Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 3

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) J947 ‡ ^edits 00:15, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

• Kickboxing at the 2021 Asian Indoor and Martial Arts GamesKickboxing at the 2021 Asian Indoor and Martial Arts Games → 2021 Asian Indoor and Martial Arts Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Event was cancelled; no need for this redirect. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:57, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. This is part of two series of pages: one for kickboxing (Kickboxing at the 2013 Asian Indoor and Martial Arts Games, Kickboxing at the 2017 Asian Indoor and Martial Arts Games, etc.) and another for events at the 2021 games (Badminton at the 2021 Asian Indoor and Martial Arts Games, Taekwondo at the 2021 Asian Indoor and Martial Arts Games, etc.), so it follows patterns that users can expect. The target article also describes the planned kickboxing events, so readers will find information about the subject there. - Eureka Lott 15:44, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:32, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per EurekaLott User:Redirect Editor Talk! Date:May-4-2026 — Preceding undated comment added 04:11, 4 May 2026 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:04, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Resolved. This redirect was changed into a stub article. Peaceray (talk) 19:14, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

• Ron Dyens → Flow (2024 film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete Ron Dyens is only listed in the Infobox on Flow (2024 film). Dyens has produced, written, & directed other films.^[1][2][3] He has articles in three different language Wikipedias: de:Ron Dyens, fr:Ron Dyens, & it:Ron Dyens. This redirect most certainly fails 10. If the redirect could plausibly be expanded into an article, and the target article contains virtually no information on the subject. It likely fails WP:RFD#DELETE #1. This is a situation in which {{ill|Ron Dyens|de||fr||it|preserve=yes}} should be used instead of a redirect, but having the redirect causes the intended article to be a blue link & redirecting to the wrong target, instead of a red link: Ron Dyens [de; fr; it]. Peaceray (talk) 20:55, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Is something preventing you from creating the article by translating any of those articles? Tbhotch^™ (CC BY-SA 4.0) 00:07, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

@Tbhotch: That is a bit beside the point, isn't it? The first thing that we should be discussing is whether WP:RFD#DELETE applies to this situation. I would ask you to respond firstly to the fact that Flow (2024 film) only mentions Dyens name. It thus meets the deletion requirement that the target article contains virtually no information on the subject.

To respond to your question, we are both 100,000+ edit contributors. Thus you know our availability ebbs & flows. I will lack the bandwidth until after SIFF 2026. I recently created 2026 Seattle International Film Festival. Are you suggesting that I prioritize creating the Ron Dyens article over all the other red links? I would reject that because Wikipedia is a collaborative effort. I know from other film festival articles that I have worked on that other editors often take the initiative & created those formerly red-linked articles. To point a redirect to an article that only cursorily mentions a producer's name gives a false impression that something substantial exists. Other editors will fail to realize that the article needs to be created or translated. That is the purpose of {{ill}}. To leave this redirect in place is, in essence, false advertising. Peaceray (talk) 15:19, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

No, it isn't. And it is a valid question, so please answer it, otherwise I'll create the article myself to prove that this is a pointless discussion. Tbhotch^™ (CC BY-SA 4.0) 16:55, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Yes, please create the article. I am sorry that my comments above did not make it clear that I have no intention of creating the article. Peaceray (talk) 00:57, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

I created a stub with the most important merits. Tbhotch^™ (CC BY-SA 4.0) 08:55, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks! Peaceray (talk) 19:05, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 21:49, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

• Ateles saporis → Bushmeat#In popular culture  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Term isn't mentioned in article and I couldn't find an alternative article where it is mentioned. Previously mentioned in article but the section was removed in 2010 and I don't think it's notable enough to be readded. Suonii180 (talk) 20:22, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 19:30, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

• Noman - ill fated Italian airline → Noman (airline)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

R from move created today that I didn't believe qualified for suppression. Created at this title because the current one redirected elsewhere, base title since fixed. Not useful for navigation, bit of a NPOV/OR issue with this title. Delete. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 18:33, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. You should have suppressed a redirect in this case. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:37, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. I'm not sure I agree this is an NPOV or OR issue, but the format isn't a useful search term and it's also misspelled ("ill-fated" should be hyphenated). Thryduulf (talk) 20:11, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per Thryduulf User:Redirect Editor Talk! Date:May-4-2026 WP:SOCKSTRIKE -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:03, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
• delete per above. I'll also assume that - ill fated Italian airline is a malformed dabifier --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:20, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 19:01, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

• ʎɥsoןs → Homestar Runner#Music  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Another one with upside-down text that mixes the Hebrew letter ן with some other non-ASCII characters. See also Comedy ןɐɹʇuǝɔ below. The exact string is used in the article, however. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:32, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. It is the name of a fictional band in a web cartoon. The coverage in the target article seems to be unsourced trivia. No demonstration that the web cartoon spells it with a Hebrew character so we shouldn't either. --DanielRigal (talk) 17:52, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:21, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 19:00, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

• Comedy ןɐɹʇuǝɔ → Comedy Central  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible sequence of non-ASCII characters to write "central" upside-down. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:07, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

• Sigh, delete, per nom. This isn't helpful to anyone. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 17:17, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Real weird redirect, and from the article's lead image it's not even stylized as being upside-down, so that's even less reasoning to keep. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 17:18, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
• Comment, oh, it's even worse, the upside-down "L" in "central" is actually U+05DF ן HEBREW LETTER FINAL NUN, not a turned latin L. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 17:28, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. Pointless and unhelpful. Probably seemed funny at the time. --DanielRigal (talk) 17:39, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
• Delete Implausible for navigation. Organhaver, the Comedy Central logo from 2011–18 used a rotation for "Central", and the redirect dates to that time. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 05:36, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

  Thank you for the explanation, I appreciate it. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 06:09, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:21, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 17:00, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

• Googoormuckup → Mundaring, Western Australia  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Does not appear to be connected with target. If it does, the article needs updating. PeriodicEditor (talk) 16:41, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. If you search for it in quotes you get literally nothing. Nothing! --DanielRigal (talk) 17:41, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
• Strong delete. This word was almost certainly coined by User:Stevene1919, since the only search results google gives me are for RfD itself. Duckmather (talk) 02:47, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:21, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Epicgenius (talk) 16:20, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

• Virgin Mary joke → Mary, mother of Jesus  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not discussed in the article. Delete 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 14:56, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. Weird and unhelpful. No point in redirecting somewhere that doesn't cover what was seached for. --DanielRigal (talk) 16:44, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per above. A quick google suggests there isn't one single joke about the Virgin Mary that's more notable than any other, and we don't have any content about any of them that I can immediately find anyway. Thryduulf (talk) 20:15, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per Thryduulf. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 15:40, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Epicgenius (talk) 16:20, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

• Mary Free → Mary, mother of Jesus  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I'm not sure what "Free" has to do within this Marian context. There's also the Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital in Michigan, USA, which could possibly be referred to in casual conversation as just the "Mary Free" (cf. Mater Dei Hospital is almost always just referred to as Mater Dei in my country), however I'm not a local of Grand Rapids, Michigan to confirm whether it is the short name for it. Either retarget it to the hospital or else delete. 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 14:40, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. This seems like random nonsense. If it did ever mean anything it is not clear what. Retargeting does not seem likely to be helpful. The Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital shows no indication that it is ever abbreviated it to "Mary Free" only to "Mary Free Bed" e.g. in its URL. --DanielRigal (talk) 16:50, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
• Delete There is a hymn, "When Christ was Born of Mary Free" which starts "When Christ was born of Mary free, in Bethlehem, in that fair city, Angels sung e’er with mirth and glee,". My guess is that this is based on a misunderstanding that lyric, however it doesn't seem to be a common way to refer to the hymn or anything related to it and the only relevant content we have is a single sentence passing mention at the end of Gerrit Smith (composer)#Life and career. Thryduulf (talk) 20:22, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Epicgenius (talk) 16:20, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

• Christ Mary → Mary, mother of Jesus  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Either a highly implausible misnomer (who considers Mary the Christ?) or else a WP:XY situation. Delete 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 14:34, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. Implausible search term. I can't see this being of any utility to anybody. Anybody typing "Mary" into the search box will find what they want easily enough without ever knowing that this redirect existed. --DanielRigal (talk) 14:43, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
• delete per WP:XY --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:22, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Sainte-Thècle. (non-admin closure) J947 ‡ ^edits 00:07, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

• Saint ThècleSaint Thècle → Thecla  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Per WP:RLOTE, this should be deleted as there doesn't seem to be any special affinity between Thecla, a 1st-century Christian in the Middle East, and the French language. 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 13:57, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Is it possible this is merely the French name, and there will be people who don't know the name of the article? I don't know a lot about saints or their names, but I know that languages historically don't keep most names that consistent. By the way, for some reason I was notified on my talk page about this redirect; not sure why that occurred, so forgive me if my input is so obvious. I would think that a person who knows about saints would be the right person to give their opinion. I know there is a town with a similar name to this saint (the redirect's title), so if someone is wondering what saint the town is named for, this might be helpful. --SidP (talk) 15:10, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi @SidP, you were notified because you were the one who created the redirect and it is part of the RfD procedure to notify the redirect's creator.

Does the town you mention have a Wikipedia article? The redirect could very easily be retargeted there, should consensus decide so, just like Saint-Jérôme not long ago.

Otherwise, the redirect would normally be deleted per WP:RLOTE, which states that overall, redirects in foreign languages shouldn't be kept unless they have affinity (i.e. something relevant to do with) the target article. Cheers, 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 15:29, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Yes, I've seen that the town article does have a very similar name, Sainte-Thècle. However, I would think that since the article may not address the person, this is a more accurate redirect, and perhaps in the town's article, there should be a link (without redirect) to the actual saint. Or is this not standard methodology for WP? I merely add redirects when, after typing what I want to search and finally finding it (usually, hopefully, most of the time), I then add what search term I thought would lead me to the article in the first place. Thanks for helping inform me. --SidP (talk) 16:20, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Sainte-Thècle, seems more likely that someone searching the French spelling "Saint Thècle" in the english wikipedia would be looking for this town. nahle.ghini (talk) 20:03, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Sainte-Thècle. Note that I've edited the town's article to link to the saint via the Saint TheclaSaint Thecla redirect rather than this one, eliminating the sole incoming link from mainspace. Rosbif73 (talk) 14:51, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to List of libraries in Melbourne. (non-admin closure) Chess enjoyer (talk) 17:55, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

• Melbourne Public LibrariesMelbourne Public Libraries → Victoria (state)#Education  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Should be retargeted to List of libraries in Melbourne A1Cafel (talk) 06:54, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget per nom. Thryduulf (talk) 20:31, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to List of attacks during the Twelve-Day War#Operation Rising Lion. See my comment below. wbm1058 (talk) 16:10, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

The Arab–Israeli conflict is designated as a contentious topic with special editing restrictions. Editing and discussing this topic is restricted to extended confirmed users. You are not logged in, so you are not extended confirmed. Your account is extended confirmedis not extended confirmed, but you are an administrator, so your account is extended confirmed by default. Participants are limited to 1,000 words per formal discussion.

• June 2025 Israeli strikes on IranJune 2025 Israeli strikes on Iran → Twelve-Day War  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Retarget to List of attacks during the Twelve-Day War#Operation Rising Lion, consistent with 2025 Israeli strikes on Iran and many other redirects to the list. LIrala (talk) 07:14, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Twelve-Day War per nomination. Achmad Rachmani (talk) 07:36, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The target of this redirect has been disputed in the past, meaning a bigger quorum than one is ideal, and there are roughly 80 incoming links.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 ‡ ^edits 02:16, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

@Achmad Rachmani if im not mistaken it currently redirects to Twelve-Day War User "Oreocooke" (speak of the sun and it shines) 18:33, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget June 2025 Israeli strikes on Iran to Twelve-Day War per nomination. --PoliticalPoint (talk) 22:32, 25 April 2026 (UTC) —  PoliticalPoint is a confirmed sockpuppet of Justthefacts, see investigation. consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 18:22, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 06:48, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Comment: my other nominations here and below closed as unopposed. Both had the same contradictory vote by Achmad. LIrala (talk) 03:43, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

• Comment. On 17 June 2025, this title was an article. Later that day it was merged into Iran–Israel War, which subsequently moved to Iran–Israel war, which appears to have subsequently been page-mover swapped to some other title. In any event the content that was once housed under this title appears to have migrated to the proposed target. Indeed, there are some 11 redirects to section "Operation Rising Lion" so why not make it a dozen. 29 of 43 redirects to that list of attacks are section links which bypass the context provided by the list's lead section, so I'm copying the relevant lead information to the relevant sections, so that readers jumping to sections are provided with section leads giving them context for each section. – wbm1058 (talk) 16:01, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 06:45, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

• Chesttop → Laptop  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Upon searching this term, this brought up results that included clothing, toolboxes, cabinets, and the body part itself, but nothing related to laptops or computers, specifically. As the term is not mentioned in the article, it could come off as a surprise to readers. I'm thinking that the redirect could be:

8BitBros (talk • edits) 06:45, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

• Keep, pertains to people who edit or read while laying about and place their laptop on their chest. An easily understood concept. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:33, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

  If it's so easily understood, then why do we need a redirect? –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:30, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, unmentioned, unhelpful, unlikely search term. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:30, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. Obscure term that could also mean something like the "top of a chest" without context. Currently, this seems like unused, invented slang. Steel1943 (talk) 16:59, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
• Delete, Not mentioned in article and ambiguous searchterm. Suonii180 (talk) 07:56, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:46, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. A straight head count shows only a slight majority for keeping, but WP:RDRAFT has the consensus of an RFC behind it, which gives the !votes that cite it more weight. (non-admin closure) Chess enjoyer (talk) 17:48, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

• Draft:God of War (upcoming TV series)Draft:God of War (upcoming TV series) → God of War (American TV series)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Leftover redirect from a former draft title after move. There is no longer an active draft at this title. Since attribution history has been passed, the redirect has little navigational value. Umais Bin Sajjad (talk) 06:34, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: as per nom. ꕥ 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 ꕥ ^{→𝙼𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝚖𝚎←} 07:45, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -- ZooBlazer 07:48, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
• Keep per WP:RDRAFT. Thryduulf (talk) 12:40, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

  This was never an active draft, it was just a redirect to mainspace so doesn't fall in WP:RDRAFT. Umais Bin Sajjad (talk) 05:55, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

  No. It was an active draft that was moved to article space. Jay 💬 09:51, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 12:33, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 01:08, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per WP:RDRAFT. Steel1943 (talk) 14:36, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Keep per WP:RDRAFT. No reason to delete, and not harmful. The delete !votes do not have rationale either, which is really something they should avoid to do in the future. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 16:12, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Keep per RDRAFT. 9ninety (talk) 16:37, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).