Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 5

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 22:21, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

• Salmon bakey → Salmon as food  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unclear what this refers to; unmentioned in the article; 0 results on Google Search (although there were 21,600 results for "salmon bakery"); delete as vague. 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 23:12, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

• Delete I would assume this relates to "Salmon bake", which we don't have an article about but which gets no shortage of google hits. However "Salmon bakey" does indeed get 0 hits. The only use of "bakey" as a term for food I can find is in the phrase "wikt:wakey wakey eggs and bakey" or just "eggs and bakey" where it unambiguously means bacon. I hope I don't need to explicitly cite that salmon is not bacon. Thryduulf (talk) 00:23, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
• Delete, term isn't a plausible search term. Suonii180 (talk) 08:50, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Left guide (talk) 23:18, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

• Wodanesdag Press → Heathenry (new religious movement)#Wodanesdag Press .28Hyatt.29  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. PARAKANYAA (talk) 04:00, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kingsmasher678 (talk) 21:43, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom. -Samoht27 (talk) 20:55, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, not mentioned in target and there is no suitable retarget. Suonii180 (talk) 08:53, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Left guide (talk) 23:18, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

• Edred Wodanson → Heathenry (new religious movement)#Wodanesdag Press .28Hyatt.29  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. PARAKANYAA (talk) 04:00, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kingsmasher678 (talk) 21:43, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, not mentioned in target and there is no suitable retarget. Suonii180 (talk) 08:53, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Left guide (talk) 23:18, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

• E. Max Hyatt → Heathenry (new religious movement)#Wodanesdag Press .28Hyatt.29  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:59, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kingsmasher678 (talk) 21:43, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, not mentioned at target and I couldn't find a suitable retarget. Suonii180 (talk) 08:55, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:57, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

• Devil's coffee mill → Machine gun  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Devil's Coffee Mill → Machine gun  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

strange case, yet again. results were torn between literal coffee mills (not even necessarily ones deemed to be FROM THE HELL or something of the sort), gatling guns in general (coincidentally, all of those seemed to be from different sources quoting a single passage from the same book that teased its presence in a civil war, and nothing else), and the "union repeating gun" (whatever that is). i've found nothing actually tying them to machine guns, or more than one that provides a coherent, non-clickbaity reference to the name consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 18:31, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

oh hey, this is the part where i almost immediately out myself as dumb of ass, because i did find the union repeating gun!! it's the agar gun, which its article refers to as looking like a coffee mill (which doesn't automatically warrant those redirects, but does warrant coffee mill gun), and there's an explicit mention of it being referred to as "devil's coffee mill"... in its german article. in the infobox. without a source. this doesn't actually change much of the rationale, since there's still no usable source for it, but it's a neat little tidbit

it also means that i have no idea what sources using the term to refer to gatling guns are talking about if they're describing this machine gun, so i'm sure that gave some gun pedant somewhere a cardiac heart attack consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 18:49, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Yep, Agar gun is a better target. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 10:14, 16 April 2026 (UTC).

i still disagree per that addition, since the one mentioned isn't in enwiki, and doesn't have a source. people looking for this and not finding the term or its origin will have to do detective work for it consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 11:58, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kingsmasher678 (talk) 23:27, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 ‡ ^edits 10:28, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Nothing on Devil's coffee on enwiki. Jay 💬 22:00, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Note to next closer, this should probably close as no consensus if it goes another week.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kingsmasher678 (talk) 21:42, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, per the above. Kingsmasher678, there's a consensus to delete here already. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 16:31, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

  I didnt see it until you expressed an opinion, and waiting one more week is cheap. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 16:53, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

  @Kingsmasher678: No it's not cheap. WP:RFD already has an issue with too many discussions and unnecessary relisting (including your no participation relists) is a contributor to that. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:15, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

  This discussion should have been closed as no consensus or no-consensus retarget after the first relisting failed to generate any additional comments. Given that didn't happen it should have been closed as no consensus or no consensus retarget on the 5th. There was not a consensus to delete prior to Deacon Vorbis' comment. Thryduulf (talk) 17:34, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

  @Tavix I will take this into consideration in the future. I am sure it will be deleted next week. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 18:01, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

  For the record, although I often close discussions as no consensus in lieu of a second relist, here I left it open since there was minimal participation and I thought there was a good chance of that relist producing a consensus. Unfortunately, the nominator not explicitly recommending any action precluded that from happening. J947 ‡ ^edits 23:26, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

  if you want it made more explicit, delete and don't retarget to agar gun, in both cases unless mentioned. per my findings above, that might not be now, since results were (and still are) vague to the point of being incoherent consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 17:18, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

  really, i'd struggle to say cheap doesn't need its own backinbox consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 17:20, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. I see that this has more history than the correctly capitalized version, and thus considered moving this one over that one, but inasmuch as there isn't consensus to delete this one, there would be little practical difference made. --BDD (talk) 14:51, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

• Draft:Harry Potter (tv series)Draft:Harry Potter (tv series) → Harry Potter (TV series)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Obsolete draft-space redirect from a miscapped title; now that the topic has an established article title, this appears to add little or no independent navigational value. Umais Bin Sajjad (talk) 08:09, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: as per nom. ꕥ 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 ꕥ ^{→𝙼𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝚖𝚎←} 08:24, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
• Keep per WP:RDRAFT. Thryduulf (talk) 12:39, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

  It a misspelled draft and duplicate of another working draft Umais Bin Sajjad (talk) 06:05, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

  Agreed. Delete. Jay 💬 12:12, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Weak keep errors in the DABifier are generally less worthy of retention than other errors, though miscapitalizations are sort of the exception to the exception. Still serves the function of directing would be drafters to the existing page where they should contributing and has history, so on balance weak keep. ~2026-14944-70 (talk) 14:16, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:35, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

• Weak keep It's a harmless difference of a few uncapitalized letters. Waste of time to delete, waste of time to even discuss deleting, makes no difference. silviaASH (inquire within) 17:44, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kingsmasher678 (talk) 21:40, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

• Draft:Harry Potter (TV series)Draft:Harry Potter (TV series) was page-swapped with Harry Potter (TV series) @ 15:23, 14 July 2025. The page history of the draft is just 11 confusing junk edits with no content. Just solve this with move Draft:Harry Potter (tv series) → Draft:Harry Potter (TV series)Draft:Harry Potter (TV series) (over the top, deleting the 11 junk edits), without leaving a redirect, effectively deleting the miscapped title. The draft fork with the parallel history will be more easily found there, in the event someone finds any useful content in it that they want to copy to the article. – wbm1058 (talk) 16:09, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
  • regarding serves the function of directing would be drafters to the existing page where they should contributing – the deleted page Harry Potter (tv series) does that. This fork was created in article space in May 2025, when the other version was still in draft. We shouldn't have that page advertising There is a draft of this article at Draft:Harry Potter (tv series), redirecting to Draft:Harry Potter (tv series). – wbm1058 (talk) 16:17, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Left guide (talk) 23:19, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

• Bracha Benizri → Haredi burqa sect  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target, though it formerly mentioned at the target (unsourced) until this 2018 edit. I'm unable to verify whether or not such a person existed (there are a few mentions on sites like alliancefr.com, but I don't know how much to trust them). Maybe delete unless someone has an explanation? Duckmather (talk) 21:06, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. The only editor supporting this is the one who created it; their rationale is unconvincing. wbm1058 (talk) 00:57, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

• Operation Epstein Files → 2026 Iran war#Politicians  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

"Epstein" is not mentioned in the target article. The target section no longer exists in the target article. Delete due to lack of context. Steel1943 (talk) 20:37, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Keep for the same reasons Operation Epstein Fury was kept Yacàwotçã (talk) 22:52, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

This rationale has no context. The only reasonable claim that I could see is that the nominated redirect is a misnomer for the other redirect, but even that is quite obscure. Steel1943 (talk) 02:18, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Operation Epstein Fury was retargeted not kept. See Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 29#Operation Epstein Fury. Retargeting this redirect to the same target may work in that I don't think it would be a surprising destination, but this particular variation isn't explicitly mentioned at the target so others might disagree. – Scyrme (talk) 02:22, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

The terms to describe this war are infinite, if Operation Epstein Fury was kept then fine, I'll accept that redirect. But this idea of keeping infinite made-up terminologies and having them redirect to Iran war-related articles would be too overwhelming. HarvardJock🏫 (talk) 21:25, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Delete - lack of context, totally arbitrary made up term, and per notability standards it doesn't even warrant it's own redirect page. No matter what you think of the war, sensationalized titles like this are unencylopedic and if accepted, anyone could make up any dissident-style term to describe a major conflict like this and it would have to be added. Let's delete this. HarvardJock🏫 (talk) 21:24, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Saint-Sébastien. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:00, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

• Saint SébastienSaint Sébastien → Saint Sebastian  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Saint SebastienSaint Sebastien → Saint Sebastian  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• St. SebastienSt. Sebastien → Saint Sebastian  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• St SebastienSt Sebastien → Saint Sebastian  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Retarget to Saint-Sébastien, Creuse. 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 20:08, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

• Speedy retarget to existing disambiguation page Saint-Sébastien, unless I'm missing something. --BDD (talk) 20:14, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Saint-Sébastien No clear primary topic. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 22:08, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Saint-Sébastien. I agree with the editors above. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 23:49, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
• retarget per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:12, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Gymnasium. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 23:55, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

• GymnasiumsGymnasiums → Gym  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Gymnasium is a DAB page. I'd instantly retarget it there if it weren't for the fact that 28 articles use this redirect as a wikilink, seemingly all in the "gym" sense rather than the scholastic sense. 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 20:00, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Gymnasium as {{R from plural}} per WP:PLURALPT but consider an RM to move the dab page to Gymnasium (disambiguation) and make Gymnasium a primary redirect to Gym. I'm frankly surprised that Gym is not the primary topic for Gymnasium. However, the dab page appears to have been stably at that title for some two decades and WikiNav shows that Gym is only the third most popular destination readers navigate to from the dab page. Pageviews shows that the school is the most popular topic. These findings are suggestive that the term is ambiguous and there is no reason to suspect that the plural indicates a different primary topic here. Although this redirect is nearly as old as the dab page and its usage in articles is noteworthy. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 00:16, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Left guide (talk) 23:21, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

• TOB Duke → Polo G#2020–present: The Goat, Hall of Fame, and Only Dreamers Achieve Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned on page. मल्ल (talk) 18:43, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom. YeetV4 (talk) 04:45, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Comment it appears to be someone that Polo G signed to his record label at some point, however the only sources I can find about him being signed are a few YouTube interviews.^[1][2] YeetV4 (talk) 04:46, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

From what I could find, he was signed to Geffen Records for some time but I couldn't find any sources besides those Youtube interviews connecting him to Polo G. मल्ल (talk) 22:24, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 14:49, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

• Drama Relax → Lil Tjay  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned on page. He's a different artist who has collaborated with Lil Tjay on a song before but that's about it. मल्ल (talk) 18:32, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:09, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

• De 500, a 2,000 → Pop Smoke discography  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not a real song by Pop Smoke. मल्ल (talk) 18:17, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

• Delete this is apparently the title of a real song but by non-notable musician "EL Real Cotorreo". Duckmather (talk) 02:18, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Delete, unrelated subject. -Samoht27 (talk) 20:56, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Left guide (talk) 23:22, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

• Pop Smoke (Pop Smoke album) → Pop Smoke discography  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There is no self-titled Pop Smoke album, misleading redirect. मल्ल (talk) 18:14, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom Duckmather (talk) 21:22, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Comment It is mentioned in Faith_(Pop_Smoke_album)#Release_and_promotion that the album was believed to be self-titled at some point but this is unsourced. मल्ल (talk) 22:21, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Thepharoah17 (talk) 04:17, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

• Mr LincolnMr Lincoln → Abraham Lincoln  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Searching Lincoln leads to a DAB page. It makes more sense that this should be retargeted to Lincoln (name) so anyone searching the term can find the various males with the surname (as long as "Lincoln" doesn't point to the President's article, as it hasn't for a while now.) 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 17:49, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. Abraham is the primary topic amongst people with the name Lincoln. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:52, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

  Should a Template:Redirect hatnote at Abraham Lincoln be added pointing to Abraham (name) then? 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 19:19, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

  Nah. If anything, the current hatnote can be expanded. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:29, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Lincoln (name) Since neither that page nor Lincoln redirect to the president, I disagree that there's a primary topic here. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 20:05, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

  What are you referring to by "that page"? Surely you're not implying that Lincoln (name) would redirect to the president (which would be nonsense regardless of primary topic). Lincoln doesn't have a primary topic because it's competing with things like Lincoln, England, Lincoln, Nebraska and Lincoln Motor Company but none of those are people. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:29, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

  If Abraham Lincoln is the primary topic among all people named Lincoln, then it is not implausible that Lincoln (name) would redirect to him. Since it does not, clearly there is not a primary topic here. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 22:09, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

  No, Lincoln (name) is clearly referring to a name, not a biography. A redirect with the disambiguator "(name)" should never target a biography. That has nothing to with primary topics. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:38, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per Tavix. Moreover, "Mr. Lincoln" has a particularly strong primary topic. See Great Moments with Mr. Lincoln, Young Mr. Lincoln, and Rosa 'Mister Lincoln'. Few people in history, perhaps no one, have been referred by "Mr. [surname]" as prominently as him. One caveat: "Mr Lincoln" rather than "Mr. Lincoln" is typically British style (see Full stop). So there's a weak but real argument in that sense that given English actor Andrew Lincoln, there's sufficient ambiguity for Mr Lincoln but not for Mr. Lincoln (which therefore shouldn't be bundled). J947 ‡ ^edits 23:38, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
• Note: I am bundling Mr. LincolnMr. Lincoln. I can't see any reason why the variants with and without a period would have different targets. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 00:27, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

  I've unbundled it, given J947's comment above, although I disagree. If this closes as 'keep', Mr. LincolnMr. Lincoln should also be kept. If this closes as retarget on the basis of British usage favoring Andrew Lincoln, Mr. LincolnMr. Lincoln should not be retarged. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 00:42, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

• Weak keep. It's a little unusual but overall I am persuaded by Tavix's and J947's reasoning. WikiNav provides some additional support for this. From Lincoln, the #1 destination is Lincoln (film) (about the US president), followed by Lincoln, England, and then Abraham Lincoln. The #5 destination is Lincoln (name). No other person is among the top 10 destinations, but USS Abraham Lincoln makes an appearance. From Lincoln (name), Lincoln, England is actually the top destination, followed by Abraham Lincoln. The WikiNav results are not overwhelming but I agree with statements above that the vast majority of folks looking for the president are not likely to land on the '(name)' page first. "All-time" massviews shows a substantial lead for Abraham Lincoln. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 01:06, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
• Keep and change hatnote to {{Redirect2|President Lincoln|Mr. Lincoln|the troopship|USS President Lincoln{{!}}USS ''President Lincoln''||Abraham Lincoln (disambiguation)|and|Lincoln (name)}}. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 08:55, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. Sorry to add yet another option here, but unless this is the actual title of a work or something like that, or the rare exception where someone is especially very well known in this way, we have no business keeping redirects of the form "Mr. X", "Mrs. Y", etc. These are generic and nonspecific ways to refer to people, and they should not be made or kept. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 16:51, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

