Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 July 5

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedily deleted by Sohom Datta. Thryduulf (talk) 10:24, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

• An Act to amend the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Act (supply management) → Act to amend the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Act (supply management)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I would like this redirect to be deleted, because I made a mistake in page move. The primary article was named "Bill C-202, an act to protect Canadian supply management in trade negotiations". I wanted to rename it "Act to amend the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Act (supply management)" since it is now an act, not a bill. BUT: I made a mistake in the page move and accidentally kept "An". So now, "Bill C-202, an act to protect Canadian supply management in trade negotiations" is a redirect to "An Act to amend the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Act (supply management)", which in turn is a redirect to "Act to amend the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Act (supply management)". Can it be fixed so "Bill C-202, an act to protect Canadian supply management in trade negotiations" is a redirect to "Act to amend the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Act (supply management)", and the one in-between ("An Act etc.") is just eliminated? Sorry to be a bother. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 23:14, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

• Speedy delete per nom's statement and WP:G7/WP:R3. Tagged page as such. Casablanca 🪨^(T) 01:22, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 18:27, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

• Te Triti (whare) → Taupō Bay#Taupō Marae  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Misspelt redirect, whilst misspellings can be helpful this one only has 5 views and is to a one-word mention, very few people are searching for this with correct spelling and even less would be misspelling it. Traumnovelle (talk) 22:07, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:31, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

• Akatarere → Kaeo  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Akatarere is a locality west of Kaeo. The redirect was created to point to a marae but I removed mention of it from the article because the marae is not located in Kaeo. There is mention of the marae else where, as well as mention of a mountain called Te Akatarere but considering these are trivial mentions and primary usage is likely the locality return to red is best here. Traumnovelle (talk) 21:43, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

• I just notified the target of this discussion. Jay 04:13, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. I am comfortable overriding a 20 year old consensus even in the absence of further participation in this discussion. Rusalkii (talk) 18:27, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

• Technicolour yawn → Australian English vocabulary  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Technicoloured Yawn → Australian English vocabulary  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Technicolor yawn → Vomiting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Technicolor Yawn → Vomiting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This can be seen as confusing as these terms are not mentioned or described in either target. Note that "Technicolor Yawn" may refer to a song by The Dumplings (duo). Mathguy2718 (talk) 20:55, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

• Comment Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technicolour yawn closed with a consensus to redirect to vomiting, and the American English spelling was created as a result of that discussion also. Pinging @Sjakkalle: as the only editor in that discussion still active. See also Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 15#overly niche vomit synonyms(?). Thryduulf (talk) 10:31, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 18:12, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

• Ciudad Victoria (song) → Coco (soundtrack)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Song not mentioned in target. As with Dora's Dance below, if a good source for song it exists, it should be added to the article and this redirect kept. While it's listed on IMDB, I can't find anything useable. Rusalkii (talk) 18:09, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 18:12, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

• Dora's Dance → Coco (soundtrack)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target. There's a Dora's Dance mentioned at David Chesky, and a Dora the Explorer episode "Dora's Dance to the Rescue". If a good source for song it exists, it should be added to the article and this redirect kept. While it's listed on IMDB, I can't find anything useable. Rusalkii (talk) 18:04, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete to favour search results. Jay 04:47, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Sue Me (disambiguation). Rusalkii (talk) 20:48, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

• So sue meSo sue me → Sosumi  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• So Sue MeSo Sue Me → 19.99 (album)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This could also just refer to the phrase, see wikt:sue me (I just added that to Sue Me (disambiguation)), and maybe this could be just resolved by a {{Wiktionary hatnote}}, though searching for the phrase on the web does not seem to return Apple-related search results. For the capitalised form, this also appears to be an episode of Snake Tales (TV series). 1234qwer1234qwer4 12:56, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Retarget to Sue Me (disambiguation) as a plausible variant. ScalarFactor (talk) 17:41, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 17:56, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Sue Me (disambiguation) and expand the disambiguation page to cover cases of "So Sue Me". I did do a little digging for more cases of "So Sue Me" just to see, and there are a few more that are Wikipedia-referenced: song from Time on My Hands (John Scofield album), cartoon collection by Sidney Harris (cartoonist), segment from Fox & Friends#Recurring segments, song from The Young Knives ...Are Dead ...And Some, song from C'est la Vie (Polara album), play by Arthur Yorinks (in addition to the ones already above Sosumi, 19.99 (album), and the episode of Snake Tales (TV series)). Just figured I'd leave this here so that if this is closed as retarget, it's less work to expand the disambig page to cover the So Sue Me cases as well. NerdyEpiscopalian (talk) 01:06, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Media Decoder Blog and Retarget Media Decoder to Codec. * Pppery * _{in solidarity} 21:22, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

• Media Decoder Blog → The New York Times  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Media DecoderMedia Decoder → The New York Times  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned at target; not really helpful and not sure we need redirects for specific blogs of the NYT like this. 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:32, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

• Delete Media Decoder Blog per nom. This would be fine as a redirect if it were mentioned somewhere, but it doesn't appear to be (I've not looked to see if it ever was). Thryduulf (talk) 00:21, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget Media Decoder to Codec, which discusses media decoders. I prefer the top of the article to the Codec#Media codecs section as the explains the terminology for those who aren't aware and I don't think we can assume someone using "media decoder" is familiar with the term "codec". Thryduulf (talk) 00:21, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 17:55, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete the blog, and weak retarget Media Decoder to Codec per Thryduulf. Jay 03:44, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 19:12, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

• 2026–27 AFC Champions League Two group stage → 2026–27 AFC Champions League Two  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• 2026–27 AFC Challenge League group stage → 2026–27 AFC Challenge League  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• 2026–27 AFC Champions League Elite league stage → 2026–27 AFC Champions League Elite  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

WP:TOOSOON Qby (talk) 14:03, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

Delete per WP:TOOSOON. And per WP:RETURNTORED to encourage article creation. Servite et contribuere (talk) 00:48, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. --BDD (talk) 14:45, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 15:31, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep * Pppery * _{in solidarity} 21:22, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

• North Macedonia in the Eurovision Song Contest 2026North Macedonia in the Eurovision Song Contest 2026 → North Macedonia in the Eurovision Song Contest  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Related to Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2026_July_5#Canada_in_the_Eurovision_Song_Contest_2026 which creator also recommended for deletion due to mistake. North Macedonia did not participate in Eurovision in 2026; redirect is substantively misleading. Grk1011 (talk) 13:46, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to North Macedonia in the Eurovision Song Contest, which explicitly states they did not participate this year but also notes that it was considered and other relevant information. It's a plausible search term given their previous and possible participation, and if (as expected) they do participate next year that will only increase it's plausibility. 2026 Eurovision Song Contest#Other countries does mention North Macedonia but provides much less information so I think it's a less useful target. Thryduulf (talk) 16:00, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget per Thryduulf. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:51, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
• Thryduulf, CycloneYoris, the target is already North Macedonia in the Eurovision Song Contest, do you mean keep? Rusalkii (talk) 18:25, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

  Err, yes. Thryduulf (talk) 19:12, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * _{in solidarity} 21:23, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

• Triacontakaidecimal → Base32#base32hex  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target; comes up in search results but seems to be some sort of citogenesis (see Special:Diff/1181924281)? I don't see how this word makes any sense. 32 would be "duo kai triakonta" in Greek ("triakonta" being 30), but "decimal" is a word derived from Latin (32 in Latin would be "triginta duo", 32nd would be "duo et trigesimus"), and names for numeral bases are usually based on Latin numerals – it seems that base32 has sometimes been called "duotrigesimal", and changing the alphabet used for the 32 digits would not affect that. Even ignoring the blending of Greek and Latin numerals, this name suggests the base is... 30+10? Wherever the 30 comes from, since base32hex adds 22 letters of the alphabet to the 10 decimal digits... 1234qwer1234qwer4 02:32, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Retarget to DEC RADIX 50 which is in fact a base-40 encoding. The blend is due to conventions for naming radices (see also for example hexadecimal) In solidarity, PokemonPerson (talk) 16:40, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Still no evidence that the name has been used for that (if anything, it has been used for the current target, probably based on its previous inclusion in Wikipedia). Writing 40 has "30+10" is not related to any conventions I'm aware of, and base 40 would just be called quadragesimal. (Also hexadecimal might be more of an exception than a convention (even the article says Schwartzman (1994) argues that use of sexadecimal may have been avoided because of its suggestive abbreviation to sex), and it does not contain "kai".) 1234qwer1234qwer4 19:36, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:53, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Notified of this discussion at the suggested target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 10:13, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

Delete: Seemingly incorrect and hoaxed name per nom; ReasonsDel#5: The redirect makes nosense. In solidarity, Aaron Liu (talk) 20:32, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Should a mention be added to the target article, feel free to recreate. Rusalkii (talk) 18:23, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

• The Dish (2026 film) → Disclosure Day  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• The Dish (Steven Spielberg film) → Disclosure Day  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete. The only source for this alternative name for the film are the titles (not the content) of two articles in Deadline Hollywood, and, apart from the link title, the name is not mentioned on the page. Tevildo (talk) 17:25, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

• Keep if a mention is added, delete otherwise there are other sources, e.g. , , , , so a mention might be due, and if it is then this will be a fine redirect, but I'm not familiar with typical practices in this area. Note that there is a film called The Dish but this was released in 2000 and wasn't directed by Spielberg so would not be an appropriate target for either redirect here. Thryduulf (talk) 10:35, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
  • We probably have adequate sourcing for the name (although all of those articles post-date the creation of the redirect, only the Deadline Hollywood article is older than it). Is it sufficiently notable to be added to the article? Perhaps this should go to the talk page instead. Tevildo (talk) 17:10, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

    I have left a note on that talk page about this discussion. Rusalkii (talk) 01:46, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 09:35, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 13:24, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

• Ōtangaroa → Kaeo  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Ōtangaroa (Mangawhero) → Kaeo#Ōtangaroa (Mangawhero)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Otangaroa is a separate locality with a bit of distance between it and Kaeo. There was a mention of an eponymous meeting house, but as the meeting house is located in Otangaroa it made no sense to mention it there. Traumnovelle (talk) 07:48, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

• Bundled Ōtangaroa (Mangawhero). J947 ‡ ^edits 00:31, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. Mentioned variously at Ngāti Kahu ki Whangaroa (with similar content to what was at Kaeo), List of marae in the Northland Region, Oruaiti River, and Taupō Bay but never in depth. Deletion gives the reader easy access to search results, which is most helpful. J947 ‡ ^edits 00:34, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete without prejudice against recreation as an article or as a redirect to an appropriate target. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 18:05, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

• Tauroa Peninsula → Ahipara  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Only mentioned as simply being west of the target. Also nominating Tauroa Point for a similar reason. Traumnovelle (talk) 07:09, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. We would either need an article, or a section describing this peninsula. Jay 10:24, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 13:58, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

• Abercrombie, Texas → Crestview, Austin, Texas  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target, leaving the connection between the two confusing. This blog post is also of interest, though I can't find any high quality sources on the topic. Rusalkii (talk) 07:07, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete There's a couple of vague references on Google Books (example here) but nothing substantial. Notably, there's no mention of such a place in the only county history I could find electronically. Please ping me if others find sources, but, as of now, I don't see enough to warrant adding a mention here. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 19:15, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:12, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Content on the subject still has not been added. If the addition is made, feel free to recreate. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:05, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

• Belgian faggots → Faggot (food)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Is this a reasonable alternate name? This, nor Belgium, is not mentioned in the article currently. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 04:12, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

• states "the earliest record of Faggots is in a cookery book called ‘A Plain Cookery Book for the Working Classes’ By Charles Elme Francatelli dated back in 1852. The name of the recipe is ‘Belgian Faggots’ and suggested pig pluck was the preferred meat although sheep’s pluck or bullocks liver could be used.". For that it cites the Foods of England website, which isn't working currently but is available on the Internet Archive and the same site has a copy of the cited recipe book (as does Project Gutenberg ). My first reaction is to add content and keep the redirect, but it's not a common term. Thryduulf (talk) 10:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

  Page views are nil. Top of the suggestion list when typing 'belgian fa' into our search box (I stumbled across it whilst in the midst of typing in "belgian fashion" during due diligence for a request at WP:AFC/R). — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 10:18, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

  I think we should do that, then; surely the oldest known record of X is one of the things Wikipedia should record about X. Dingolover6969 (talk) 06:25, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

  @Dingolover6969 to clarify, when you say I think we should do that are you referring to my suggestion to add content and keep the redirect? Thryduulf (talk) 10:20, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

  Yes. Dingolover6969 (talk) 12:41, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No mention yet at the target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 07:04, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete I'm not especially convinced by the first attested name of the dish if it isn't a common one, and I think it's appropriate to give more scrutiny here than we would to any old dish. --BDD (talk) 15:35, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. A standalone article could indeed be valuable. In the meantime, there is not consensus to change the status quo. --BDD (talk) 15:30, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

• Age statementAge statement → Whisky  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Ambiguous, even within the world of liquor (e.g. whisky, bourbon, cognac, etc.). We do not seem to broadly cover liquor aging or statements of aging anywhere; even if it were, this might be ambiguous with other things, such as cheese aging or (even) stating one's age for various purposes. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 14:58, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

• Comment. Based on google searches, whisky is by far the primary topic for the term "age statement" - on the first four pages of results, one in the middle of page two and the second hit on page 3 were about rum, literally every other single result was about Scotch whisky. Our coverage could be a lot better, as we have varying amounts of overlapping content at Whisky, Blended whiskey, Scotch whisky, Single malt whisky, Straight whiskey, Single malt Scotch, American whiskey, Bourbon whiskey, Blended malt whisky and probably more articles too. None of them stand out to me as being an obviously better target than any of the others. Internal search results are terrible, without quotes the results are for articles about statements that happen to mention age (e.g. Switch statement, Thesis statement), articles about ages that happen to mention statements (e.g. Voting age, Stone age) and articles that happen to have one of those words in the title and the other in the body (e.g. New Age travellers, The Statement (2003 film)). With quotes the results are slightly better, in that it puts Scotch whisky at the top, but almost all the hits are specific products or distilleries that mention an age statement in some way. "Age statement" "rum" finds nothing relevant. My first thought is that we would be better served by consolidating all the various mentions into an article at Age statement with a hatnote to any content we have about other uses, if such content exists (I've not found it). Thryduulf (talk) 15:44, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
• Keep. Age statements are primarily associated with whisky. They are sometimes used in other contexts (e.g. brandy), but generally with the same definition – i.e. the minimum amount of barrel ageing applied to the spirits in the bottle. The whisky article says this. Readers interested in other topics such as brandy will still find the definition helpful for other spirits, and I can't think of a better place to lead them. See the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, title 27 section 5.74, which provides a definition. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 20:19, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
• Comment - There may be enough extant referencing about this topic to warrant a stand-alone article. However, I am not able to look into potentially taking up the task until next month or perhaps even beyond that. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 13:00, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 06:58, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 14:03, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

• Scooby-Doo! Gokko → Scooby-Doo  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not yet released series not mentioned in target. WP:TOOSOON at best. Rusalkii (talk) 06:41, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

Delete Whether it should be mentioned at this point is up to you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 15:54, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 14:10, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

• Dash Albus → Kansas City Royals minor league players  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Hunter Alberini → Kansas City Royals minor league players  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Jhosmmel Zue → Kansas City Royals minor league players  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Roni Cabrera → Kansas City Royals minor league players  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Brooks Bryan → Kansas City Royals minor league players  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Andy Basora → Kansas City Royals minor league players  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

These players are mentioned at several other pages (e.g. Columbia Fireflies), none of them are clearly primary. Delete to make way for search. Rusalkii (talk) 04:50, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete all per nom. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:09, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 14:15, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

• T:DSA → Template:Contentious topics/alert  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There is consensus against creating new "T:" pseudo-namespace redirects. That consensus only applies prospectively, but I believe this shortcut is should be deleted for two reasons:

1. It is surprising to go from "T:DSA" to a contentious topic alert.
2. Most importantly, this redirect is harmful to readers. T:DST:DS is a redirect to the mainspace article Thief: Deadly Shadows. Readers searching for T:DS will see this in the search results, and the reader comes first.

Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:16, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete I'd suggest people might well think "T" is talk, see Wikipedia:Perennial proposals#Create shortcut namespace aliases for various namespaces. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:22, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 14:21, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

• Follow The Sun Parkway → Osceola Parkway  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No google hits for "Follow The Sun Parkway", not mentioned in target. Rusalkii (talk) 02:24, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete This source indicates that "Follow the Sun" was a tagline used in older signage but no longer in use since at least 2016. Not an official name of the highway and unlikely to be searched for now. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 19:18, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:23, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete without prejudice against recreation as an article or as a redirect to an appropriate target. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 18:03, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

• Port Awanui → Tikitiki  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Separate locality unmentioned at target Traumnovelle (talk) 01:15, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete without prejudice against recreation as an article or as a redirect to an appropriate target. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 18:02, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

• Pātangata → Ōtāne  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Patangata is a locality east of Otane, not mentioned at target nor should it be. Traumnovelle (talk) 01:10, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Central Hawke's Bay District Council § History. Jay 08:14, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

  That mentions the county but Patangata is also a locality and its hard to say which one a reader would want. There are multiple mentions of the county on wiki and a few of the settlement. Also the county never had the macron used in its name. Traumnovelle (talk) 09:49, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

  Fair enough! Struck. Jay 10:20, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Carry#Firearms. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 11:36, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

• Carrying a gunCarrying a gun → Open carry in the United States  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Carrying a weaponCarrying a weapon → Open carry in the United States  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Carrying a firearmCarrying a firearm → Open carry in the United States  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

May also refer to concealed carry, and no obvious affinity to the US with this phrasing. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:52, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

• Comment - The closest thing I could find to a broad overview of the topic is at Gun control#Historical context, which still left me wanting. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 03:23, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment all three of these redirects originally targetted Open carry, which is the article that got moved to the present target title. That might be a WP:INUSA issue. Thryduulf (talk) 16:17, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Carry#Firearms which disambiguates between Concealed carry and Open carry (although see my comment above) and probably should also have a link to Right to keep and bear arms (where Bear arms redirects), although I'm not immediately sure how to word it. Thryduulf (talk) 16:21, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

  Support. The same should be done for most redirects to Open carry in the United States as well. In solidarity, Aaron Liu (talk) 16:56, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Carry#Firearms per Thryduulf --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:01, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Retarget to Carry#Firearms as per geographic neutrality. KT System (talk) 08:29, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to White House Task Force on Celebrating America's 250th Birthday as an {{adr}} of Freedom 250. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 18:01, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

• Freedom250Freedom250 → United States Semiquincentennial  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Let's discuss whether this should instead target Freedom 250. User:Randy Kryn seems to make either the point that "Freedom250" with the space omitted refers to America 250 or argue that the existence of the spaced version frees up the unspaced version to redirect to America250 (which is supposed to omit the space, unlike Freedom 250). I find the former argument unfounded and the latter confusing, and I note that the (second?) biggest controversy with Freedom 250 is their alleged efforts to confuse themself with America250. In solidarity, Aaron Liu (talk) 00:45, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep the redirect to the event. Aaron, the only reason I redirected this in early June was that the name 'Freedom 250' was being used as one of the real names of the 250th anniversary. Not related to the name 'America 250', which had nothing to do with my thought process. Then editors recently argue that 'Freedom 250' means only the organization and not the event (think of it kind of like "please xerox this" is understood by almost every North American). Even if that holds up, 'Freedom250', without the space, is not the name of the organization. It, and in my opinion, 'Freedom 250' as well but that's being discussed elsewhere, should redirect to what most readers are searching for when they type the name into the search box. Randy Kryn (talk) 01:43, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

  You have repeated several times that Freedom 250/Freedom250 is the name of the anniversary. I have not seen you provide a source for this, and all the sources I've seen (including , which I've provided) say it's not the name of the anniversary but that of the task force. In solidarity, Aaron Liu (talk) 14:46, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

  I said it's a common name. Do you seriously think that readers typing in 'Freeedom 250' after seeing that name in connection with the 250th anniversary are actually looking for a commission and not the 250th anniversary of the United States? WP:COMMONSENSE seems appropriate here. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:00, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

  You have repeated this several times in various places. I'm sure you are able to find my answer. In solidarity, Aaron Liu (talk) 15:18, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

  Sometimes commonsense needs repeating. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:21, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Freedom 250. Whether or not United States Semiquincentennial is the WP:PTOPIC for Freedom 250 should be determined in a page move. This alsost feel like the WP:WRONGVENUE other than that the page does not currently target Freedom 250, unless there is an argument made that WP:SMALLDETAILS is relevant here. If Freedom 250 is moved to somewhere like Freedom 250 (commission) and made a redirect targeting United States Semiquincentennial, then Freedom250 should also target United States Semiquincentennial. I do not have a particularly strong opinion on whether or not the page should be moved, just that in its current form this would be confusing to the reader if not retargeted. Casablanca 🪨^(T) 18:52, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Freedom 250 Every reference to "Freedom 250" that I've ever seen explicitly refers to the Trump events, not the overall semiquincentennial, which is generally referred to as "America250." - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 19:21, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget. As Presidentman. The branding confusion has itself become a notable topic, and we shouldn't muddy the waters further. Mackensen (talk) 12:05, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: The proposed target should be White House Task Force on Celebrating America's 250th Birthday, and not Freedom 250 which is a redirect. CycloneYoris ^talk! 11:42, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

  Sorry I wasn't clear. I meant it would be tagged with {{a2r}} to Freedom 250, which currently targets "White House Task Force [...]". In solidarity, Aaron Liu (talk) 19:26, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 19:15, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

• Web3D Chat → Second Life  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

We do not appear to have content on this anywhere. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:12, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 19:15, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

• Feted Inner Core → Second Life  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No content on this on the English Wikipedia. Despite two attempts to delete this, the redirect was never actually sent to RfD. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:10, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 14:37, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

• Detroit Life → Second Life  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. There is a company by this name, but we only have content on the Detroit Building. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:06, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete unnotable fan article not worth a mention at target and a copyvio. Traumnovelle (talk) 01:16, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:19, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete not mentioned at target, and per Traumnovelle. Pascuet (talk) 04:27, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 14:56, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

• Melita Insula → Second Life  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned anywhere on the English Wikipedia; page was apparently hosting a copyvio prior to redirection. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:04, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Pascuet (talk) 04:29, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).