Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 9

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. wbm1058 (talk) 22:31, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

• Letter from Güyük Khan to Pope Innocent IV (1246)Letter from Güyük Khan to Pope Innocent IV (1246) → Letter from Güyük Khan to Pope Innocent IV  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I think the redirect should be deleted as they are no other known letters written by Güyük Khan sent to Pope Innocent IV making it unlikely anybody would use this search term. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-87598-9 (talk) 23:15, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. This is a perfectly standard and perfectly harmless {{R from unnecessary disambiguation}}. Thryduulf (talk) 02:30, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: I just tagged the redirect since it wasn't tagged by the nom. CycloneYoris ^talk! 02:35, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
• Delete, this is not a standard sort of redirect. It doesn't help readers find the target, and it's not appropriate as a linking aid either. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 07:28, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
• Keep per Thryduulf. As an academic historian, I'll add that inserting the year in parentheses after the title of a primary source is common practice in our profession. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:16, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
• Keep per Presidentman's explanation. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:46, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. These two redirects for Marvin's Restaurant were both created several months after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marvin's closed. wbm1058 (talk) 23:16, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

• Marvin's → DePauw University#Marvin.27s  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A redirect from 2007 that should have led to the now-removed "Marvin's" section in the article, detailing a restaurant on the campus of DePauw. However, it was improperly created, and tried linking to "Marvin.27s" instead. Anyways, now that there is no mention of Marvin's, I think we should either delete the redirect or turn it into a disambiguation. The Master of Hedgehogs (talk) (contributions) (Sign my guestbook!) 22:39, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

• What would you disambiguate it with? Also note Marvin's Restaurant redirects there. -- Tavix ^(talk) 03:25, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Maybe Marvin's Marvelous Mechanical Museum and Marvin's Marvelous Mechanical Museum (album). Those are the only two "Marvin's" things I can think of. The Master of Hedgehogs (talk) (contributions) (Sign my guestbook!) 12:07, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

If it's just those two things, there's a primary topic amongst them so we can retarget to Marvin's Marvelous Mechanical Museum without the need to disambiguate. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:00, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

It's not just those two. There's also Marvin's Room. This is just a partial title match, well served by the Search box. – wbm1058 (talk) 23:07, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. User:Rezakaisar91 has made nearly 50 edits since they were notified, on their talk page, of this discussion, and have not responded with an explanation of the rationale for their creation. wbm1058 (talk) 03:15, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

• CU-T1452 → Santa Bárbara Airlines Flight 518  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• PR-TTC → Santa Bárbara Airlines Flight 518  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• PK-PAV → Voepass Flight 2283  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• B-2591 → Aeroflot Flight 821  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

None mentioned at their targets, and not even really all that plausible, but just a bit too old for WP:R3. ~2026-80954-2 (talk) 22:39, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the redirect's undeletion. Rusalkii (talk) 01:02, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

• Perinaise → Mayonnaise  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

only mentioned in passing in the see also, without a source, and unmentioned in piri piri consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 21:02, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the redirect's undeletion. Rusalkii (talk) 01:02, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

• Papas mayo → Mayonnaise#Chile  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

potato salad but it has mayo. looks fucking delicious. is fucking delicious. isn't mentioned consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 21:00, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:35, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

• Spicy mayo → Mayonnaise  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

not mentioned, and seemingly vague. used to be two unsourced sentences consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 20:58, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:RETURNTORED: not defined anywhere on enwiki AFAICS, probable article potential, and not really a subtopic of the target. J947 ‡ ^edits 00:52, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 22:02, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

• Dogs (IShowSpeed and Kai Cenat song) → IShowSpeed#Discography  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Subject is mentioned at both the current target and Kai Cenat with no clarity on what expectation there is on which musician the reader is expecting to locate when searching this redirect, given the subject of the redirect is explained in either article no further than listing it as a single. Delete per WP:REDLINK unless some sort of applicable album-like subject is found to retarget this. Steel1943 (talk) 12:37, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Delete. We should delete in cases like this where a non-notable subject receives passing mention in multiple articles and none is straightforwardly the primary topic or a more appropriate place for to expand coverage. Selecting one target or the other is arbitrary and obscures search results which reveal the full extent of on-wiki coverage (limited though it may be). And if this song is notable, WP:RETURNTORED applies. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 01:48, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 20:28, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per Myceteae, as there's no clear reason to select one target over the other. Zzz plant (talk) 22:14, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and Myceteae. Paprikaiser (talk) 21:45, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:44, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

