Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2026 June 12

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

< June 11
June 13 >

June 12

Template:City of Edinburgh

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:47, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

Unused sidebar. Gonnym (talk) 09:09, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 18:58, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Masters France tournaments

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:47, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

Unused navigation template after pages were redirected. Gonnym (talk) 09:15, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 18:55, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
  • delete, no longer provides useful navigation. Frietjes (talk) 22:46, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox tribe

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. No consensus for a merge. Primefac (talk) 10:53, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

Propose merging Template:Infobox tribe with Template:Infobox ethnic group.
WP:INFOCOL. At the first, this may seem unreasonable. However, a merge could be considered.

One may wish to consider how Template:Infobox family works fine referring to a multitude of different types of families, whether royal, aristocratic, consort-related, business/activity-related etc., including larger and small branches, etc.

Just as many ethnic groups are understood as being part of larger ethnic groups, many which are customarly referred to as tribes can also be understood as ethnic groups within ethnic groups. Especially in the case of former, historical tribes, many if not most are indistinguishable from ethnic groups, or at least subject to the same variables. Compare migration periods. For those that don't apply to the aforementioned, perhaps the variables of Template:Infobox family or possbly Template:Infobox clan would help better backend.

All in all, letting go of the infobox for tribes doesn't mean ignoring the term or its scope or definition as such any less than in the above case of the varying scopes of Template:Infobox family. In fact with more variables offered in Template:Infobox ethnic group, the opposite effect could be said to apply. Only that for technical reasons its relevant variables (including its present two infobox-specific nisba, varna) should arguably be able to fall into those of either Template:Infobox ethnic group, Template:Infobox family or, least likely (backend technically) Template:Infobox clan? PPEMES (talk) 17:09, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 18:52, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
Oppose dosen't make sense to merge this, ethnic groups and tribes are very different. Abu Isa 🇴🇲 18:45, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I would say that tribes and ethnic groups frequently overlap, but aren't exactly interchangeable. The first and outright matter is the concern of scale and properties that separate a tribe from an ethnic group and vice versa; ethnic groups are much larger than tribes, and might not have the same level of local-level cohesion as a tribe would have... I also feel that there's not a lot of variables from IB ethnic group that we can import to IB tribe. .n⠀eandert⠀hals8 03:52, 17 June 2026 (UTC)
Oppose unhelpful nomination that lacks WP:BEFORE. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:10, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
Oppose any intro/ 101 class on ethnography or ethnology course will tell you ethnic group and tribes are different. Take the Tribe of Israel.
Look at the ancient Israelites and their Twelve Tribes of Israel. The Israelites were an ethnic group that later formed a kingdom and was made up of 12 tribes within that ethnic framework. They were all the same ethnicity, but a different tribe. Now to be fair ethnology can be hard because sometimes tribes become their own ethnicity. The modern Jews are mostly decedents of the Tribe of Judah, with a little bit of Benjaminite and Levi mixed in.
Also look at the Native American groups. It depends on the ethnologist but they can be collectively called an ethnicity, but then you have to be careful, because depending on how you categorize it a group of Native American Nations maybe the same language group, or even Individual Native American Nations may be considered their own ethnicity.
Many Native Americans groups also have their own bands/ or tribes apart from their Nation.
Getting rid of this would create a major headache for editors knowledgeable in Social Sciences, ethnology, anthropology, etc. And may strike as disrespectful to some ethnic groups. Historyguy1138 (talk) 18:48, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
@Historyguy1138: The nominator doesn't appear to be suggesting that every tribe isn't part of a larger ethnic groups, but rather sub-ethnic groups within a larger ethnic groups (in your case of the Israelite tribes). Other sub-ethnic groups such as Pomors use Template:Infobox ethnic group though they are described as a subgroup of ethnic Russians. What I'd perhaps ask is if there are any parameters of Template:Infobox tribe that are not in the ethnic group Infobox and can't be easily migrated over, though perhaps there's something I'm missing before even that. Arctic Circle System (talk) 05:24, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Parameter/styles.css