  This is your rare exception where someone is especially well known in this way. Great Moments with Mr. Lincoln, Young Mr. Lincoln, and Rosa 'Mister Lincoln' each receive over 1,000 monthly pageviews. J947 ‡ ^edits 23:19, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

  Mr. Lincoln's War is what comes to my mind. -- Tavix ^(talk) 01:45, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

• Keep, this redirect worth its weight in tophats. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:49, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Left guide (talk) 23:22, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

• Brian Mitchell (keyboard and accordian player, and founder and leader of the Brian Mitchell Band) → Brian Mitchell (musician)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Seems a little unlikely of a disambiguator, especially given the typo "accordian". eviolite (talk) 15:54, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom due to the misspelled disambiguator Duckmather (talk) 21:36, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
• Speedy delete, G6, leftover from a page move, and at the title for 2 weeks about 20 years ago. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 16:56, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:55, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

• Undercover (Life on Mars) → List of Life on Mars (British TV series) episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• The Bombing (Life on Mars) → List of Life on Mars (British TV series) episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• My First Day (Life on Mars episode) → List of Life on Mars (British TV series) episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• The Stabbing (Life on Mars) → List of Life on Mars (British TV series) episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• The Footie (Life on Mars) → List of Life on Mars (British TV series) episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• The Safe-Cracker (Life on Mars) → List of Life on Mars (British TV series) episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Suburban Swingers (Life on Mars) → List of Life on Mars (British TV series) episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• The Kidnapping (Life on Mars) → List of Life on Mars (British TV series) episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• A Deadly Drug (Life on Mars) → List of Life on Mars (British TV series) episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• The Crash (Life on Mars) → List of Life on Mars (British TV series) episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• The New World (Life on Mars) → List of Life on Mars (British TV series) episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• The Stabbing → List of Life on Mars (British TV series) episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• A Conflict of Interests (Life on Mars) → List of Life on Mars (British TV series) episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• The Footie → List of Life on Mars (British TV series) episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• The Deadline (Life on Mars) → List of Life on Mars (British TV series) episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Wrongful Death (Life on Mars) → List of Life on Mars (British TV series) episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• The Good Father (Life on Mars) → List of Life on Mars (British TV series) episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Helpless (Life on Mars) → List of Life on Mars (British TV series) episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• The Safe-Cracker → List of Life on Mars (British TV series) episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Suburban Swingers → List of Life on Mars (British TV series) episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• A Deadly Drug → List of Life on Mars (British TV series) episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• The Shooting (Life on Mars) → List of Life on Mars (British TV series) episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Delete as misleading. Episode titles for this series are of the form "Episode x", no evidence that any episode is known as "Undercover". Paradoctor (talk) 12:57, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
See also Talk:List of Life on Mars (British TV series) episodes § Episode names Paradoctor (talk) 12:59, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

• Delete all If they really are just made-up names, it would be unencyclopedic to keep them. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:30, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: All redirects are now unlinked. Paradoctor (talk) 14:50, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Amazon (company)#Other major campuses. (non-admin closure) Chess enjoyer (talk) 19:06, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

• Sonic (building)Sonic (building) → Amazon (company)#Operations  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Sonic is apparently the name of one of the buildings at Amazon's campus in Bellevue, Washington. However the building is not mentioned at the current target, nor was it mentioned in the former target List of Amazon locationsList of Amazon locations (prior to the recent merge). Rosbif73 (talk) 12:47, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

• Comment – I added a brief mention of the building into the Other major campuses section. SounderBruce 20:27, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

  Thanks. So we can refine the target to that section. Rosbif73 (talk) 08:15, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Vacuum permittivity. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 23:56, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

• Ε0Ε0 → E0  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Of the two items on the disambiguation page that are read as "ε0", Vacuum permittivity receives about 12 times the daily pageviews as Epsilon number. As such, it is the clear primary topic. (I am agnostic to the inclusion of "ε0" entries on the disambiguation page e0.) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:23, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

• Note the first character of the redirect is an uppercase Greek epsilon (Ε), the first letter of the target is an uppercase Latin E. Thryduulf (talk) 10:49, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
• Comment Regardless of what is done, it would be nice if an {{lot}} template could be added to the redirect as well. Casablanca 🪨^(T) 14:36, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Actually, there already is one it just does not seem to downcase the Epsilon. Fascinating. Casablanca 🪨^(T) 14:37, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

I just added that a few minutes ago! As noted on {{lowercase title}}, When using the template on redirect pages, the template must be placed after the redirect, as it will break the redirection if placed before it. This, however, limits the template to have an effect only when viewing the redirect page directly. Nevertheless, it is still useful in this scenario to document the proper capitalization of a term. Rosbif73 (talk) 14:39, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Vacuum permittivity per nom and hatnote to Epsilon number and E0 (disambiguation) Duckmather (talk) 21:08, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 12:14, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

• The largest integer that has an entry on Wikipedia → Graham's number  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The current redirect is just blatantly false. Rayo's number has an article, but is debatably not well defined. TREE(3) and SSCG(3) don't have their own articles but are talked about in depth in the articles for their respective functions. I would personally think of that as counting as an "entry". There are probably more examples to be found that don't have either of these issues. --Bumpf said this! ^{ooh clicky clicky!} [insert witty meta-text on wiki-sigs here] 03:32, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

• Leaning delete as being too self-referential. We don't have redirects like The winningest sports team that has an entry on Wikipedia or The shortest vowel that has an entry on Wikipedia. BD2412 T 03:35, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per Bumpf. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:24, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. This isn't the title of a topic or a related term; it's a search query. Since redirects are manually maintained by editors, this redirect essentially demands that editors behave like a human-powered search engine to find the answer and update the target if the answer changes. That's neither practical nor appropriate. Redirects are not intended to be used as a substitute for a search engine. Admittedly, Wikipedia's internal search engine isn't likely to be good for answering this particular query because an article is unlikely to include a line saying "this is the largest integer with a Wikpedia entry", but other search engines exist that can answer queries like this about Wikipedia. – Scyrme (talk) 05:25, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
• Delete for lack of a good target. We have an article about a sort-of related concept, interesting number paradox. The redirect The smallest positive integer that does not have an entry on Wikipedia that points there was kept at RfD in 2017 (Template:Integers suggests that number is presently 317). However the smallest positive integer without an article is something that has an easy to define definitive answer (even if that answer is not constant), the "largest integer" is both equally fluid and harder to define as the present target makes clear. It is something reliable sources could conceivably write about, in which case a referenced article or mention might be due, and this redirect could target that - however I haven't found any evidence they actually have done so, making the dueness question moot. Thryduulf (talk) 11:17, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
• Weak delete; seems a bit too WP:NAVELGAZING for my taste. 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 21:25, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
• Delete, meta and misleading redirect with little usage, and will become inaccurate unless maintained. Kibblebrain (talk) 02:32, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
• Delete It's a fun language game, but not one that belongs in article space. — The Anome (talk) 12:41, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to List of people named in the Epstein files#Rothschild. wbm1058 (talk) 19:39, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

• Relationship of the Rothschild family and Jeffrey EpsteinRelationship of the Rothschild family and Jeffrey Epstein → Connections of Jeffrey Epstein#Rothschild Group (Rothschild & Co)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

See Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 April 25#Relationship between Jeffrey Epstein and members of the Rothschild family. This should have been bundled with that, but it's a couple days past now, and I'll just leave it listed separately. Same idea though, the target lists only a single Rothschild and doesn't talk about the family as a whole, so delete. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 02:46, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, per same rationale as the other one. Andre🚐 04:53, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
• Strong Keep. As I mentioned elsewhere, the Rothschilds were apparently mentioned over 12,000 times in the Epstein files. That should definitely warrant this redirect link to remain. David A (talk) 10:20, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

  And as I mentioned there, it doesn't matter if they were mentioned 12 million times; if the article doesn't have anything else beyond the one, then the redirect is misleading and should be deleted. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:44, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom and reasons expressed at the related RfD. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 17:18, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
• delete pet above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:17, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
• Refine to Connections_of_Jeffrey_Epstein#Ariane_de_Rothschild. LIrala (talk) 04:25, 4 May 2026 (UTC) Retarget per J947/Tavix. LIrala (talk) 06:16, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Further thoughts on refining?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 03:21, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to List_of_people_named_in_the_Epstein_files#Ariane de Rothschild per Tavix in the other RfD. This target appears to provide more information on multiple Rothschilds' relationship with Epstein than Ariane_de_Rothschild#Relationship_with_Jeffrey_Epstein, Edmond_de_Rothschild_Group#Jeffrey_Epstein, or the current target. J947 ‡ ^edits 02:12, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:08, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

• Réné GirardRéné Girard → René Girard  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

That was initially a typing error 20 years ago, see the talk page of Réné Girard. Durament (talk) 23:24, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep, plausible typo. PARAKANYAA (talk) 04:02, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Well, Girard isn't the only René, most famous René or even the most famous philosopher with such name. Then we would also need redirects Réné Descartes, Réné Guénon, Réné Lacoste, Réné Lévesque... and why only men? also women with the feminine form of the name: Renéé Zellweger or Reneé Zellweger or Rénee Zellweger or Rénéé Zellweger... Those are all plausible typos. What’s unique about Girard? Durament (talk) 10:23, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

I've made this typo on Guenon at least... PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:48, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

People would rather write "Rene" (with no acutes) or misspell "Girard" as "Girar", "Gerar", "Giraffe", "Giraud"... or else. Really, why not consider "Rene Giraffe" as a plausible typo? Same with Guenon: they'd rather write with no acutes at all. Durament (talk) 19:24, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep plausible Jq talk 💬 contributions 18:39, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Comment - The traffic stats show reasonably regular, albeit low, traffic before 2021 until an unusual spike in August of that year. Since then the traffic has been more sparse (essentially negligible background noise). Perhaps this was previously linked somewhere until August, 2021? I'm not sure what to make of this. The risk of breaking incoming links (included from external sources) is a reason to keep (WP:RKEEP#4), however the very sparse traffic since 2021 suggests that maybe any issues with incoming links were already addressed by someone at some point. It's difficult to check for external usage as major search engines ignore diacritics. – Scyrme (talk) 20:22, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

• Comment – This is not the only page that contains "Réné" that redirects to a page that contains "René". There are also the redirects:

1. Maurice Réné Fréchet → René Maurice Fréchet
2. Réné Leibowitz → René Leibowitz
3. Réné Magritte → René Magritte
4. Rohrbacher, Réné François → René François Rohrbacher
5. Vertot, Réné-Aubert, Sieur de → René-Aubert Vertot
6. Réné François Rohrbacher → René François Rohrbacher
7. Réné Charles Joseph Ernest Maire → René Maire
8. Réné-Aubert Vertot → René-Aubert Vertot
9. Réné Lévesque Park → René-Lévesque Park
10. Réné Altmayer → René Altmayer

To repeat a question the nominator asked but in a different context, what's unique about Girard? Mathguy2718 (talk) 23:42, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Well, but then why there's no Maurice Réné Fréchét, Réné Magritté, etc.? A misspeller would misspell "René" with redundant acutes, but not other "e"s in their names? A misspeller would double accents in "René", but not in "Fréchet" or "Lévesque"? You see how arbitrary it is? And what about women with "Renée" name? Why should we overlook them? Durament (talk) 19:07, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Comment - After reconsidering, I searched more and came across a Wiktionary entry "Réné" with two accutes as a standard Norman spelling of the name. I'd be persuaded of the necessity of this redirect, if that's legit, since Norman is a genuine language in France and the region is close to England, it’s plausible that a Norman speaker searching in English might write it that way. But, unfortunately, I couldn't find any source connecting this spelling to Norman language orthography. Durament (talk) 22:50, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any further thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:24, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

• Keep as a plausible misspelling. The comments relating to other redirects are pure WP:OTHERSTUFF and as such are essentially irrelevant. Thryduulf (talk) 01:29, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Environmental issues in Brazil#Oil spills. (non-admin closure) Chess enjoyer (talk) 00:26, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

• Oil spills in BrazilOil spills in Brazil → Energy_in_Brazil#Environmental_damages  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Nothing mentioned in the current target, the section doesn't exist. Respublik (talk) 23:17, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Comment - The section existed when the redirect was created (July, 2018) but was deleted in revision 962666340 (June, 2020) with the edit summary: Outdated and not significant to the topic. The section discussed a single incident in 2011. The plural "oil spills" suggests the reader would be looking for an article covering multiple incidents or a list article. Several articles for oil spills in particular countries exist (Category:Oil spills by country), but none exists for Brazil. List of oil spills lists a few spills in Brazil, but the list there is, for the most part, not organised by country, so I'm not sure it would be an appropriate target. Category:Oil spills in Brazil lists articles for several spills, so perhaps a list would be viable if someone volunteers to make one? – Scyrme (talk) 23:32, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

• Environmental issues in Brazil is another potential target. The article mentions oil spills, but it probably needs to have more coverage of the topic to be a suitable target. - Eureka Lott 19:39, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:21, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Environmental issues in Brazil. Mentions the subject and wouldn't be a surprising destination. Ideally there'd be more there, but I added a little borrowed material from an article about a major 2019 spill to make it just a bit more informative. Should be a viable target now. Any readers seeking more information about the spills mentioned can click through to their articles. It's better than a list than isn't focused specifically on Brazil (which searching "in Brazil" implies the reader wants) or a cross-namespace redirect to a category, and is certainly more informative than deletion. This target would be an appropriate place to add further information, and the redirect may encourage relevant additions. – Scyrme (talk) 01:23, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget or listify. A list would probably be first choice in the absence of a dedicated article, but in the absence of such a list the Environmental issues is the best option we have and, per Scryme, better than the other alternatives suggested. Thryduulf (talk) 01:32, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Environmental issues in Brazil#Oil spills as a good start. Thank you to Scyrme for creating the section. - Eureka Lott 14:59, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Environmental issues in Brazil#Oil spills per above. — The Anome (talk) 08:11, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 12:00, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

• نشان or مسیریاب و نقشه نشان → Neshan  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Mixed-language redirect that joins two Persian-language names for the topic with an English conjunction. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:19, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. Clearly defective name, not the result of a page move, visit levels are down in the background noise level of scraper bot traffic. — The Anome (talk) 08:13, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Unopposed deletion suggestion. Jay 💬 11:45, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

• The Voice Kids - أحلى صوت → List of The Voice Kids TV series  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• The Voice Kids – أحلى صوت → List of The Voice Kids TV series  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Should these point instead to The Voice Kids: Ahla Sawt, or deleted? –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:17, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. WP:MIXEDSCRIPT Katiedevi (talk) 07:39, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 11:42, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

• Nowroozٔ → Nowruz  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Missed this one in an RfD below. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:13, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

• Delete Not the result of a move, zero Google hits outside of Wikipedia maintenance pages. — The Anome (talk) 12:43, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 11:41, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

• 'iram dhat ٱleimad → Iram of the Pillars  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Alkall، Mawiyah → Al-khalal, Mawiyah  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Elifbâا → Ottoman Turkish alphabet  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Khorramkohوkharapu → Kharehpu  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• ۢAbd al-Rauf al-Sinkili → Abd al-Rauf al-Fansuri  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Miscellaneous redirects containing an extraneous Arabic letter mixed with other scripts. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:02, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, WP:MIXEDSCRIPT. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 03:58, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:MIXEDSCRIPT. — The Anome (talk) 08:33, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).