• The Legends of the AlhambraThe Legends of the Alhambra → Tales of the Alhambra  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Legends of The AlhambraLegends of The Alhambra → Tales of the Alhambra  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There was no instance of a reliable source ever calling it "Legends of the Alhambra". Delete. ~2026-36939-5 (talk) 18:58, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Keep - I believe it is an alternative, typically archaic, title of the book, see . Golem08 (talk) 19:57, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Neutral This was a WP:AFC/R request, reviewed and accepted. I have no horse in this race. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 22:48, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Keep per Golem08, is the title of several editions or derivative works: 1909, 1910, 1924, 2022. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:26, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Note: the page on the book appears to be incorrectly titled – it was published in 1832 as The Alhambra: a series of tales and sketches of the Moors and Spaniards in the United States and as The Alhambra in the United Kingdom. Various derivative editions titled Tales of The Alhambra appeared from 1850 onwards, but that is not the original title. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:49, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Keep per Golem08 and Justlettersandnumbers. Even if these are all just incorrect renderings or derivative works, the redirect is still useful to readers. Station1 (talk) 01:08, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 22:03, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

• List of Roblox controversies → Child safety on Roblox  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This redirect isn't to a list page therefore it isn't needed. The article is about child safety on roblox rather than roblox controversies so I presume nobody would wanting this title would be expecting to go to something different. DAmik001 (talk) 18:50, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Delete. This redirect only exists because somebody moved the page without discussion and I had to move it back. It's not really useful. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 19:15, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget and keep.

• Retarget Dr. Ivo to Doctor Eggman
• Keep Doctor Ivo (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:49, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
• Dr. IvoDr. Ivo → Professor Ivo  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Doctor IvoDoctor Ivo → Doctor Eggman  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

These should point to the same target. Thepharoah17 (talk) 16:29, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

• Weak preference for Professor Ivo, okay with a delete too. Let's not forget good old Ivo Shandor too. Only one of these three has Ivo as a last name, which is what would get paired with "Doctor", except in special cases, which don't seem to apply here. The only catch is that one is named "Professor" instead of "Doctor", but that's probably a more plausible error than "Doctor Firstname". Still, given the vague/incorrect nature here, a delete wouldn't be unreasonable either. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 18:06, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

  Dear Gozer, I just looked at the text on Shandor, and it's a wall of (partially) in-universe, unsourced madness –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 18:10, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:36, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:10, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

I just tagged the section for citations needed. The same situation in other sections though. Jay 💬 11:14, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Retarget first redirect to Doctor Eggman. "Doctor Ivo" most likely refers to Dr. Ivo Robotnik aka Eggman. Furthermore, I can't see Anthony Ivo referred to in the article as "Doctor Ivo". Worst case scenario, we can always add a hatnote. thetechie@enwiki:~$ she/they | talk 02:46, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget per above. 8BitBros (talk • edits) 04:53, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

@8BitBros: Please clarify your retarget preference. "Above" there has been two targets suggested, Professor Ivo and Doctor Eggman. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:20, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

I apologize. I only saw the suggestion for retargeting the first redirect to Doctor Eggman at first glance, which I agree with doing, as it appears to make the most sense. On an additional note, you can simply leave a reply without a ping, and I'll respond. 8BitBros (talk • edits) 03:22, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:18, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget Dr. Ivo to Doctor Eggman. Doctor Ivo can stay, as Eggman is also known as Dr. Ivo Robotnik in some earlier Sonic the Hedgehog works. The Master of Hedgehogs (talk) (contributions) (Sign my guestbook!) 22:18, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

  actually, that is still his name, it's just that pretty much everyone calls him by his nickname consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 23:10, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget Dr. Ivo to Doctor Eggman and keep the other one. Eggman is the most likely character to be referred to as Doctor Ivo out of the two. --Schützenpanzer (Talk) 23:31, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was as follows:

• Keep Khachaturian
• Retarget Khachaturyan to Khachaturian (surname)
• Keep Khachadurian
• Retarget Khachatourian to Khachaturian (surname)
• Delete Խաչատուրյան

There is history of Khachaturian redirecting to the composer since July 2003. This is the predominant spelling of the composer's name in English. If there's a primary topic for the Khachaturyan spelling, it would be Vahagn Khachaturyan. All other spelling variants are redirected to disambiguation as none of them appear to be common variants for anyone. Խաչատուրյան deleted as a foreign-language misspelling. wbm1058 (talk) 17:40, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

• KhachaturianKhachaturian → Aram Khachaturian  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• KhachaturyanKhachaturyan → Aram Khachaturian  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• KhachadurianKhachadurian → Khachaturian (surname)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• KhachatourianKhachatourian → Aram Khachaturian  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Խաչատուրյան → Khachaturian (surname)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This follows on from a discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects#Redirect request: Khachadurian, Խաչատուրյան. Since both of us agree the redirects should exist in some form but disagree on the target I though we might bring it here rather than trying to figure out where WP:AFC/R appeals go.

To briefly summarize my position, as a result of Talk:Khachaturian (surname)#Requested move 18 March 2025, the index was moved to a title with disambiguator and Khachaturian was targeted to Aram Khachaturian as the WP:PTOPIC. My assessment is that all four variant transliterations of Խաչատուրյան, and the original Armenian string itself should point at the same target to reduce potential confusion, and that target should most probably be Aram Khachaturian based off of the RM. However, User:Timtrent did not reach the same conclusion and will hopefully be along soon to offer a different perspective. Hoping to gain some additional insight from more people as to the best target here. ~2026-39780-5 (talk) 18:16, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: As the AFC reviewer who reviewed the request linked to above (note that it will soon be archived, thus Old revision of Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects will help us) I was aware and content that this discussion would follow. It is not a discssion to delete the redirects, but is one to determine the correct target. To be clear I oppose deletion of any or all of these.

Agree and Support that all the redirects should have the same target. Anythng else would be ridicuous. They are redirects from the surname.

Disagree and Oppose that the surname redirects should link to the composer, since he is simply a well known gentleman of that surname. While the concept of not setting a precedent on Wikipedia is well understood, it is custom and practice to use the surname to disambiguate between even well known people.

Support that all these surname redirects link to the surname disambniguation page - Khachaturian (surname). That is what I would expect as a reader. Further, as a reader of Wikipedia, I would be very pleased when entering any of these into the search box and arriving at the surname disambiguation page, to see all the other people with that surname, and would enjoy disappearing down the rabbit hole of finding out more about them.

When accepting those I accepted I was in cordial discussion with the requestor / nominator. I also asked for eyes on this from other AFC reviewers at WT:AFC, hoping for advice, but none was forthcoming, thus I declared what I believed to be the correct outcome, and made it so after a pause to allow advice. I have no particular horse in this race except that I believe consensus needs to be formed. We can all work with consensus, never with uncertanity, nor inconsistency. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 18:48, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• Note. These are the relevant edits by Timtrent, aka Fiddle Faddle – wbm1058 (talk) 14:05, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

• Reorganize redirects per Timtrent. thetechie@enwiki:~$ she/they | talk 20:37, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
• If Khachaturian targets Khachaturian (surname) then it is WP:MALPLACED. Khachaturian (surname) would need to be moved to Khachaturian in that instance which would require not an RfD but an requested move overturning last year's RM. But I agree with Extraordinary Writ's comment in said RM: the composer is the primary topic for the search term "Khachaturian". Therefore Khachaturian should target Aram Khachaturian – keep.
  That's not the be-all and end-all of this situation, however. There's no need to aim for consistency here. The reader is not going to be confused when different search terms target different places since they're only going to search up one of those search terms. Editors might, but readers first. Vahagn Khachaturyan is Armenia's current president. It is silly to suggest that an alternative transliteration of the composer's name is the primary topic over the normal transliteration of the politician's name. So I suggest to retarget Khachaturyan to Khachaturian (surname).
  As for the other three redirects, my opinions are less strong but I recommend to keep Խաչատուրյան (the composer's probably not the primary topic for the Armenian name as opposed to the specific transliteration) and retarget Khachatourian to Khachaturian (surname) (given Leon Khachatourian). There is no one named Khachadurian on the surname page, so I am ambivalent about either target or deletion. J947 ‡ ^edits 02:17, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
• Keep Khachaturian → Aram Khachaturian. That is the common spelling of the composer's name in English, and the composer is the primary topic for that spelling. I don't think the other versions all need to target the composer, though; J947's argument is very compelling. I'm not knowledgeable about Armenian romanization, but it wouldn't surprise me to learn that each variant has different usage and a different/no primary topic. So, I'm undecided on the rest. Toadspike [Talk] 16:24, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:06, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

• Question. Is Khachaturian (surname) (Armenian: Խաչատուրյան) a fork of Khachatryan (Armenian: Խաչատրյան)?
  • On the Armenian wiki, the page hy:Խաչատուրյան does not exist, so that looks like a typo on the English wiki to me.
  • On the Armenian wiki, hy:Խաչատրյան is the surname page, on which the composer, our purported primary topic, is listed. It is not a primary redirect.
  • When I ask Google Chrome to translate hy:Խաչատրյան while I'm reading the Armenian wiki, it says Khachatryan. That's our surname page, which was first drafted on 10 July 2008.
  • The newer (fork) surname page was started on 14 February 2014.

  I'm leaning towards moving the Khachaturian (surname) back to KhachaturianKhachaturian, reversing the result of the thinly-attended requested move, reverting that back to the redirect of 19 March 2011, and merging the contents of the fork into the original surname page Khachatryan. – wbm1058 (talk) 13:40, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

  Khachatryan (wikidata:Q37447652) is linked on 2 wikis: en:Khachatryan (English) and fr:Khachatryan (French) — family name

  Khachatryan (wikidata:Q1068269) is linked on 7 wikis: hy:Խաչատրյան (Armenian), de:Khachatryan (German), and five others — Wikimedia disambiguation page

  I'm going to try to merge these two Wikidata items. – wbm1058 (talk) 14:14, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

  Oh, I see – family name has to use a different item than disambiguation page – Why not both? wbm1058 (talk) 14:22, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

  Khachaturian (wikidata:Q15740442) is linked on 14 wikis: en:Khachaturian (surname) (English) and 13 others, including de:Chatschaturjan (German), but not Armenian — Wikimedia disambiguation page

  What a mess – wbm1058 (talk) 14:52, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:12, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

• I'm going to pick up this ball, and deal with it, since nobody else has stepped up to handle it, taking multiple steps to close this more complicated case.
  • Firstly I've used the new IP Information tool for the first time (hopefully within what the policy allows) to determine that ~2026-39780-5 is based in the United States. Given their editing history, I'm assuming that they have no particular affinity to Armenia, so when they made this request to create Խաչատուրյան, they were propagating a typographical error, given that hy:Խաչատուրյան is a red link. Therefore, I'm going to delete Խաչատուրյան. This is the English Wikipedia, and users searching for the Armenian name in the Armenian language are most likely to be using the Armenian wiki. – wbm1058 (talk) 15:16, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Pageviews do not show a clear prinmary topic between the composer and the current president of Armenia, but, although it seems their names are spelled the same in Armenian, they are different in English. I'm going to history-split Khachaturian (surname) – wbm1058 (talk) 16:42, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Submission of Draft:Verdis has been repeatedly declined, on 31 January 2026 by RangersRus, on 7 February 2026 by Pythoncoder, on 8 February 2026 by ChrysGalley, and on 9 February 2026 by Robert McClenon. However, Wikipedia:Articles for creation is an advisory process. Established users are encouraged to create articles on their own if they do not need support from reviewers. If your account is autoconfirmed, you may create articles. However, this page is fully-protected so that only administrators can edit it (I'm an administrator). If, despite the multiple draft-reviewers' advice, you wish to proceed with creating this article yourself, you may propose on Talk:Verdis to replace the redirect with an article, by moving the draft article over the top of the redirect. Make this proposal using the WP:Request for comment procedure to obtain a consensus to create the article. If an uninvolved non-administrator closes that discussion with a consensus to create the article, they may then place the {{Edit fully-protected}} template on the talk page to draw the attention of administrators for implementing that uncontroversial change. wbm1058 (talk) 10:12, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

• VerdisVerdis → Croatia–Serbia border dispute  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This redirect should be deleted to allow the creation of a standalone article. The target article Croatia–Serbia border dispute only mentions "Verdis" in passing, while a fully sourced, comprehensive draft article exists at Draft:Verdis. The redirect is misleading and prevents coverage of a notable distinct topic. TeddyFazzber (talk) 17:18, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Please note that "Verdis" is a notable topic deserving its own article, and the draft includes substantial coverage from highly authoritative sources such as BBC, CNN, Firstpost, among others TeddyFazzber (talk) 17:22, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

@TeddyFazzber you might want to use twinkle for rfd noms, to avoid issues with indenting. also, regardless of the draft's current state (too many primary/non-journalistic sources tbh), where's the bbc source? consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 17:39, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Also note that the RfD tag goes on the redirect page itself, not on the target article. If you can't place it there due to protection then don't place it somewhere else, just mention it in your nomination and someone who can edit the redirect will tag it for you. I'll fix this one. Thryduulf (talk) 18:00, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

• Keep at least for now. There is a lot of history here - articles about this subject have previously been deleted three times: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free Republic of Verdis (2019), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Verdis (2020) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Verdis (2nd nomination) (2022). Between the second and third AfDs Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 25#Princedom of Ongal concluded that Verdis (micronation) and Free Republic of Verdis were appropriate redirects and that Verdis probably was too (quoting myself: It isn't quite unambiguous but based on 2 minutes looking it seems to be the best target, others may take a different view. No views to the contrary were expressed). At the third AfD it was noted that the salting of Verdis was lowered specifically to permit the creation of a redirect, but that got overwritten by an article after three days. That AfD closed with a consensus to redirect and it was fully protected to prevent recreation. RfD is not the right venue to determine whether the draft article should replace the redirect (that's either WP:AFC or WP:DRV, I can't remember which ottomh). Thryduulf (talk) 18:00, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for the detailed historical context and for correcting the procedural issues, @Thryduulf and @Consarn. I appreciate the guidance.

