Wikiwand AI

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 8

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 8

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 8, 2026.

Barnstar of National Merit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Left guide (talk) 00:20, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

This was previously a redirect to barnstar before being retargeted, but neither target works: the name clearly refers to a Wikipedia-specific term and XNRs should generally not exist if possible. Wikipedia barnstars are mentioned in barnstar, but not this particular one. Delete. — An anonymous username, not my real name 22:22, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Delete, anyone who knows the term "barnstar of national merit" would know to search on the wp: namespace. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 23:52, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete per Lunamann. XNRs should generally not exist if possible. is not quite correct (even if only talking about main → project space XNRs) as sometimes they are exactly the right thing, but those situations are limited and this is not one of them. Thryduulf (talk) 00:22, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
    That's what generally means. — An anonymous username, not my real name 21:01, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
  • delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 00:01, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Chicken Pyongyang

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Left guide (talk) 00:20, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Not mentioned at the target. Judging from the edit summary creating the page, it may be intended as a joke. Recommend deletion. ~2026-12223-02 (talk) 21:03, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

  • delete as it appears to be entirely made up, all search results are either coincidental occurrences of the words 'chicken' and 'pyongyang' together, or referring to chicken in pyongyang caesar (it/he) (talky place) (united bestowals) 21:14, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia, and as far as I can tell (after using WikiBlame) Pyongyang has never been mentioned at the target. – Scyrme (talk) 21:45, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
  • delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 00:00, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Nintendo 8-bit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:27, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Nintendo 8-bit and Sega 8-bit are ambiguous, as the Game Boy, Game Boy Color and Game Gear were also 8-bit. Sega 16-bit is less ambiguous, but the Sega CD can be considered a separate system in some respects. UPDATE 7 FEBRUARY: bundling similar redirects. Mr slav999 (talk) 21:10, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

  • Nintendo video game consoles and List of Sega video game consoles would be the ideal landing places for these redirects. The Nintendo list does a good job of listing the number of bits, but the Sega list does not. Perhaps that's something that can be added to the Sega list? -- Tavix (talk) 21:23, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
  • the Sega CD can be considered a separate system in some respects
    Even if this was correct-- it's not, the Sega CD is as unambiguously an add-on to the Genesis as the Sega 32X is (as well as the Nintendo 64DD > Nintendo 64)-- the Sega CD is explicitly discussed on the Sega Genesis page. Similarly, the Game Gear is basically a Master System made portable, and is compatible with all Master System games through a cartridge converter; it is also, as with the Sega CD, discussed on the Master System's page. Keep these two.
    The Game Boy and Game Boy Color, though... Those aren't as clear-cut, as the tech of the GB and GBC aren't nearly as cleanly mapped to the NES's hardware (you can't just use a converter to plug an NES or Famicom copy of Super Mario Bros into a GBC and play it, like you can with a Master System game on Game Gear). NES still feels primary topic, but I'm not sure enough to come to a decision there; anyone have any other thoughts here? 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 21:24, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
    I don't think most people would say a console is the same as another just because it can play its games. The Genesis has an add-on that allows it to play Master System games, but no one considers them to be the same. The PS2 can play most PS1 games but no one thinks they're the same thing. Also, I said the Sega CD may be considered its own system because it has an exclusive library of games that can't be played on a base Genesis. Mr slav999 (talk) 18:11, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
    I don't think most people would say a console is the same as another just because it can play its games.
    That's a valid concern re: referring to the Genesis as a Master System, a PS2 as a PS1, or the Wii as a Gamecube. However, I'd say it's not applicable re: the Master System and Game Gear. Unlike with all of the prior examples, which are backwards compatible but have extensive libraries that the prior console it's compatible with can't play, the Game Gear and Master System are literally the same thing-- not only can most Master System games work on Game Gear with a cartridge converter (save for certain games that require, say, the light gun), but in turn, most Game Gear games can be played on Master System (although a converter didn't exist at the time, there *are* third-party ones that exist); there are exceptions-- Game Gear exclusive titles that you can't play on Master System because they use colors that the Master System couldn't support-- but one of these Game Gear exclusive games can be converted into a Master System compatible game with only minor graphical modification.
    Which means rather than being a case of a PS2 and a PS1, it's more like the case of a Game Boy Advance, a Game Boy Advance SP, and a Game Boy Player. All three of those I'd consider to be versions of the GBA, and that includes the Game Boy Player.
    I said the Sega CD may be considered its own system because it has an exclusive library of games that can't be played on a base Genesis.
    ...Hm. I'm... a little torn on this. Part of me is insistent that the Sega CD should merely be considered a disk drive addon to the Genesis-- like of course the base Genesis can't play Sega CD games, it doesn't have a disk drive on its own!-- but then I look up at my own argument that the Game Boy Player is a GBA (which... it is, it's not an emulator, it's the actual hardware from a GBA hooked up to your Gamecube). And as per Sega_CD#Technical_specifications, it's NOT just a CD drive bolted to the Genesis, it has its own graphics and processor.
    ...Hm. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 21:07, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
  • delete all redirects missing the word "console" as vague with consoles, games, rereleases of those games, and rereleases of those games but in collection form, among other less plausible stuff like merch and the reader being one of those "so retro" folk
delete the others as well as... a misleading mess of varyingly implausible targets at best. judging by the views and incoming links (all one of them not related to this rfd in sega 16 bit console), it's unlikely that a reader would be looking for those without already knowing what the consoles are, which would make the most plausible target some sort of list of consoles separated by bits or something, which technically doesn't exist, and even if it did (which would be at the list of sega video game consoles and list of nintendo products), they'd actually still be vague with arcade systems, which are separated in the nintendo list and in a separate list for sega (for which no 8-bit ones seem to exist, and only one 16-bit one seems to exist), and with the multiple consoles each of them have per bit (despite sega's best attempts to hide its pre-mega drive stuff) consarn (talck) (contirbuton s) 19:20, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
they'd actually still be vague with arcade systems
You're arguing that the redirects that have the word "console" are an issue because they're vague with... arcade systems, which are famously not consoles? 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 21:10, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
yes and no. regardless of whether or not i think it's plausible (it's a skill issue, really), this is a confusion i've seen a good bit of among people who have lives, and i have snk's arcade shenanigans of all things to blame for about half of it, with the other half being a sentiment of "that's just nomenclature, isn't it?". and Streets™ 2 depending on who you ask
even then, there are still multiple systems for both (do people even remember the sg-1000 and pico?), and no target that would really fit the oddly specific criterion of a search for consoles per that one number consarn (talck) (contirbuton s) 22:15, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
...Okay, while the Pico does roundly trounce the idea that the Genesis is the only target for Sega 16 bit console, I'd like to point out that the Master System was the SG-1000 in much the same way that the Game Gear was the Master System; the Master System being the Sega Mark III (as in the 3rd release of the SG1000). The Master System article even mentions it in the second sentence. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 23:36, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
that they even have different articles in the first place makes this whole thing kinda pointless, as they're considered different enough platforms in mainspace consarn (talck) (contirbuton s) 23:49, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
Eh, my counterexample regarding that is Game Boy Advance SP, DSi, 2DS, et cetera, all examples of major revisions of popular (handheld) consoles (the GBA, Nintendo DS, and 3DS respectively for the examples I gave) that ARE in every respect the base console but have enough notability by themselves to have their own articles. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 00:02, 8 February 2026 (UTC)
Well, most would say that the SG-1000, Master System and Game Gear are separate consoles, even if they have some common origins. Sorry, but the fact you have a different opinion on this is kinda irrelevant, because what matters is what most people think. Mr slav999 (talk) 15:35, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 19:03, 14 February 2026 (UTC)
  • This has largely been a three-way discussion. @Tavix: would you like to add or modify, considering 3 more entries were bundled after your !vote? Jay 💬 03:45, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
Why? I left a general comment—not a !vote—that would also apply to the additional entries. -- Tavix (talk) 16:51, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Chess enjoyer (talk) 20:42, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Ok, I read your comment as a retarget !vote. Jay 💬 17:19, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Leopard skin

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 25#Leopard skin

Savage Man Savage Beast 2

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 16#Savage Man Savage Beast 2

Symplectic form

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 25#Symplectic form

Super P.E.K.K.A.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Left guide (talk) 00:21, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

This troop type does not exist. There is one that was renamed to "Power P.E.K.K.A.", but this is not currently mentioned in the Clash of Clans article. "P.E.K.K.A." does point to the article, and is sufficient. Delete as unhelpful to the reader, and as a non-existent term. TNstingray (talk) 19:22, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Renewability

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 15#Renewability

MNC News

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 15#MNC News

00FFFF

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Cyan. (non-admin closure) J947 ‡ edits 00:45, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Unless someone can demonstrate that hex is more affiliated with Aqua (color) and rgb is more affiliated with Cyan, these redirects should have the same target. Mathguy2718 (talk) 05:19, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

  • None of these redirects need to exist at all. Wikipedia article titles do not need to be a service for resolving RGB color triples to CSS color names. –jacobolus (t) 06:59, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Weak retarget all redirects to Cyan since that is the longer article. In fact, it might even be worth merging the aqua and cyan articles at some point. Duckmather (talk) 07:02, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete all. There are 50,331,648 such possible redirects of these forms, and they're still ambiguous. Triplets of numbers and bare hex values can refer to all sorts of things besides color. Even something like rgb(...) is ambiguous without a reference for what the possible ranges can be. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 17:38, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
    Not sure where 50,331,648 is from. There are 16,777,216 triplets of 8 bit numbers; 113,379,904 if we include mixed-case hex. pburka (talk) 15:40, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
    It's 3 * 2^24, for the 3 types of each in the nomination. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 16:46, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete all per Deacon Vorbis. TheTechie[she/they] | talk? 04:15, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
  • delete all per WP:COSTLY. I also the last redirect as having a malformed modifier. --Lenticel (talk) 04:28, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete all per WP:PANDORA per Deacon Vorbis. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 14:39, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Retarget the first one to Cyan (and I would also support a merger of Aqua (color) there. The WP:PANDORA argument is nonsense, we don't have 50,331,648 different color articles so there wouldn't or shouldn't be redirects for all of them. That's like saying the redirect 418 (number) should be deleted (even though we have content on that number) because 50331648 (number) is a possibility. -- Tavix (talk) 14:48, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
    Colors don't have unique such representations as triplets. A human cannot distinguish between #00FFFF and #01FEFD. Most will be a close approximation to a color we do have an article on and could realistically be made into redirects. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 16:46, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
    The article for Cyan defines it as #00FFFF. That's the redirect that should exist for the color (minus the # for technical reasons). Any other approximates can and should be deleted, but that's not what's being discussed here. -- Tavix (talk) 17:00, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
    No, it merely lists that as one value in an infobox...a value which very much contradicts the same infobox describing it as a range of frequencies in the electromagnetic spectrum. "Cyan" doesn't have a strict definition; it's a word that has a range of similar colors associated with it. We should no more have A52A2A redirect to Brown, even though it's a "standard" value for it in certain schemes. Instead, someone can use WP's search feature to search for the string, and find a number of articles where such standard color values are listed. There isn't a single best target for these. Redirects should have clear targets and not get in the way of searches. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 17:11, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
    Just as we don't list all possible hexes in the infobox, we don't have redirects for all possible hexes. 00FFFF is a standard definition of cyan, so that's the hex that's listed in the infobox and thus the redirect that should be kept. -- Tavix (talk) 17:22, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 15:35, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Central Estonia

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 16#Central Estonia

Autopedophilia

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 25#Autopedophilia

Renewables

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 15#Renewables

Fastest man-made object

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Chess enjoyer (talk) 20:30, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Retarget to List of vehicle speed records. The Parker Solar Probe is currently the fastest object, but this is likely to change, and having the redirect target the general list makes more sense. There are no longer any incoming links to this redirect, which was not the case when the previous discussions concluded. Tevildo (talk) 10:00, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Keep - No reason to change and zero chance that anything will soon exceed the Parker Solar Probe. Even if it did, the redirect could be retargeted easily as it already was. () This is simply a new rehash of the same prior discussions. Further, "incoming links" is not a mandatory criterion for a redirect. See this parallel discussion for more arguments. This has been debated before. -- Veggies (talk) 13:28, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Comment The previous discussions were about whether the redirect should exist at all. I'm not proposing that it be deleted, just that it's retargetted to what I consider a more appropriate article. In addition, "soon" is a relative term - the Solar Probe's speed may not be exceeded in the next few years, but the next few decades? Tevildo (talk) 13:50, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
      • the Solar Probe's speed may not be exceeded in the next few years, but the next few decades? Then whenever that happens, it can be retargeted in a single edit. There's zero reason to try to save 15 seconds of work at some nebulous point in the future by rederecting a link to a less accurate (and incorrect) target. -- Veggies (talk) 14:39, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep as per WP:CRYSTAL; there's no need to "fix" it before it needs to be fixed. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 18:17, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep as per WP:SPECULATION. At this point there is no faster man-made object Guitarjunkie22 (talk) 15:25, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Question: Could "fastest" refer to something else? "Fast" is not only used to show objects moving quickly; it may also refer to a high data transfer rate in computing. Computers are also man-made and considered objects. Given that Fastest computer redirects to TOP500, which lists the most powerful (or the fastest) computers, is it possible that someone would be looking for this? Mathguy2718 (talk) 00:21, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
    Based on the first 10 pages of search results for "Fastest man-made object" -Wikipedia, no. The results are almost entirely either the Parker Solar Probe, lists of fastest things (all of which are objects that themselves physically move or were phsyically moved), and various other spacecraft (either incorrect or pre-dating the current record holder). The only other thing to get multiple mentions are various other spacecraft and the "nuclear-powered manhole cover" (Operation Plumbbob#Missing steel bore cap). Thryduulf (talk) 11:47, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

List of shipwrecks in Lake St. Clair

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Left guide (talk) 00:22, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Target article has no content about shipwrecks in Lake St. Clair. Delete per WP:RETURNTORED Mdewman6 (talk) 09:47, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

l + ratio

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 25#l + ratio

Houston Soccer Team

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Sports in Houston. (non-admin closure) Chess enjoyer (talk) 22:53, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

This was raised after this discussion, where Houston Football Team was retargeted. Similarly, this could also refer to the Houston Dash. Retarget to Sports in Houston similarly to the previous discussion? Servite et contribuere (talk) 07:43, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

  • I was going to retarget this boldly, but realized this has come to RfD, so will wait for due process. Jay 💬 08:53, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Retarget per nom. Thryduulf (talk) 13:25, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Sports in Houston - agree with nom. Asteramellus (talk) 20:45, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Retarget per nom. NerdyEpiscopalian (talk) 13:55, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete. Neither the Houston Dynamo FC nor the Houston Dash have been known as "Houston Soccer Team". -- Tavix (talk) 16:36, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
    It is however an extremely plausible search term for someone who doesn't know the name of the soccer team representing Houston and/or that there is more than one. We do not and should not require readers to have read the article(s) before they are able to find the article(s) to read. Thryduulf (talk) 00:42, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
    I disagree on plausibility (lol to "extremely") and your last sentence is nonsense. -- Tavix (talk) 20:12, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
    If you're reacting "lol" to something this self-evidently plausible, then it's clear we're never going to agree on plausibility so I'll leave that there, but I'm not understanding at all why you regard my final sentence as "nonsense"? Are you disagreeing with its applicability to this situation, disagreeing with the concept as a whole, not understanding what point I'm trying to make or something else? Thryduulf (talk) 11:34, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
    No thanks. Given your track record, I know that it's not worth the effort to attempt to get you to understand my position. -- Tavix (talk) 14:47, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
    That is possibly the most unhelpful reply you could have given. Thryduulf (talk) 11:54, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Côco

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 15#Côco

Sarah (Suikoden)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 15#Sarah (Suikoden)

Picton Parish (Yancowinna County)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 15#Picton Parish (Yancowinna County)

Edgar, Yancowinna County

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 15#Edgar, Yancowinna County

Body mass

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 25#Body mass

U(1)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 15#U(1)

Muntaber

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 15#Muntaber

Acii

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 15#Acii

Big Booty Judy

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 20:46, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

“Big Booty Judy” appears to be a song from Chris Brown’s first mixtape, “In The Zone (Rhythm & Streets)”. However, this specific song on the mixtape is not mentioned in the article nor anywhere else on Wikipedia. The mixtape in question also doesn’t have its own article.

This term also seems to have multiple uses besides the Chris Brown song, as there is apparently a wrestler also called “Big Booty Judy” from searches of the term, so I’m not sure where this could be retargeted to. ApexParagon (talk) 17:16, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

  • Comment: The song is mentioned at Kevin McCall#Production and writing credits and "Big Booty Judy" (Remix) is mentioned at Chris Brown discography#Guest appearances. A different (?) song with this name is mentioned at Shawnna discography#Solo singles. A character with this name is also mentioned at ATL (film). There's enough here to cobble together a dab page. Problem is, the wrestler is also mentioned at two pages—Mike Jackson (wrestler) and Evan Golden (wrestler). Neither of the '(wrestler)' pages is an appropriate entry on a Big Booty Judy dab page and we don't have an article on the wrestler him(?)self. Creating a dab page would effectively hide the passing mentions to the wrestler, although we could include {{canned search}} or similar links. The primary meaning is a slang term which has appeared in a number of songs and other places. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 22:02, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
    Note that the Chris Brown and Kevin McCall articles refer to (essentially) the same song. If DABified, I would link only the Chris Brown discography. Still not sure a dab page is the right move. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 17:29, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 04:37, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Chess enjoyer (talk) 06:19, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete. While there may be enough bits and pieces to scrounge together a dab page, Myceteae is right that it would hide mentions to the wrestler. Readers would be better off with the search results. मल्ल (talk) 16:22, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Accra International Airport (AIA)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 15#Accra International Airport (AIA)

Paaskula

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 17:50, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

This redirect currently targets Pääsküla, a district in Tallinn, Estonia. However, there is also Paasküla, a village in Lääne-Viru County, Estonia. I'm not sure what the best thing to do is for this situation. Mathguy2718 (talk) 02:57, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Safechuck v. MJJ Productions

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Restore and send to AfD. Just counting the bolded words makes this look like a clear "delete", but looking beyond only one person (TheWikiholic) is actually arguing that this should be deleted without AfD. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:45, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

This nomination is on behalf of Bhdshoes2, whose original nomination was somewhat malformed. Part of their rationale is as follows:

apologies if this is redundant or poorly listed for discussion but I do not see the entry. The redirect of Safechuck v. MJJ Productions points to "1993 allegations" page, but this is a distinct lawsuit now set for trial in 2026. It should be a freestanding article.

Chess enjoyer (talk) 01:41, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
There was also this text at the redirect itself:

I believe the Robson and Safechuck lawsuit against Michael Jackson's companies for aabuse likely warrants a standalone article because it is a separate civil lawsuit with significant independent coverage, some notable legal rulings on the duty of care, two celebrities (Jackson and Wade Robson), and an upcoming trial in California in November 2026. At minimum I dont see logic of redirecting it to an article about a completely unrelated child abuse case from 1993. Only commonality is that the alleged perpetrator is Jackson. SEE ALSO Overview of Michael Jackson sexual abuse allegations for context (in my view) Bhdshoes2 (talk) 01:19, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Chess enjoyer (talk) 01:42, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete The article was REDIRECTED three years ago because the case was still in it's early stages. No trial has happened and like the title says it's about the case between Safechuck vs MJJ Production. Nothing has happened in the last three years in this case to warrant a standalone article. TheWikiholic (talk) 06:29, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
    It was redirectsd erroneously three years ago - I just didnt bother raising an objection so it got memory holed by superfans. The case is in the press now renewied because of the lawsuit booked for trial in November 2026 and the litigation between the estate and Jackson's daughter over the legal spend related to the lawsuit. If there is a reason to have a page about the DOCUMENTARY about this lawsuit (Leaving Neverland ) surely there is a reason to have a page on the actual case actively going to trial in 2026 Bhdshoes2 (talk) 08:02, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete/retarget. Just because a case involves a celebrity does not warrant a standalone article, as notability is not inherited. Based on my research on this subject, the case appears to still be at an early stage and has not yet demonstrated notability on its own merits. At minimum, the redirect target should be changed from the current one to Leaving Neverland#Safechuck and Robson lawsuits. Never17 (talk) 01:36, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Comment: The redirect is a result of a BLAR. It was contested by the nominator, then re-BLARed. This happened multiple times. Per WP:BLAR, I think AFD might be a better venue for this. Chess enjoyer (talk) 09:30, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Restore and send to AfD as per Chess Enjoyer. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 11:55, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete It doesn't need a redirect. ~2026-15034-31 (talk) 14:51, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete WP:UNDUE and WP:NPOVFORK. Wiki doesn't have pages for millions of lawsuits, there is no reason to have one for this. The Safechuck's lawsuit is extensively covered on already existing pages. If not delete as a result of votes here send it to AfD PinkSlippers (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 21:21, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
    Wiki doesn't have pages for millions of lawsuits, there is no reason to have one for this.
    This is a pandoran argument and needs to go back into the box. The wiki is certainly not starving for storage space, especially not for redirects. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 22:27, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
    Those are reasons to delete an article, not a redirect, and this is currently a redirect. Do you mean that you want to keep the redirect? Chess enjoyer (talk) 00:30, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
    No, I agree it should be up for deletion as you proposed PinkSlippers (talk) 22:02, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
    I proposed no such thing. My nomination was on behalf of another editor, and they want it to be standalone article. I myself don't have a strong opinion on this at the moment, except that RFD may not be the right venue for this discussion. Chess enjoyer (talk) 22:13, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
    I meant it should be sent to articles for deletion, you proposed that above to send it to AfD, I agree with that. Unless of course it gets deleted based on the vote here. Not sure if that is possible. PinkSlippers (talk) 22:37, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
    Sorry, I guess I misread you. Chess enjoyer (talk) 23:33, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
    re "The safechuck lawsuit is already covered extensively on already existing pages," tell me more about that. There is an aside on the Leaving Neverland documentary page but that documentary came out 7 years ago. The documentary and the lawsuit are two separate things. The lawsuit is going to trial now. The ruling came 4 years after the documentary. I also don't see that as a reason to redirect this page to coverage of a child accuser from 33 years ago. Bhdshoes2 (talk) 14:40, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
    The plaintiffs first filed in court, years later made the film to support their ungoing effort to win their multi-million dollar lawsuit. Hence, there is a whole section for this lawsuit on the film's own page. The newly created page does nothing but cheerypicks certain elements of the legal process incl. using primary sources, thus it's WP:NPOVFORK and should be deleted. PinkSlippers (talk) 22:04, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete The material is already adequately covered in broader articles such as Leaving Neverland , rebuttal documentarys and the pages discussing post-2009 allegations involving Michael Jackson. Creating a separate page maken the information unnecessarily. I think sent to afd be best like Chess enjoyer expressed Mr Boar1 (talk) 16:37, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete or send to AfD as per Chess enjoyer The article violates numerous policies WP:BALANCE WP:NOR WP:NPOVFORK also looks like it was hastily put together by AI Guitarjunkie22 (talk) 15:08, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Free access

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 23#Free access

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks