Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 19

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:17, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

• Love at First Sight (upcoming film) → Love at First Sight (2023 film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per WP:UFILM. Target released over 2 years ago, minimal page views. Steel1943 (talk) 23:52, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. 5 views since 1 November, none of them in 2026. This is what minimal page views actually looks like. Thryduulf (talk) 16:36, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
• Keep per WP:UFILM: 92 pageviews last year. J947 ‡ ^edits 23:56, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:58, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. Seemed to have fully tapered off and no discussion of sequel that might justify keeping it. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 18:10, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 18:12, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

• Alone in the Dark (upcoming video game) → Alone in the Dark (2024 video game)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per the spirit of WP:UFILM. Target released over a year ago, minimal page views. (However, this redirect seems to have history as an article ... but it seems most of it was a copyright violation?) Steel1943 (talk) 22:49, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. The sprit of UFILM is actually "don't delete redirects until they have ceased to be useful", the page views here indicate that it is likely still useful as the pattern of activity has been consistent since shortly after it was released. The copyright violating material in the history has been revision deleted so is of no concern. Thryduulf (talk) 17:02, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
• Delete Since Alone in the Dark is a series, there's a good chance a reader using this search term is looking for a game that is indeed upcoming. --BDD (talk) 19:33, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:57, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. I agree with the nom and with BDD. I find the pageviews minimal but I acknowledge this is subjective and this is a bit higher than some cases. The bigger issue here is ambiguity and potential for WP:RSURPRISE. Given that this is a series with a long history and multiple iterations, it is possible that readers are anticipating coverage of some new future game with this title. This is true whether they are searching on-wiki or clicking an old external link. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 20:55, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Road House 2 (upcoming film). voorts (talk/contributions) 03:18, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

• Road House (upcoming film)Road House (upcoming film) → Road House (2024 film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per WP:UFILM. Target released over a year ago, minimal page views. Steel1943 (talk) 22:19, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

• Keep this is very obviously still beign used - it received almost 70 hits since October with far more days getting views than no views. This is not what "minimal" means. Thryduulf (talk) 17:04, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
• Delete in favour of search results due to ambiguity with Road House 2 (upcoming film). J947 ‡ ^edits 00:47, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:57, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Nominator comment: Quite frankly, in this case, I'd be okay with "Retarget to Road House 2 (upcoming film)" for now. Steel1943 (talk) 05:43, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Road House 2 (upcoming film)" for now. This actually fits the description of "upcoming Road House film" which is the plain language rendering of our in-house disambiguation style. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 21:00, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to the sequel as a better target. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 01:00, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:26, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

• The Critic (upcoming film) → The Critic (2023 film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per WP:UFILM. Target released over a year ago, minimal page views. Steel1943 (talk) 21:43, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

• keep. If it wasn't for the spike in views around 2 January I'd have agreed that this was clearly no longer useful but that spike does exist and it's too soon to say whether it indicated anything meaningful, so now we need to wait another couple of months after this nomination closes to understand whether this is still being meaningfully used (in which case it needs to be kept) or not (in which case it's fine to delete). Thryduulf (talk) 17:33, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:16, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, per WP:UFILM keeping this is misleading to readers. The all-time page view graph clearly shows that pageviews have tapered off. I₂Overcome ^talk 10:23, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

  Yes, obviously there are fewer users now than there were when the article was at this title, that's indisputable but also completely irrelevant to everything. What matters is whether the redirect is still useful, and I've explained why we cannot know that yet - WP:UFILM is explicit that we don't delete redirects until they are no longer useful, not just when we guess they might no longer be. Thryduulf (talk) 13:05, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

• Weak delete. Sympathetic to Thryfuulf's point, but I'm not sure a spike that didn't hit double digits is enough to keep a redirect that is otherwise at nearly at 0 hits a day in the 90 days prior to the nom otherwise . There is also no talk of a sequel at this article that might otherwise justify keeping a redirect. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 03:01, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 21:29, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

