Wikiwand AI

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2026 May 30

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 30

Template:Campaignbox Sino-Russian conflicts

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Primefac (talk) 21:21, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Unused campaignbox and mere collection for different wars and conflicts. NZ Bunnies (talk) 09:58, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Oppose. The entire purpose of a campaignbox is to be a collection of related wars and conflicts. I would be willing to add it to pages that are missing it. Wasting time is still my passion (talk) 17:59, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
Oppose. In the context of "special interests" and the Manchuria-Mongolia problem, a matter in which Russia is directly involved, this is very much relevant. Revisionist authors will often say that the Sino-Japanese War lasted from 1931 to 1937, which although untrue, is grounded in the truth that the Sino-Japanese conflict began in full force by 1931; though it arguably could be extended as far back as the Jiawu War. If campaign boxes are not for "different wars," then why is the Mukden incident listed in "pre-war conflicts" for the Sino-Japanese campaign box? As for different conflicts; in all the decades of Russia and China's hostile relationships, it has all ultimately been over one thing. In that case, can it not said that it was really one long conflict? Why else does the west call the hundred years war, the hundred years war?
But really, I oppose this because it makes the article awkward to read, and I thought the introduction was deleted. Boo! 汪精衞迷 (talk) 07:32, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
To the users who oppose the deletion
First, I want to make sure that 'to be a collection of related wars and conflicts' is quite false to adopt in this article. Because, there's no relation between 'Sino-Soviet split' and 'Qing-Russian conflicts'.
Second, 汪精衞迷 says 'the decades of Russia and China's hostile relationships, it has all ultimately been over one thing.' and this campaignbox is not about Sinophobia or Russophobia. Also, if you want to talk about when does Second Sino-Japanese War started, please use Talk:Second Sino-Japanese War, because this section isn't for when it starts. And what does that ' Boo!' means? NZ Bunnies (talk) 12:10, 19 May 2026 (UTC)
Before I continue, I would like to issue an earnest thanks to whoever edited the "considered for deletion" box, and I would like to say in advance that I probably would not continue this discussion further, simply out of lack of motive.
It was to illustrate a point. I agree that it is not about Sino or Russophobia, because that was not my intention, either. There is very much a relationship between the Sino-Soviet split and the Qing-Russian conflicts. Ever since the Opium Wars, and the Treaty of Aigun and later Beijing, in which the Manchus ceded Outer Dongbei to the Russians, Russia has continued its desire to expand southward and expand its influence. I am not here to argue whether or not the Soviets were a continuation, or are responsible/would be responsible for earlier and later Russian states, but in practical terms, it was very much a Russian state. At first, Russian expansion southward manifested in a primarily colonial manner; wishing to assimilate the Chinese populations on the frontier as Orthodox Russians, then to settle them with their own Slavic peoples. In fact, there is even a special term for the supporters of such a project, known as the Asianists (Vostochniki), with the end goal being to establish Zheltorossiya.
It was this which first brought the Russians to fight the Qing during the Boxer Rebellion; and subsequently to occupy the rest of Dongbei, and colonise it as they did with Outer Dongbei. Yet, when the Japanese came, and kicked them out, their ambitions in inner Dongbei were shattered, and colonisation was no longer feasible. This did not mean an end to expansion, however, and this is why I oppose the deletion. While colonisation was the means, the ends was to secure the wealth of the frontier, including the vast mines and geopolitical buffer that it would provide. And given the behaviour of the Soviet Union, it is clear that they did not change much from their predecessors, despite claims to internationalism, and the equality of all peoples. While there is no direct relation between the Sino-Soviet Split and the Qing-Russian conflicts, that would be itself misleading. It is like saying there is no direct relation the July Crisis and World War II, when the reality is that the July Crisis caused the Great War, which is very much related to World War II. Once the Soviet Union could no longer depend on a friendship with China to maintain its position in East Asia; it instead took to military means, both simple means to an end of maintaining their influence. After decisively defeating China in the Sino-Soviet border conflict, the Soviet Union secured their disputed territories and permanently culled the Chinese Communists as a threat, at least, until the Soviet Union themselves collapsed. Over the decades, means and governments changed, but the end goal, the grand strategy, never did. The Boselli Government collapsed after the Battle of Caporetto, but that didn't mean Italy left the Great War, right?
Honestly, if you want to delete a campaign box, I suggest you just go delete the Anglo-French one. There's much less basis for it than there is with China and Russia, and it is a much more globalised conflict. In contrast; the Hundred Years war does have a campaign box; in fact, several. At different times, there were different reasons that the British launched their chevauches into France, and under different kings, too. Does that mean that it should be deleted? Because there's "no relation" between the conflicts at all? That's all I have to say, please take my words with grace, sorry if I may have came off as rude before.
Sincerely, a fan of Wang Jingwei. 汪精衞迷 (talk) 05:24, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
I can oppose with that cause, although you think campaignbox shouldn't be omitted, previous article proved that it should be deleted. And there's also the policy of MOS:CAMPAIGN
NZ Bunnies (talk) 14:52, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
Delete a mess of a navigational template. Way too many un-organized links. Best case scenario this is a case of WP:BLOWITUP if it is to every be useful. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 23:00, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
I agree. NZ Bunnies (talk) 23:13, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 12:10, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 23:45, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Japan Rugby League One squad templates

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as a soft deletion. Editors can request undeletion of these templates for any reason. Primefac (talk) 21:17, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

While these templates do link some players, all of these templates have a minimum of 40 redlinks with it unlikely these pages will be creatd. I'm not sure they help aiding the readers navigation anymore and are just a sea of red. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 14:32, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

Comment: the red links can and should be removed. Gonnym (talk) 07:36, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
I would be opposed to this. These templates are there to show full squads, so only showing a select group of players I don't think is right. I would also be opposed to deletion of some but not all of these templates. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 08:50, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Navigation templates are not meant to replace articles. They are meant to offer navigation between related articles. When there isn't an article, the link shouldn't be in the template, see WP:EXISTING (and preemptively answering, see the end of point #2). Gonnym (talk) 18:30, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
My preference still would be for deletion, but if keep or no consensus, I will remove links to players that are 90% unlikely to have an article created for them. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:29, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 23:44, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Hungarian-built ships of WWI

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2026 June 8. Izno (talk) 18:11, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Osaka University

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 15:56, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Apart from the notable people, all links are either non-existent articles, or non-existent sections in the main article. – Fayenatic London 13:22, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 20:46, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:ZED FC matches

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:30, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

This navbox contains only one link, providing no benefit to readers. S.A. Julio (talk) 06:01, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Citation CT bat 0910

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:09, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Unused citation template. Gonnym (talk) 05:42, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 05:38, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
Delete as unused. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:31, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Citation CT bat 1011

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:11, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Unused citation template. Gonnym (talk) 05:42, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 05:38, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
Delete as unused. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:31, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Comoé Province map

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:10, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Unused map template. Gonnym (talk) 05:44, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 05:35, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
Delete as unused. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:31, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Display redirect

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:10, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Unused and seems to be broken template. Gonnym (talk) 05:45, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 05:35, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete, the expected behaviour of the template is unclear. Peterwhy (talk) 23:12, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Delete as unused. --Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:32, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Euronext was

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:10, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Unused ticker template. Gonnym (talk) 05:48, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 05:34, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
Delete as unused. --Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:32, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Hero of the Nation

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:10, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Unused icon template. Gonnym (talk) 05:48, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 05:34, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
Delete as unused. --Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:32, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NBA G League Ignite roster

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:10, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Unused after this edit. The team disbanded and the template was subst to the article. Gonnym (talk) 05:56, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 05:34, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
Delete as unused. --Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:32, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Northamptonshire Special Rank Insignia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:10, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Unused insignia table template. Gonnym (talk) 05:57, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 05:33, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
Delete as unused. --Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:32, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:RAchelous

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:10, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Unused drainage basin succession template. Gonnym (talk) 05:59, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 05:33, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
Delete as unused. --Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:32, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Scottish Parliament election results graph (percentage)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:11, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Unused timeline template. Gonnym (talk) 05:59, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 05:33, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
Delete as unused. --Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:32, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Smaller U.S. Big Tech companies

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:11, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Unused table template. Gonnym (talk) 06:00, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 05:33, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
Delete as unused. --Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:32, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:TV reviews seasons box

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:11, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Unused review table template. Gonnym (talk) 06:00, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 05:33, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
Delete as unused. --Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:32, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks