Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 10

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 10

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 10, 2026.

The Critter

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 19:20, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Targets a section that was deleted in April 2020 as "insufficiently germane". No longer mentioned in the article. Possible retarget to Critter. Johnj1995 (talk) 21:53, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

  • Just delete. None of the entries at the dab page are particularly appropriate. The only entry there with the definite article normally attached is "The Critters", but that's a band, and would never be referred to in the singular. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 22:52, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
  • delete' per Deacon Vorbis --Lenticel (talk) 01:40, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Just notified of this discussion at the current and proposed targets. Jay 💬 05:45, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wladimir Lenin

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn/keep. Per nom and rationale below. (non-admin closure) Thepharoah17 (talk) 21:50, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

This is the Afrikaans and Silesian spelling of "Vladimir Lenin"; delete per WP:RLOTE; no affinity with either of these languages. 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 21:11, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Keep - it's also the German spelling (among a few others), and the cult of Lenin was significant enough in East Germany that I think there's a nontrivial chance that English readers could come across this spelling. signed, Rosguill talk 21:24, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
Ah, I wasn't aware of that; I pressed ctrl + f and searched "Wladimir Lenin" on Lenin's Wikidata entry (which contains all the foreign language variants of his name) and I only saw those two languages; had I just typed "Wladimir" I would have also seen the German entry there which was his full name. I'll wait for other users to opine whether the East German cult of personality was significant enough to justify this redirect; Lenin's time in Germany may also be of relevance here. 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 21:31, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
Keep - It's a useful direct and it's a spelling for Lenin in multiple languages. It would be most helpful to readers who search his name in this spelling to be directed to Vladimir Lenin main page. WP:RFOR isn't official site policy - which means, as editors, we can use that as a vague guideline but we are also free to make up our minds ourselves. HarvardJock🏫 (talk) 21:37, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Josephstalin

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 05:12, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Unlikely missing space; delete. 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 21:07, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Agree - Delete because it's not a common or significant misspelling that warrants an entire redirect page of its own. Readers who search the term would likely come across Joseph Stalin anyway. Easy grounds for deletion. HarvardJock🏫 (talk) 22:58, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
So why is the redirect Donaldtrump allowed to stay up? Electron230 (talk) 02:39, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
How should I know? You act like I created that page and vouched for it lmao. Donaldtrump should be deleted too, again, pointless page that should be deleted in addition to Josephstalin. HarvardJock🏫 (talk) 03:49, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

斯大林

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 17:37, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Not mentioned in article, this is the Chinese transliteration for Stalin's name; delete per WP:RLOTE. 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 21:06, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