• MoangahelaMoangahela → Monongahela  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Nothing at the disambig is spelled like this, and a Google search shows nothing. I don't see why this would be a misspelling, unless it's some sort of alternate transliteration? KyleSirTalksAlot (talk) 14:20, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. I could not find any use of this misspelling. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 19:42, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
• Weak keep Ehh, that's a pretty difficult name to spell, so I'm inclined to be generous with the misspellings we'd support. Those first couple of syllables can especially run together for an English speaker. --BDD (talk) 18:36, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
• Weak keep per BDD. Likely alternative spelling of a non-English word. Steel1943 (talk) 21:23, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:13, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

• Weak Keep. Monongahela River gives a plethora of disparate transliterations. Very easy to see this might be what English ears hear. older ≠ wiser 13:43, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G6. This is an obvious error fixed by the person who made it. Thryduulf (talk) 21:46, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

• American qnd Canadian Water Landmark → American and Canadian Water Landmark  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Target was at this title for 9 minutes in 2013, and this misspelled redirect is no longer required. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 21:31, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:42, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

• List of countries by GDP (nominal) per capita (2005) → List of countries by GDP (nominal) per capita  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• List of richest countries in 2006 → List of countries by GDP (nominal) per capita  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• List of Richest Countries in the World in 2006 → List of countries by GDP (nominal) per capita  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Neither year mentioned in target. These redirects are not useful, because for the very low chance that someone types in one of these redirects, they will not get any information they wanted. Mathguy2718 (talk) 20:47, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

• Delete all. Anyone searching using these redirects will be frustrated or worse, actively misled (if they fail to spot the year in the table headings or elsewhere). —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 21:39, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Steel1943 (talk) 21:06, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:27, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

• Annex to the list of countries → Dependent territory  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• List of countries/Annex → Lists of sovereign states and dependent territories  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

It is unclear what "annex" is intended to mean in this context, and neither target of either one of these readers makes it clear either. (Note that Annex to the list of countries is a {{R with history}} due to a WP:BLAR in 2008.) Steel1943 (talk) 19:39, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:27, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

• List of Countries by GDP (Projected nominal 2005-2007) → Lists of sovereign states and dependent territories  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There seems to be no information that precise in the target article, even at Lists of sovereign states and dependent territories#Gross domestic product. (Most likely, this redirect was a remnant of when Lists of countries by GDP was an article, but that was about 18 years ago.) Steel1943 (talk) 19:33, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:26, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

• Downey's Dream Cars → Robert Downey Jr.  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Mentioned in Robert Downey Jr.#2020–present: Oppenheimer and expansion, the section includes only a brief two sentence description of the subject of the nominated redirect. Per those two sentences, the subject of this redirect seems notable enough where WP:REDLINK deletion applies to encourage article creation. Steel1943 (talk) 19:06, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was revert to the status quo from May 2025. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:30, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

• Three Bean Salad → Three Bean Salad (podcast)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Malplaced redirect, retarget to Three bean salad (the dabpage) or move? ArthananWarcraft (talk) 17:50, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

• Per WP:ONEOTHER and WP:DIFFCAPS, the current setup isn't needed and disambiguation can be handled via hatnotes. Move Three Bean Salad (podcast) back to the base title and redirect three bean salad to bean salad. In other words, we should return to where things stood prior to last May. - Eureka Lott 18:37, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
• Move Three Bean Salad (podcast) to Three Bean Salad and redirect Three bean salad to Bean salad. I agree with Eureka Lott's assessment as to the application of WP:ONEOTHER and WP:DIFFCAPS here. Three bean salad is a common variation of bean salad so the sentence case should redirect to the dish as the primary topic. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 19:56, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:24, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

• Michael Loyst → 2010 Ontario municipal elections  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per WP:RETURNTORED. This was originally a 1-sentence article, but was turned into a redirect on 11 June 2010. The last reference to Michael Loyst was removed there on 2 July 2010 and the source both articles relied on is now dead. None of the history is useful as you'd start from scratch if an article was ever justified. Aoeuidhtns (talk) 17:12, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Esmeralda (The Hunchback of Notre-Dame)#Adaptations. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:25, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

• Esmeralda (Disney)Esmeralda (Disney) → Esmeralda (The Hunchback of Notre-Dame)#Disney adaptation  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete as Esmeralda (Disney character) also exists and is more accurate and consistent with naming conventions. Only one article used it, which I removed as unnecessary, so this doesn't need to be replaced anywhere. WinstonDewey (talk) 16:50, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. Harmless and accurate. We can have more than one redirect for a thing. BD2412 T 17:24, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
• Keep per BD2412. Not ambiguous. Steel1943 (talk) 19:08, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Esmeralda_(The_Hunchback_of_Notre-Dame)#Adaptations, just like for the other redirect. Currently, the redirect targets a non-existent section, so that should be fixed. I do agree that this is harmless, accurate, and unambiguous though. Mathguy2718 (talk) 00:08, 21 January 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget per Mathguy. Term clearly wants a certain adaptation, so no harm in going to the section (or even an anchor). ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 13:29, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Religious views on torture (n.b., Religious views on torture redirects there). The need to expand that article is apparent, but there is interest in redirecting there in the meantime. Potential disambiguation should be discussed/handled separately. --BDD (talk) 16:39, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

• Christianity and tortureChristianity and torture → Torture#Religious perspectives  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No words with the prefix "Christian" are in the target article, leaving the connection between the redirect and the target unclear. Steel1943 (talk) 23:12, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

Delete valid WP:REDLINK (t · c) buIdhe 23:21, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

@Buidhe: The article once had a section about religious perspectives on torture. Since you deleted this section, should it redirect to religious perspectives on torture instead? Jarble (talk) 23:39, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

Oh yeah I forgot that content got spun off. I have no objection to such a redirect. (t · c) buIdhe 23:57, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

• Nominator update: I oppose "Retarget to Religious perspectives on torture" since the article currently does not include any information directly about Christianity in general, but rather just includes information related to a type of Catholicism. Steel1943 (talk) 21:29, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:13, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Retarget to Religious views on torture as more useful to readers than a red link: Catholicism is a denomination of Christianity and so it is reasonable that readers looking for information on Christians' views on torture would want to know at least what some Christians think about it. Sdrqaz (talk) 07:40, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Notified of this discussion at the suggested target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 16:36, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Retarget to Religious views on torture since the Catholics are Christian, last I checked. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:42, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Do not disambiguate. DABs are for ambiguous page titles, not ambiguous ideas. This would require a broad concept article and I'm not sure this is the best title for that article in any event. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:15, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

• Look for "torture" in Persecution of Christians, and it gives much more information than Religious views on torture gives. I don't think there is a single good target. Jay 💬 10:52, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: give a bit of time to consider late thoughts
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:38, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

• Disambiguate, as this can mean one of several things. Christians have been subject to torture; Christians have used torture (e.g., the Inquisition); Christians have philosophical views on torture in this world and the next. BD2412 T 17:30, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget per above. Just because the information isn't currently there doesn't mean it shouldn't be added. I strongly disagree that this would make a suitable DAB page. I really doubt that "Christianity and torture" is a common way of finding information about Christians being tortured, even if there is more of said information overall, and the same applies to specific examples of Christians torturing others. (Anecdotally, I think turning Judaism and violence into a DAB page listing The Holocaust would seem quite obviously absurd.) — Anonymous 03:17, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Religious rejection of politics. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:22, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

• Political quietismPolitical quietism → Political quietism in Islam  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Disambiguate, turn into an article, or delete per WP:XY. Redirect goes from a broad topic to a narrower one, and thus should probably be disambiguated. ~2025-42329-12 (talk) 16:27, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Changing stance, retarget to religious rejection of politics. ~2025-42329-12 (talk) 16:28, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to religious rejection of politics. Srnec (talk) 03:03, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:21, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

• Ash Angel → List of Star Wars creatures#Ash Angel  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Same as before, minor creature with no mentions, Delete. TNstingray (talk) 14:44, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:20, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

• Adar (Star Wars) → List of Star Wars creatures#Adar  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Minor and non-significant Star Wars species, nothing substantial on Wookieepedia and not mentioned here, besides Adar (disambiguation). Delete as unhelpful, and remove entry from the dab page. TNstingray (talk) 14:33, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:20, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

• Iriquios Pliskin → Solid Snake  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

implausible misspelling of "iroquois", swapping 3 letters consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 14:05, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Delete, I find it highly implausible that a misspelling this mangled would be repeated and not caught. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 03:16, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Left guide (talk) 13:44, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

• Virgil Let Me DownVirgil Let Me Down → In a Perfect World (Kanye West album)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target Vestrian24Bio 09:30, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

• Keep: "Virgil" (mentioned at the target) was formerly known as "Virgil Let Me Down".

