Wikiwand AI

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2025 October 3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 3

Template:Gemini TV Shows

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:06, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Only three shows, two of which they only had one season. Serves no purpose other than acting like WP:NOTTVGUIDE. CNMall41 (talk) 19:00, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Roh roster

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:04, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

No transclusions. A discussion agreed to deprecate this template. See this TFD for links and details. I neglected to include this template in that TFD, and now it's too late to merge them. – Jonesey95 (talk) 10:51, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

Delete Per nom. Its functionality is now implemented into Template:Professional wrestling profiles. Prefall 11:12, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Motorcycle speedway tracks

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2025 October 13. Izno (talk) 06:08, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Australian place

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Withdraw. Going to withdraw this until I have a sample that I can demonstrate with. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:56, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

Propose merging Template:Infobox Australian place with Template:Infobox settlement.
This isn’t technically a nomination to merge, but a nomination to convert to a wrapper. A search of other custom settlement infoboxes (such as {{Infobox US state}} or {{Infobox Italian comune}}) shows that nearly all of them us {{Infobox settlement}} as a base. In fact I was unable to find any that don’t use this well established template as their base. While this certainly has some customization with tracking categories and other custom logic, I see no reason that this cannot be redone as a wrapper template so that its layout is in the same well established format of settlements around the world.

Additionally this template violates many best practices with its large color boxes around labels (I can find NO other Infobox that does this) and contains lots of information that does not belong in an Infobox. There is a reason that {{Infobox settlement}} with its 576,000+ transclusions does not have information such as average rainfall, mean temperature or distance to nearest suburbs. At the very least this template should follow best practices and look better than it does. — Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 05:08, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

This has been discussed at length in July 2020 at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 July 19#Template:Infobox Australian place. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 06:31, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
It would be best if you could implement a merge using e.g. Module:Template wrapper in the Template:Infobox Australian place/sandbox and demonstrate how it's better. --Joy (talk) 09:21, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
@Joy: I'm about to call it a night, but I'll do that tomorrow! --Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 09:44, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
Strong Oppose Mainly the arguments made @AussieLegend on the most recent discussion. This template allows for mentions in the InfoBox for critical facts like Local Government Area(s), State Electorate(s), and Federal Electorate(s). Regarding the colour violation, this is leaning towards WP:CLEANUP territory. Local Government Area is actually crucial information on an Australian Suburb. These suburbs are quite similar United States Neighborhoods, E.G. JeffVanderLou, Lafayette Square, they don't have there own mayor, but unlike United States Neighborhoods, Australian Suburbs are actually defined as existing legally by their state government and by the Census. Regarding the Colour violation, these Colours can just be removed. Servite et contribuere (talk) 12:37, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Huntington Hammer seasons

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:03, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Only one link. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 03:54, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Canton Cougars seasons

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:02, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Only one link. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 03:49, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Despite its name

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Pppery (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:01, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

You would surely expect a Wikipedia article to be serious, otherwise the unserious content would have been deleted. I bet disclaimers similar to these have been added many times to articles and promptly removed, throughout WP history; this time it’s in template form. Polomo (talk) 23:51, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete as not usable on Wikipedia articles. We don't post disclaimers of this sort. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:30, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
    fair, good statement Versions111 (talk) 01:44, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete Not usable. Johnuniq (talk) 02:19, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 00:18, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
Delete, clearly goes against WP:NDIA. 2A0E:1D47:9085:D200:5CA8:42D8:9718:AB3C (talk) 12:05, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks