Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 30

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 30

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 30, 2026.

Wikpedia:job queue

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Left guide (talk) 23:17, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Unneeded and unhelpful redirect from mainspace to the help namespace. The first word is misspelled, and the correct spelling Wikipedia:Job queue, which is in Wikipedia namespace instead of article namespace, already redirects to the same target. Mathguy2718 (talk) 22:42, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Delete. An otherwise implausible one-off mistake. Probably was never intended to be made in the first place. If it had been noticed earlier it would have been a speedy deletion. – Scyrme (talk) 22:46, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom and Scyrme. The job queue is not a target that needs a redirect from mainspace under any spelling. Thryduulf (talk) 17:21, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Puzzle game

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 April 6#Puzzle game

Adult themes and the Scooby Gang

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Scooby-Doo#Reception and legacy. Left guide (talk) 23:19, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Section does not exist. Scooby-Doo#Reception_and_legacy does mention "presumed subversive themes", though I'm not sure that justifies this redirect. मल्ल (talk) 20:21, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Retarget redirect to Scooby-Doo#Reception_and_legacy, which I would contend does justify the redirect. BD2412 T 22:37, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep and refine per BD2412. I'm not sure how much more we'd have to say, but I agree that there's enough there to support the redirect. --BDD (talk) 20:51, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Thyamine

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Left guide (talk) 23:19, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

WP:RDEL#D2: ambiguous misspelling: currently redirects to Thymine, but also a 1-letter misspelling of Thiamine (the sense intended from e.g. Special:Permalink/1346110485#Applications). Preimage (talk) 18:17, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nominator. I agree that this is likely to cause confusion. External search results do show that it's a plausible misspelling for thymine (eg. BBC Bitesize) but also for thiamine (eg. Pavlović (2019)). The later is especially plausible not only on the basis of spelling but also pronunciation. I don't see a strong case for one being more likely than the other and disambiguation for a misspelling doesn't seem appropriate. – Scyrme (talk) 19:26, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Aileen Liu

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Left guide (talk) 07:55, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Not mentioned in target article and I couldn't find a suitable alternative. A WP:BEFORE search didn't bring up reliable sources to add the name to the article. Suonii180 (talk) 17:41, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Kel Gleason

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 April 9#Kel Gleason

Young Choppa 5ive5ive6ix

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Left guide (talk) 23:20, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Not mentioned on page, unable to find any sourcing on the topic. मल्ल (talk) 17:26, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. Non-notable figure; I wasn't able to find enough sourcing to be confident that he's even dead, let alone murdered. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 13:40, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Tiddey

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Left guide (talk) 23:21, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

This redirect is of no navigational value, because the string Tiddey appears only in the hidden section ITWT 621-0 — ITWT 640-0, with no indication to the reader as to what must be expanded to find the string that is the name of the artist. The way to find it is to view the source wikitext, copy the text to a Word document, and search the Word document with the Find-Replace tool. A reader of the encyclopedia won't do that, but will just curse at finding nothing. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:27, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Delete. You can ctrl+F the source text when viewing it on Wikipedia, but that's not much better. Even if the section were by-default expanded the mention is still not really enough to anchor a redirect. Thryduulf (talk) 17:33, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Outline of Java

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) J947 ‡ edits 03:32, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

This title could be mistaken as an outline of the island of Java, rather than the programming language, and is likely to cause confusion. Uffda608 (talk) 14:30, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Comment. One one hand there is no WP:OUTLINE for the island and I'm not sure how likely it is for anyone to make an "outline of" for a geographical location, but on the other hand Java is the primary topic (WP:PTOPIC) for "Java". – Scyrme (talk) 14:35, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
We do have Category:Outlines of geography and places so a geographical place outline is not as unlikely as I might have thought. The redirect has scant pageviews since its creation and no incoming links. I'm leaning 'delete' but an alternative would be to 'keep' with a hatnote to Java and possibly Java (disambiguation). —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 14:47, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Interesting. Looks like it's mostly cities/metropolitan areas, countries, and territories right now, but someone making one for a large island doesn't seem so implausible now.
Thinking about it more, I'm actually now leaning keep. There is no outline of the island, and redirecting to the island's article isn't appropriate as it's a prose article (WP:NOTOUTLINE). The primary topic problem could be dealt with using a hatnote so if anyone was looking for information about Java they could still find it, even if not in outline format. I only lean because arguably it might discourage someone from creating an outline if it already redirects somewhere else, especially if there end up being incoming links to change. – Scyrme (talk) 18:20, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Keep per discussion above. If an outline is ever written about the country, it should live at the base name or this should be retreated there. If there is concern for ambiguity, a hatnote can be added to the outline pointing to Java and/or the dab page. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 14:23, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 ‡ edits 05:26, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Chess enjoyer (talk) 15:20, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

StandWithUkraine

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 April 7#StandWithUkraine

Dream Co., Ltd.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 20:50, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Not a plausible search term, might be confused with other companies, if any, of the same name. Go D. Usopp (talk) 13:38, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Keep per the if any clause of the nomination. If there are confusion with other companies, you need to provide evidence of that confusion. -- Tavix (talk) 15:29, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete per Tevildo. I missed that it wasn't mentioned in the article, I was too busy searching for potential ambiguity. -- Tavix (talk) 15:07, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Not mentioned in article. Tevildo (talk) 22:12, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Kana Aibara

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Left guide (talk) 23:35, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Not a plausible search term, might be confused with other people, if any, of the same name. Go D. Usopp (talk) 13:38, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Keep per the if any clause of the nomination. If there are confusion with other people, you need to provide evidence of that confusion. -- Tavix (talk) 15:28, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep per Tavix. Not mentioned in any other article, plausible search term. Tevildo (talk) 22:12, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Sunday Chin

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Left guide (talk) 23:35, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Not a plausible search term, might be confused with other people, if any, of the same name. Go D. Usopp (talk) 13:37, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Keep per the if any clause of the nomination. If there are confusion with other people, you need to provide evidence of that confusion. -- Tavix (talk) 15:27, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep per Tavix. Not mentioned in any other article, plausible search term. Tevildo (talk) 22:12, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Yuichiro Tomari

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Left guide (talk) 23:36, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Not a plausible search term, might be confused with other people, if any, of the same name. Go D. Usopp (talk) 13:36, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Keep. If there are other people with the same name, that would be a case for disambiguating, not deletion. There doesn't seem to be anyone else with the name mentioned on Wikipedia. -- Tavix (talk) 15:20, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep per Tavix. Not mentioned in any other article, plausible search term. Tevildo (talk) 22:12, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Dr. Kubota

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 April 7#Dr. Kubota

Jannsen

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 April 8#Jannsen

Kelly Wiglesworth

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 April 9#Kelly Wiglesworth

Karytaina-Dimitsana Road

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 22:51, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

I think we should delete the redirects, because there is no National Road that runs between Karytaina and Dimitsana. For more information about the list of extant national roads, see National roads in Greece. Minoa (talk) 15:12, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

It seems that this was once a standalone article but was later merged to Greek National Road 76, which itself was redirect to the highways list, hence why we have the current redirects. Despite it being said as being a merge Markussep never merged any content so we do not need to maintain the page for attribution. Whether someone thinks the page history is worth keeping is another matter but given the article was entirely unsourced I'm in favour of deletion. Traumnovelle (talk) 21:30, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 12:41, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
  • @Jay: According to https://doy.ggde.gr/, there is no direct provincial road between the towns. The most direct route between Karytaina and Dimitsana appears to require using three provincial roads (Arcadia Provincial Roads 40, 36 then 38). The list of Provincial Roads in the former prefecture of Arcadia, Greece can be found at https://ia37rg02wpsa01.blob.core.windows.net/fek/01/1956/19560100047.pdf (pages 752–753). I think the list of Provincial roads in Greece could be a new article project, although it is uncertain how much time I can invest in it. --Minoa (talk) 23:12, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
    What would you like to do about the entry at Arcadia_(regional_unit) - remove it or keep as a redlink? Jay 💬 05:27, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
    @Jay: I have replaced the unreferenced list with a general summary, with reference to the decree. --Minoa (talk) 00:55, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
    Thanks! All may be deleted. Jay 💬 04:02, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wikipedia:NOPE

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep and add a hatnote to WP:NO. Thryduulf (talk) 09:54, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Why specifically WNIN? I don't see why "Nope" would refer to that article in particular. In general, "nope" is not very formal, so I doubt it would make for a good project-namespace redirect. SeaHaircutSoilReplace 13:56, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 21:15, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Weak keep per Mathguy2718 Toarin (talk) 00:42, 22 March 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Strong opinions about this redirect are also allowed
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 12:36, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
Retarget to WP:NO and add current target (WP:What notability is not) to that dab page; as this redirect is subtly harmful; while I won't argue that existing usage points towards current target, the idea that all *future* usage will be for current target too is a bit WP:ATA#CRYSTAL-y. What's more important IMO is that not only is it WP:XY with WP:What Wikipedia is not as well as everything else listed at WP:NO, but also, WP:NO itself exists as a dab page that currently does not include WP:WNIN. The difference between the two is an WP:UPPERCASE trap and a half; I can definitely see someone assuming they're the same and using one when intending the other. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 12:47, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Comment after 2nd relist: Looking further into this shortcut, it looks like WP:NOPE gets used more than the other shortcut, WP:WNIN. I'm going to assume this is because a word is much easier to memorize than an initialism, so WP:NOPE ends up being used more. I'm not a fan of changing a shortcut being used for over 18 years (with the last use being on 30 April 2025), especially since it's the most used shortcut of the target, but I would accept retargeting to WP:NO with a mention of the previous target of WP:NOPE. However, I would prefer a hatnote, something like this:
"WP:NOPE" redirects here. For other uses, see WP:NO.
This allows editors to still correctly assume that WP:NOPE redirects to Wikipedia:What notability is not while allowing readers to seek other meanings. With this information, my opinion becomes slightly stronger but not to the point that I would remove the "weak" part yet. Mathguy2718 (talk) 15:27, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep It is used in old discussions and retargeting or deleting could cause those discussions to be far harder to understand. I am fine with hatnoting, but I think anything further risks being more harmful than helpful. Casablanca 🪨(T) 21:41, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep with hatnote per Casablanca Rock. This isn't a hard nope to change: if a good target arises in the future, likely to eclipse this shortcut's once-in-a-while use, it should be retargeted there with hatnote. But a disambiguation page is not that. Not targeting a particular thing defeats the point of a shortcut, swallowing up its usefulness. WP:NO is good to hatnote to, not to redirect to. J947 ‡ edits 07:04, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Hetero-curious

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was invert targets. A weak consensus that the first three redirects should target Bi-curious. (non-admin closure) J947 ‡ edits 07:10, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Invert the targets? Also, there's no homocurious/homo-curious redirect(s). Abesca (talk) 23:13, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Retarget per caesar. NerdyEpiscopalian (talk) 14:23, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Retarget Hetroflexible Hetroflexible → Heteroflexibility. Not sure if a redirect can be both an {{R from misspelling}} and an {{R from adjective}} but if so, these both apply. It's simply a misspelled adjective form of the word Heteroflexibility. Note that the correctly spelled HeteroflexibleHeteroflexible redirects to Heteroflexibility and HetrosexualHetrosexual exists as an {{R from misspelling}}. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 03:26, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete Hetero-curious, Heterocurious, and Straight-curious. These are not synonymous with either heteroflexibility or bi-curiousness. At a minimum these terms require more explanation, which is not found at either target, though it's possible they could be defined in these articles or some other article as related concepts. Bicurious typically describes a straight-identified person whereas hetero- or straight-curious describes a gay-, lesbian-, or otherwise queer-identified person. Bicurious people are "curious" about sexual or romantic engagement with the same gender while heterocurious people have similar "curiosity" about the opposite gender (or a gender different from their own, depending on definition). Heteroflexible is an identity unto itself although may also describe someone who also identifies as or is assumed to be straight/heterosexual. Keeping or retargeting these indicates that these terms are synonymous with heteroflexible or bi-curious. These all receive minimal pageviews and none are linked in articles. Thus they do not qualify for soft redirects to Wiktionary per WP:SOFTSP and Template:Wiktionary redirect. All of these terms may have somewhat squishy and context-dependent definitions. Reliable sourcing may be a challenge but these need to have a clear definition or discussion of varying usage if they are to be targeted anywhere. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 19:32, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
    homoflexibility redirects to its antonym. And it doesn’t seem that there are only one case of bicurious or only one definition for heterocurious. It’s not rare to find uses while searching for this having the same meaning of bicurious, especially when most results in my first googling were porn. However, I found some definitions in scholar:heterocurious: By ‘heterocurious’ we mean those individuals who consider themselves heterosexual but like to engage in sporadic homosexual relations. So it’s either a subtype of bicurious or itself. Abesca (talk) 16:28, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
    HomoflexibilityHomoflexibility may need to be considered separately. I maintain that all the straight/hetero-curious redirects should be deleted unless and until they are discussed in an appropriate article. The fact that the definition is squishy is all the more reason why an appropriately sourced discussion is necessary to support these redirects. My finding is that definitions vary but part of the base definition of 'bicurious' is straight or straight-leaning while part of the base definition of 'heterocurious' is (often) non-straight. Unexplained redirects will either indicate that these are always completely synonymous with 'bicurious' in all its uses or will leave readers scratching their heads wondering why they landed at an article that doesn't describe the redirect—WP:RSURPRISE applies. With only 21 hits on Google Scholar, this terminology appears rather obscure, hence my earlier statement: Reliable sourcing may be a challenge but these need to have a clear definition or discussion of varying usage if they are to be targeted anywhere. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 19:47, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Notice placed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 01:47, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Legoktm (talk) 03:12, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Retarget Hetroflexible → Heteroflexibility per all. Delete others per Myceteae. Jay 💬 08:03, 28 March 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Consensus is clear that Heteroflexible should be retargeted to Heteroflexibility, but there is presently no consensus regarding the others.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 09:54, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Invert all. Dont delete heterocurious since there are dozens of scholar sources showing this is a synonym and a subtopic. It's also a plausible misnomer. --MikutoH talk! 04:45, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Survivor: China-only contestants

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Survivor: China. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 08:15, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

All of the above appeared in only Survivor: China. So far, they haven't reappeared in later Survivor seasons since. --George Ho (talk) 07:08, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

  • If these names are unambiguous, then retarget per nom. Thryduulf (talk) 18:17, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Stup Forever

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Left guide (talk) 07:56, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Is quite notable and there is no content about it in the article besides a listing. WP:RETURNTORED PARAKANYAA (talk) 06:17, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Survivor: Fiji-only contestants

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Survivor: Fiji. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 08:12, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Not to be confused with later seasons filmed in Fiji. All of the above contestants appear in only Survivor: Fiji and, as long as they haven't reappeared in later Survivor seasons, should be retargeted as such. --George Ho (talk) 04:55, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Assuming these are unambiguous (the two I spot-checked are) then 'retarget per nom. Thryduulf (talk) 18:18, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Chaotix

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 April 9#Chaotix

Johnny in the Middle of the Park

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. No prejudice against recreation should a mention be readded with a reliable source. -- Tavix (talk) 17:52, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

The page "Johnny" redirects to no longer mentions the song. This is because I removed the paragraph about it after my attempts at googling the title only yielded user-generated/self-published sources such as Reddit threads and Fandom wikis, which aren't the types of sources our guidelines permit using. Since there are no suitable redirection candidates that I am able to find, I propose deletion. Giovanni Potage (talk) 03:15, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Just notified of this discussion at the target and creator pages. Jay 💬 05:27, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wanggiya (surname)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 April 9#Wanggiya (surname)

When a man argues...

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 April 9#When a man argues...

Kenward "Boo" Bernis

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Survivor: Fiji. (non-admin closure) Chess enjoyer (talk) 01:09, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Wanna list this as part of another multi-nom listing, but I read that this person has made casting recommendations of Survivor. Nonetheless, if still proven non-notable, then should be redirected to Survivor: Fiji, his only Survivor season so far. --George Ho (talk) 02:19, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Retarget all to Survivor: Fiji. I think most of these Survivor redirects should be uncontroversial but I will note that @Red Director changed the redirect target in 2021, without providing an explanation. This contestant is mentioned multiple times throughout Survivor: Fiji and only once at the list entry in the current target, with little additional information. In general, when a contestant appears on or is (quasi-)notable for only a single season of a show, it makes sense to redirect to that season rather than the list for the entire franchise, especially when the season article contains substantive coverage of the contestant's game play. There is no other suitable target for these redirects. Whether or not this contestant played a role in other Survivor seasons is not discussed anywhere that I can find on en-wiki. Kenward "Boo" Bernis is not mentioned in any other articles. There is a Kenward Bernis listed at Southwest Stakes and Whitmore Stakes. We have virtually no information about the winner of these two horse races in 1962. Tag Kenward "Boo" BernisKenward "Boo" Bernis as {{R with history}} and tag the others as {{R avoided double redirect}} to Kenward "Boo" Bernis. Kenward "Boo" Bernis has the most substantial edit history. If this is ever converted to a standalone article, whether or not to preserve "Boo" in the article title can be determined via WP:RM in accordance with WP:NICKNAME and other applicable article titles. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 19:11, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
    Feel free to do whatever is best in regard to these and other one-time players. I see more rationale for one-timers being redirected to their season while players with multiple seasons going to the list article unless their first season was truly what they are defined by. The reason that those were changed back then (I think, it has been a while) was that newer players redirected to the List article instead of the main season so an attempt was made to get older redirects on a uniform standard, which sometimes is not the best way to go around here I admit. I apologize for any trouble. Red Director (talk) 19:15, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
    No need to apologize! I don't necessarily expect a detailed rationale when editors retarget a redirect. I pinged you and noted the history only because we have seen a large number of these Survivor contestant redirects here recently and most seem uncontroversial but the nominator made it sound like these have perhaps been disputed in the past. It's helpful to understand the thinking behind these now that they are being nominated for reconsideration. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 23:29, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Survivor: Cook Islands-only contestants

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Survivor: Cook Islands. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 01:24, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

All of the above appeared in only Survivor: Cook Islands, whose page the pages should be retargeted to. So far, they haven't reappeared in later Survivor seasons. --George Ho (talk) 01:21, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

I am good with a retarget back to Cook Islands per my comment above. Red Director (talk) 19:17, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Nualros

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:G3. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:02, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Not mentioned at target or anywhere else onwiki. PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:23, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete per G3 as a hoax (oldid) that was then incorrectly redirected. The only Google results are from auto-generated lists of synonyms clearly based on the redirect's existence. If you look at these two edits made by another account as the article was being created (note: links to shock site; not sure if it's still online), this looks like two friends doing schoolhouse vandalism at each other. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|🤷) 10:02, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI