Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 August 13

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Epicgenius (talk) 02:28, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

• Deputy Chief (later Bureau Chief) Madeline Wuntch → List of Brooklyn Nine-Nine characters#Recurring characters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete this implausibly long title. Thepharoah17 (talk) 23:45, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. Nobody is looking for an article title like this. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 15:11, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete, implausable redirect as an absurd page title. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 15:57, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete, implausible search term. Suonii180 (talk) 10:13, 15 August 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Ciudad de la Paz. (non-admin closure) Skarmory (talk • contribs) 01:43, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

• Ciudad de La PazCiudad de La Paz → La Paz  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Is this a WP:DIFFCAPS situation (where the redirect to the seat of government of Bolivia would remain) or should this target Ciudad de la Paz, the current capital of Equatorial Guinea? Mathguy2718 (talk) 20:17, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget but tag as a {{R from incorrect capitalisation}}. This is difficult to determine from search engines as they are all stubbornly case insensitive (even in verbatim mode). From what I can tell, the two cities do differ in official capitalisation - the Bolivian one capitalises "La" the Equatorial Guinean one does not, but as a case insensitive string the African capital is the clear primary topic (so Ciudad de la paz should definitely remain targetted towards there). Looking at Wikinav the Bolivian city is only the 12th most common destination for people navigating away from the African city and the latter is not in the top 20 most common origins for people viewing the South American city's article. The redirect doesn't get enough views to be able to determine whether traffic patterns follow either of the target articles. Based on the traffic stats we do have though, the significant majority of people using the four word term are looking for the city in Equatorial Guinea. Thryduulf (talk) 11:47, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:16, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

Retarget to Ciudad de la Paz per Thryduulf's analysis. The existing hatnote covers any disambiguating concerns. मल्ल (talk) 14:36, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 05:50, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

• བོདབོད་ (༡༩༡༢-༡༩༥༡) → Tibet (1912–1951)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Even for valid WP:RLOTE redirects, we don't do non-English disambiguators, right? ~ A412 ^talk! 18:29, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

If the term, including the disambiguator, is plausible for a English speaker to encounter and search for then we do (Wikipedia is not the only thing that needs to disambiguate, nor is it the only one that uses parentheses to do so). I'm not sure whether that's the case here though, it's not implausible but that's not the same thing as actually used. Thryduulf (talk) 21:31, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:11, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, not a plausible search term. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 06:54, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete, this is a translation of the en.wiki disambiguation. CMD (talk) 07:49, 19 August 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Converted to dab page. Epicgenius (talk) 02:29, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

• Brooklyn North → Brooklyn, Wellington  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Most references on Wikipedia to 'Brooklyn North' are about Brooklyn, New York City. I'm not particularly sure what someone searching for this would be looking for but I doubt the Wellington suburb is what most are searching for. Traumnovelle (talk) 23:11, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. The current target is what I'd be looking for, but I'm not representative. There's no good target for the most likely topic, North Brooklyn, New York, unlike South Brooklyn. It's possible readers will be searching in analogy with Brooklyn South, a police procedural. Organization of the New York City Police Department and New York City Department of Sanitation do have subunits that use this term, discussed in some degree of depth, but it's not enough for a dab page. J947 ‡ ^edits 01:49, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
• Keep the target covers "Brooklyn North" while the NY article doesn't mention the term at all. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:41, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

  Many articles on Wikipedia about the NYPD mention 'Brooklyn North' (presumably its a police district), and using a VPN and private window Google gives me results about Brooklyn, NY. I don't believe most people will expect this to lead them to a Wellington suburb. Traumnovelle (talk) 21:55, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

  But that's probably just for the northern part of Brooklyn, if as a proper noun "Brooklyn North" only refers to the statistical area in NZ unlike Birkenhead West then there is no reason why the current target shouldn't be kept. There is a reason Brooklyn West is a red link along with the likes of Paris North, Tokyo North and Atlanta North are red links in that they aren't valid uses. Crouch, Swale (talk) 22:10, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

  Its a police borough command district, so a proper noun. It certainly doesn't only refer to the Wellington suburb. Traumnovelle (talk) 03:24, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

  But is the police borough covered on Wikipedia? Crouch, Swale (talk) 22:19, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

  I linked it. J947 ‡ ^edits 22:39, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 17:16, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

@J947: What did you link? Jay 02:54, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 19:57, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

J947 clarified that he was referring to his mention of Organization of the New York City Police Department, an article that mentions the police borough. I have drafted a dab at the redirect. I don't see how a Wellington suburb can be primary over the New York borough. Second choice, Delete. Jay 13:16, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the dab?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rusalkii (talk) 20:17, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

I'm fine with the DAB. Crouch, Swale (talk) 22:16, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

The DAB is fine to me. Traumnovelle (talk) 22:16, 15 August 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was move Monochrome (Ammonia song) over the redirect. (non-admin closure) Skarmory (talk • contribs) 02:46, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

• Monochrome (song) → A (Ayumi Hamasaki EP)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There is definitely more than one song titled "Monochrome", though there is only one song titled "Monochrome" with an article, Monochrome (Ammonia song). Since there is one song with an article, would the Ammonia song be the primary topic? Even if not, the song by Ayumi Hamasaki is almost certainly not the primary topic, so the current target doesn't make sense. Mathguy2718 (talk) 04:16, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

• Since we have only one article on songs with this title, move Monochrome (Ammonia song) to Monochrome (song) and add a hatnote pointing to Monochrome (disambiguation)#Songs. - Eureka Lott 16:06, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Monochrome (disambiguation) § Songs. Jay 18:02, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
• Move and hatnote per Eureka Lott. Fine to prioritize an article over list items. --BDD (talk) 15:35, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: move or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:45, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

• Move and hatnote per Eureka Lott, the article is the PTOPIC. मल्ल (talk) 20:47, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 21:09, 22 August 2026 (UTC)

• CBD rail tunnel → City Rail Link  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• CBD Rail Tunnel → City Rail Link  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

As far as I'm aware, this is not a proper name for anything and a generic term too ambiguous to be unique to Auckland, New Zealand. CBD meaning Central business district. I can't find a suitable list to retarget to. Fork99 (talk) 18:00, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

Comment: It's worth noting that this was a working title/general reference for the CRL before the CRL name came about. pcuser42 (talk) 20:49, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

The source you gave is from Greater Auckland (advocacy group), the blog post's title is CBD Rail Loop, but running text uses CBD rail loop, nowhere do I see "CBD Rail Tunnel" or "CBD rail tunnel". None of these currently exist on Wikipedia and the loop names could be ambiguous with City Loop and City Circle. The source also uses Britomart tunnel project, which I would be okay with being a redirect though (currently doesn't exist). Fork99 (talk) 00:41, 15 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete Confuciou (talk) 03:02, 15 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete too vague, unlikely search term instead of the proper name. If someone wanted the tunnel specifically they are more likely to search CRL tunnel or City Rail Link tunnel or Auckland CBD rail tunnel, all of which are red. Traumnovelle (talk) 22:18, 15 August 2026 (UTC)

  Just as a note, I would oppose CRL tunnel (and plural/capitalisation variations) redirecting to City Rail Link as this could be ambiguous with Singapore's Cross Island Line. If ever created, probably redirect it to CRL#Transportation infrastructure. Fork99 (talk) 02:18, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Epicgenius (talk) 18:36, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

• Cbd tunnel → City Rail Link  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Note that CBD tunnel and CBD Tunnel don't exist. A generic term too ambiguous to be unique to Auckland, New Zealand. CBD meaning Central business district. I can't find any suitable list to retarget to. Fork99 (talk) 17:55, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete - odd choice of capitalisation to keep around. pcuser42 (talk) 20:50, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete as it is an odd choice of capitalisation as per above, and second, this is way too ambiguous. What CBD? Does it refer to a Tunnel taking you from one part of a CBD to another? A tunnel going under it like the Cross City Tunnel? None of these are worthy redirects. Servite et contribuere (talk) 04:11, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete Confuciou (talk) 03:02, 15 August 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Epicgenius (talk) 18:36, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

• City centre rail tunnel → City Rail Link  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Too ambiguous to be unique to Auckland, New Zealand. I suggest deletion to favour search results as I can't find any suitable list articles to retarget to. Fork99 (talk) 17:44, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete - not a working title as far as I'm aware, and too generic. pcuser42 (talk) 20:50, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete Confuciou (talk) 03:03, 15 August 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 17:24, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

• .cpi → List of filename extensions (A–E)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is no longer mentioned at the target, and while there is a mention at GEM character set, it does not explain what it does. This is probably best deleted unless a mention can be added back to the target. It was removed in 2020 with this diff. Casablanca 🪨^(T) 16:07, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 17:25, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

• St Leonards-Blue Mountains Intercity Railink → Epping to Chatswood rail link  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Was tagged for speedy deletion as vandalism/hoax in 2005 but was rejected (while it was an article).

The first revision contains a hoax, there is no such thing as a direct railway between Epping and Springwood in the Blue Mountains; real, proposed, planned, under construction or otherwise. The St Leonards-Epping portion was a real proposal though, which is mentioned at the target.

None of the supposed stations in the Blue Mountains (Lapstone, Glenbrook, Blaxland, Springwood) nor "Blue Mountains" are mentioned at the target. Note that these are real stations on a railway line that does not have anything to do with St Leonards or Epping. Fork99 (talk) 15:41, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. I'm not aware of any proposals for such a service. Sounds like someone took the Parramatta to Chatswood rail link, and used that as the basis for a hoax. Steelkamp (talk) 16:10, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete there were never any proposals for proposal as Steelkamp says, and second, the rail infrastructure at St. Leonard's station makes terminations there basically impossible, and would have to require something very unconventional like heading to Lindfield and turning around without opening for passengers (Or travelling with no passengers or no passengers off past St. Leonards which would be like such a bizarre train service. Servite et contribuere (talk) 04:04, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete. Difficult to prove a negative, but there was never such a proposal. The original speedy deletion tag was justified (and observed the text had mostly been lifted from another article) but seems to have been rejected for technical reasons. The only Google hits for "St Leonards-Blue Mountains Intercity Railink" are all WP:CIRCULAR. Rob.au (talk) 02:30, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Qtopia Sydney. Rusalkii (talk) 17:29, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

• QtopiaQtopia → Qt Extended  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I am doubtful as to whether this name should remain the redirect to the computer program "Qt Extended". I doubt that this computer program is well-known outside of this redirect. Pageviews clearly show that the article for the museum in Sydney is more popular than the current target as the computer program article has been available since 2004 and has only had 131 pageviews, compared to the museum article which has had 126 pageviews since it was created in 2025. Qwerty123M (talk) 09:22, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

• @Qwerty123M: I assume you are suggesting a retarget to Qtopia Sydney? Fork99 (talk) 17:02, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

  Yes. Is there a clearer way I could have proposed the target change? Qwerty123M (talk) 22:12, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

  @Qwerty123M This was reasonably unambiguous but the usual format is something like "retarget to Qtopia Sydney", with a link to the proposed new target. Rusalkii (talk) 17:28, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Per WP:RETURNTORED. Epicgenius (talk) 18:35, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

• Pseudopecoeloides arripi → Pseudopecoeloides  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Pseudopecoeloides atherinomori → Pseudopecoeloides  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Pseudopecoeloides carangis → Pseudopecoeloides  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Pseudopecoeloides chloroscombri → Pseudopecoeloides  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Pseudopecoeloides engeleri → Pseudopecoeloides  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Pseudopecoeloides equesi → Pseudopecoeloides  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Pseudopecoeloides gracilis → Pseudopecoeloides  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Pseudopecoeloides hafeezullahi → Pseudopecoeloides  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Pseudopecoeloides hickmani → Pseudopecoeloides  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Pseudopecoeloides lesteri → Pseudopecoeloides  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Pseudopecoeloides tenuis → Pseudopecoeloides  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

These are redirects from a species to its genus. Accepted species are presumed to be notable per WP:NSPECIES, so I think these should be deleted to return them to red. Chess enjoyer (talk) 08:09, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete. Target includes no meaningful information on any of these species to make these redirects worthwhile. Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 04:08, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 08:04, 25 August 2026 (UTC)

• Crispin Cronk → List of Harry Potter characters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target or anywhere else on Wikipedia. Created from a move, so no concerns with history. Fork99 (talk) 04:07, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as a soft deletion. Editors can request the redirect's undeletion for any reason. Epicgenius (talk) 18:39, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

• List of Thomas the Tank Engine & Friends Videos → Thomas & Friends  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete, as no such list at the target or anywhere else on enwiki. This was created as a catalog in 2007 and BLAR'ed within 2 days. A similar list was deleted at AfD per WP:NOTCATALOGUE. Jay 02:55, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom. मल्ल (talk) 04:49, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to ǂKá̦gára and ǃHãunu. Search results didn't show ǂKá̦gára and ǃHãunu for Hauna, but this is the obviously correct target. Figured it best to close and retarget than waste time with discussion if no one objects. (non-admin closure) Casablanca 🪨^(T) 01:34, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

• !Haunu (moon)!Haunu (moon) → List of trans-Neptunian objects  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is not mentioned at the target or seemingly anywhere else on wikipedia. It would likely be betst deleted. Casablanca 🪨^(T) 01:31, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).