ItsMario97 (talk) 13:05, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

@ItsMario97: then this detail should be added to the target article. Vestrian24Bio 09:15, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per sources provided by ItsMario97. Not mentioned at the target is not a very good reason for nominating, please provide a fuller rationale next time. BugGhost 🦗👻 19:30, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
• Keep as a well documented former name for the a song on the album. This should maybe be tagged as {{R from song}} and {{R from former name}}; I don't know if those apply since it's not the current name for the song and not a former name for the album. Also, the line Virgil let me down (usually written in sentence case) is a frequently repeated line in the song so this may also qualify as {{R from lyric}}. Anyone searching this is likely looking for information about the specific Kanye West song with this (former) title. Coverage is limited at the target but this aligns with a common practice of redirecting songs to album articles with track listings. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 18:56, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:26, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

• Men of the Harem → Studio Dragon  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target page 𝙰𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚊^(talk) 07:30, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per REDLINK and because the studio has produced several works, and is not a good target. Jay 💬 10:26, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to PCM1. (non-admin closure) WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 12:40, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

• PCM-1PCM-1 → Boeing Starliner-1  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No apparent connection; Google search shows this initialism is used for other things but not this. Also ambiguous with PCM1. I₂Overcome ^talk 05:22, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

• Should we retarget to PCM1, then? I checked PCM (disambiguation) for anything else that might be numbered; the best I could come up with was Pro Cycling Manager, but especially since the first game was only called Cycling Manager, that seems like a stretch. --BDD (talk) 22:26, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

  I would just say delete it. I₂Overcome ^talk 08:45, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any further thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:27, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Retarget to PCM1 as {{R from alternative hyphenation}}. Example use: . voorts (talk/contributions) 03:35, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete per WP:SNOW/WP:G7-ish. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:32, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

• Dundee Bank → Danish Brotherhood in America Headquarters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per WP:RETURNTORED. There is now a well known bank actually called Dundee Bank. Not sure if anyone has called this building Dundee Bank in the first place, it's nowhere near Dundee. –DMartin (talk) 06:09, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

• Comment I am also working on a draft article for Dundee Bank(the company), but it might be awhile before it's ready for mainspace.–DMartin (talk) 06:10, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. I₂Overcome ^talk 08:50, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
• Comment (as creator): Dundee Bank set up their operational headquarters in the historic building in 2015 which is mentioned in the article with a citation; the bank's website shows a picture of the building right here. But articles are more important than redirects so no objection to deleting.
  I look forward to the new company article! - RevelationDirect (talk) 13:30, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:RETURNTORED. This is a prime example of this reason to delete. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 18:15, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 18:10, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

• Hitler's acid → Orthocarbonic acid  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The term isn't mentioned in the article and while a search did bring up evidence that it could be a colloquial term for orthocarbonic acid, I couldn't find a reputable enough source to warrant adding it to the article. Suonii180 (talk) 23:56, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

• Weak Keep. ScienceDaily and the Daily Mail, although not reliable sources for any sort of factual information, are probably good enough to confirm that the term exists. ( ). Tevildo (talk) 18:50, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Paprikaiser (talk) 21:24, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:29, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

• Delete No mention of Hitler in target article(never thought I'd say that).–DMartin (talk) 06:11, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
• Keep. Term exists, even if extremely informal, and the first hit on Google for "Hitler's acid" is the Wikipedia page. Higgs In Space (talk) 14:23, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. If a person is searching for this term and presumably are unfamiliar with what it is or why it is called as such, we are providing no help directing them to an article that does not even mention the term. older ≠ wiser 14:45, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 18:10, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

• J Man → Joker (character)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete, name not mentioned at the target. ~2025-42329-12 (talk) 23:29, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

• delete as extremely vague. okay, let's see... john wick, jesus the christ, jojo, jojo, jojo, jojo, giogio (no, wait), jojo (no, wait), jojo (why's this one gotta be a repeat name?), jojo, john doe, jane doe (specifically the one from team fortress 2), jorel (and his brother), jor-el, jimmy neutron, jimmy wales (huh, what's a wikipedia?), jack the ripper, jack the ripper, judge holden, you probably get the idea. there is a somewhat undercooked joker known by that name in the animated series, but he's not all that notable consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 11:52, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

None of those are relevant, "J Man" is not an established nickname for any of those people/characters. What is relevant is who actually has this nickname? For example, there's a character in Envy (2004 film) with this name. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:57, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget (along with J-Man) to List of Batman Beyond characters#Jokerz where the mention resides. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:57, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:29, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Delete per Consarn. thetechie@enwiki:~$ she/they | talk 05:26, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

• comment: oops, thought i mentioned before. i don't think that list will work since the entire jokerz section (and most of the list for that matter) is cruft that is either unsourced or reliant on primary sources. if anything, it should probably go to afd to get merged consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 11:42, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 18:09, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

• Shanghainese Americans → Chinese Americans  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No need to be such specific, just like we don't have Beijingese Americans A1Cafel (talk) 02:38, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, no mentions in the target article aside from a brief mention of Shanghainese dialects. 🦬 Beefaloe 🦬 (talk) 09:52, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
• Keep (creator). "Shanghai" and "Shanghainese" are mentioned in the target article. feminist🩸 (talk) 02:43, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:28, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

• Keep Shanghainese is a both a local and linguistic identity.–DMartin (talk) 08:19, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per Beefaloe. We lack relevant information on the topic. --BDD (talk) 20:33, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Delete per Beefaloe. thetechie@enwiki:~$ she/they | talk 05:27, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Delete. The article contains only the most passing of mentions:

Varieties of Wu Chinese, particularly Shanghainese and the mutually unintelligible Wenzhounese, are spoken by a minority of recent Chinese immigrants hailing from Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Shanghai.^{[when?][citation needed]}

There is virtually no information about this subset of Chinese Americans. Anyone searching this term will be woefully disappointed or, worse, possibly misled into thinking the term is synonymous with the target. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 01:18, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Delete as per Myceteae. Not enough info here to keep. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 02:45, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy Delete under criterion G6. (non-admin closure) –DMartin (talk) 07:12, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

• Fam to Market Road 1098 → List of Farm to Market Roads in Texas (1000–1099)#FM 1098  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I request the deletion of this redirect as it is a misspelling not present on any other Farm to Market Road redirect UltrasonicMadness (talk) 00:13, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

• Weak Keep as a semi-plausible typo redirect per WP:RTYPO; the main thing that hurts plausibility here is the one missing character is in the first word, leaving plenty of time to catch the typo before hitting enter. If someone challenges plausibility for that reason I won't fight. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 00:45, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
• Speedy delete, G6, obviously created in error -- the creator of this created the corrected version very shortly after this one. There's abolutey no ned to kep randm tyop rediret creatins aruond. (Especially for ones to such obscure topics). –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 01:17, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete under criterion G6.–DMartin (talk) 06:12, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:08, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

• Comerica TowerComerica Tower → Ally Detroit Center  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Ally Detroit Center was previously known as Comerica Tower at Detroit Center. "Comerica Tower" now better describes Comerica Bank Tower in Dallas, and this redirect may cause confusion. 42-BRT (talk) 00:08, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

I'm not sure whether it is best to retarget to the Dallas building or disambiguate, given that the building in Detroit was renamed more than 15 years ago. 42-BRT (talk) 00:11, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. From what I can tell, Comerica Tower generally refers to the building in Detroit, not the building in Dallas. There's also a good chance the Dallas skyscraper will be renamed in the near future, since Comerica has been acquired by another bank. - Eureka Lott 18:43, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Keep and add a hatnote per Eureka Lott. thetechie@enwiki:~$ she/they | talk 05:28, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).