• Regarding past deletions (AfDs): I have reviewed the past deletion discussions. The new draft at Draft:Verdis is not a recreation of the previously deleted articles. It is built on a foundation of recent, substantial, and independent journalistic coverage (primarily CNN and The Guardian) that was not central or may not have been available during the previous AfDs. This new evidence directly addresses the core notability concerns that led to those deletions.
• Regarding sourcing: Thank you for the catch, @Consarn. I misspoke regarding the BBC. The primary, high-quality journalistic coverage comes from CNN^[1], The Guardian^[2] and The Sydney Morning Herald^[3]. The draft has been cleaned to rely on these authoritative secondary sources and removes promotional/primary material.
• The core argument for RfD: The purpose of this RfD is not to judge the draft's readiness for mainspace (that is for AFC), but to decide if the current redirect is useful or harmful. The redirect "Verdis → Croatia–Serbia border dispute" is actively misleading. It implies the topic is synonymous with the border dispute, while reliable sources now treat "Verdis" as a distinct entity with its own narrative, goals, and media coverage. Keeping this redirect obfuscates information and directly prevents readers from finding the dedicated draft article where the topic is appropriately covered.
• Proposed path forward: I propose a consensus to delete this redirect. Following that, I will immediately submit the improved Draft:Verdis for review via the Articles for Creation (AFC) process, where it can be judged solely on its own merits based on the current sourcing. This is the standard procedure for replacing an inadequate redirect with a proper article.

In summary, the situation has materially changed since 2022 with new, significant media coverage. The redirect now causes confusion and blocks access to a more appropriate treatment of the subject. TeddyFazzber (talk) 18:47, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

as a heads-up, "primary" has a different meaning in this context: it refers to sources directly related to the subject of an article, or that flat-out are from the subject. read wp:primary for more info on that, but the nitty-gritty is that you don't want an article that relies too much on its subject's own word consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 20:00, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

• Oh wow, now the micronation enthusiasts are coming back with AI-generated proposals? Who could have seen this coming... this would continue to be an WP:UNDUE WP:NOT#NEWS violation. Keep and salt. --Joy (talk) 20:02, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

  @Joy "Keep and salt" is a contradiction - WP:SALTing is for pages that are deleted. The redirect is already fully protected. Thryduulf (talk) 21:32, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

  Sure, I mean that as whatever we can do to stop these repetitive discussions about the latest stories from the fun section of the newspapers. --Joy (talk) 21:50, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

  is it? despite the description, i haven't seen much that suggests that creation protection can't apply to pages that exist. so while it would be redundant and kind of useless here, it might not necessarily be a contradiction consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 22:36, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

  while this nom is suspicious, from a suspishusly new account with a sussy streak of some (but admittedly not enough) knowledge of wikipedia's internal workings, on a subspeciously sock-filled topic, related to a draft suspisyphusly passed on by a handful of suspensefully single-purpose accounts, i'm not actually entirely sure it's ai. it could definitely be ai-assisted, but it's definitely missing a lot of the tells, like having a suspiciously human-like level of awareness of events that have happened more than a sentence ago consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 22:54, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

• Thanks everyone for the feedback. I've heard the arguments, especially about the deletion history and the sources. I understand I rushed this. I won't push for deleting this redirect anymore. I'm ending my involvement in this discussion here TeddyFazzber (talk 05:29, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

• As mentioned above, I think this is the wrong place for discussing this, as the issue here is the promotion of the draft article. This looks okay to me at a quick glance, and there's a new article about Verdis on ABC News (Australia) today, so I'll have a look at the draft later with a view to promotion, if someone else doesn't get there before me. Time to close this rfd now? Laterthanyouthink (talk) 21:49, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

No, please don't try to promote that draft without consensus. Please read the closer's explanation in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Verdis (2nd nomination). If you want to restore this article, read WP:DRVPURPOSE and present an argument there. --Joy (talk) 09:02, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:04, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

• Just fixed the redirects Verdis (micronation) and Free Republic of Verdis that were pointing to a non-existing section. Refine this as well to Croatia–Serbia border dispute § Micronational claims. Jay 💬 16:16, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. The content of the stub here, before this was changed to a redirect, was little more than the definition found at wikt:disco funk. wbm1058 (talk) 03:59, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

• Disco funk → Disco  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Genre re-directs to disco where there is no discussion of the genre. No indication whether it should link to funk or disco. On looking, I can't find any information regarding it being its own unique genre and there's no discussion about it. It appears to be just another hybrid genre name dropped by journalists without information on what elements are prioritized. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:27, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Fails WP:XY - Disco and Funk are two distinct genres of 1970's music, if Google is to be trusted. Tevildo (talk) 00:09, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
• Keep. Disco has its roots in funk. In this case, it usually refers to disco where these roots are more emphasized, the tempo is slower, the funky bass is stronger, but typically it is still considered disco, since these influences are visible to varying degrees in almost any American disco. The term can also be found in sources . and widely used elsewhere (brief mentions, mixes or compilation names like ). It is unlikely that a separate article will appear on this subject. Solidest (talk) 11:46, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
• Delete ironically as per User:Solidest's arguments plus WP:RETURNTORED. That's some MIGHTY fine information you have there, Solidest-- presumably, someone searching for Disco funk wants to learn about that. Unfortunately, that information isn't in the article. We shouldn't redirect unmentioned things to articles that don't have information on them based on information that COULD be in the article but ISN'T. If you really think that might be information someone's looking for, and that this article should be where the information lives, the correct idea is to add it to the article. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 12:27, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:04, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per Lunamann, and bundle Disco-funk as well. Jay 💬 12:44, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 22:04, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

• Bazghanj → Pistachio  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

no affinity with... northern afghan dialect? really? results suggest this might be a word in a couple assorted languages, but seemingly not any that are widely spoken in afghanistan or have affinity for the purposes of redirects, and even then, literally all but one of said results mentions it as a fruit from the... pistachio tree. i'll just assume implausible synonym/slang, and that anyone willing to search this would most likely already know what the other word is

it also seems to see some use as a surname, but i doubt that's important here consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 14:15, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

I created this redirect during my master degree studies of Tajikistan's Gorno-Badakhshan when I saw this term used in the local Shughni language, which is spoken in the Badakhshan regions of Afghanistan and Tajikistan. I don't recall the book or article that I saw it in. David Straub (talk)— Preceding undated comment added 14:02, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:04, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:FORRED and the above discussion. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:55, 9 February 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per all. Jay 💬 18:47, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. wbm1058 (talk) 09:43, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

• Dr. G → Dr. G: Medical Examiner  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Dr. G could also refer to Doctor G, which gets about triple the page views. In addition, I'm sure some of the pages from the prefix index at Dr. G and Doctor G use the abbreviation. Not sure if Dr. G should be retargetted to Doctor G or disambiguated, but I don't prefer the current target. Mathguy2718 (talk) 00:37, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

• Weak keep the primary topic in my google results is for a brand of "dermacosmetic" skincare creams and related products that we don't have any content about (that I've found). Neither the reality TV series (current target) or film (Doctor G) appear in the first three pages of my search results, the TV series gets one hit on page 4, but that's it to the end of page 6. However, when searching for "Dr. G." -Wikipedia -skincare -moisturiser -cream almost all the results on the first three pages are for either the current target or for a soundcloud/youtube artist who doesn't seem at first glance to be notable. I would suggest adding a hatnote from Doctor G to the TV series though (one already exists for the opposite direction). Thryduulf (talk) 14:37, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thepharoah17 (talk) 02:57, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per Thryduulf’s findings. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 03:02, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
• Disambiguate given the ambiguity found by the nom. Add a hatnote at Doctor G pointing there too. WP:SMALLDETAILS, WP:ONEOTHER, etc., but I like this solution given the pageview gap between the two targets. It also allows for an entry for Two Mafiosi Against Goldginger and even the brief mention of the skincare company at L'Oréal#Recent history and acquisitions. I don't fully understand the suggestion to delete, especially given that unlike either target with a hatnote or the disambiguation page, search results only show one of the two primary targets for this search term. J947 ‡ ^edits 03:36, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
• Nominator comment: I just found out that there is a minor planet named "Dr. G." (Note the extra period at the end.) Mathguy2718 (talk) 15:26, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

  Based on this and J947's comment, I'm now peferring disambiguation over keeping but keeping is definitely better than deletion here. Thryduulf (talk) 15:51, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

• Disambiguate per those above, and per precedents like Dr. A, Dr. D, Dr. K, and Dr. Z. BD2412 T 16:40, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:02, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted by ThadeusOfNazereth under criterion G6. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:59, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

• Moonee Ponds, → Moonee Ponds  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I think it is unlikely that this formatting error will be useful as a redirect for a possible typo. No articles apart from the target page currently link here. Uffda608 (talk) 13:10, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 14:19, 9 February 2026 (UTC)
• Delete implausible typo. --Schützenpanzer (Talk) 14:46, 9 February 2026 (UTC)
• Speedy delete, G6, clearly an accident during a page move. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 16:00, 9 February 2026 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom. This was the page title by mistake for only one minute. ArthananWarcraft (talk) 16:35, 9 February 2026 (UTC)
• Speedy delete, it was at this title for about a minute last month. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:11, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 22:04, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

• Disposable blades → Razor  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

as far as definitions go, razors aren't even the only kind of "disposable blade" used for shaving. outside of that area, razors seem to be wrestling for primary topichood with scalpels, knives, pocket knives, switchblades, lawn mower blades, the blades of razors (apparently very important distinction), and assorted suspiciously knife-shaped non-knife utensils consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 11:53, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, I'd even count plastic disposable knives (i.e. the ones in plastic cutlery packets you get with meals in fast food places and the like). 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 20:52, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

  At least in the UK, many of them are now wooden rather than plastic. Thryduulf (talk) 14:30, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, given that razor blade is not the PTOPIC for blade. Jay 💬 13:25, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per above, we don't seem to have any content about this. Thryduulf (talk) 14:30, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 13:29, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

• The Ultimate Showdown of Homosexuality → The Ultimate Showdown of Ultimate Destiny#The Ultimate Showdown of Homosexuality  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

to be confused with "the ultimate orgy of homosexuality". was mentioned in passing with only a primary source, edit warred over, and removed in 2016 consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 11:39, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom: No mention in article and somewhat scandalous. Aaron Liu (talk) 16:21, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Delete, no reason to restore this section given lack of notability; the only sources it ever had were WP:PRIMARY links to the flashes in question. (And really, when someone starts throwing the R-slur around, they've lost the argument.) 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 17:40, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Jay 💬 13:37, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

• How nice to meet you gentleman !! → All your base are belong to us  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

not how the line goes, even translated from japanese consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 11:26, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Delete Flat out incorrect. This has no chance to survive. Make its time. DanielRigal (talk) 20:04, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. There is no Red-brown politics existing. Jay 💬 09:50, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

• Far-left and right politics → Red–green–brown alliance#Similar terms  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This seems like a very broad term that's distinct from a "red-green-brown" alliance. Semantically at least it reads like it's about these two tendencies rather than an alliance between the two. Smallangryplanet (talk) 09:36, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

• I'm leaning delete for no good target here. None of Horseshoe theory, political spectrum, extremism or Left–right political spectrum, which are the articles I found that might discuss this, feel like they would be what someone using this search term would be looking for. I might have missed something though. Thryduulf (talk) 11:48, 9 February 2026 (UTC)
• For now, I'd suggest a double redirect, to Red-brown politics! and initially redirect that to the current target. But the section that is the current tatget wouod be better off as an article in itelf. BobFromBrockley (talk) 12:51, 9 February 2026 (UTC)
• Delete as an WP:XY of Far-left politics and Far-right politics. I₂Overcome ^talk 04:37, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. It's either XY or is a phrase that could be used in any number of contexts. It has no common, consistent meaning or even set of meanings that could be DABified. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 02:44, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as with Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 9#Redirects to flights made by Rezakaisar91 wbm1058 (talk) 03:32, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

• YR-BAB → Tatarstan Airlines Flight 363  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Last one I hope of these ... this redirect doesn't seem to be related to the target article. The aircraft involved was VQ-BBN. Smallangryplanet (talk) 09:23, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. as with Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 9#Redirects to flights made by Rezakaisar91 wbm1058 (talk) 03:34, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

• PT-SSI → Tatarstan Airlines Flight 363  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Another one of these ... this redirect doesn't seem to be related to the target article. The aircraft involved was VQ-BBN. Smallangryplanet (talk) 09:22, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. as with Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 9#Redirects to flights made by Rezakaisar91 wbm1058 (talk) 03:36, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

• 5X-USM → Tatarstan Airlines Flight 363  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Another one of these ... this redirect doesn't seem to be related to the target article. The aircraft involved was VQ-BBN. Smallangryplanet (talk) 09:21, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as with Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 9#Redirects to flights made by Rezakaisar91 wbm1058 (talk) 03:38, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

• F-GGML → Tatarstan Airlines Flight 363  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This redirect doesn't seem to be related to the target article. The aircraft involved was VQ-BBN, F-GGML is a different airplane, I think. Smallangryplanet (talk) 09:18, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to List of Apiaceae genera#Tribe Tordylieae and blank-and-redirect Apioideae to List of Apiaceae genera#Subfamily Apioideae. User:Plantfan, feel free to try again with creating these, if you can more substantively address the concerns raised here. wbm1058 (talk) 13:01, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

• TordylieaeTordylieae → Apioideae#Tribe Tordylieae  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The target article was gutted five months after it was written in 2015 and turned into a redirect. Then in August of 2025 someone changed it back into an article. In the months since the user who did so has not made significant progress in improving or expanding it. One of the few useful pieces of information to be found there is that the Apioideae Subfamily contains approximately 380 genera of flowering plants. This includes notable vegetables and plants like celery, carrots and hemlock. The target page currently lists three.

Furthermore, this redirect is coming from a page concerning the tribe Tordylieae. According to wikispecies, this tribe is one of 23 that fall within this subfamily. Lo and behold, the only tribe mentioned on the target page happens to be in a header, the same header targeted by this redirect. A header that was added the same day this redirect was created. By the same user. Who is also the user who turned the target page back into an article last August. I want to assume good faith, but this smacks of adding a header just so it can be targeted by a redirect; possibly with the intent of turning a redlink into a blue link without having to add meaningful content.

If any other redirects to this target exist, they are probably RfD candidates as well, but I have no idea how to search for redirects to a specific page. ~2025-35665-72 (talk) 08:39, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Apioideae has no other redirects to it. Steps: Go to Apioideae > What links here > check "Hide transclusions" and "Hide links" > Go. Jay 💬 10:23, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to List of Apiaceae genera#Tribe Tordylieae and WP:BLAR the target article to List of Apiaceae genera#Subfamily Apioideae. At present, the list contains more useful information than the article. I₂Overcome ^talk 17:46, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 10:27, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

• Macropharmacology → Pharmacology  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete unmentioned redirect. This is an obscure term that does not have a consistent meaning. I found only three hits on Google Scholar that use this term and one other scientific paper. Two refer to Traditional Chinese medicine or herbal medicine. Another distinguishes micropharmacology within individual cells from macropharmacology‍: a deterministic or phenomenologic function of time. Regular Google thinks this is an error and returns results discussing the pharmacology of macrolides. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 16:31, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

It would be nice to see the speedied article. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 20:58, 2 February 2026 (UTC).

I’m not sure what this is referring to —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 02:03, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

The redirect which was created in October 2007 if my memory serves, replaced an article which was speedy-deleted. It would be useful to see the speedied content in order to judge whether, with hindsight, this is a good redirect. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 19:24, 3 February 2026 (UTC).

Gotcha, thanks for clarifying. It's always useful to have insight into a redirect's origins but we'd still be left having to assess it on its merits in the current state. A well-meaning editor probably created this with a meaning that they understood but all I can find is that the term is rarely used and has different meanings when it is. Just based on the roots I thought maybe it had something to do with the pharmacology of macromolecules but I found nothing to support that best guess. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 05:46, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, enbi [they/them] • [talk] 06:57, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

@Rich Farmbrough: The 2007 article contained only the plain text Macropharmacology (macro pharmacology), and nothing else. jlwoodwa (talk) 08:04, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

No objection to deletion. Thanks Jlwoodwa and Myceteae. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 20:02, 9 February 2026 (UTC).

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Left guide (talk) 10:51, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

• Biochemical Pharmacology (SUNYAB-1973) → Pharmacology  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete unmentioned redirect. The history provides no indication of what this is supposed to mean but apparently this has something to do with the redirect creator's dissertation. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 16:44, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, enbi [they/them] • [talk] 06:57, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Left guide (talk) 10:50, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

• Biochemistry Pharmacology → Pharmacology  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Biochemistry pharmacology → Pharmacology  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Delete as WP:XY. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 16:46, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, enbi [they/them] • [talk] 06:56, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 22:05, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

• List of Black supervillains → Supervillain  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Black supervillains → Supervillain  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Leftover redirects from the deleted page List of black supervillains. Thepharoah17 (talk) 02:15, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

• Delete as there is no list and no information about black supervillains at the target or anywhere else. These are not leftover redirects from the deleted page though. Jay 💬 10:49, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Super. wbm1058 (talk) 22:46, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

• Draft:SupersDraft:Supers → Superhero  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• SupersSupers → Superhero  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I have no idea what this is supposed to be Thepharoah17 (talk) 01:27, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

• The first hit on Google is for article with this title on The Disney Wiki, and that begins: Supers are superpowered humans in the world of the Disney/Pixar The Incredibles franchise. The lead of our article includes the line The franchise takes place in a fictional universe where superheroes, also known as "Supers"..., so there is clearly a connection. My first thought was Superintendent (police), but google also tells me there is a mini series with this title (we have no content I've found, I don't know if we should), something related to on-screen graphics (we have no content I've found, it seems likely we should) and various clippings other other nouns starting with "super" including supermodel and supertanker. I think the best bet is to retarget this to Super (disambiguation) and expand that to cover "Supers" as well, including the Incredibles usage. Thryduulf (talk) 02:11, 9 February 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: the draft one. No use of having that. Retarget the mainspace one to Super (disambiguation) as a plural of the term. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 14:23, 9 February 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to dab page per Thryduulf. We probably want to add Brights movement to the dab page - "Supers" is a term Dawkins suggested to refer to his opponents (see, for example, this page) which is briefly mentioned at the "Brights movement" article. Tevildo (talk) 08:48, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
• If Supers is retained, the draft should also be retained per WP:RDRAFT. Jay 💬 06:56, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).