Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 June 19

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 09:32, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

• George Kellman → American Jewish Year Book  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. Notable from what I can see (also known as Joseph Kellman; Barnet Kellman's father), so WP:RETURNTORED PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:46, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 19:08, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

• Chakat → Hybrid beasts in folklore  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Chakats seem to no longer be mentioned in the article, after a long and heavy series of moves. User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 13:30, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. The substantive content we had on chakats (which was quite substantial) was deleted 20 years ago (AfD), and this has been a redirect without a target ever since. Time to put it out of its misery. Tevildo (talk) 14:05, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to .africa. (non-admin closure) Chess enjoyer (talk) 01:37, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

• .Africa.Africa → Africa  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The dot made the redirect WP:UNNATURAL A1Cafel (talk) 09:52, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to .africa; its target was changed without reason given. J947 ‡ ^edits 10:23, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget per J947. Thryduulf (talk) 10:31, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget, the change was recent and unexplained. If this was deleted that would achieve the same outcome but not create a situation where the target could be changed, so that would work as well. CMD (talk) 11:32, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
• Comment. While a retarget/revert is the most likely outcome here and is probably fine, this is a good example of why redirects that only differ in capitalization (with other redirects, or with the target article itself) are often not good to make. They get out of sync, and you get time wasting like this. If the redirect simply didn't exist, a search for capitalized ".Africa" would have already taken a person to the right page. So chalk me up as a moral delete, even if that's not likely this time. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 12:18, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

  Re getting out of sync, this is one of the reasons for R cats, e.g. {{R avoided double redirect}} for cases where there are multiple redirects. {{R from other capitalisation}} could be modified to output an error if the target does not differ only in capitalisation. Thryduulf (talk) 12:52, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

  Yes, but a pretty hefty portion (probably the majority) of redirects aren't categorized like this (this one wasn't), and in a case like this, there's nothing stopping someone from simply removing the rcat when they change the redirect anyway. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 14:58, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

  Why would we inconvenience readers who search for Wikipedia content using one of the multiple case-sensitive methods on the off-chance that someone might remove an Rcat template when changing a redirect? Thryduulf (talk) 15:23, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to .africa given the upper case is probably likely as "Africa" is a proper noun. Crouch, Swale (talk) 22:11, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:26, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

• Isis (Stargate) → List of Stargate SG-1 characters#Goa'uld  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Isis (Stargate-SG-1) → Mythology of Stargate#Goa'uld  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

There's nothing about "Isis" at the target. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:27, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

• Note I've bundled Isis (Stargate-SG-1) with this discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 10:43, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. We have no content about this topic, although it is marked as a {{R from merge}} any content that was merged is long gone as the article this was merged to has itself been merged at least once subsequently. It's worth highlighting this edit where the two-sentence article was described as "not really a stub, since this is all we know of her". There were circa 2 seasons of the show released after that edit was made, so it's not impossible there is more known now but if there is it isn't covered anywhere on Wikipedia. Thryduulf (talk) 10:43, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
• Just notified of this discussion at the target talk of Mythology of Stargate. Jay 19:21, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:26, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

• Greenpark meadows → Neighborhood association  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Greenpark Meadows Mullingar → Neighborhood association  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The name of a resident association that is not discussed at the target, or anywhere else on enwiki. The creator recreated these as redirects in 2009 probably because his promo articles at this, and similar titles, were repeatedly getting speedy deleted, and the link insertions into articles were getting reverted. Delete these as well. Jay 💬 09:25, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Mullingar would be the appropriate target if there was any content, but there isn't and the only thing external searches are finding are estate agent listings and routine planning applications so there isn't anything that could be added. Thryduulf (talk) 10:47, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Taheen Modak. Jay 17:07, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

• TaheenTaheen → The Dark Tower (series)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Redirect without mention ZFT (talk) 03:39, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

• The redirect apparently refers to a race of fictional beings or creatures in this book series: The redirect is mentioned in other articles related to the target subject, including The Dark Tower: The Gunslinger, but not in a way which appropriately identifies the subject. None of the other article articles related to the target subject seem to appropriately. Identify the target subject either. That being said, the only other two mentions of "Taheen" I could find on Wikipedia include Taheen Modak and Jalen Taheen FosterJalen Taheen Foster, a redirect towards Real Boston Richey. With that being said, since we have a {{R from given name}} template, but no {{R from middle name}} template, retarget to Taheen Modak as a {{R from given name}} until the time exists where this redirect's title can be converted to a disambiguation page (which I currently do not see given my findings; at best, a hatnote can be added to Taheen Modak to refer readers to some article related to the current target subject if need be). Steel1943 (talk) 03:57, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: This is a plausible phonetic spelling of Spanish TajínTajín, which is a redirect to El Tajín. The only other Spanish title on the Tajin dab page is Tajín seasoning. So, if this is kept or retargeted, a hatnote (perhaps {{Distinguish}}) should be added to the target pointing to El Tajín and Tajín seasoning. —Myceteae‍🌈 (talk) 07:02, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:59, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

• Delete if the subject is not notable enough to be explained in the target article. ZFT (talk) 03:39, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Taheen Modak per {{R from given name}} and hatnote to Tajin (disambiguation). -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:19, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:21, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

• "Paris" → The Chainsmokers  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This used to be an article before being blanked and redirected to The Chainsmokers. A day later, Paris (The Chainsmokers song) independently became an article. However, this redirect was never updated since. That said, this redirect should not target The Chainsmokers song, as the song does not look to by stylized in quotation marks (see "Heroes" (album) for something that does). Usage with quotation marks varies between several meanings found at Paris (disambiguation). I lean towards deletion because of the lack of affinity of the quotation marks. Mathguy2718 (talk) 01:56, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

• Delete or weak retarget to Paris (disambiguation)#Songs. I'm leaning towards deletion because this is not something standard that we do, nor is it an expectation of that readers who do not use Wikipedia regularly know that we put song titles quotation marks, and this there is no reasonable expectation that this redirect would be used as a valid search term since it's meta to Wikipedia itself. On the other hand, I could be totally off base here, and the redirect could just be considered ambiguous per what we do on Wikipedia, which will lead the best option to target this redirect to a list of articles which this title could refer, which is at Paris (disambiguation)#Songs; however, we also put television episode titles and quotation marks as well, meaning, even then, the use of quotation mark is ambiguous. Either way, the current target is not appropriate per all my aforementioned thoughts. Steel1943 (talk) 03:45, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

  Scrap the idea to retarget the redirect to the disambiguation page; sure enough, the disambiguation page also includes "Paris" (The Apprentice), which is listed at Paris (disambiguation)#Film and television. Steel1943 (talk) 03:49, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Paris (disambiguation). This could include any of the topics there that are titles of works, but not Paris the base title. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:16, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per Mathguy2718's reasoning. ZFT (talk) 20:59, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Paris (disambiguation) as a possible title of works, per User:LaundryPizza03. BD2412 T 02:37, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:58, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

• Delete as something that we do not generally do or that readers expect, and because neither the existing target nor, as far as I can tell, any of the potential targets listed on the Paris dab page are stylised with quotation marks. Furthermore there seems to be no history to preserve, in that the first version of Paris (The Chainsmokers song) does not appear to have reused any content from the pre-BLAR version of "Paris". Rosbif73 (talk) 08:00, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:UNNATURAL--A1Cafel (talk) 03:20, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:AFFINITY. Unreasonable without particular connection. Meanings outside of songs may use quotes. Every title that is a song name does not need to be rendered this way. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 01:53, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 05:14, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

• Quisarctus → Halechiniscidae  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I think this should be deleted for the same reasons as my nomination below. Quisarctus yasumurai passes WP:NSPECIES and should be covered at this title. Chess enjoyer (talk) 04:34, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Endemism. Rusalkii (talk) 19:14, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

• EndemicityEndemicity → Endemic (epidemiology)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not sure which target is the more correct one, but most backlinks apparently refer to endemism. 1234qwer1234qwer4 09:07, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

• Well, they are both correct. Unless your linguistic tastes want to go back to 1900-times. This is technically a WP:PTOPIC debate. Checking the first page of https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=endemicity, I find they're about equal. As another comment, sampling the links I find that many of the backlinks that apparently refer to endemism are [[endemicity|endemic]], which is weird because they could just be [[endemic]] and go to the right place (endemism). Dingolover6969 (talk) 10:47, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Endemism. There's sort of an odd history here; I checked one of those random backlinks, and it's actually written as "endemic", but piped to "endemicity", which is wrong. I don't know why it picked this over "endemism". Currently, endemicendemic is a redirect to endemism, but it looks like it was originally a dab page, hence the need for a pipe. Regardless, I think we have the right PTOPIC here, and a hatnote can get people to the epidemiology article if needed. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:40, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more try at arriving at a primary topic, if any.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 03:28, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Endemism seems to make the most sense and be consistent with where endemic goes and how endemism is a primary topic whereas the epidemiology meaning has a parenthetical in its title. Crossroads ^-talk- 16:55, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 05:13, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

• Lepoarctus → Styraconyxidae  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is a redirect from a genus to its family. This genus is monotypic, meaning it only contains one species. Per WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA, monotypic genera and their sole species share an article at the genus (usually). Per WP:NSPECIES, accepted species are presumed to be notable.

I think this should be deleted to return it to red. Lepoarctus coniferus passes NSPECIES, and would redirect to the genus title. Chess enjoyer (talk) 03:09, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to List of world cups. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:52, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

• List of World CupsList of World Cups → List of world sports championships  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I suggest retargetting to List of world cups, I would do this boldly as a simple capitalisation difference but it is the result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of World Cups which closed as merge to List of world championships (the present target). Thryduulf (talk) 01:40, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

• I object and the original discussion is disappointing. Someone needs to reopen this discussion as a World Cup and World Championship are not the same thing. In a majority of Sports the World Cup is the overall winner of the annual series/tour and in most sports a World Championship title is linked to an event. Sadly football confuses the situation by calling it World Championship the term gold cup is also sometime used in a few sports. This was correctly pointed out by User:Miller17CU94. Yachty4000 (talk) 05:42, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
  • @Yachty4000: I'm confused. Your comment makes it sound like you think the present target (List of world sports championships) is incorrect and that the proposed target (List of world cups) is preferable, but you've prefixed it with an objection to retargetting (i.e. keep the present target)? Thryduulf (talk) 10:57, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
• It's a pity nobody tried the alternative capitalisation during the original AfD. The result would probably have been different. Is there a formal or informal time limit on DRVs? Phil Bridger (talk) 08:04, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
  • There is no formal time limit, but after a while DRV will just say "start a new discussion". This AfD was 13 years ago, so that would absolutely be the outcome here. We don't need to overturn the AfD to retarget, we just need a consensus here to do so. If you think there is content that was in the pre-AfD article that should be merged somewhere other than the present redirect target (and isn't there already) you can just go ahead and do that (remembering to attribute properly per WP:CWW). Thryduulf (talk) 10:57, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

    So let's retarget then. It's silly having one capitalisation as an article and another as a redirect pointing elsewhere. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:16, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Rusalkii (talk) 19:38, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

• Antra → Omeprazole  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Ambiguous with Associação Nacional de Travestis e Transexuais; not mentioned. Dudzcar (talk) 00:43, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

• Comment ANTRA redirects to Associação Nacional de Travestis e Transexuais, so at the very least the two articles need hatnotes to each other. In other uses Antra Records redirects to Kurupt (there is a limited mention at Kurupt#Career after Death Row) and Antra lyga is a Lithuanian football league that has lots of mentions in articles about teams that play(ed) in it but no single target for a redirect that I've found. "Antra" is a given name, with Antra Liedskalniņa the only person having it we seem to have an article about. There is an article in the history of the Antra redirect about an Indian musical term that was later redirected to Antara (music) that I think is about the same subject (it's plausible that the different spellings are alternative transliterations but I haven't checked). Thryduulf (talk) 11:07, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
• Disambiguate. I have drafted a disambiguation page below the redirect. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:09, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
• Disambiguate per Tavix. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 16:38, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 05:19, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

• Notkilleveryoneism → AI safety  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• AI notkilleveryoneism → AI safety  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unmentioned neologism; WP:NOTNEO and WP:RDELETE p. 8. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:16, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).