  • Delete. No affinity. The previous RfD brought up the Sino-Soviet split, in which destalinisation was a point of contention, but that is just an intersection between the topic of Stalin and the topic of China. Just because China is relevant to a topic doesn't mean that the affinity between China and the Chinese-language also extends to that topic too. The topical intersection does not make it plausible that English-language authors would use the Chinese form of Stalin's name as a loanword when referring to Stalin, or that English-speaking readers would search for Stalin by his Chinese name.
    A search in Chinese is much more likely to be either an attempt to navigate Wikipedia in Chinese or a search for a Chinese-language article. The former is something Wikipedia does not intend to support and which exceeds the purpose of redirects. The latter is something the English-language Wikipedia does not have and so cannot redirect to. It could also be an attempt to use Wikipedia's search bar to translate, similar to how you can get Google to offer a translation via a search, but this is also something which Wikipedia does not intend to support and which exceeds the purpose of redirects. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a translator. – Scyrme (talk) 22:02, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
    @Scyrme actually, yeah, was the idea of inter-language search suggestions (i.e. pointing people looking for this to zh:斯大林) discussed sometime within the last 8 years? it seems like it'd be useful alongside wiktionary and wikiquote for people who somehow got in the wrong wikipedia consarn (talk beige) (count ribs) 14:49, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
    I'd be surprised if it hasn't been discussed, but if it hasn't it should be (maybe over on WP:VPI?). The main practical issue that comes to my mind is that there can be matches across multiple different languages and presenting all of them may be overwhelming, so it wouldn't be straightforward to implement. One idea could be to instead integrate a menu into the search box to select a language from a list, so that if a user selects a language other than English clicking on "search" will link to the search results page on that language's version of Wikipedia instead of the results on ~enwiki. – Scyrme (talk) 15:29, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep, remains helpful due to high use. J947 ‡ edits 23:33, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:RFOREIGN. With this basis, there won't be any English speakers who would regularly use that Chinese name to get redirected to the English language Joseph Stalin article, and, as a result, it would be useless to have a redirect page for that. Chinese language searchers can be redirect to the Chinese version of the Stalin article - I think that page exists, right? Delete, in any case. HarvardJock🏫 (talk) 03:58, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
    "English speakers" and "Chinese speakers" are not mutually exclusive groups. J947 ‡ edits 05:00, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
    We're on the English Wikipedia. HarvardJock🏫 (talk) 05:39, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
    A Wikipedia which many Chinese speakers frequent. J947 ‡ edits 11:20, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
    that says nothing. assuming for one second that brazil actually exists, many (however many "many" is) brazilian portuguese speakers frequent this wikipedia as well, but that doesn't mean alemães would be a good redirect to germans without first proving affinity... which is a really funny thing to say when said affinity is more concretely proven in that article than stalin's shenanigans with china, and it's comparatively "just" too weak to warrant that redirect
    in this case, deletion will serve people who search on or link to the english wikipedia better, as it'll then either direct them to search results (in this case, the main one would be wiktionary) or let them know that they're in the wrong wikipedia consarn (talk beige) (count ribs) 14:42, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
    Somehow I think the readers intending zhwiki will realise they're on the wrong Wikipedia when everything's in English, not Mandarin. But if they are actually intending to reach zhwiki, it's actually significantly more helpful to direct them to Joseph Stalin than search results. There's an interwiki link at the target or they could change the URL subdomain, and return to zhwiki far quicker than if they're directed to search results. Thankfully changing the URL subdomain from "en" to "zh" works since Chinese Wikipedia helpfully has a redirect from "Joseph Stalin". Directing readers intending Chinese Wikipedia to English Wiktionary couldn't possibly help them. J947 ‡ edits 22:28, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
  • despite high views, delete per my comment above. admittedly, i have no idea where those views are coming from, but they're evidently in the wrong wikipedia consarn (talk beige) (count ribs) 14:45, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Israeli (nation)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 18#Israeli (nation)

State Of israel

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 05:10, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Highly unlikely miscapitalisations; why would anyone capitalise "Of" but not "Israel"? Delete. 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 20:44, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Delete - Implausible capitalisation. The traffic in the years since it was created has been the sort of negligible traffic redirects pick up just by existing. Deleting is unlikely to impact navigation negatively, as even if someone did the implausible thing and try entering this into the search bar they'd still end up at the right article via state of israel. (You can verify this by trying another implausible capitalisation with no redirect like StAte oF IsraEl. If you copy that title into the search it will redirect via state of israel.) – Scyrme (talk) 21:20, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
Delete per Scyrme. I agree with his reasoning. The capitalization is unlikely and does not warrant its own redirect page. The other issue is the "State Of" part of the matter - those two words are entirely negligible, as almost nobody consistently refers to all nation-states as "state of this" or "state of that". Even if they do, they'll just end up at Israel's article page. No reason for this to exist. HarvardJock🏫 (talk) 23:01, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
The "State of Israel" is the official title of Israel, so in this case there's no problem with "State of". – Scyrme (talk) 23:07, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
But is it reasonable to assume people commonly search for "State of Israel"? It seems like a totally useless redirect page to me. HarvardJock🏫 (talk) 00:58, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
It is reasonable, as Israel could also refer to a concept, a nation, a region, a historical kingdom, a name, etc. That's why Israel (disambiguation) exists; "State of Israel" is a standard Template:R from unnecessary disambiguation.
ETA: State of Israel has a daily average of 377 pageviews. 9ninety (talk) 06:17, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
MOS:BOLDALTNAMES. Sometimes, half-bots create articles for phrases that are mentioned in bold in the lead. Dudzcar (talk) 08:53, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
  • delete due to at least two errors --Lenticel (talk) 01:41, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Weak delete while maybe harmless it does as noted have 2 errors. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:16, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The oldest hatred

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 05:02, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Non-neutral redirects which are not mentioned nor claimed in the target article. It's also vague since hatred and ethnic hatred are not synonymous; one could argue (even from a Jewish perspective) that Satan's fall from Paradise arose from his hatred of God, and thereby he had "the oldest hatred"; delete per WP:UNNATURAL. 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 20:39, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Delete - I don't think the claims relating to Satan in Jewish exegesis are correct (and Satan#Judaism would generally agree), but my understanding is that asserting that antisemitism is "the oldest hatred" is something of a WP:FRINGE view, invoked polemically in works like this but not something that we say in the article nor something that we should endorse via a redirect. While one could defend it with WP:RNEUTRAL, given that virtually no source ever tries to discuss antisemitism purely by referring to it as "the oldest hatred" without further clarification, the odds of this being a useful navigation term seem low. signed, Rosguill talk 21:30, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
Delete per Rosguill. As WP:RNEUTRAL notes, some leniency for non-neutral titles is permissible in redirects because they're less visible to readers. However, this lack of visibility is negated by the plausible ambiguity of these titles. One could argue, for example, that misogyny, the hatred of women, is older. (eg. Misogyny: The World's Oldest Prejudice) If not deleted, a better target would be History of antisemitism where the expression "the longest hatred" is mentioned. – Scyrme (talk) 22:50, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
Delete per the above two users. WP:RNEUTRAL is the most important consideration here and I agree that this should not be kept. HarvardJock🏫 (talk) 23:05, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

AntiSemite

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was No consensus * Pppery * in solidarity 02:09, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

CamelCase-style redirect created in 2021; delete 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 20:32, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

  • Delete. Probably made in good faith but the capitalisation is just wrong. --DanielRigal (talk) 20:41, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep. I created it five years ago. I don't remember the exact circumstances, but I imagine that I came across this casing somewhere. Would keep it really be harmful? Nightscream (talk) 21:05, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep. I recently wrote an essay about antisemitism and kept wanting to write "antiSemitism" instead of "antisemitism" or "anti-Semitism". It's not an unreasonable search term. J947 ‡ edits 22:08, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete, even if, as is claimed immediately above, it's a reasonable search term (it's not really; normal English words never use camel case), the search feature already automatically redirects to mere casing differences. It's not useful as a linking aid, and we should strongly avoid having redirects that differ only in casing unless there's some special reason to keep them, because they tend to get out of sync and incur a general maintenance burden. It's not all that uncommon to see listings here with this or other sorts of such subtle differences that point to different targets, and a discussion is needed to decide on which to use. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 22:59, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep - It's a totally reasonable search term and easily can be perceived as one of the multiple variants of the term, like J947 pointed out. It's perfectly appropriate for it to redirect to the main Antisemitism article. For educational purposes too, it's best to have the search terms expanded for redirection to the main page. HarvardJock🏫 (talk) 23:35, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
    Type CaMeLcAsE into the search bar. Notice how you're automatically taken to the article at Camel case even though CaMeLcAsE doesn't exist. This is because CamelcaseCamelcase already redirects there, and searches will match casing differences automatically. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 00:39, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
    That is true; however, WP:redirects are cheap, and whether this one continues to exist is functionally inconsequential, and the capitalization is reasonable; so is there even a point in deleting it when it already exists? 9ninety (talk) 06:35, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:SMALLDIFF. Insofar as this is a reasonable search term, the redirect is not needed, as Wikipedia's search function will automatically correct it. But, the moment that someone writes a notable book (or other media) titled AntiSemite it denotes a separate topic. Nothing is to be gained from keeping, and there's a small chance we avoid future confusion. signed, Rosguill talk 00:12, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete per above delete rationales. Not useful. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 02:21, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete The search engine detects such typos and offers the correct result, so the redirect is redundant. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 18:00, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep per J947, this is reasonable. -- Tavix (talk) 00:38, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep' per J947 and WP:R#KEEP point 5. Thryduulf (talk) 03:31, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Hillary 4 U and Me

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 18#Hillary 4 U and Me

HillaryRodham

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 04:21, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

CamelCase-style redirect created in 2007, a few years after CamelCase weren't required by the Wiki software; delete 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 20:18, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

  • Delete, either as a misuse of camel case, or as simply a missing space, either way. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 23:06, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
  • delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 01:44, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete because it's a completely pointless term, likely not very commonly used, and doesn't deserve it's own redirect page due to a lack of notability. I find it unlikely anyone would search "HillaryRodham", not just given the lack of spacing but also because she's known as Clinton. HarvardJock🏫 (talk) 05:54, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete The search engine detects such typos and offers the correct result, so the redirect is redundant. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 18:02, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ms. Clinton