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn. Primefac (talk) 11:00, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

Unused style page. Gonnym (talk) 09:20, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 18:39, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
Apparently this style sheet will be required per Template talk:Parameter#para2. Template:Parameter2 is set to be merged into Template:Parameter shortly — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:01, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
I have no issue withdrawing this nomination if it's going to be used. Worst case, it ends up back here again at a later date. --Gonnym (talk) 05:46, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Hanacaraka

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2026 June 24. Primefac (talk) 11:26, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Demography

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2026 June 24. Primefac (talk) 11:05, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox rune

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 03:06, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

Propose merging Template:Infobox rune with Template:Infobox grapheme.
WP:INFOCOL. PPEMES (talk) 14:52, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Oppose, same objections as I left for the other proposals above: the layouts are incredibly different and it would be quite difficult to cleanly reconcile them; I don't think INFOCOL applies here, as they aren't really that similar at all. Compare the following:
These are all vastly different, and I don't see how merging them together would be beneficial. See also my comment in #Template:Infobox hieroglyphs about yet another template. ~ oklopfer (💬) 16:56, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
I could see Infobox Semitic letter be replaced by Infobox grapheme. Infobox Semitic letter design is pretty awful and lacks pretty much any real information. Gonnym (talk) 09:41, 15 June 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 18:38, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox census

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Izno (talk) 00:26, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

Propose merging Template:Infobox census with Template:Infobox demographics.
WP:INFOCOL. Accounts of census missing from destination template. Census information could well be merged as variable. PPEMES (talk) 15:07, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

  • Comment, unless I am missing something, I don't see any parameters in common between these two infoboxes, so it's not clear what benefit there is from merging them. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:46, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 18:37, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
Oppose completely different templates. No overlap at all. I guess you could argue the names are about similar topics but that is it. ZERO attempt at WP:BEFORE by the nominator here. Recommend speedy close on this. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:22, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
  • oppose, no reason to merge. Frietjes (talk) 20:39, 15 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2028 Philippine local elections

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:08, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

Navboxes with only red links. OK to recreate when there are some article to link. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:06, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

Delete. Nothing to navigate to. Gonnym (talk) 07:59, 17 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:South Africa squad 2025 U-20 Africa Cup of Nations

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:08, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

current wikipedia standard is to only create squad templates for senior major tournaments Joeykai (talk) 07:55, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 09:13, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom, youth squad temples not needed. GiantSnowman 09:15, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Years in tennis

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:09, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

Redundant to templates in the Template:YEAR in tennis category. 8rz (talk) 01:16, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

I'm unclear what you did. Why did you add years to Template:1880 in tennis (which is not what the template is for), and nominate this, which is what the template is for? What is this template redundant to? Gonnym (talk) 07:17, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
Please revert your entire edit history related to this as it is very much controversial and incorrect. Gonnym (talk) 07:18, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
I merged {{Years in tennis}} to all the templates starting with "Year in tennis" in the aforementioned category and per
the one-sided proposal without any objection, I went forward with the merger and am now nominating this template for deletion. 8rz (talk) 11:54, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
Template mergers are done via TfD. Gonnym (talk) 07:55, 17 June 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 04:22, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
  • keep, useful for navigation between the various "years of" articles. I reverted the copy-and-paste of all the years in every {{YYYY in tennis}} template per WP:BIDIRECTIONAL. also, imagine when 2027 comes around and someone would have had to edit every single {{YYYY in tennis}} to add 2027. really bad idea. Frietjes (talk) 16:41, 15 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep I am certain that if a merge request was opened instead of unilaterally combining them, it would have failed. It would be the same as adding every NFL season to the 2026 NFL season template, or every US presidential election to the 2024 presidential election template. This is clearly not the purpose of a specific year in tennis template. That is why this template, and template categories exist. I fail to see how adding each of the years to each yearly template is an improvement. Not to mention the WP:BIDIRECTIONAL concerns that Frietjes had when undoing the recent edit adding the list of years to the yearly template.-UCO2009bluejay (talk) 05:28, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep and restore per everything above. Gonnym (talk) 07:56, 17 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep I realized that the merger was impractical because one would have update all the templates each subsequent year per WP:BIDIRECTIONAL. 8rz (talk) 10:10, 17 June 2026 (UTC)
    You could just withdraw the nom.-UCO2009bluejay (talk) 03:26, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
    I am withdrawing my TfD nom per WP:SNOWBALL and have already removed the TfD notice on Template:Years in tennis. 8rz (talk) 14:16, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Drainage basin succession templates

I am nominating all of the templates in Category:Drainage basin succession templates (and its subcats) for replacement with {{drainage}}, which I created to centralise all of the 2k templates into one easy-to-update template. This means that if a new drainage basin is needed, a single template can just be edited rather than having to create yet another template. There will be no visible change to any article; code-wise it will simply be changing (for example) {{PAchelous}} to {{Drainage|Achelous}}. Primefac (talk) 00:32, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

I've listed them all at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2026 June 4/Drainage basin succession templates. Gonnym (talk) 06:02, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep. There are two functionalities that will be lost by replacing the R- and P-templates with this new template. First, the R-templates categorize the articles that use them into a tributaries category, for instance {{RMeurthe}} into Category:Tributaries of the Moselle. Second, the system of interlinked P-templates implies that only one P-template ({{PWeser}}) has to be modified if the Weser article is moved to for instance Weser (river). In the {{Drainage}} template it would have to be changed in 55 places. Markussep Talk 07:46, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
    I'm still working on a recursive version to deal with that; will likely be a module, but if not, the new syntax editor allows for really quick find/replace for something like Weser → Weser (river). As far as the Rs go, we have moved away from templates adding content categories to articles, so the R-names should be deprecated anyway. Primefac (talk) 09:26, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
    Why? --Joy (talk) 12:12, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
    About moving away from templates adding content categories to articles, could you point me to that guideline? Markussep Talk 12:50, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
    WP:TEMPLATECAT. Gonnym (talk) 14:18, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
    That guideline recommendation lists many reasons, but it's not clear which of them apply here. --Joy (talk) 17:20, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
    All of them? The sortkeys one does seem to be handled by the use of PAGENAME though. Primefac (talk) 09:32, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
    For example it says editors can't see it in wikitext. Do we need them to see it, how likely is it that this sort of a thing needs to be edited? Or that we can't remove or restructure the categories - how likely is it that these categories need that to be done? --Joy (talk) 10:28, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
    OK, that's clear, thanks. Markussep Talk 12:23, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
Why don't you create an implementation that confirms this is useful first, and then transclude it from those templates, make sure there's no regressions, and only then start a TfD to replace the call sites in the articles?
I never liked the P* and R* names myself, they seem too obfuscated, but that doesn't mean the functionality is bad. --Joy (talk) 12:15, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
I... did? I made {{drainage}} as a 1-to-1 replacement and plopped it in a few articles to make sure things would work. Primefac (talk) 09:32, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
That's not what I asked above. For example, the new template should be used within {{PAchelous}} and others, and then we see that it works, and then we can be at ease to ponder the fine details of naming and caller syntax. --Joy (talk) 10:32, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
That's.... not how things work? Why would I change the text inside PAchelous when PAchelous itself is the issue? It would be pointless for me to place {{drainage|Achelous}} inside of {{PAchelous}} just to show that they give exactly the same output:
{{PAchelous}} → ‹See Tfd›Achelous→ Ionian Sea
{{drainage|Achelous}} → Achelous→ Ionian Sea
I'm not going to put drainage inside of the other templates to show that the new template works, just so that I can later go and replace the old templates with the new. I'm sorry if I'm still totally misunderstanding what you're going for, but it's not how things are worked at TFD so I guess that's from whence my confusion is coming. Primefac (talk) 09:51, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
I guess I'm just not used to this method of development where we first make decisions and only then completely verify outcomes. In my mind, this ends up too much of an all-or-nothing experiment, instead of a gradual and safe transition. Obviously, this is all pretty minor and simple and there's only so much that can go wrong with so little code, but the method is still weird to me. --Joy (talk) 11:05, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
I mean, in this particular case I have verified the outcome, but yes, at TFD it is often the case that "we should merge these two templates" is decided first, and then the merge happens. I figured I would show proof of concept because it would be egg on my face if it didn't work. Primefac (talk) 23:16, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
General support - Have not read through all the intricacies of this template, but fully support centralizing this and replacing over 1,000 tiny templates with 1 larger, easy to maintain template. Obviously lets make sure all the functionality gets flushed out, but Primefac has a lengthy track record when it comes to template work so I have full faith that they can make this solution work. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 04:33, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 04:20, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
I've used claude.ai to see if Lua can handle the issue that Markussep raised better. The result is at Module:Sandbox/Gonnym/drainage (again, this is AI-written). Gonnym (talk) 08:23, 14 June 2026 (UTC)
Apparently there is an error in the module. When I tried {{#invoke:Sandbox/Gonnym/drainage|chain|Fulda}} (or any other river), I got "Lua error in Module:Sandbox/Gonnym/drainage at line 436: attempt to concatenate field 'Lake Baikal' (a nil value)." It's a nice idea, but I guess it needs good documentation for anluabetes like me. Markussep Talk 17:44, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
@Markussep fixed the bugs. Gonnym (talk) 19:22, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
But I need to emphasis this, this was done with AI so if anything from this is used, the data needs to be verified. Gonnym (talk) 19:25, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Looks good to me, but indeed the output needs to be checked before each P-template is replaced. I think it's not too difficult to add new connections, so I support using this module to replace the P-templates. A maintenance category would be nice. Markussep Talk 07:22, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
For what it's worth, the proposed template works for all current cases, so while I am fine with using a module (which I agree will allow for easier creation of new links) the replacement doesn't have to use the module from the get-go (assuming the replacement proposal is accepted). Primefac (talk) 20:33, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
At the very least, delete the R-templates as they are all unused. Gonnym (talk) 07:49, 15 June 2026 (UTC)
Agree, but they're not unused (at least the ones I checked, like RLoire, REms, RPo, RAngara), they'll have to be substituted. Markussep Talk 17:48, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
Ah, those weren't in the unused reports so they aren't listed at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2026 June 4/Drainage basin succession templates. Gonnym (talk) 19:24, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Support replacement, this looks like sensible consolidation to me. Choucas 🐦‍⬛ 13:02, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Template:Navbox2

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (We do have a CSD for that.) Izno (talk) 18:56, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

Nonsense; created by a vandal. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:19, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Mbabel-WMDC

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as a soft deletion. Editors can request the template's undeletion for any reason. Primefac (talk) 11:14, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

Unused and not a subst template. Seems Template:Mbabel1c is the one used. Gonnym (talk) 12:36, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 04:18, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Politics of Brazil/styles.css

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as a soft deletion. Editors can request the template's undeletion for any reason. Primefac (talk) 11:15, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

Unused after this edit. Gonnym (talk) 12:51, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 04:18, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Portal content pages (header bar 2)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as a soft deletion. Editors can request the template's undeletion for any reason. Primefac (talk) 11:15, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

Unused portal-related template. Gonnym (talk) 12:52, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 04:17, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:SuperSport United F.C. squad

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:10, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

the team does not exist anymore, does not need a "current squad" template Joeykai (talk) 02:56, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 09:13, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom, not needed. GiantSnowman 09:14, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI