Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 22

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Elli (talk | contribs) 04:07, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

• Haminations → List of animated television series of 2017  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Subject is no longer mentioned at the target article. (Regardless, Haminations shouldn't be there considering this is the subject themselves, not a television series (e.g. Odd1sOut & Jaiden Animations)) ConeKota (talk) 22:40, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Katiedevi (talk) 00:14, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
• delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:32, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Elli (talk | contribs) 04:07, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

• The New Reign (Warriors) → Warriors (novel series)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Either a hoax or a fanfic, according to a quick Google search. Either way, not mentioned at target, and no reliable source in the article has ever mentioned "The New Reign". --not-cheesewhisk3rs ≽^•⩊•^≼ ∫ (pester) 20:20, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. ~ rusty ^meow ~ 02:09, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
• delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:32, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 18:21, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

• India at the 2030 Commonwealth Games → 2030 Commonwealth Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Way too early for this. Can be created closer to games time. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 18:04, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Katiedevi (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
• delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:16, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Thepharoah17 (talk) 23:39, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

• Wikipedia:♠Wikipedia:♠ → Wikipedia:Call a spade a spade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is unhelpful and defeats the purpose of a shortcut Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 13:22, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. I don't see the problem here. "♠" is read as or understood to mean "spade". It's a bit whimsical and I acknowledge that most editors won't take the time to find the ♠ symbol when they could just type "SPADE" but that doesn't mean it's not useful to some. This gets an average of 9 views/month over the last 12 and 24 months. The target is unambiguous and corresponds to the sister redirect WP:SPADE. Deleting this will break incoming links and disadvantage the 100 or so editors who use this redirect each year. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 17:01, 22 March 2026 (UTC)
• Keep it might not be the easiest to type but I can't see where else it should go. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:53, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Free Internet Chess Server#Usage (I prefer the refinement). (non-admin closure) J947 ‡ ^edits 04:27, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

• XICSXICS → Internet Chess Server#Protocol and access  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This redirect is tagged R from merge, but it is confusing because "XICS" is not mentioned at the target. Is it suitable for a retarget to Free Internet Chess Server ? Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:40, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget per nom, with possible refinement to Free Internet Chess Server#Usage where XICS is mentioned. I haven't gone through the history, but if a merger actually occurred at some point, the {{Merged-from}} template should be completed and placed at Talk:Internet Chess Server. The {{R from merge}} template on the redirect should be completed with {{R from merge|Internet Chess Server}}. (And if there was no merger, {{R from merge}} should be removed.) If we have to preserve R from merge's for attribution, we should still be able to retarget them when content and coverage moves around in order to maintain their usefulness. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 18:11, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to 2012–2013 escalation of the Syrian civil war. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:31, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

• Syrian Civil War, November 2012 – March 2013Syrian Civil War, November 2012 – March 2013 → Syrian civil war  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Syrian Civil War, November 2012 - March 2013Syrian Civil War, November 2012 - March 2013 → Syrian civil war  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Clearly incorrect, the war was not ended in March 2013 A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to 2012–2013 escalation of the Syrian civil war Thepharoah17 (talk) 03:40, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:05, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to 2012–2013 escalation of the Syrian civil war as proposed by Thepharaoh17. It makes sense that we should target the more specific article here. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 20:50, 22 March 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to 2012–2013 escalation of the Syrian civil war. Anyone specifying this date range is probably looking for something specific in that range. Looking at the history, it seems these redirects are the result of an attempted split that was reverted. However, the target has evolved a lot since then. Looking at the revision before the split was reverted, it appears that the relevant content ended up at 2012–2013 escalation of the Syrian civil war which is where it's now located; much of it is still word-for-word identical. Evidently, then, that's what these titles were originally intended to point to anyway. – Scyrme (talk) 21:07, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Israel (disambiguation). (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:33, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

• Biblical IsraelBiblical Israel → Ancient Israel and Judah  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Israel (Bible)Israel (Bible) → Jacob  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Shouldn't it have the same target? Or at least hatnote each other. Abesca (talk) 03:09, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

One is a place, the other is a person. A disambiguation page might be in order, but in lieu of that, definitely hatnote each other. Lychniis (talk) 10:55, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

One is a place, the other is a person who isn't the wp:primarytopic for the namespace. Retarget so both point to the place with a hatnote disambiguating the alternative name for the guy. — LlywelynII 13:14, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Isn't Land of Israel a better target for Biblical IsraelBiblical Israel? If it's ambiguous, Israel (disambiguation) would be the appropriate target for these. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 16:23, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget both to Israel (disambiguation) Even if we presume the place is the primary topic, is the reader looking for a general article about the region? Or one about the polity referred to as the "kingdom of Israel"? And, of course, there is the off chance they are looking for an article about Jacob. Ultimately, there's too much ambiguity here for me to identify a primary topic, and this isn't a case where there are only two possible targets. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 17:50, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget both to Israel (disambiguation) as {{r from incomplete disambiguation}}. Even in just a Biblical context this is very ambiguous. Could be the land, the kingdom, the name, or a metonym for the Israelites or people of Israel in general. All of these are linked at the proposed target. – Scyrme (talk) 18:55, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

  There's also The Israel Bible, which dab should mention. Abesca (talk) 17:41, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

  Do people refer to it as just "Israel"? – Scyrme (talk) 18:47, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Which target?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:05, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Israel (disambiguation). I agree with Presidentman and Scyrme. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 03:04, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 07:30, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

• ZF-UDS-7329 → ZFOURGE  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unmentioned, delete. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 03:04, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. This is the name of a specific galaxy. There's no mention of it anywhere on Wikipedia. Moreover, a quick search hasn't yielded evidence that it's related to the target at all. Streded (talk) 21:11, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 07:07, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

• Owww, my legs! This is the worst pain ever! → Little Big Mom  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unlikely search term. ... discospinster _talk 02:02, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete as unmentioned and per nom. I₂Overcome ^talk 20:22, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. BD2412 T 00:13, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
• delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:17, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
• Delete and add the others in this series of redirects to WP:DAFT as an unneeded quotation redirect. Xeroctic (talk) 07:57, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 07:05, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

• Well, I don't need safety gloves, because I'm Homer Simp-*gets zapped* → Homer's Enemy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unlikely search term. ... discospinster _talk 02:02, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom. I₂Overcome ^talk 20:19, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. I doubt someone would even search for the specific formatting, "*gets zapped*". BD2412 T 00:14, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
• delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:17, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 07:04, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

• Duck, duck, duck, duck, duck, duck, duck, duck… → Sleeping with the Enemy (The Simpsons)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unlikely search term. ... discospinster _talk 02:01, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete, delete, delete, delete, delete, delete, delete, delete… per nom. I₂Overcome ^talk 20:16, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Also ambiguous to any other potential usage of the word "duck" eight times in a row. BD2412 T 00:14, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
• delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:17, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 07:04, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

• Say “goose,” you stupid freak. *Ralph runs away while crying* → Sleeping with the Enemy (The Simpsons)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Nobody would search this. ... discospinster _talk 02:00, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete all Random quotes. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:43, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom. I₂Overcome ^talk 20:18, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Unusual formatting. BD2412 T 00:15, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
• delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:17, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was move to draft. voorts (talk/contributions) 15:45, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

• List of political parties in Calabria → Politics of Calabria#Parties and elections  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There is no list of political parties in Calabria at the target or (as far as I can find) anywhere on Wikipedia. Additionally, due to the lack of content on political parties at the target article, I renamed the section simply to Elections, and now the redirect goes to the top of the article. Redirect is misleading and unhelpful, I propose Delete. NerdyEpiscopalian (talk) 00:29, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

• I'm seeing a lot of info about the parties. Why do you say it is unhelpful? Jay 💬 17:52, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

  I think it's unhelpful exactly for the reason stated by Scyrme below: it does not list all the parties, only those who happen to have been elected in the most recent election, which excludes some active parties. That's not a true list of political parties in Calabria and shouldn't be treated as one. The section does not have specific info on political parties, just has it in the context of specific election results. NerdyEpiscopalian (talk) 13:37, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

• Draftify. The redirect was originally created as a redirect to the category Category:Political parties in Calabria, but this is not a list article and the category doesn't include every party active or in government in Calabria.
  The section at Politics of Calabria lists only those parties which have been elected into government in the most recent election. It's not intended to a be a general list of parties which are active in Calabria, some of which have articles (see the category) but have not won a seat in the most recent election, so I oppose keeping the current target.
  An article was drafted under the redirect very recently during this RfD by Checco. However, it cites no references. I suggest removing the redirect and moving it to draft space. Checco could then publish it when it's ready via AfC. – Scyrme (talk) 18:10, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

  As the initial nominator, I support this proposal. Ultimately, an article would be the ideal outcome of this. NerdyEpiscopalian (talk) 13:45, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 15:44, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

• Swedish White Elkhound → Jämthund  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not listed on the article. Listed as a separate breed on elkhound. UtherSRG (talk) 14:10, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 00:16, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:RETURNTORED. Thryduulf (talk) 17:46, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
• So what's the difference between a Swedish Elkhound (redirect to same target) and a Swedish White Elkhound? Should both be returned to red? Jay 💬 20:51, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

  See elkhound and the [cf] of the Swedish article for Swedish White Elkhound. Jämthund (also called Swedish Elkhound) and Swedish White Elkhound are separate breeds. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:03, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Left guide (talk) 06:05, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

• Honorary member → Academician  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I don’t know if the redirect makes too much sense. Surely there are honorary members in all kinds of organizations, not only in academies. Geohakkeri (talk) 08:58, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

• I agree with the nominator. Ideally this would target an article with some content about the concept of honorary membership, the closest I've found is Title of honour, but that doesn't feel quite right. Thryduulf (talk) 12:13, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 00:15, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

• Don't keep per above. Honorary membership isn't a thing limited to academies, so that's not a good target. Delete if a better target can't be found. If we don't have an article on that adequeately discusses it, then it's better to leave it to search results. Chess enjoyer (talk) 06:11, 22 March 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per Chess. Jay 💬 17:42, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to List of Algerian detainees at Guantanamo Bay. (non-admin closure) Thepharoah17 (talk) 23:29, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

• Abdallah HusseiniAbdallah Husseini → List of Algerian detainees at Guantanamo Bay  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Abdullah HusseiniAbdullah Husseini → List of Guantanamo Bay detainees  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Should point to the same place but not mentioned at either target. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:02, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 13:00, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Chess enjoyer (talk) 20:59, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Comment: Per this New York Times piece, Abdallah Husseini is an alias of Labed Ahmed, mentioned on List of Algerian detainees at Guantanamo Bay with isn 703. मल्ल (talk) 17:45, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep per मल्ल Sahib-e-Qiran, EasternShah 16:52, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Seems like a reason to keep might be established but not which target would be best if kept.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 00:14, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep and target both to List of Algerian detainees at Guantanamo Bay as {{R avoided double redirect}} to Ahmed bin Kadr Labed. NerdyEpiscopalian (talk) 19:22, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget. all to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders#DSM-IV multi-axial system, except delete Acess III disorder. voorts (talk/contributions) 15:41, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

• Access 1 disorderAccess 1 disorder → Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders#Multi-axial system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Access 2 disorderAccess 2 disorder → Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders#Multi-axial system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Access 3 disorderAccess 3 disorder → Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders#Multi-axial system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Access I disorderAccess I disorder → Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders#Multi-axial system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Access II disorderAccess II disorder → Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders#Multi-axial system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Access III disorderAccess III disorder → Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders#Multi-axial system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Acess III disorder → Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders#Multi-axial system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The section target is broken and the terms aren't mentioned in the article. The redirects were created in 2009 but I can't find mentions of the terms in the article from that time and a search didn't bring up enough sources that I think it warrants adding the terms to the article. Suonii180 (talk) 14:29, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

• Weak refine all to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders#DSM-IV multi-axial system where the mention now lies. "Access" is a plausible enough mishearing of "axis". The last one being a typo on top of that is stretching plausibility; possibly delete that one. I₂Overcome ^talk 03:33, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 00:13, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

• Comment, I agree with I2Overcome's suggestion of retargeting all but the last one with the spelling mistake. Suonii180 (talk) 15:10, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).