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 22#Ms. Clinton

More implausible Hebrew + anything else titles

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus for the Xbox redirect. Delete the rest. -- Tavix (talk) 00:34, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Titles that mix Hebrew and non-Hebrew characters in an implausible manner. Most of these wedge a Hebrew character where there should be a Latin one, one is a bilingual title like those deleted at a past Devanagari-centric RfD, and one is a combo of two Hebrew names with an English conjunction. There are enough plausible titles (19 by my count, including 6 disambiguations, 4 for names of military ships with pennant numbers, 2 television seasons, 6 Hebrew names that contain embedded Latin, and ELעלALאל) that I am slightly against a general title blacklist for Hebrew + anything else, but I might support one for bizarre cases like the ones I've nominated in this RfD series. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:07, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

  • For reference, here's a query for all Hebrew + anything else titles: quarry:query/105004. Four multi-script combining diacritics are discounted for this result. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:11, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep the Xbox one (it's literally how the logo looks, as demonstrated at the top of its target article.) No opinion on any of the Hebrew ones this inexplicably got lumped in with. (???) Sergecross73 msg me 18:28, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
    The intermediate character is a paseq. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:32, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
    Ah, gotcha. I don't know Hebrew and have never seen Microsoft's branding of this Xbox be connected to Hebrew. Sergecross73 msg me 18:49, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
    I will say that because | is a prohibited character, I potentially understand the inclusion of the pasek, but it still should likely be deleted. Casablanca 🪨(T) 22:14, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
    Ah, it must have been someone's attempt at getting around the prohibited character. (I "created" the redirect but it was simply a leftover from me fixing a bad page move, as someone had wanted the entire article at this location.) Sergecross73 msg me 23:51, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete Daniel Acuסa. I, apparently it but that was back in 2008 and it is unclear why at this remove. Nothing links to it and nothing should, so it can go. Emperor (talk) 23:57, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep the Xbox redirects, they are harmless, are the official branding per the infobox image in that article and to my knowledge are not ambiguous with anything else. Qwerty123M (talk) 02:20, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep that xbox redirect User:Redirect Editor Talk! Date:May-4-2026 — Preceding undated comment added 04:28, 4 May 2026 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE -- Tavix (talk) 21:01, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thepharoah17 (talk) 20:15, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
Delete. This seems to be a similar case to another recently-visited topic on this page. I will introduce WP:RFOREIGN here. On this basis, there likely won't be many English speakers who would regularly use the Hebrew or French names of these items or figures to get redirected to the English language articles, and, as a result, it would be useless to have redirect pages for these. Hebrew or French language searchers can be redirected to the respective versions of these articles - I assume at least for some of these articles, the other-language variant exists. Even still, deletion is warranted. HarvardJock🏫 (talk) 06:00, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete all including the Xbox one for which we have the proper Xbox Series X｜S redirect that uses the vertical bar, the right substitute as per WP:FORBIDDEN. No reason to slip in a Hebrew character because of how it appears. Jay 💬 18:42, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Hiding your power level

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 18#Hiding your power level

Bhutan at the 2026 Asian Games

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Can be recreated individually once there is something more to say than "expected" participation. Rusalkii (talk) 21:43, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

WP:TOOSOON. Too early for this. Qby (talk) 14:22, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Chess enjoyer (talk) 18:11, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
Retarget - Far more logical for all of these links to be retargeted to the 2026 Asian Games main page. Articles like those are supposed to be detailed and lengthy, making any long descriptions of each nation's participation better off explaining under each one's respective subheading than taking up space having their own pages. HarvardJock🏫 (talk) 00:25, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Too many to go through, renominate in smaller batches. I selected 3 in random, and saw they have standalone articles for the 2022 Asian Games - Qatar at the 2022 Asian Games, Thailand at the 2022 Asian Games, South Korea at the 2022 Asian Games. I don't know if the rest of them have corresponding articles for 2022, if we need to take that as a reference. Jay 💬 18:52, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete all. No need for a redirect when there is no information on each country's participation on the target article. These can be created closer to the games. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:39, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete all. I think the table should be removed at this point because, per the article, it lists "expected" participation with no references. Countries should be added to the table once their participation is confirmed. -- Tavix (talk) 00:31, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete all per Tavix. * Pppery * in solidarity 02:09, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Jinshajiang Road

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 05:23, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

"Jinshajiang Road" has its own Chinese page, and the consecutively named metro station cannot fully represent this road. (Fengzhuang, South Qilianshan Road, Zhenbei Road, and Daduhe Road are all locate at Jinshajiang Road) Benteds (talk) 14:19, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

  • Keep and tag with {{R with possibilities}} in lieu of deletion; I've interwikilinked this redirect with the zhwiki article. Duckmather (talk) 02:49, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
    As I mentioned, various stations located on Jinshajiang Road, redirecting it only to Jinshajiang Road station could be misleading. It is irrelevant with possibilities. Benteds (talk) 07:12, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Chess enjoyer (talk) 18:01, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
Keep and tag per above. I don't see how this could be misleading. People looking for, say Daduhe Road station, will be typing the station name "Daduhe Road station" into the search bar, not the road the station is located at. S5A-0043🚎(Talk) 09:32, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
However, keeping it will make it hard to add interlanguage links. I added a link on Daduhe Road station, but the bot deleted it. I don't think links are unnecessary. Benteds (talk) 10:43, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Public Services (Monaco)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) J947 ‡ edits 03:48, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Public Services are an unlikely search term for somebody looking for the details of the Monegasque Military. The terms are not synonyms. Boynamedsue (talk) 08:44, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

  • Keep This redirect is the result of a recent move, and the article appears to have been at the "Public Services" title for several years. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 16:48, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Chess enjoyer (talk) 17:59, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Saint Abbas

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 04:27, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

This is an unlikely typo of the English translation of his name (Sabbas). Saint Sabbas redirects to Sabbas, which is a DAB page. Delete or at the very least retarget to Sabbas.

As to why it's an unlikely typo, why would someone capitalise the 'A' if they meant to capitalise the 'S' and missed it? Saint abbas would be somewhat plausible, but not this. 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 13:53, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Epicgenius (talk) 16:19, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
Delete - I don't think this a common misspelling of the Saint, therefore implying that it's an entirely different concept. Because of this, it wouldn't be appropriate for it to strictly redirect to Saint Sava. Now even if this is the case, a redirect to Sabbas would be best, but I lean towards deletion because of my prior stronger rationale. HarvardJock🏫 (talk) 00:15, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Prez Trump

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Jay 💬 04:20, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Delete per WP:UNHELPFUL, which literally lists "Pres of United States" as an example of a redirect to avoid creating. 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 14:12, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. Clear case of WP:RDEL #8 to me. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 19:50, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:30, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep, common colloquial shortening of "President"; so common, in fact, that it's used in newspaper headlines, let alone everyday searches ( ). All sorts of modifications that would be rarely viewed for most articles become plausible when targetting such a high-profile article. J947 ‡ edits 23:30, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
    It's fine if this was Prez redirecting to President, but this is much more specific (which makes it unhelpful). It's not a nickname for him or synonym, literally just a shortening used to write stuff faster. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 02:26, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
    And of course, no one ever uses a shortening to write stuff faster when they're searching for something. J947 ‡ edits 03:02, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete entirely, this is an easy one. I agree with WP:UNHELPFUL being applied here as you said, but I would argue even more simply that "Prez Trump" is not a common search term, certainly not common enough for a reader to stumble upon a redirection page like that. It's safe to say the vast majority of readers will search for "US President" or simply "Trump" because it's even more common. HarvardJock🏫 (talk) 00:12, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep per J947. "Prez" is a common shorthand for "President" in American English. This term is unambiguous. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 18:36, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep. Unambiguous. WP:UNHELPFUL is just part of an essay in competition with WP:CHEAP. I don't see how this could possibly hurt anything. Station1 (talk) 20:55, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete, no one should be searching for this, period. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 04:22, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep, WP:UNHELPFUL is an essay and not policy. Personally I disagree with it, this is a common shorthand. TheSilksongPikmin (talk | contribs) 14:53, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
    Just because it's a common shorthand (also, it's not really) doesn't mean that anyone is liable to actually search for it like this. There are endless variations people might use, but we realistically shouldn't be making redirects for them. We need to trust that people are going to search for the simplest thing they can unless there's some reason to specifically include a longer form, but there's not here. This would conflict with a title of media that shared the name that would be more likely to search for this way. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 16:32, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Weak keep. It gets a few hits each month. Who knows how many of them were actually looking for the Trump article and how many were just examining the redirect and thinking "Well, that's a bit weird". Anyway, it seems harmless enough. If it is helping anybody, even if it is only a few odd people, then I think we might as well keep it. --DanielRigal (talk) 17:05, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete. The common abbreviation for Trump is "Trump", no title or modifier necessary. I haven't seen or heard anyone refer to Trump as "Prez Trump", whether it's in news media or just talking to people. It's either "Trump" or "President Trump". Space4TCatHerder🖖 14:43, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep: This is unambiguously going to the right target, and a few editors above think this is useful. That's good enough for me. I think that the headlines that J947 found show that this isn't that obscure. Chess enjoyer (talk) 23:06, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Republic French

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 17:36, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

A 8-year-old redirect which seems to be a literal translation of République française into English; 793 total page views, of which 687 came from 2022 and very negligible numbers before then and ever since then; such as 10 views in the last year. Delete as implausible. 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 12:57, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

A literal translation doesn't seem implausible, especially given so many pageviews. What caused the spike in 2022? 9ninety (talk) 13:18, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
That's why I think it's implausible, if it otherwise had low page views (low enough to just be "background noise" so to say), then something must have happened in 2022 for a random spike; I can't say for certain but I guess someone linked it in a well-viewed article relating to France and a bunch of readers clicked on it; the link eventually got somehow removed and views went right back down to (on average) ~ 0. 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 13:55, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
Also I should specify that the spike occurred mainly between April and December of 2022, January to March saw regular single-digit, countable-on-one-hand page views for each respective month. 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 13:57, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
  • I assumed before I saw the target this would be about the Republican Language policy in France. The current target seems quite doubtful as the expected destination. CMD (talk) 14:45, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
Delete - "Republic French" isn't even a proper term or concept. The correct spelling would be "Republic of France" if anyone mistakenly searched for that, instead of reaching the France article. I agree that it's implausible for this to be the French-to-English translation even still, making deletion the most warranted and appropriate option. HarvardJock🏫 (talk) 00:30, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Cockie

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was setindexify. (non-admin closure) J947 ‡ edits 03:43, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Current target isn’t the primary topic. A google search shows this is a common Australian colloquial term for a cockatoo, and there are plenty of article titles here which also include this term. Perhaps creating a dab at this title would help? CycloneYoris talk! 11:22, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Sex differentiation disorders

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 17#Sex differentiation disorders

Israel-Iran war

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep unless/until Iran–Israel conflict stops being an article. Note Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iranian strikes on Israel, a merge discussion, is ongoing. (non-admin closure) J947 ‡ edits 01:28, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iran–United States war decided to redirect Iran–United States war to 2026 Iran war as the primary topic. Does that mean that it is also for Israel–Iran war or Iran–Israel–United States war? LIrala (talk) 05:54, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

  • @LIrala: That means that this redirect is also for Iran–Israel–United States war. Achmad Rachmani (talk) 07:14, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
Keep Iran–Israel–United States war → 2026 Iran war as it's the primary topic. As for Iran–Israel war and its variants, we should probably have an AfD on Iran–Israel conflict first, as it seems like an unsubstantive fork of Iran–Israel relations and is basically still a set index article in disguise. 9ninety (talk) 13:02, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
Agree & Support both points, including the second point. That is actually a good idea, Iran-Israel relations provides far greater coverage of the history of Iran and Israel since 1979, making me now question what the point of Iran-Israel conflict was. I didn't include this in my comment below until I just read yours. An AfD should definitely be in the cards. If deleted, then this matter would solve itself and all the above links could redirect to Iran-Israel relations. HarvardJock🏫 (talk) 21:35, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
Keep Iran–Israel–United States war → 2026 Iran war as the latter page is the main article and covers the exact events for anybody searching the latest Iran War. As for all the other redirects, I assume someone created a fresh article - or otherwise untouched article - called Iran-Israel conflict that covers the entire history of tensions between Iran and Israel since 1979? I've never seen that page. In any case, if that page is to be expanded, then I would agree all the other links should redirect into Iran-Israel conflict. I support that too. HarvardJock🏫 (talk) 21:31, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

No (Vim! song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 18:18, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

While this might be a popular song within the community, it's not mentioned at the target link, so I suggesting deleting it. An identical redirect was deleted back in 2021 for a similar reason (see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 3#No_(Vim song)). 8BitBros (talk • edits) 05:16, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Delete. I agree with you. If it's not mentioned in the target link then deletion would be the best course of action, assuming Eddsworld is the applicable page for it. If not, then it's an entirely confusing redirect link going somewhere random. In both cases, deletion is the best option. HarvardJock🏫 (talk) 06:06, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Government of Europe

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 18#Government of Europe

Greatest spectecle in racin

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 04:22, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Implausible (?) alteration; one definite typo (spectacle -> spectecle) and one word that could arguably either be a typo or an informal term (racing -> racin). I suggest deletion. Duckmather (talk) 03:47, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

  • Delete per WP:UNNATURAL; as clear examples of titles with adjectives (e.g. important, significant, and consequential) that have no more affinity than any other for the subject at hand. The misspellings only make them more implausible as search terms. 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 12:39, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Tasi Chen

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 04:20, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

No evidence that this person is known as "Tasi Chen". As google suggests, this could potentially be a misspelling of "Tsai Chen"; this is not a plausible alternative spelling of "Cai Qian" (since "Qian" and "Chen" are different syllables in pinyin), but it is a partial title match of three notable people, namely Tsai Chen-nan, Tsai Chen-nan (businessman), and Tsai Chen-chou. I suggest deletion. Duckmather (talk) 03:31, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom and probably add a dab page for Tsai Chen. 🍁EFOSERVETY🍁 13:32, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
@EFOSERVETY: I just PRODed that dab page you created, because, as I stated earlier, all of those are partial title matches. Namely, "Tsai Chen" is just their surname ("Tsai") plus part of their given name ("Chen-nan" or "Chen-chou"). Duckmather (talk) 19:38, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
I see. As an inexperienced Wikipedian I was not aware of this. 🍁EFOSERVETY🍁 21:58, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. I don't think a DAB page is appropriate, as it appears none of these people are named "Tsai Chen" or likely to be called by that name. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 14:50, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
  • delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 01:44, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Kochō and Asuka

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of Inuyasha chapters (199–398). (non-admin closure) J947 ‡ edits 03:39, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Neither "Kocho" nor "Asuka" are mentioned at the target, and neither are mentioned in any historical revision of the current target that I checked. This title was an article from 2006 to 2008, but it was merged into Kikyo in 2008; that article, in turn, was BLARed to List of Inuyasha characters in 2009, but the redirect was later retargeted to Kikyō in 2017 where it now points.

This redirect is likely an artifact of fancruft in my opinion, so, unless someone has a better alternative, I suggest deletion. Duckmather (talk) 02:56, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

  • Retarget to List of Inuyasha chapters (199–398) as suggested above. The list page at least gives context to the characters, unlike the current redirect target. If retargeted, the resulting circularity on the list page will need to be corrected. Kodning 🌸 (talk) 05:24, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Iran–United States conflict

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Nothing gaining momentum other than "keep". (non-admin closure) J947 ‡ edits 02:56, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Following the recent discussion at AfD for the Iran–United States war page, what should happen with this redirect? Options include:

  • Keeping it as it is
  • Changing it to target another page
  • Turning it into a set index or disambiguation page (@LIrala has argued that this would not be ideal because there are already too many disambiguation pages duplicating the topic)
  • Moving the United States strikes on Iran page over it (as previously proposed in a requested move; this would avoid the creation of an entirely new set index or disambiguation page, but @Scyrme has argued that it would also not be ideal because it would require readers who search for the existing title to scan through a longer, more vague list)

I am currently neutral on which of these should be implemented.
(pinging @FOARP, who participated in the requested move, @Abesca, who moved this redirect to its current title, and @Lova Falk, who merged the Iran–United States relations after 1979 article into the current target of the redirect)
–Gluonz talk contribs 02:45, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Note that I had not known about the previous discussions at RfD for "Iran–United States conflict" and for "Iran–United States war" until after publishing this nomination.
(pinging both participants in the "Iran–United States conflict" discussion: @Jay and @Thepharoah17)
–Gluonz talk contribs 03:14, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
"War" is different from "conflict", and the Iran–United States war RfD happened in 2025, before the current war started, so I wouldn't want to tie that discussion to the current redirect. On the Iran–United States conflict RfD that I nominated, I wouldn't push for a WP:G4, as there was just one !vote, who went with the G5 aspect of the nomination, and not the other points. The part about recentism regarding the 2025 nuclear strikes is also outdated, considering the 2026 attacks. So I'm all for a fresh discussion on the points, which I'm duplicating below. Jay 💬 05:47, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
@Jay: I was not trying to tie that discussion to this redirect, but I had not known about it when nominating the Iran–United States war page at AfD. –Gluonz talk contribs 15:30, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
Don't retarget. I guess someone can draft a stub like Iran–Israel conflict (it keeps being WP:BLARed and reverted because of AI-generated content). It can be a dab or a set index list, but I don't recommend another one to exist, unless the SIA in case details more than just wars or strikes, which then comes back to the issue: it's better to have a WP:BCA, which there isn't. But I guess it's kinda redundant with the target page if you think about it. LIrala (talk) 05:34, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
"We do have a US-Iran proxy war which redirects to the Red Sea crisis which doesn't have a mention at the current target. Recentism though may cause readers to be interested in the United States strikes on Iranian nuclear sites that were retaliated with the 2025 Iranian strikes on Al Udeid Air Base."
My preference is to reverse Abesca's move, thereby deleting Iran–United States conflict, and nominate the earlier title Current international crisis with Iran in a fresh RfD (so it can be deleted too). Like the others, I'm not in favour of a new SIA, or retargeting to or moving over any existing SIAs. Jay 💬 05:47, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
Keep as it is, because, as Jay said, conflict is different from war, and since 1979, the relations between these two states can be characterised as a conflict. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lova Falk (talk • contribs) 05:53, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
Keep - The most recent and significant conflict between the US and Iran has been this last war, making a redirect to 2026 Iran war more than appropriate, as it currently stands. Most readers who stumble upon that page will likely have been looking for 2026 Iran war regardless, it's more than reasonable to keep the redirect. HarvardJock🏫 (talk) 21:58, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
The convention here is that "Keep" implies you support the current target (Iran–United States relations). If you support a target of 2026 Iran war, it would mean you prefer a "Retarget". Jay 💬 08:23, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
Keep the current target of Iran–United States relations per Lova Falk. The conflict between these two countries predates the current war by decades, and Iran–United States relations is the appropriate article that covers the history of this conflict in detail. 9ninety (talk) 06:51, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

American Born Chinese

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 20#American Born Chinese

Chef (baking)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 20#Chef (baking)

Appendix:Frequency of analog TV channels in Vietnam

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 17#Appendix:Frequency of analog TV channels in Vietnam

Liu Wan-yu

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 04:17, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

No point in this redirect, there is no coverage about her in this page. only her name is mentioned once. she is an Olympian and Asian Championship medalists, her name is in several other pages as well, it doesn't make sense to redirect it here. should be deleted until an actual article is made. Sports2021 (talk) 01:02, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Delete Might be about a different person with the same name. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:29, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
Delete entirely. There's no point in having this addition, firearms regulations is also a completely different issue than an Olympian and Asian Championship medalist despite the barely minimal crossover. Deletion is best for the redirect. HarvardJock🏫 (talk) 03:47, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Coockie

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 19:19, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Ambiguous misspelling, could also be a plausible misspelling for Cockie, Cocky or Coocky (which doesn't exist but has various meanings found via third party search engines that are not the nominated redirect's target.) Steel1943 (talk) 00:44, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

  • Keep for now; google search only shows results related to cookies, and ChatGPT also jumps to the same topic. Duckmather (talk) 06:46, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
    Seems like a potential "uses Wikipedia as a source" folly (this redirect existing), which I've run across a few times. Steel1943 (talk) 14:42, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
    @Steel1943: I could believe Google might have been influenced by this particular redirect in terms of that SERP (although the search term "coockie" neither triggers a Wikipedia search result, other than the generic The purpose of this redirect is currently being discussed by the Wikipedia... verbiage, nor a Google Knowledge Graph entry), but I don't think ChatGPT is especially influenced by this redirect. Duckmather (talk) 19:43, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
    Why do you think ChatGPT is not influenced by this redirect? Jay 💬 03:57, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Ambiguous indeed. I'll open a separate RfD for Cockie, since the current target is clearly not the primary topic. CycloneYoris talk! 11:17, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Respublik (talk) 17:28, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete because it's really not an especially notable or common misspelling. It would just be taking up space, really. HarvardJock🏫 (talk) 21:59, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
    That's not really a good argument against a single redirect. The "space" taken up by 1 redirect is negligible. (WP:CHEAP.) "Space" only becomes a concern when dealing with a very large class of redirects, and even then the effort of maintenance by editors is a bigger concern than any space taken up. For a single redirect, neither is an issue. – Scyrme (talk) 04:02, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete - redirect is not useful and may be confusing - may plausibly be a misspelling of other similarly spelled words. Asteramellus (talk) 00:48, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
  • delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 07:13, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete The search engine detects such typos and offers the correct result, so the redirect is redundant. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 18:09, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI