Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 June 23

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 23

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 23, 2026.

M60 motorway

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to M60#Transportation early/WP:IAR per WP:JUSTDOIT ... since overwriting the redirect with a disambiguation page would result in a WP:TWODAB situation, which tends to be avoided. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 05:00, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

Ambiguous. This redirect is the byproduct of a pagemove in 2020. Retarget to dabpage M60. 162 etc. (talk) 23:24, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

McCornick

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 July 3#McCornick

Tatty

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Weak consensus on this, anyone can update the disambiguation page. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 02:38, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

Original rationale of creator was {{R from incorrect spelling}} of Tattie, which is tagged as {{R from alt lang}} for Scots Language. Most search results I see online for "Tatty" are the dictionary definition (Collins), and this could just as easily be a nickname for a Tattoo. Could delete, DABify, or turn into a soft redirect to Wiktionary. ScalarFactor (talk) 16:57, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

I think disambiguating or redirecting to wiktionary works
though I should note that Tatty is the name of a 2004 book by Christine Dwyer Hickey. It is missing a page currently, but it is most likely notable as it was the One Dublin One Book for 2020 Froglord (Finnfrog99) (talk) 17:02, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Pretty easily passes WP:NBOOK, yeah:
  1. Humphreys, Simon (2005-01-09). "Gripped by a life of Filth". Mail on Sunday. p. 72. ProQuest 328857862.
  2. Hand, Derek (2004-03-13). "The telltale signs of a family life in tatters". The Irish Times. p. 60. ProQuest 309651894.
  3. McCarthy, Gerry (2004-02-29). "Through a glass starkly". The Sunday Times. p. 24. Gale A114027037. Full access available to users of The Wikipedia Library.
  4. Dukes, Gerry (2004-03-06). "Growing up in a dysfunctional family". Irish Independent. p. 36 – via Newspapers.com.
ScalarFactor (talk) 17:21, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Thanks
I'll add it to my to-do list Froglord (Finnfrog99) (talk) 17:35, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Draft:Tatty Froglord (Finnfrog99) (talk) 17:48, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
wait, wiktionary says tattie is an alternate spelling of tatty (scots for potato) wikt:tattie wikt:tatty Froglord (Finnfrog99) (talk) 17:54, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
The evident ambiguity/confusion makes the case for the DABpage stronger, in my opinion. ScalarFactor (talk) 19:41, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
I heavily expanded the draft diambig Draft:Tatty, if anyone wants to expand further feel free Froglord (Finnfrog99) (talk) 21:07, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
  • "Tatty" is a song in Smart (Sleeper album). Possible retarget? Mathguy2718 (talk) 20:55, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Disambiguate as an ambiguous term without a clear primary topic. Draft disambiguation page started below the redirect. Searching returned a bunch of WP:PTMs that include the term, so I may have missed some items when drafting the page. - Eureka Lott 21:00, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
    oh, I was already drafting a disambig at Draft:Tatty Froglord (Finnfrog99) (talk) 21:09, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
    Tattykeeran should be merged into this disambig page Froglord (Finnfrog99) (talk) 21:11, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
    I'll copy everything from Draft:Tatty into the redirect's WIP disambig Froglord (Finnfrog99) (talk) 21:44, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
  • support proposed dab --Lenticel (talk) 04:06, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
The disambiguation list could use a bit of work, but the ambiguity is confirmed, it makes sense to disambiguate. --Joy (talk) 10:09, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
what changes do you suggest? Froglord (Finnfrog99) (talk) 14:20, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
See WP:D / MOS:D - there's several entries with multiple links of the same type, and several which have no blue link to explain a red link. --Joy (talk) 15:48, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
The draft disambiguation page needs some serious trimming. It's overloaded with WP:PARTIAL title matches (like everything in the food section) and WP:DABRELATED subjects (like the entire places section). Also, as Joy noted, it includes entries with multiple blue links (see MOS:DABBLUE) and entries with only red links (see MOS:DABRED). There's a lot to clean up. - Eureka Lott 16:58, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Java (cachaça)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 09:23, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

not a plausible synonym, as cachaça is not actually coffee (despite what some people would like you to think). not a well-known manufacturer or plausible as a disambiguator either. it is a manufacturer, it's just so unnotable in that regard that i could only find one result confirming that it's real consarn (talk beige) (count ribs) 12:33, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

the term is mentioned in a template at the bottom of the page. Dudzcar (talk) 03:39, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
Yeah but only due to linking to an unrelated alcoholic drink apparently made with the Java plum, right?. Not relevant to this page . Dingolover6969 (talk) 10:22, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
Perhaps it is in reference to Java, a brand of Cachaca?
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CachacaJava.jpg 𝟏𝟎𝐚𝐫𝐭𝟏 talk 19:52, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
I guess that is what it's supposed to be! As mentioned in the nom I guess. Anyway, no prejudice against restoring this redirect if the Java brand ever gets mentioned at this target. Dingolover6969 (talk) 20:04, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
Delete If the page used to be a page that was removed for some reason (eg. lack of notability) then redirected to the parent page, I get it, but that's not even the case. It's just a redirect created in 2005. 𝟏𝟎𝐚𝐫𝐭𝟏 talk 19:53, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Prince of Wales's 2nd Brigade, Eastern Division, Royal Artillery

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 July 6#Prince of Wales's 2nd Brigade, Eastern Division, Royal Artillery

As Soon as Possible Rocky

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 July 4#As Soon as Possible Rocky

Sea bottle

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 18:38, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Common name not used in reliable sources, created by a now blocked account. Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 09:27, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Sea tree

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 18:38, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Common name not used in reliable sources, created by a now blocked account. Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 09:02, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Sea sun

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 18:38, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Common name not used in reliable sources, created by a now blocked account. Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 08:43, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Sea button

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 July 1#Sea button

Homestuck characters mentioned in passing without dedicated headers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep with no prejudice to refining the redirects somewhere within the article, which can be done by anybody. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 03:19, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Various characters mentioned in passing without dedicated headers; those headers were probably removed during a cleanup in the past. Rufioh receives nontrivial commentary under Tavros Nitram's section, some characters possibly should have had sections, rest are probably too minor. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:22, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

A case could be made to keep the antagonist Jack Noir, maybe the Peregrine Medicant, and late protagonists Aranea Serket and Meenah Peixes, if someone is willing to write those sections, but the rest can be deleted. — Nameless(?) 06:46, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Keep +, ideally, re-refine. I mean, if you want to find out who, e.g., Peregrine Mendicant is, these redirects do in fact tell you. What if we {{vanchor}} or {{anchor}} these names? (To remove the need for headers.) That's my suggestion. Dingolover6969 (talk) 08:56, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Weak keep + refine to anchor and/or unrefine to main page. All of these charachters are mentioned on the page, they just don't have dedicated sections. In all cases the mentions are sufficent to give at least a little context about who these characters are. We can either add anchors to the names, or remove the headers and let readers ctrl-f themselves. Rusalkii (talk) 19:11, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep and refine by anchor (or another refine-type remedy). No prejudice against individual nominations for disparate concerns in the future. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 04:37, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Unmentioned Homestuck characters

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. There was a bit of discussion about ones that have a possibility of being kept without that list being solidified. If there's an acceptable target for any of these, feel free to recreate it. -- Tavix (talk) 14:55, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

Various characters who are not mentioned at all in the target article, and most of which point to nonexistent section which were probably removed at some point in the article's history. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:17, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

A case could be made to keep the carapacians (e.g. Wayward Vagabond, Aimless Renegade) and the Midnight Crew (e.g. Spades Slick, Diamond Droog, Hearts Boxcars, Clubs Deuce), if someone is willing to write those sections, but the rest can be deleted. — Nameless(?) 06:46, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Some of these seem to be alternate names for characters, so perhaps they could be easily converted into the category of characters who are mentioned without sections if we put a little parenthetical AKA next to their name with their other name. Dingolover6969 (talk) 09:36, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Delete, mostly so that I have the chance to delete myself. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 14:08, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Ironic that you are not instead Keeping! Dingolover6969 (talk) 11:20, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
  • @Dingolover6969: Can you list the ones that have a possibility of being kept, so that a closer can delete the others? Otherwise this may have to close as a WP:TRAINWRECK. Jay 08:05, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
    The short answer is: the ones that target a different character name, like Clubs Deuce → List of Homestuck characters#Courtyard Droll. Dingolover6969 (talk) 10:49, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete all. Even in the cases where this is an alternative name, the coverage in the page is sufficently trivial that adding these aliases doesn't seem worth it. Rusalkii (talk) 19:13, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Too many to go through at once. I'll try to look at 4 per day, and finish them in a week. The top four - Delete. Jay 04:56, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
    5,6,7,8 - Delete. Jay 08:10, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
    9,10,11,12 - Delete. Jay 04:13, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
    13,14,15,16 - Delete. Jay 05:22, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
    17,18,19,20 - Delete. Jay 07:24, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
    21,22,23 - Basically Delete all. Jay 16:07, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Zoosmell Pooplord

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 18:39, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Alias that isn't mentioned at target. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:15, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Sea sunflower

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 18:40, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Common name not used in reliable sources, created by a now blocked account. Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 05:57, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Sons of the Prophets

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 20:53, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

Not in target page Dingolover6969 (talk) 05:34, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

Judging by googling, this term is probably meant to denote a different topic than the biblical books of the prophets. But I'm no expert. Dingolover6969 (talk) 05:42, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
It's probably like this because this biblical encyclopedia Wikipedia takes some inspiration from has an entry on "sons of the prophets" that just says "see prophets". I didn't look into it further. Dingolover6969 (talk) 10:33, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Sea mulberry

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 19:01, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

Common name not used in reliable sources for the target species. Oxford English Dictionary (paywalled) defines "sea-mulberry" as an obsolete term meaning "A variety of coral", based on a quote from a 1753 issue of Philosophical Transactions: "The soft lithophyton, usually call'd the sea-mulberry". I was able to find the common name "sea mulberry" used in academic sources (via Google Scholar) for several taxa: Cudrania tricuspidata, Conocarpus erectus, Ceratophyllum species, Sonneratia caseolaris or other Sonneratia species. It does not seem to be an especially widely used common name for any of these taxa, but at any rate, the current target is not appropriate. Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 05:13, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

@Ethmostigmus, is your preferred outcome deletion? Rusalkii (talk) 20:54, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete - no mention of this nickname anywhere on enwiki, and the current target is not ideal per nom. Jay 09:48, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Sea beard

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 June 30#Sea beard

Shy Guy colors

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 July 4#Shy Guy colors

M6 rocket

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Rusalkii (talk) 18:52, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

there are two main issues here

  • the rocket is only mentioned in passing, in a context that suggests that it's mentioned elsewhere as an unreliable piece of shit handed off to soldiers more likely to spawncamp themselves than to know what a weapon is
  • if it's to be defined somewhere, it wouldn't be here, so this isn't a particularly good target
  • it's a vague as fr*ck name, being used to refer to seemingly multiple types of rockets that go boom (which don't seem to be exclusive to use in bazookas), rockets that take people to the one place not corrupted by capitalism... SPACE! and i guess a lego piece
  • despite having found a good few results for the specific m6 rocket that was jammed into bazookas, i could only find passing mentions. the only ones that had anything more than raw info were usually in the context of "what the fuck were they doing", which is pretty funny

yes, that's two, don't question it~ consarn (talk beige) (count ribs) 11:43, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

I don't see a problem. The section covers M6 rockets. I'm not an expert but from this section and a brief Google these "m6 rockets" seem to be bazooka rockets. If there are other M6 rockets that need to be covered maybe it could get a dab... Dingolover6969 (talk) 12:51, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
this part isn't important to note due to the aforementioned context of the passing mention issues, but #world war ii mentions them in (relatively) more detail in the same article, so it would already be a better target
more importantly, mentions of m6 rockets (specifically m6, not the improved versions) in wikipedia seem to be primarily about the lvm3-m6 (which was not itself the rocket), with some more passing ones about m6 rocket bags (which are not themselves rockets), such as in isro and m18 recoilless rifle respectively
mentions outside of wikipedia were similarly torn between different sources related to lvm3-m6 and assorted rocket-related stuff used in wars that had the code "m6" for whatever reason, veering more towards the former, suggesting that the rocket used there might be the primary topic for the term? at this point, though, i'm actually still a little unwilling to suggest retargeting there, as the rocket itself isn't mentioned in too much detail aside from "it's an lvm3"
on an even less important note, there were also a few results related to golf clubs, like whatever this is, but a lego piece was funnier to note consarn (talk beige) (count ribs) 13:46, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
there's also m6, which is already a dab that could potentially cover this redirect, but without a detailed enough mention somewhere, it's better off left off consarn (talk beige) (count ribs) 13:50, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
  • @Consarn: please can you tone down the attempted humour in your RfD noms, I have no idea what soldiers more likely to spawncamp themselves than to know what a weapon is is intended to mean and I can't work out whether it is actually relevant to this redirect or not. Your third bullet would be just as informative and much easier to understand with about half the words. Your goal should be to convey your point as clearly as possible not to be entertaining. Thryduulf (talk) 12:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
    wikt:spawn camp is relevant here. the gist of it is that the soldiers burdened with those rockets generally didn't have the training to properly handle said rockets. it's probably good to make it a little clearer that those mentions of the rockets themselves were also in passing, usually more focused in the aforementioned context of the soldiers' poor training and the conflicts in which they were thrown, that there were no more than two of said passing mentions per accessible source, and that this also applies to the sources that only mentioned them as raw info (that is, just listing them among the supplies they had) consarn (talk beige) (count ribs) 13:14, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 19:46, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 02:27, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Keep as is, I do not see an issue here, and I disagree that it is mentioned in passing: The M6 seems to have been a step in the development of bazooka rockets, which is appropriately explained in this section. I do not find the nomination statement very clear in general, so I also do not see a preferable alternative to what I think is currently a satisfactory target. Choucas 🐦‍⬛ 14:58, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Sea mushroom

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 July 6#Sea mushroom

Goes to Washington

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 July 4#Goes to Washington

Quicken Loans

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Rocket Mortgage#Quicken Loans. Argruber, feel free to suggest any changes to the article as an edit request on the talk page, but be aware that the backlog is unfortunately quite long so it may take a while for an editor to review. Rusalkii (talk) 21:03, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

I am an employee of Quicken Loans and have a disclosed conflict of interest. I am nominating this existing redirect for discussion because the corporate and legal structure has changed significantly since the 2021 rebrand, when the redirect was initially introduced. Currently, "Quicken Loans" operates as a home loan marketplace licensed to LMB Mortgage Services (#167283), while "Rocket Mortgage" (the redirect target) is a direct lender (NMLS #3030) This can be verified on the NMLS website - https://www.nmlsconsumeraccess.org/EntityDetails.aspx/COMPANY/167283 These are now distinct entities with separate business models and regulatory licenses. Maintaining the redirect misleads readers by implying they are the same company. I request that the redirect be removed so that the Quicken Loans page may be brought up to speed with it's current status. Argruber (talk) 19:41, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

  • Keep for now. We don't seem to have an article about the current incarnation of "Quicken Loans", so the current target is the best we have. If you think that the new company licensed to use the name meets the corporate notability guidelines, you could draft a new article and propose it at AfC, as suggested at WP:COIEDIT. Only then could we consider retargeting the redirect. Rosbif73 (talk) 08:22, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
    @Rosbif73 - Thank you for the feedback. I was actually hoping that instead of the other company getting its own article, that the Quicken Loans page just become a stub article. The article could still contain a redirect to Rocket Mortgage. Proposed Language for the stub article would be:
    Quicken Loans is an online financial marketplace operated by LMB Mortgage Services (NMLS #167283), a subsidiary of Rocket Companies. Founded in 1999 as a direct lender, the brand transitioned its direct lending operations to Rocket Mortgage in 2021. In 2023, the brand was separated into its current structure as a home loan marketplace, no longer acting as a direct lender.
    Sources for this are the NMLS website listed above. If needed, I can provide other sources as well. Your assistance is greatly appreciated Argruber (talk) 20:45, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:49, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
  • RfD isn't the right venue for this discussion: any editor can boldly transform the Quicken LoansQuicken Loans redirect into an article – but given your COI I'd suggest making an {{edit COI}} request at the redirect's talk page. Rosbif73 (talk) 06:42, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
    That is true. Dingolover6969 (talk) 08:44, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
    It seems like both editors above have the same idea, which also seems like the right one to me: make a new article for Quicken Loans itself, if it is WP:NOTABLE. The standard way to do this seems to be for User:Argruber to go through the WP:AfC process. Or maybe Wikipedia:PROPSPLIT. Note that you will need to understand WP:RS, slippery as it is. The NMLS website seems to be just a database listing which isn't enough to support an article, so I'm hopeful about your other sources.
    I've now read Talk:Rocket_Mortgage. Argruber, what if Quicken Loans targetted Rocket Mortgage#Quicken Loans? Adding info to just that section might be less of a quixotic task.
    Honestly reading the current Rocket Mortgage page is pretty confusing, because various things rebrand to be other things so many times. Dingolover6969 (talk) 08:35, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
    @Dingolover6969 thank you so much for that feedback. Yes, its is very confusing! I don't think that Quicken Loans, as it is now, would be considered WP:NOTABLE. I like the recommendation to go to the Rocket Mortgage #Quicken Loans section. As you will have seen in the Talk:Rocket_Mortgage section, I wasn't very successful at getting anything through that way. It may be helpful to have another editor help with the proposals.
    Primarily, another bullet should be added to the Quicken Loans History section:
    • In 2023, Rocket Mortgage licensed the brand name Quicken Loans to LMB Mortgage Services (NMLS #167283)
    The other suggestion is to change the opening paragraph. Rather than saying "formerly Quicken Loans" a new sentence could be added at the end of the paragraph. The justification would be that in it's current state, it can read that Quicken Loans is an American mortgage lender, which is no longer true. If we change it to the end, to say "Previously, Rocket Mortgage operated under the brand name Quicken Loans, LLC. it removes confusion for users and LLMs.
    Any guidance/assistance with these requests is really appreciated. Argruber (talk) 17:33, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
    I think those verbiage improvement suggestions are alright, but those go to the talk page. Here on RFD we just discuss where the redirect points. Dingolover6969 (talk) 11:27, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Adjust target to eponymous section. As long as there is no separate article there is no reason to redirect to any other page; I would have boldly targeted to the section if there was not an active discussion open, because I do not think this is controversial. Choucas 🐦‍⬛ 15:07, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
    @Choucaswould you please be able to assist me in making that change. I am not sure exactly how to do it and don't want to make a mistake. Argruber (talk) 21:37, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
    @Argruber the change will be made if the administrator who closes the discussion decides based on this discussion that it is the preferred/preferable outcome; while I would have done it myself if I had encountered the redirect "in the wild", since this discussion is currently open it is not my decision alone to make and it must be based on consensus. Choucas 🐦‍⬛ 21:51, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
    @Choucas thank you for explaining! Argruber (talk) 16:53, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
    Sounds good to me. To be clear, this is my !vote to refine to Rocket Mortgage#Quicken Loans. Dingolover6969 (talk) 07:14, 2 July 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chinese

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 July 6#Template:Chinese

Jaimee Grubbs

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 03:51, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

Not mention at the current target and unlikely to be mentioned there again, reasonably. Mentioned in passing at Tool Academy season 1, but I am unsure if redirection there or deletion is better. Casablanca 🪨(T) 16:30, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Note the page is currently untagged due to being fully protected, but I did leave an edit request on the talk page. Casablanca 🪨(T) 16:31, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
I requested unprotection at WP:RFPP...either way. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 19:50, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
Note I've tagged the redirect, but I've not looked whether the protection should remain. Thryduulf (talk) 20:23, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The protection was downgraded to extended confirmed protection. Retarget or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Chess enjoyer (talk) 06:18, 15 June 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:46, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Delete I am a bit confused because this looks like a redirect to an anchor (I assume), but I cannot find it anywhere, so I assume it was removed alongside the name itself. The mention on Tool Academy season 1 is completely trivial so there is no reason to redirect there. Choucas 🐦‍⬛ 15:16, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
The anchor was removed in this 2021 revision that was otherwise entirely minor copyediting. It pointed to the Tiger Woods#Infidelity scandal and fallout section (which still exists). "Jaimee Grubbs" was removed in this 2012 edit with the relevant part of the edit summary being remove some uncited and excessive content. Thryduulf (talk) 18:21, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Appropriation Act (Northern Ireland) 1921

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 July 6#Appropriation Act (Northern Ireland) 1921

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI