Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Finance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is a collection of discussions on the deletion and merging of articles related to Finance. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
- Adding a new AfD discussion
- Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
- Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
- You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Finance|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
- There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
- Removing a closed AfD discussion
- Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
- Other types of discussions
- You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Finance. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
- Further information
- For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.
Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:| Purge page cache | watch |
Finance
AbdulRazzaq AbdulMajeed Alaro
- AbdulRazzaq AbdulMajeed Alaro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable Nigerian academic; I can find no evidence he passes WP:GNG or WP:NACADEMIC. Sources are brief routine coverage (, ) and his own writing/lectures (, ), and a primary source professional bio. No evidence of meeting any of the NACADEMIC criteria; Scopus pegs his h-index at 1, which is a sign of very low academic influence. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:10, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Finance, and Nigeria. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:10, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
- Keep - The subject passes GNG as there lot of sources about him which include being name as the Nigerian Islamic Finance Person of the Year in 2024[1] and also clearly passes C6 of NPROF. Kaizenify (talk) 14:19, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
- Can you supply third-party evidence showing that "Nigerian Islamic Finance Person of the Year" is a significant award per WP:NAWARD? As for C6, "head of department of Islamic Law" is not a high-level post. Department chairs don't count for C6, generally only presidents/chancellors/vice chancellors and in some cases deans. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:31, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
John D. Steinmetz
- John D. Steinmetz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nominated for deletion. The subject of this article is a regional banking executive (CEO of Vista Bank, later NBH Bank) and a former regent for the Texas Tech University System. While these are notable professional milestones, they do not inherently satisfy Wikipedia's Notability guidelines for biographies or Notability criteria for businesspeople.
A review of the existing references and available search results reveals that coverage is largely limited to routine corporate announcements, regional industry press releases regarding executive appointments, local business journal accolades (e.g., Dallas Business Journal's 40 Under 40), and transactional reporting surrounding the acquisition of Vista Bank by National Bank Holdings.
Per General Notability Guidelines and WP:ROUTINE, routine career transitions, regional awards, and political/educational board appointments do not constitute the significant, sustained, independent, and in-depth secondary source coverage required to justify a standalone encyclopedic biography. Despite his prominence within the regional banking sector, the subject lacks the national or lasting historical significance required by Wikipedia policy. Because the primary subject matter revolves around his executive tenure, the article is a candidate for deletion or potentially a redirect to Vista Bank (Dallas) if any encyclopedic history warrants a merge. --DutchBoy97 (talk) 14:42, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
- Comment Why the AI-generated nomination? /over.throws/✎ 14:51, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Finance, and Texas. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:24, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, speedy close - This AI-generated "argument" for deleting John Steinmetz's article doesn't make any sense, and it was also posted by a newly registered SPA with absolutely no other contributions on Wikipedia. Steinmetz is clearly notable per WP:GNG and WP:NBIO, as he is the president of a notable American bank in Texas with its own Wikipedia article. Plus I crafted this article with a lot of care as an enthusiast in the world of local American banking.
- You can't try to delete a BLP simply because you have a grudge against the subject. This is against Wikipedia's policies.
- The AFD nominator also said on his talk page that it's his very first edit and so he had to use AI to do everything. Speedily keep this and close this right away, since this is AI slop autogenerated from an SPA. The AfD nominator is clearly not here to contribute to an encyclopedia and lacks basic competence. Nebulousways (talk) 16:05, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
- This being the first proposed edit that I've made to Wikipedia doesn't mean that I'm here to act on a grudge, nor does it make my account an SPA. It's simply the first update that I've made, and I used available tools to assist me in that process. I'd remind you of WP:AFG before you level accusations like these against me. I haven't attacked you, nor your work, I simply made a proposal for deletion based on lack of notability of the article's subject. DutchBoy97 (talk) 16:59, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
- Delete I don't see any malicious use of an LLM in this case, and as Nebulousway's clearly has a COI with this article that must be declared (and 38 edits in six years), their vote is very much a case of not liking that their edits are now under scrutiny as their most recent edits are to this and Vista Bank, and I feel like the nom is being charitable asking for a redirect to Vista because they have more of a strong delete case as the subject is a generic bank executive out of many. The only assistance I see with the nominator regarding LLM was looking up policy to solidify their rationale, and I feel like they expanded them into their own words appropriately. Also Nebulousways, do not attack a nominator who made a good faith argument; this isn't 'slop'. Nathannah • 📮 22:40, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
- Reply - My apologies for that. I was emotional yesterday, so let me reply with a clear head.
- Something seems incongruent when a brand new editor's first edit is an AfD nomination.
- This is compounded by the AI use. On the one hand they claim this is their first edit and so require LLM assistance, but yet on the other hand, they clearly know how to add tags, nominate it for AfD, etc. Which is it?
- WP:AGF doesn't mean one has to accept all edits without question. An editor's first edits are very telling, whether it's nominating an article for deletion, casting a vote for AfD or something else a bit contentious. Nebulousways (talk) 04:57, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Knut Frängsmyr
- Knut Frängsmyr (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Swedish entrepreneur (BLP). Soft deleted in a previous AfD discussion, but then reinstated at the request of the page creator. As the previous nominator stated, it is not clear that the subject meets WP:BASIC, since the references seem to be WP:ROUTINE coverage of appointments and so forth. Dionysodorus (talk) 17:24, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Music, Finance, Technology, and Sweden. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:31, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Trumpetrep (talk) 01:05, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Patrick M. Brenner
- Patrick M. Brenner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
American policy writer (BLP). As in the previous nomination, it is not clear that there is any sustained coverage in sources independent of the subject that would meet WP:BASIC, and most of the references are to the subject's own writing rather than to coverage of the subject himself. Dionysodorus (talk) 17:44, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Politics, Economics, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:30, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Antonia Medlicott
- Antonia Medlicott (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
British journalist (BLP). This article was recently soft deleted, and then undeleted by the request of the page creator, who then put the draft through AfC, where it was accepted. However, as in the previous nomination, the sources are mostly passing mentions or work by the subject: it is not clear that there is sustained coverage of her in sources independent of her, as required for WP:BASIC. Dionysodorus (talk) 17:52, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Journalism, Finance, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:29, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was moving this to draft space. See discussion at AfD. Drmies (talk) 18:53, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Ben Stimson
- Ben Stimson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
British banker (BLP). I see no evidence that the subject meets WP:BASIC or any special notability criterion. Dionysodorus (talk) 14:53, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Politicians, Finance, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:14, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
- soft delete - so he was Chief Operating Officer of the Bank of England, which is at least something. However, the position is much lower compared to something like the Governor of the Bank of England. The role may not also have much definition/prominence given that it was created relatively recently in 2013. He does not appear to have generated much individual coverage, so there is merit to deleting his page. However, if occupying a position in the Bank of England warrents notability in of itself, then it probably should be kept LincolnMagnus (talk) 20:21, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related AfD discussions. 11:01, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
- Back to Draft. This article is insulting. 2 sentences? Do it properly or not at all. PlainJane91 (talk) 17:26, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
- As in the case of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah John, I am rather doubtful whether this article should in fact be deleted, since on reflection I think that holding such a high position in a national institution perhaps does justify inclusion. Per WP:WDAFD I cannot withdraw this nomination, since it has received two !votes that are not keep !votes, but I would ask the closer to consider me a keep !vote rather than a !vote for deletion. Dionysodorus (talk) 17:40, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Sarah John
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep; withdrawing as nominator. Dionysodorus (talk) 17:30, 3 September 2026 (UTC).
- Sarah John (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
British banker (BLP). As with Ben Stimson, I see no evidence that she meets WP:BASIC or any special notability criterion. Dionysodorus (talk) 14:55, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Politicians, Women, Finance, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:13, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
- Keep. Chief Cashier of the Bank of England is a notable post. These are the people whose signature appears on banknotes, for crying out loud. You'll note that almost all have articles. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:26, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related AfD discussions. 11:02, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
- Keep and Improve. She is notable and as such the article isn't a fair reflection of her notability and so needs to be improved. PlainJane91 (talk) 17:19, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
- Necrothesp, PlainJane91, please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Stimson. Drmies (talk) 17:21, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
- @Drmies Ok thanks! PlainJane91 (talk) 17:23, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
- @DrmiesThe editor should lose their right to create new articles. Theyre on this spree of creating all stubs/2 sentence articles. The subjects are notable but the articles are just appalling. PlainJane91 (talk) 17:28, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
- @Drmies Ok thanks! PlainJane91 (talk) 17:23, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
- Necrothesp, PlainJane91, please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Stimson. Drmies (talk) 17:21, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Carl B. Weinberg
- Carl B. Weinberg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A run-of-the-mill economist. The current sourcing consists of organizations that have a COI against him and op-eds/articles written by him. I've only been able to find articles merely quoting him, so he probably doesn't pass WP:NBIO. Nighfidelity (talk) 22:15, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Finance, Politics, Economics, Italy, United States of America, and New York. Nighfidelity (talk) 22:15, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment a Google Scholar search of "CB Weinberg" finds a significant number of fairly well cited papers. Unfortunately he does not have a profile, and Scopus has nothing on him so someone would have to count by hand unless there is a better way. For certain his h-factor is more than 20, cites > 2K. That is not enough for WP:NACADEMIC, but a better counting might be.Ldm1954 (talk) 22:40, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment. (Here from Wikipediocracy, where I often learn about both articles needing improvement and AfDs). Weinberg appears to be the Associated Press' go-to economist: search on apnews.com for "Carl Weinberg" and "High Frequency Economics". That looks to me like a solid indicator of impact in his field, by no means run of the mill. (Many of the non-AP articles I looked at, in the financial and general press, also referred to TV appearances.) But I can't find a single published profile to lock it down; the closest is this, which is all about his opinion, but attributes the biographical paragraph at the end to the High Frequency Economics website. I'd like to argue "Keep" and to brush up the article, but absent coverage of Weinberg himself, I don't see how. Yngvadottir (talk) 22:29, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Accion U.S. Network
- Accion U.S. Network (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I propose redirecting to Accion International because this article does not have the notability to stand on its own. This article, as it exists, relies almost entirely on primary sources and is written like an advertisement. The subject of the U.S. Network is already covered in the 1990s section of Accion International. Details can be added to the target article if properly sourced to flesh out this portion of the company's history if need be but I don't see a need to even qualify this as a merge due to existing issues with independent sourcing on both articles. S1mply.dogmom (talk) 23:40, 28 August 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Business, and United States of America. S1mply.dogmom (talk) 23:40, 28 August 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the list of New York-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:32, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
Industry superannuation fund
- Industry superannuation fund (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I propose merging to Superannuation in Australia because this is just a part of the broad topic of the Australian superannuation system and all relevant information should be easy to find in one article per points one and two of WP:MERGEREASON. Qwerty123M (talk) 06:20, 24 August 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Law, Management, Products, Economics, and Australia. Qwerty123M (talk) 06:20, 24 August 2026 (UTC)
Agree. It is important to delineate the effectively not for profit Industry funds from the other types of funds. The best place for this is probably on the Superannuation in Australia page. Alexasmith (talk) 06:41, 24 August 2026 (UTC)
- Keep, using arguments from the parallel discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retail superannuation fund. Klbrain (talk) 15:17, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
- Keep per Klbrain. MERGEREASON is not satisfied: The two articles are not duplicates and the overlap between them is too small.James500 (talk) 06:21, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, In solidarity, Iseult Δx talk to me 07:28, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Retail superannuation fund
- Retail superannuation fund (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I propose merging to Superannuation in Australia because this information doesn't need to be in two articles per points one and two of WP:MERGEREASON, this is part of the broader topic of superannuation in Australia. These articles are currently more difficult than they need to be to navigate to and should be merged to collect all relevant information in one place. Qwerty123M (talk) 06:15, 24 August 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Law, Management, Products, Economics, and Australia. Qwerty123M (talk) 06:15, 24 August 2026 (UTC)
- Merge per WP:OVERLAP. FaviFake (talk) 08:30, 24 August 2026 (UTC)
- Keep, noting that Superannuation in Australia and the other articles are sufficiently long that a merge for 'short text' isn't helpful; WP:SUMMARY format is fine. I also note that we have 3 parallel discussions that have been started by the same editor, and these really should have been discussed in one place because of the problems of crowding at the intended target. The other discussion are at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Industry superannuation fund and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taxation of superannuation in Australia. Klbrain (talk) 15:17, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
- Keep per Klbrain. MERGEREASON is not satisfied: The two articles are not duplicates and the overlap between them is too small.James500 (talk) 06:11, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, In solidarity, Iseult Δx talk to me 07:28, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
Taxation of superannuation in Australia
- Taxation of superannuation in Australia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I propose merging to Superannuation in Australia because this topic is directly relevant to the target and it is unnecessary to be required to navigate to a seperate article to see this important information, this means the merge complies with points one and two of WP:MERGEREASON.
Separately from the main point of this discussion, this article will also need to be updated for the federal government's recent reforms that increased taxation on super balances of over $3 million. This article and the proposed target will also need to be check to make sure it does not include financial advice as it is not Wikipedia's job to do that and I assume it would be illegal to provide that per guidance the media always provides on this issue. Qwerty123M (talk) 02:39, 24 August 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Law, Management, Economics, and Australia. Qwerty123M (talk) 02:39, 24 August 2026 (UTC)
- Merge selectively as suggested and as reasonable in these circumstances. Bearian (talk) 15:27, 27 August 2026 (UTC)
- Keep, using arguments from the parallel discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retail superannuation fund. Klbrain (talk) 15:17, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 04:12, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
- Keep. Satisfies GNG with significant coverage in books and periodical articles in Google Books, Google Scholar and elsewhere. There are entire book chapters about this and entire periodical articles . This article does not satisfy criteria 1 of MERGEREASON because it is not on the same subject, and does not have the same scope, as superannuation in Australia. Nor does it satisfy criteria 2 of MERGEREASON, because the overlap is small, non-redundant and insufficient, as taxation of superannuation is only one aspect of the much larger and wider topic of superannuation in Australia. James500 (talk) 05:41, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
- Those citations should be added to the article now or to the merged content so that editors can make an informed decision on whether to merge or to keep the status quo. I didn't nominate this topic because I thought it wasn't notable, I thought this content would fit better in a different article, in this case
Superannuation in Australia
; the article has a very similar scope as they both cover an aspect of Australia's financial system, that means the subject is very similar too. Qwerty123M (talk) 06:55, 31 August 2026 (UTC)- Per WP:ARTN and WP:NEXIST, those sources do not need to be added to the article in order to determine that the article should be kept. Per WP:BEFORE, editors are required to read those sources even if they are not added to the article. GNG creates a presumption that a topic should have a standalone article. There more GNG-satisfying coverage the topic has, the stronger that presumption will be. In this case, there is so much coverage that the presumption appears overwhelming. Those four sources alone contain 76 pages of coverage between them. That much information would be WP:UNDUE in the parent article and could not be added to the parent article without making it WP:TOOBIG. There is no similarity between the scope of the two articles or their subjects. To claim otherwise is roughly equivalent to claiming that Norfolk has a similar scope to England because the latter contains the whole of the former, or because both are part of the UK. James500 (talk) 08:50, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
- Those citations should be added to the article now or to the merged content so that editors can make an informed decision on whether to merge or to keep the status quo. I didn't nominate this topic because I thought it wasn't notable, I thought this content would fit better in a different article, in this case
- Merge to Superannuation in Australia, the nominator User:Qwerty123M has valid reasoning. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 10:15, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
JTC plc
- JTC plc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Just WP:CORPTRIV with no indication of notability. I wasn't able to turn up anything of substance on google, google scholar or google news so WP:LISTED doesn't seem to apply. Athanelar (talk) 12:25, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, United Kingdom, and Jersey. Athanelar (talk) 12:25, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Note: JTC has recently been acquired by Permira, so a merge there might be appropriate.
- If kept, please note this rename request, as JTC is no longer a PLC.. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:09, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- For what it's worth, the move to JTC Group was carried out, even though it is generally not considered correct to move articles up for AfD during the discussion. (No opinion on the article.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:21, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any thoughts on the merger proposal?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:45, 27 August 2026 (UTC)