, or a better target. Not really related to "beam". Indeed not exclusive to tripod, but no better target has been proposed so far. Taylor 49 (talk) 20:48, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
    that concept is defined, but not really well imo. as you yourself mentioned, it's not exclusive to tripods, but seems to be exclusive to standing frames, if we're going by what wikidata has to say. it's also unclear if the n is meant to reference the shape of the stand (or its leg(s)) or a number, and both would be... weird in just about any context consarn (grave) (obituary) 19:36, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete, not discussed at target, and doesn't seem to be a really well used term. There doesn't seem to be much to say about it anyway. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 21:17, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
    Comment: very clearly discussed at target at the very top of page: is a portable three-legged frame or stand, and connected to WikiData. Taylor 49 (talk) 21:09, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
    that definition says nothing about the number of legs consarn (grave) (obituary) 07:14, 21 September 2025 (UTC)
    You are the one who linked this redirect to stand (Q109154771) on Wikidata and you are the one who added the "N-legged frame" alias. Why do you keep bringing the Wikidata item up as if it proves anything? Warudo (talk) 20:58, 21 September 2025 (UTC)
    more than anything, i want to know where this name even came from lmao consarn (grave) (obituary) 11:08, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
    The WikiData item d:Q109154771, by its existence (NOT created by me) and existence of pages on 3 wikis (NOT created by me), proves the validity of the concept. The fact that I created the redirect does NOT invalidate it. Taylor 49 (talk) 09:12, 23 September 2025 (UTC)
    The concept is well defined. The name N-legged frame seems to be WP:OR on your part. Warudo (talk) 10:50, 23 September 2025 (UTC)
    you know you only added two synonyms to a preexisting concept without sources and are insisting that they exist despite not having presented any actual proof of that being the case, right? consarn (grave) (obituary) 11:35, 23 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Keep. Lead: "A tripod is a portable three-legged frame ... Variations with one, two, and four legs are termed monopod, bipod, and quadripod". Tripod is the best target. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:27, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
    no, really, what does that say for or against this redirect that it doesn't also say for standing frames in general? consarn (grave) (obituary) 20:24, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Keep: not sure how or why anyone would come across this redirect – surely not via searching this – but it receives views, this is the best target, and search results are manifestly unhelpful. J947 ‡ edits 01:58, 27 September 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Austurríki

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Icelandic, keep the rest. Legoktm (talk) 03:16, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

These should be Deleted per WP:FORRED, Icelandic, Dutch and French are not official languages of Austria. ArthananWarcraft (talk) 10:32, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete Icelandic, but Keep French and Dutch - due to Austria also being a member of the European Union, and the EU having 24 official languages, French and Dutch being in those, it means that the official names of Austria in those languages do have official name status, so should be kept per WP:FORRED exception for official names. page views also support that they are used as search terms often enough to be valuable. Raladic (talk) 14:15, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete all per WP:FORRED. Membership in an international organisation that uses a language is not enough of an affinity to keep. We wouldn't keep an Arabic or Chinese redirect to Austria even though those languages are official languages of the United Nations, why should we treat the EU any different? Warudo (talk) 14:31, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
    The European Union has jurisdiction over Austria and its other member states at a constitutional level so it’s a little different from the United Nations. The European Union for all intents and purposes is really one supra-national “state” and acts as such with regards to all areas that the countries sign in the treaties of joining the European Union, which is why the European Union also has the various institutions such as a legislative body. Raladic (talk) 15:58, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
    Jurisdiction is not the criterion we use. Instead we delete redirects that point to articles not directly related to that language or a culture associated with that language. Austria has no special connection to the French language/culture nor to that of the Netherlands just because it is a fellow EU member. It's not like you can use French in Austria and expect to be understood by default. In general, official languages of the European Union are not official languages of the member states the same way official languages of the UN are not official languages of its member states. Warudo (talk) 16:11, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
    I had only brought up the EU link as I figured that would be simple enough, but fair enough let me expand: That's where it gets tricky, the Jurisdiction of the European Union is that of a community, which does have a European Culture and the European principle of multilinguality is enshrined and embraced by members of the European Union.
    Ignoring the history of relations by European countries also ignores facts that the European culture and its interconnectedness over the centuries, including linguistically.
    Whether that be Marie-Louise of Austria (why the en-wiki title is the only one that has current article title not be that is an absurdity by itself,rather than her common name that is used in pretty much every other language wiki, but WP:NCROYAL is a mess. Even the it-wiki has her ancestral name w:it:Maria Luisa d'Asburgo-Lorena as well as the fr-wiki using her common name w:fr:Marie-Louise d'Autriche, despite her having been ruler-consort of both Northern Italy and France), Empress consort of the French (and wife to Napoleon).
    And then we get to the Congress of Vienna, which established some of the modern countries of Europe following Napoleon's fall, resulting in the establishment of Germany.
    Or the post World War II resulting Allied occupation of Austria (Between the French, U.S., Soviet and British forces) when Austria was sub-divided into four parts (history tends to talk more about the east/west Germany divide) and English, French and Russian were common language for 10 years in the respective sub-divisions of Austria and Vienna respectively (Vienna was split slightly different by the Allied Control Council), which had a lot of intermingling of culture in the more "recent" history of Austria. Austrian German has a lot of loanwords from French that are used in day to day interactions, whether reading the Feuilleton in a newspaper, drinking a Wiener Melange and so forth.
    Which is also why French is the most common second language after English (which itself isn't a minority language in Austria as it's spoken by 3/4 of the population) in Austria and is spoken by over 10% of the population.
    It also falls afoul of the fact that the European Union has in fact jurisdictionally influenced Austria's (and other member states') language policy, in particular with the legal recognition of certain minority languages spoken as primary languages in some regions of Austria - Slovenian, Hungarian and Burgenland Croatian (a Austrian-specific variant of the Croatian language) being legally recognized as official languages for official government use in some of the regions (codified in Austrian law).
    Then we get to food and drink, which is even more of a giant mixing pot linguistically across Europe. The world-famous French croissant has its origin in the Austrian Kipferl, following an Austrian baker opening a Viennese bakery in France. The linguistic English term for fine pastry is Viennoiserie (a French loanword term for "Viennese pastry"), named after the bakery's origin from Vienna. Ironically the group of pastries itself it also very commonly nowadays just lumped in with the term Danish pastry, which, surprise, was another baker from Austria who brought Viennoiserie to Denmark and ironically, the Danish language term is wienerbrød (Vienna bread). Then on to Viennese coffee house culture which spread throughout Europe and the western world, and that ironically the most common type of coffee ordered in Austria has the Austro-French name Wiener Melange (Viennese mix, w:fr:Café viennois) and is the precursor to the Italian Cappuchino.
    Long story short, the French culture and language is most certainly extremely intermingled in Austrian culture. So are the Italian and many others.
    I don't have as strong a case (outside the EU jurisdiction part) for Dutch, but for French, the links are far and wide. Raladic (talk) 19:56, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete Icelandic, Keep French and Dutch per Raladic. -- Tavix (talk) 13:40, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, A1Cafel (talk) 03:03, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete or retarget Austurríki, Austurriki, and Oostenrijk → Name of Austria where they are mentioned. Weak delete or weak retarget Autriche as well. I find the arguments for cultural or legal affinity with Icelandic and Dutch very weak; the arguments for French less so but overall not convincing. France and the French language have tremendous cultural impact in Europe and globally but I don't find that this makes the French name for every country in Europe a reasonable redirect. --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 20:21, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Per Raladic. WP:FORRED is meant to keep out obviously esoteric names, like the Icelandic name here, not to gatekeep plausible search terms like someone in the EU searching for an EU country's name in one of the EU's official languages. The standard, per WP:R#D8, is unrelated, not not the country's official language. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|🤷) 09:34, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Retarget all per MYCETEAE, or further refine to Name of Austria § Other languages. Jay 💬 12:16, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 18:59, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Tcheque Republique

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 7#Tcheque Republique

HODL

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 19#HODL

Chalcedonian Church of Constantinople

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 8#Chalcedonian Church of Constantinople

Space Marine Corps

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the redirect's undeletion. Rusalkii (talk) 19:39, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

pretty vague as far as those things go, pretty much only narrowing it down to "not doom eternal". results gave me a mix of warhammer 40k (where the results seem accidental), actual marines, and dragonforce (where the results seem coincidental). around here, it's got two completely unrelated mentions that also wouldn't serve as targets consarn (grave) (obituary) 17:33, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Little Whining

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 28#Little Whining

Team Cherry (developer)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 26#Team Cherry (developer)

Locations in Harry Potter by David Jarvis

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 19:40, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

I genuinely don't know what this means or who David Jarvis is. At best, it is something super obscure that my Google searches are missing, but I'm concerned this may have been some sort of a joke. No reason to exist, should be an uncontroversial Delete. TNstingray (talk) 14:58, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

  • Upon looking closer at the page history and the user responsible for creating this page, it is indeed a joke redirect and may therefore be eligible for speedy deletion, again unless someone knows something I'm missing. TNstingray (talk) 15:00, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

Delete. Agree with TNstingray. — Tonymec (talk) 19:19, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Protein-coding gene

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Gene. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 12:59, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

This is certainly not exclusive to humans and should probably redirect to Gene. 1234qwer1234qwer4 13:40, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

  • Support retarget per nom, frankly I'm surprised they weren't already pointing to the more general term. Perhaps this is commentary on our tendency to place ourselves at the center of existence. TNstingray (talk) 15:26, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • I agree that the current redirect is inappropriate. There are several million species that contain protein-coding genes and there's no reason to redirect to a description of protein-coding genes in just one of those species. Redirect to Gene. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Genome42 (talk • contribs) 16:47, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Retarget to gene per above, plus mentioned in lead. ⇌ Synpath 15:21, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Big gene

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 28#Big gene

Ras v12

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 26#Ras v12

Undecaploid

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 26#Undecaploid

List of cities and towns in the Maldives

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 12:56, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Deleting these redirects would be better as the Maldives officially don't have towns or villages so I don't see how anyone would search these. They do have cities but there is already an existing redirect for cities that redirects to the above targetted article. UnilandofmaTalk 12:47, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

  • Keep These are very plausible search terms for someone who doesn't know that there aren't any settlements with these official designations in the Maldives and the target page seems to be the most relevant content we have. Titles equivalent to all these should be blue links for every country (and every country-like territory) so that readers can easily navigate between them without needing to know the administrative structure and article structure is before being able to find the content that tells them. Thryduulf (talk) 17:38, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Keep per Thryduulf. When we have lists of cities and towns, or towns, or cities, towns, and villages in various other countries, people may expect there to be such lists for the Maldives. The only countries for which such lists shouldn't exist are microstates (no need for a list of cities, towns, and villages in the Vatican) and perhaps city-states like Singapore. Nyttend (talk) 08:50, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Walküre 699-035

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 27#Walküre 699-035

Friesland 1909791013

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these redirects. Rusalkii (talk) 19:10, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Some sort of identifier numbers that were not mentioned in the article even before I removed an indiscriminate list of specific product forms at the target, apart from being included as comments in the source code. Unlikely and unhelpful for the reader anyway. 1234qwer1234qwer4 11:08, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Finger lock[ing]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 8 #Finger lock.5Bing.5D

Anorexia (medical condition)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Anorexia nervosa. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 08:43, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Current target is Anorexia (symptom), but I think this disambiguator could also apply to Anorexia nervosa. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 02:28, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

  • Redirect as per Clovermoss. The lead of Anorexia (symptom) states that it's a symptom that could 'indicate a serious clinical condition'. Thus, it is not a condition in and of itself. Since the redirect is looking for a condition, redirecting to Anorexia nervosa seems best. Katiedevi (talk) 03:47, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
    @Katiedevi this is currently a redirect, do you mean “retarget” instead? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 06:10, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
    I absolutely did, thank you for pointing this out! Katiedevi (talk) 03:23, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete. Brand new redirect with an implausible disambiguator. Anorexia already redirects to Anorexia nervosa. Presumably someone thought this would make it easier to find the page on the general term, which would make retargeting completely bypass that. But in that case, it's completely pointless, as someone is farrrr more likely to just look for "anorexia" in the first place. Even still, I think the fact that we're here shows that it's pretty vague, and best to just let hatnotes and dab pages direct people where they need; this redirect being here isn't going to make it any easier to find anything. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 06:13, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
    Redirects are cheap. Retargeting per nom makes sense here because the medical condition is Anorexia nervosa and not Anorexia (symptom). Even if someone may be more likely to just search for 'anorexia' instead, having this redirect does not do any harm or mislead the reader. Katiedevi (talk) 03:27, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Retarget per nom, more accurate target. BugGhost 🦗👻 17:52, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
    Retargeting isn't valid here...it's pretty much keep or delete, per my comment above. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 18:23, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
    Don't worry I read your comment - I drew a different conclusion. BugGhost 🦗👻 07:39, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Anorexia nervosa. Someone using this plausible search term is looking for information on the medical condition known as Anorexia, and our content about that is located at Anorexia nervosa. It's true that Anorexia presently redirects there, but that just makes this a {{R from currently unnecessary disambiguation}}, which we keep for good reason - both future proofing and not requiring readers to know whether or not we regard the topic they are looking for as the primary topic or not. In this case, even if someone is searching using a method that provides article title suggestions (and not everybody does do that) it's plausible that the base title could be an article about the symptom, a disambiguation page or some other topic they don't know. Thryduulf (talk) 10:26, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
    The very creation of this redirect to the specific different page shows that your claim is wrong on its face. And even if someone is looking for this, they're just going to look for "anorexia" directly, making this completely useless, and it should still be deleted. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 17:54, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
    even if someone is looking for this, they're just going to look for "anorexia" directly, this is simply not true for everybody. You might not use redirects like this, but plenty of other people do. Thryduulf (talk) 21:24, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Big Fruit

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 26#Big Fruit

Frist Raid on Uchiza

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 07:46, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

The word "First" is misspelled, and also no such raid is mentioned at the target, so I suggest deletion .Duckmather (talk) 02:10, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

+1 LeChatiliers Pupper (talk) 03:04, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
Delete per above and fix all links. Taylor 49 (talk) 20:57, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks