Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 22

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:11, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

• Nouvelle-Zelande → New Zealand  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per WP:FORRED and old rfd. No affinity with French. Thepharoah17 (talk) 16:44, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom and the linked discussion. ArthananWarcraft (talk) 18:03, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per FORRED. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 18:49, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to List_of_country_names_in_various_languages_(J–P)#N which tells the reader this is French for New Zealand, or keep. J947 ‡ ^edits 02:41, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:36, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• Delete but also why does the list above even exist? Something about it just feels... off. That really doesn't go against INDISCRIMINATE? Has it ever been brought to AfD? I don't feel like digging further but I'm rather puzzled by the fact that we have that list at all on English Wikipedia. — Anonymous 23:50, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:07, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

  @Lenticel and @J947, I've gone ahead and bundled the lists of country names in various languages for deletion if you two are interested. — Anonymous 02:02, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

• Delete no strong ties between NZ and French language. Don't support redirecting to the list since the list is at AFD and I support deletion of the list. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:28, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Delete no affinity with French and the suggested target is likely to be deleted at AFD. Sign² (talk) 01:27, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

• Wait until the AfD concludes. Otherwise the list is a suitable target per J947. Jay 💬 07:33, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

  to be a little unfair, i don't actually see any need for waiting. that afd could be closed as delete either right now or in a few hours if a closer felt like it (it probably comes down to a little pedantry), and i really don't think more than 9 people will come in with viable arguments for other options at the last second consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 11:47, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

  and there it goes consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 13:34, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:09, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

• Peom → Poetry  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

plausible misspelling of "poem", but also (if not more so) of "peon", and apparently "peor" (which isn't a word worth worrying about here) consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 13:00, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, ambiguous misspelling. ArthananWarcraft (talk) 14:55, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
• Delete WP:XY as per nom. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 17:31, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
• Delete ambiguous misspelling. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 19:16, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
• Keep. Not convinced this is seriously ambiguous. All the Google results I'm getting for "peom" -wikipedia are intended to be "poem". There's even a collection of poetry named Poems, Peoms and Other Atrocities (Robert Holdstock#Death). Importantly, if the reader does mean Peon, they can access Peonage just as well from Poetry as from search results. J947 ‡ ^edits 02:27, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:30, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

delete per above Oreocooke (talk) 23:45, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:07, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
• Keep per J947. Search results will be a significantly inferior result for pretty much everybody who uses this redirect. Thryduulf (talk) 15:17, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Left guide (talk) 01:16, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

• Template:Country data FHR → Template:Country data Republic of Haiti (1859–1957)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Republic of Haiti (1859–1957) is not known by these initials. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 22:14, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. "FHR" in the context of Haiti seems to primarily refer to Federation Haitienne de Racquetball (the governing body for racquetball in the country). Googling "FHR" "Republic of Haiti" -Wikipedia doesn't find anything relevant (although it does find a surprising number of OCR errors for "the"). Thryduulf (talk) 15:26, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to The Presidents of the United States of America (band). (non-admin closure) Thepharoah17 (talk) 02:43, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

• POTUSAPOTUSA → The Presidents of the United States of America (band)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• PotusaPotusa → President of the United States  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• PotUSAPotUSA → The Presidents of the United States of America (band)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

These should point at the same target as the capitalization doesn't seem to make a difference in meanings here. I would target them all to President of the United States as primary topic. ArthananWarcraft (talk) 19:06, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

retarget all to President of the United States, as POTUS seems a much more likely target of POTUSA than TPOTUSA band. hatnote can be added if needed. Oreocooke (talk) 21:37, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

@Oreocooke Google results do not support this statement at all. A quick search reveals it is a common shorthand for the band among fans on sites like Reddit. Here is one such example in a news article: . — Anonymous 21:59, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

the above withdrawn due to being too weak. just wanted to clear that up. Oreocooke (talk) 22:34, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per my comment above. — Anonymous 22:00, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

  Also the top reply to this post on Quora is rather telling . (Far from a reliable source but reliability isn't necessary for showcasing general usage.) — Anonymous 22:04, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

@An anonymous username, not my real name still, a hatnote can (and probably should) be added if needed. besides that it was a bit weak anyway Oreocooke (talk) 23:43, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Well I now see that they did not originally all have the same target so just to be clear, I think all should point to the band. I'm not sure which page you think needs a hatnote; the band page which already has the disambiguator "band" in its title certainly doesn't (see the guideline NOTAMBIG. And the name of the band is plural so the same probably applies to "President of the United States". — Anonymous 23:48, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• Target The Presidents of the United States of America (band). Is there evidence that President of the United States is abbreviated POTUSA? It's always been POTUS in my experience. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:01, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
• Target all → The Presidents of the United States of America (band). Search results invariably refer to the band. Like Tavix, I have never seen this refer to the actual president. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 18:49, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:07, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

• Boeing YAL-1A Airborne Laser (ABL) → Boeing YAL-1  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

redundantly includes an abbreviation of the term, abbreviating the term with redundancy consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 18:54, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• Weak delete the exact string, including the redundant abbreviation, does actually turn up in searches, but usually to introduce the abbreviation for later use by the writer, and since typing the first part of the string into the bar brings up the article, the redirect is not needed for navigation. It is still getting some pageviews, but even the high month last year saw only ten, so should be safe to delete. ~2026-39780-5 (talk) 21:24, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:06, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

• Lemon custard → Custard  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete (essentially) unmentioned redirect. The sole mention of lemon occurs at Custard § Variations which states that lemon is among the common flavors used with a particular variety of custards. If lemon custard is notable, WP:RETURNTORED applies. Either way, readers searching for information on lemon custard will find none here. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 18:32, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to The Beach (TV series). (non-admin closure) WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 18:10, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

• Beach (series)Beach (series) → Bleach (manga)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete. Beach ≠ Bleach. Thepharoah17 (talk) 18:03, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to The Beach (TV series). It's the only series listed at Beach (disambiguation). -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:17, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to The Beach (TV series) per User:Tavix. ~2026-39780-5 (talk) 18:19, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget per Tavix above. thetechie@enwiki:~$ she/they | talk 20:37, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to The Beach (TV series) per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 10:32, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:05, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

• Sunni Islam apologist → Sunni Islam  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete. Was creator's only edit as a redirect to Barack Obama. Not really relevant to target. Thepharoah17 (talk) 17:36, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: Islamic apologeticsIslamic apologetics redirects to Kalam. Kalam and Islamic apologetics can be synonymous, but are not straightforward one-to-one synonyms per the definition of kalam in the lead and the description at Kalam § Kalām as apologetics. This suggests Kalam § Sunni kalam schools *might* be a good target. I'm not confident making that call. Otherwise, there's no mention of apologetics or apologist at the current target and no mention of Sunni at Apologetics nor at Kalam § Kalām as apologetics. So, delete unless there's support for Kalam § Sunni kalam schools or some other target. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 20:33, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per all. This was a poor ATD. Jay 💬 07:40, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Left guide (talk) 01:17, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

• LankyBox → List of most-viewed YouTube channels  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Lankybox → List of most-viewed YouTube channels  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Lankybox is no longer mentioned at the target article. ConeKota (talk) 16:26, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• Delete - LankyBox now has no connection to the target article. No brainer. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 16:31, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
• Delete not mentioned at the target. ~2026-39780-5 (talk) 17:11, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: per nom. thetechie@enwiki:~$ she/they | talk 17:32, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
• Bundled Lankybox (other capitalization) with this. Delete anyways, per above. Thanks, 1isall (talk | contribs) . . (he/him) 03:49, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
• delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 05:44, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
• Delete as unmentioned. Fair enough. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 18:50, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Jq talk 💬 contributions 20:30, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 18:09, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

• 2024 T20 World Cup → 2024 Men's T20 World Cup  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This page should be a dab between Men's and Women's tournaments. Vestrian24Bio 16:17, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. thetechie@enwiki:~$ she/they | talk 17:33, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
• Disambiguate per nom. J947 ‡ ^edits 01:45, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
• Disambiguate. I'd actually already done that last year. 162 etc. (talk) 04:53, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
• dabify per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 05:45, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
• Disambig (drafted) per above. Thryduulf (talk) 16:00, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 18:08, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

• 2026 T20 World Cup → 2026 Men's T20 World Cup  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This page should be a dab between Men's and Women's tournaments. Vestrian24Bio 16:15, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: per nom. thetechie@enwiki:~$ she/they | talk 17:33, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
• Disambiguate per nom. J947 ‡ ^edits 01:46, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
• Disambiguate. I'd done that one last year too. 162 etc. (talk) 04:54, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
• dabify per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 05:45, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
• Disambig (drafted) per above. Thryduulf (talk) 16:04, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
• Disambiguate per nom (though it seems to partially have been at the minute) The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 12:22, 24 January 2026 (UTC)
• Disambiguate: per nom. QWisps (talk) 13:23, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:04, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

• Tansit → Space Ghost Coast to Coast#Characters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target. Go D. Usopp (talk) 00:34, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Seems to be a misspelling of SG's enemy Tansut --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:04, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Delete—more likely to be a misspelling of transit than of Tansut. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 12:34, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: Misspelling sure, but is it a plausible one? Search for "tansit space ghost" in the wiki search and you get multiple results for this misspelling. Jay 💬 15:11, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on Jay's comment?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thepharoah17 (talk) 15:23, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

• Delete vague misspelling/typo. A search like tansit space ghost may turn up this misspelling but that ignores the fact that transit is a far more common word overall. At the same time, it doesn't seem to be an especially common or likely misspelling or typo for transit so I would not redirect there. In a contest between a relatively common misspelling for an obscure word/name and a relatively uncommon misspelling for a very common word, it it somewhat of a toss up and therefore too vague to guess the intended meaning. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 18:44, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Space Ghost (TV series)#Space Ghost to align this with TansutTansut. I anticipated supporting deletion, but after examining this, I think it should probably be retained. This may not be a misspelling—various fan sites use both spellings, and I don't know where we'd look for an authoritative answer. When it comes to usage on Wikipedia, there are only a handful of mentions, but most of them refer to the Space Ghost character. There are a few misspellings of transit, a WP:PTM, and an acronym, but nothing else that would be a proper target. - Eureka Lott 22:12, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the possible target?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thepharoah17 (talk) 16:11, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per User:Myceteae. Perhaps individually the vagueness and typo might be tolerable in a redirect but together the navigationally utility is not there. ~2026-39780-5 (talk) 17:09, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Delete: also a plausible typo for Transit. Redirecting it to a specific TV show's page would not be helpful. I'd like to guess that 80% of the time, a reader is not looking for this video game character. thetechie@enwiki:~$ she/they | talk 17:30, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Chess enjoyer (talk) 15:37, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

• Drake "Drake Maye" MayeDrake "Drake Maye" Maye → Drake Maye  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Drake Drake Maye MayeDrake Drake Maye Maye → Drake Maye  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Bizarre creation, not mentioned at the target, unlikely search term, delete –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 14:21, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• Keep (as creator) it may seem odd, but his nickname is literally the same as his actual name. This is a fact covered in multiple reliable sources that could be added as a line to the article: , . Also, Drake Drake Maye Maye exists and that was reviewed and marked as reasonable at Talk:Drake Drake Maye Maye. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:35, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

  I just saw the other one, and bundled that along with the nomination, and being reviewed doesn't really mean anything. Even if true, it's not mentioned at the target, and no one is going to search for that. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 14:41, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per Joseph2302. I think a mention should be added, but this, bizarrely enough, is an actual rendering of Drake Maye's name with a nickname that is used enough that it makes sense to keep. Casablanca 🪨^(T) 14:38, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

  You add the mention first, then you create the redirects, not the other way around. This one shouldn't really be created anyway, because it's longer and redundant to his actual name, which anyone is going to type instead. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 14:43, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• Keep as {{R from nickname}}. It's very well attested, more sources include: . -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:39, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
• Keep, as reviewer. I agree with Casablanca that the proper path forward is to add a mention of the nickname to the page, not to delete the redirect per Tavix's sources. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 16:19, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
• Comment have added a mention of the nickname in 2025 season section- as this is when nickname/meme emerged. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:14, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
• Keep. I agree with 'keep' reasons given by others. It's an odd one, but the nickname itself is odd, and this is justified. Could perhaps be refined to Drake Maye#2025 and bolded since readers may be looking for an explanation of the nickname. I have no strong opinion on that and I think it could be done as a matter of editorial discretion if this closes as 'keep'. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 17:21, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
• Keep and probably refine post-close, per Myceteae. Probably uncontroversial but can be handled on the talk page if needed. ~2026-39780-5 (talk) 01:48, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Keep Drake "Drake Maye" Maye, and Weak "Weak keep" keep for Drake drake maye maye. Jq talk 💬 contributions 22:47, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Left guide (talk) 01:17, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

• Maccheroni con la trippa → Macaroni  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

piatto senza menzione. ha un articolo in wp-it consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 11:29, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

*voce

non le mie regole, è solo itwiki mwwv ^converse∫_edits 13:51, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Comment: why the rationale in Italian? I get you've been trying to spice it up with "funny" rationales, but this really isn't helpful. thetechie@enwiki:~$ she/they | talk 17:35, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

And before you mention the <abbr></abbr>, those do not work on mobile. thetechie@enwiki:~$ she/they | talk 17:35, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

to be unfair, you can actually see it by just clicking on the text. to be fair, this doesn't seem to work on the app for some reason, but it also doesn't seem like you're using that. also, it's a template, not html markup consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 20:46, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom. thetechie@enwiki:~$ she/they | talk 20:38, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:57, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
• Delete as nothing specific about this dish at target article. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:58, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:02, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

• Holy OrthodoxyHoly Orthodoxy → Eastern Orthodoxy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Possibly WP:POV name, not present at target WP:RDELETE n.8.

Therefore, this redirect should be deleted. Veverve (talk) 19:15, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

• Keep Redirects can be non-neutral (WP:RNEUTRAL), and all existing uses seem to refer to Eastern Orthodoxy. I might be inclined to delete if the phrase is used by separate denominations listed at Orthodox Church, but if it's just Eastern Orthodoxy, I'd classify this with other benign redirects like Holy Roman Catholic ChurchHoly Roman Catholic Church. I've tagged this with {{R from non-neutral name}} and {{R without mention}}. --BDD (talk) 21:41, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
• Keep per BDD. Happy Editing -- IAmChaos 22:43, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
• Delete I am not concerned about neutrality here, but where is this term defined? It may be a Wikipedia-specific neologism. Dimadick (talk) 10:44, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:27, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

• I find 17 uses on OrthodoxWiki. I'm reasonably confident this is an endonym for Orthodox Christianity and not a Wikipedia neologism. --BDD (talk) 16:21, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Does anyone have any better sources than a wiki (which are not generally reliable)?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 05:31, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

• Keep BDD makes a great argument. Servite et contribuere (talk) 05:38, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

  Actually Redirect to Orthodox #Relgion which isn't just strictly Christian Orthodoxy. The term "Holy" almost always refers to Religion. Servite et contribuere (talk) 09:46, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

• Keep, despite non-neutrality. Might be better to change the target to Orthodox Church to avoid showing prefernce to any denomination.–DMartin (talk) 05:41, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Two new target suggestions have come up.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 11:16, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• Weak keep. I have to say that the arguments above are convincing enough to support this redirect despite its non-neutrality. I don't think retargeting is the right move here, as it's not clear that any other "Orthodox" religious groups use this terminology. — Anonymous 14:24, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. The scattershot potential targets and lack of mention all point to the fact that this is too vague a term to point anywhere. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 14:45, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

  @Deacon Vorbis, have you tried Googling it with quotes? I'm seeing a rather large number of results that all point to specifically Eastern Orthodoxy to the point where it seems like a well-established endonym. I'm considering changing my vote from weak keep to just keep. Incidentally, when I Googled "holy Catholicism" as a comparison (which overall did not yield the same consistent type of results), I found this statement on a website called The Byzantine Forum: It is Holy Catholicism, just as the Orthodox believe in Holy Orthodoxy. This would suggest that the term is common enough that even Catholics are familiar with it. I'll reconsider my vote if anyone can find a use of this term to refer to any other "Orthodox" group. — Anonymous 15:43, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

  But there's no mention of it at the target, leaving any potential searcher of this term unclear why they've arrived there. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 16:07, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

  This is actually a remarkably similar case to the third bullet of WP:R#KEEP: For example, users who might see the "Keystone State" mentioned somewhere but do not know what that refers to will be able to find out at the Pennsylvania (target) article. I must trust that our readers posses the mental aptitude to put two and two together and recognize that the terms are synonyms. As for adding a mention at the source, I see that the term is used in the publications of the Orthodox Church in America ([]), the Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese of North America ([]), and the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America ([]), although I'm not sure if listing such mentions (with citations of course) would be considered original research. — Anonymous 16:44, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

  But the Pennsylvania article not only mentions "Keystone State", but goes into specific detail about its use as a nickname (and targets a section of the article that does so). That's a good redirect. The one under discussion doesn't, making it a bad redirect. "I must trust that our readers posses the mental aptitude to put two and two together and recognize that the terms are synonyms." Without a mention or source, an apt reader should wonder if this was is actually legit, or just some random redirect that someone created without good justification. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 17:00, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

  Why are they searching it in the first place then? — Anonymous 18:44, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• Weak keep based on usage evidence per User:BDD. Was appropriately tagged Template:R from non-neutral. If additional evidence that other topics are being sought after emerges then retargeting to the DAB should be fine, but this does not need deletion. ~2026-39780-5 (talk) 17:15, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
• I asked a friend, an Eastern Orthodox monk, about this. He wasn't aware of the term being used by other Orthodox churches, like Oriental Orthodox. He said that the term is often used by Old Calendarists, to suggest the established churches have strayed and what they practice is the "true" Holy Orthodoxy, but that it's also used generally by (Eastern) Orthodox Christians to refer to their faith. --BDD (talk) 20:50, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:59, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

• FC Stăuceni → Moldovan Liga 1  (talk · links · history · stats)
• FC Stauceni → Moldovan Liga 1  (talk · links · history · stats)
• Draft:FC Stăuceni → Moldovan Liga 1  (talk · links · history · stats)

This club had a page before and was deleted by a user and redirected to Moldovan league.In my understanding if a football club has no page it should be redlinked instead of having such redirect, as it makes you feel the club has a page until you click it and end up nowhere. Kolya77 (talk) 08:28, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. --BDD (talk) 17:05, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
• Delete – Per nom. Svartner (talk) 06:36, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
• Delete as above. GiantSnowman 19:20, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the pre-BLAR page history?
Also, notified of this discussion at the target and creator talk pages.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 10:15, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• Restore article and send to AFD AFD is the proper way to delete articles, redirecting them and then nominating the redirect for deletion is an improper backdoor deletion method that we shouldn't support. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:00, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

  oh, we're doing this again? cite the policy or guideline that says that, please consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 18:43, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

  WP:AFD, Articles for deletion (AfD) is where Wikipedians discuss whether an article should be deleted i.e. RFD is not the place to delete articles. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:16, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

  WP:RFD is the place to delete redirects, which this is. If there is consensus here that the content would not survive an AfD (for example), then there is no issue with deletion via RfD. That's not the case with this one as Warudo has made an argument for notability, but it is something to keep in mind. -- Tavix ^(talk) 01:05, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

• Restore and send to AFD because I have doubts as to whether the topic is notable or not. In particular, the editor who BLARed the page does not seem to speak Romanian (no activity on rowiki and no babel tag) so it is very possible that he missed some sources. The pre-BLAR article is also a translation of the rowiki article, which has lower notability standards (according to google translate, ro:Proiect:Fotbal/Notabilitate says "In general, football clubs that have evolved into a professional football competition are notable"). For this reason, the author of the article may not have put as much effort into looking for sources as they would have if they needed to pass the WP:GNG. Putting these two factors together, I think that we should send this to AFD so enwiki editors, specifically ones who speak Romanian, have a chance to look for sources. Warudo (talk) 21:28, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

  the claim that it was a translation from rowiki is really interesting, because either i caught a case of dumb again, or it's wrong. not only does it seem to never have been a straightforward translation (even in its earliest states, it seems to have been written with it as a sort of model, but not actually straightforwardly translating it), but it seems to also be part of a running gag of its creator and main author moving stuff from draftspace without discussion (twice in this case). that second part doesn't mean much here, it's just funny to note

  either way, i don't think the rowiki article would survive its equivalent of afd either, seeing as it's even more barebones (with only what would be citation 1 here) consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 18:33, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

  Yeah, you have a point. The claim that the enwiki article is a translation isn't completely wrongIt is, see below 23:25, 27 January 2026 (UTC), if you check the first revision, Special:Diff/1220381156 you'll see that it is a translation of the rowiki article, however for some reason I didn't think to check the revisions that came after. The history section found in later revisions does not exist in the rowiki article. Warudo (talk) 21:22, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

  not quite, from the looks of it. as the most obvious exampe, the "record" section doesn't seem to have existed in the same way as in rowiki for a while, even though a direct translation would've included it right away. maybe it'd be better to just ask the creator if it was a translation lol consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 22:16, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

  It turns out I got it backwards. The rowiki article was actually translated from the English article. In particular, this version of the enwiki article, which has the records section in it was translated into this version (check the edit summary). Since the enwiki article came first my notability argument does not hold so I'm changing my !vote to Neutral. Warudo (talk) 23:25, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

  oh wow, so i really was wrong. good find, grazie consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 23:57, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

• Restore per Joseph2302. Contested BLARs (and if the redirect gets nominated for deletion that is unequivocly contesting the BLAR) go to AfD not RfD. Thryduulf (talk) 03:50, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

It's not accurate to say that nominating a redirect for discussion is "unequivocly" [sic] contesting the WP:BLAR. Let's say that the nominator agrees with Onel5969 that there is not enough in-depth coverage from independent sources to meet WP:GNG but simply has an issue with where it was redirected to. That would be a contestation of the redirection but not the BLAR itself. -- Tavix ^(talk) 01:05, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

• Restore and ship to AFD as per Joseph, Warudo, and Thryduulf. While there is an argument to be made that the proper thing to do is delete per WP:SNOW, that's only if we're absolutely dead certain that there is nothing of value in the pre-BLAR article. Warudo clearly sees something that might be salvaged here, and if anyone can salvage an article like this, it's AfD. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 04:11, 24 January 2026 (UTC)
• i'm gonna do what i'm extremely disappointed hasn't been done yet, and say the following: delete per nom, and as there's nothing worth restoring in the pre-blar content. it was an extremely barebones summary with only two seemingly random matches listed, citation 1 was an equally barebones summary of their results (and nothing else), citation 2 was (seemingly) some short paragraphs about a different team (spartanii sportul, which might itself not survive afd) that lost to them (so i can judge from this capture, but it refuses to load more than 5 paragraphs, so i might be wrong), and citation 3 was about yet another different team (petrocup hînceşti, which might itself only barely not get outright deleted at afd) that wiped the floor with them. none of them would satisfy gng, and would only work on top of an article that already does establish their notability. it also goes without saying that, because the sources don't actually support all of what the article says, that's also an issue. as a sort of aside, citation 1 seems to also be incomplete unless the team really did spend 2020 and most of 2022 and 2023 asleep, so i wouldn't even consider it to be a good inclusion

research of my own mostly gave me results from fmf.md, which only seems to be compiling their results, so they're not worth much. results from other sources (all 10 of them) were all about stuff they were either tangentially related to, or coincidental due to comments or tags, and entirely unmentioned otherwise

finally, saying that it might be better off sent to afd because rowiki has different notability criteria is a complete non-sequitur as this isn't rowiki, so i'm honestly not even entirely sure why the argument was made in the first place, especially since it still says nothing about the content itself here beyond an empty hope that someone else will maybe actually have something to say probably. if input can't be guaranteed, why are you even bothering to extend this headache? consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 18:21, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per Consarn's thorough analysis. Thanks! -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:28, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:56, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

• Tonic Systems → Google Drive  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I'd be bold, but I'm a fairly new user and really wanted to get some input on this first. Tonic Systems is a company that was acquired by Google in 2007, and seems to have produced the majority of their Google Workspace software. However, the current redirect only goes to Google Drive, which doesn't seem like the right place (they had a much heavier hand in creating Google Slides, if we had to pick just one product). The current Google Drive article has no information about Tonic, so I find the redirect quite odd. My two ideas are to either WP:RETURNTORED if I can find enough independent coverage, or at the very least retarget to Google Workspace. Does anyone have any thoughts? JarJarInks_{٩(◕_◕)۶}^{Tones essay} 16:40, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Delete. "Tonic" or "Tonic Systems" are not mentioned in either article, so I suggest deleting. There are no mentions of it outside of those targets either. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 03:12, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the pre-redirect page history?
Also notified of this discussion at the target and creator talk pages.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 09:48, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. Non notable company, no WP:SIGCOV. It was prodded in 2007 and the redirect was applied instead, but overall I think deleting was the right decision anyway. Remove the history alongside, it's not needed.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:14, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
• Delete no need to restore and list at AFD because the proposed deletion of the preexisting article remains uncontroversial. In the unlikely event someone asks for restoration of the article content then treat it as deleted due to the original PROD expiring and restore those revisions, but that seems unlikely. The redirect is not navigationally useful so should be deleted. ~2026-39780-5 (talk) 17:30, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. Apparently non-notable defunct company that is not discussed in any detail anywhere. There are brief mentions at Google Slides and Google Drawings and a list entry at List of mergers and acquisitions by Alphabet that does little more than link to the redirect. Readers will be best served by search results which will reveal these scattered references which comprise the totality of coverage on en-wiki. If someone finds suitable sources, content can be added to Google Workspace (or some other target) and this can be re-created in the future. There is consensus here that the pre-PROD content can be deleted and should not be used to add content back to en-wiki. So, there's no value in maintaining the history and the current redirect effectively blocks search results which highlight what little coverage we do have. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 19:10, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Samuel Shapiro. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:52, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

• Sam ShapiroSam Shapiro → Samuel Shapiro (Illinois politician)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Pursuant to a desire or suggestion by 162 etc. to list this title here stemmed from this temporary account request (which has since been removed, hence it being a revision) to eliminate its disambiguator on the count of "see his infobox and his campaign merchandising". Amakuru (whom I'm also pinging in here) contested it with other same-titled disambiguated entries, igniting the possibility of ambiguity for in connection to the full name Samuel Shapiro (which already houses a DAB page). 162 etc. incorrectly stated that this title was created as a redirect to the Illinois politician; rather/instead, the politician's title was DABbed from this title precisely on 23 May 2005 per the page history and remained unchallenged prior that TA request. When pressed by Amakuru as to the rationale for reverting my retargeting of this title to the fully name DAB page, 162 etc. insisted that this title should be brought over here before. So now that it's here, tell us the rationale and why the reversion? Intrisit (talk) 09:09, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Samuel Shapiro. It's already established that there's no primary topic for the name Samuel Shapiro, and there's also no particular evidence I could see that the Illinois senator is the primary topic for the shorter Sam form. All of the entries on the disambiguation page are sometimes, but not predominantly, called Sam, hence that diminutive form lacks a primary topic much as the longer form does. This should have been Uncontroversial, I don't really know why the earlier bold retargeting was reverted. Cheers  — Amakuru (talk) 09:59, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

  Hence why I stated in the rationale that 162 etc. account for that reversion. Since he/she stated we should bring that RMTR discussion over here so, here it is. Let this be a reminder that this ain't my request — that temporary account alert us and reminded us of this title's then target (which personally looks biased for a global encyclopedia as this one) and by your contest, you enlightened not just me, but also unsuspecting Wikipedians and viewers with this whole ranging thing. Intrisit (talk) 13:47, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep (without prejudice to renomination). (non-admin closure) WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 18:07, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

• George WarshingtonGeorge Warshington → George Washington  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete as implausible typo. Note that Warshington was deleted as R3. Thepharoah17 (talk) 10:56, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

• Keep as a {{r from pronunciation}}. See wikt:Warshington. I'm no linguist, but I think this is covered at Linking and intrusive R. - Eureka Lott 15:54, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
• Keep per Eureka Lott. Warshington should be undeleted as well. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:44, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
• Delete, despite the rare pronunciation variant. This isn't plausibly helpful. Those who pronounce it like this still don't spell it like this, and it's not within the realm of reasonableness for anyone to go to the trouble of typing this all out exactly thus without realizing what they're actually wanting. There's a WP:PANDORA argument here too -- for every single page that contains "wash" or "washington". –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 17:46, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Keep per Eureka Lott & Tavix. thetechie@enwiki:~$ she/they | talk | contributions 19:55, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Keep, not out of the realm of possibility. Randy Kryn (talk) 23:19, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

• Delete - it's a misguided redirect. GoodDay (talk) 16:38, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:08, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Chess enjoyer (talk) 07:12, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Keep Very much unambiguous and harmless. The argument for deleting it on the basis Warshington was R3ED is basically an WP:OTHERSTUFF argument. Servite et contribuere (talk) 18:35, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per Eureka Lott. It has plausible usefulness and is doing no harm. As above, Warshington should be similarly undeleted. — Amakuru (talk) 10:02, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:49, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

• Germaine (comics) → List of X-Men members  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete, it is the first name of a fully named character with a codename that appeared in one issue, and does not appear on that page. Emcgonigle (talk) 19:25, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Retarget to List of Xavier Institute students and staff or an appropriate section or anchor within. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 19:48, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:23, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Chess enjoyer (talk) 06:52, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. No plausible notability.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:15, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. The unsourced pre-BLAR history needn't be kept as well. Jay 💬 03:18, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:49, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

• Draft:Golden Age of Cinema → Classical Hollywood cinema  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Improper use of "Draft:" namespace per WP:RDRAFT since the redirect was never an article. (Note: The equivalent in the article space, Golden Age of Cinema, does not exist and has never existed.) Steel1943 (talk) 06:00, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• Comment these direct creations of redirects in draft space are almost always malformed/misplaced requests to create the redirect in main by people who have not been informed of the proper procedure. Sometimes they are moved to main if though likely to be retained at RFD, just as if they had been listed at WP:AFC/R. ~2026-39780-5 (talk) 17:38, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. But refine to Emily in Paris#Season 5 (2025) (non-admin closure) Thepharoah17 (talk) 05:48, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

• Emily in RomeEmily in Rome → Emily in Paris  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not the title of the series, and not mentioned at the target, leaving the connection unclear –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 04:42, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• Delete string does not appear at the target. No evidence it is an alternative name. Both confusing and navigationally useless. ~2026-39780-5 (talk) 04:47, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
• Keep the title card for series 5 uses the name "Emily in Rome" on the programme. As do multiple other sources e.g. . A basic search for "Emily in Rome" clearly demonstrates that this name relates wholly to Emily in Paris being set in Rome for that season. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:03, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• A quick search for "Emily in Rome title card" shows this image in multiple places (unable to link a Google search on Wikipedia though). Joseph2302 (talk) 10:17, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

  Per above, would it be best to specifically point it to Emily in Paris#Season 5? — Anonymous 15:31, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

  That sounds like a good idea to me, presuming this is kept, I support retarget to section- will also add a note about title card rename for this season. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:18, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per Joseph2302. I'm mildly surprised this show doesn't have separate articles for each season—if it did that'd be the perfect place for explaining the title card. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:43, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

  But it doesn't, and it's not mentioned either way, so it should be deleted. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 14:47, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

  Given that "Emily in Rome" is attested, the solution to that issue is to add a mention to the target, not to delete the redirect. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:11, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

  No, the solution is to not create redirects to unmentioned terms with unclear connection to their targets. Redirects follow content, not the other way around. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 16:14, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

  Will add a sentence explaining it there, but it's not at all an ambiguous redirect..... Joseph2302 (talk) 17:18, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget/refine to Emily in Paris#Season 5 (2025) per above comments. Steel1943 (talk) 18:23, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
• Refine per Steel1943, now it is in the body. These kind of titlecard redirects are fine if explained (e.g. Captain America and the Winter Soldier). -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 04:19, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 03:24, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

• Chandu/old version → Chandu  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Does not provide navigational benefit. No page history worth preserving, article content would have been CSD eligible if not for preexisting redirect. In sum leftover page move detritus. Recommend Deletion. ~2026-39780-5 (talk) 00:34, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• delete, potentially speedily as g6, as a botched/unfinished anthony appleyard move. really, i'm starting to think it'd be a good idea to go through all of those... consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 15:04, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

  Compile a list of redirects that may need to be listed here, send me a link, and I will go through it as I get the time. ~2026-39780-5 (talk) 17:03, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

  it's so many of them that i'd have a better shot at it with massxfd, so i'll focus on that later today (assuming i don't fall asleep) consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 11:24, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 10:35, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Thepharoah17 (talk) 05:46, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

• Death of PlutoDeath of Pluto → Pluto#IAU classification  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Confusing and borderline nonsensical redirect that leads to a WP:SURPRISING target. Most likely expected target would be something alluding to Roman Mythology, if anything at all. Not useful as a navigational aid. Recommend Deletion. ~2026-39780-5 (talk) 00:31, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• Speedy delete, R3, confusing, useless, implausible, etc etc. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 04:43, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
• Keep. Michael E. Brown "killed Pluto" and this language isn't very far off. Neil deGrasse Tyson used this very term. It's a plausible shortening of an otherwise rather lengthy search term and this is the right target, although #Classification is probably slightly better. Doesn't appear ambiguous with any other encyclopaedic information. J947 ‡ ^edits 05:01, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

  Both of those refer to How I Killed Pluto and Why It Had It Coming, but even that target is dubious as the string does not appear there either. ~2026-39780-5 (talk) 05:14, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

  An offhand comment on a book jacket blurb review does not justify creation of a redirect, and as mentioned above, it's more about the book than the planet, but it's still not mentioned there. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 14:27, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• Keep as per J947, it's used by proper professionals to describe the declassification of Pluto. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:05, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

  As opposed to sketchy professionals? It's not used in any sort of standard or sustained way, though, and it's not mentioned at the target (or anywhere). –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 14:25, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per J947. This is a plausible search term for a lay person wanting to find the content at the redirect target. Thryduulf (talk) 16:10, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 03:25, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

• Grand Hôpital de Charleroi - Les Viviers → fr:Grand Hôpital de Charleroi - Les Viviers  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Per WP:SRD soft redirects to other language Wikipedias should generally be avoided, and there is no clear reason for exception here. Recommend Deletion. ~2026-39780-5 (talk) 00:28, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. If editors want a single-purpose interwiki link to be used in a related article, they can link directly using [[:fr:Grand Hôpital de Charleroi - Les Viviers]] and other stratgies. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 17:26, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
• delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:00, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Redirecting the title of an article about a place in Belgium to French-language Wikipedia could be rather controversial in addition to the usual reasons why soft redirects to non-English projects are generally unhelpful. Thryduulf (talk) 16:16, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
• Delete as per others. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:03, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete per WP:SNOW. There is no chance of any other outcome here. Thryduulf (talk) 16:18, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

• Plastic сredits → Plastic credits  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Per WP:MIXEDSCRIPT, rather WP:UNNATURAL, and not even really plausible, but just a bit too old for WP:R3. Recommend Deletion. ~2026-39780-5 (talk) 00:26, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. The first letter of the second word is a Cyrillic es, not a lower-case c. - Eureka Lott 04:14, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Uncontroversial.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:09, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and others. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 17:26, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. thetechie@enwiki:~$ she/they | talk 17:37, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
• delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:00, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).