Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Journalism

Kate Egan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:JOURNALIST. Could not find significant coverage of this individual. LibStar (talk) 02:10, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Journalism, and Ireland. LibStar (talk) 02:10, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Chris Minnick

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails NAUTHOR and GNG by my BEFORE. Jerod Lycett (talk) 04:01, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related AfD discussions. Jerod Lycett (talk) 04:01, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
delete author of many how-to books, but the sourcing used now in the wiki article is primary, or sites to buy these books. I see no book reviews that would pass AUTHOR, nor any literary awards won. Doesn't not pass notability here. Oaktree b (talk) 15:01, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Delete. This isn't a biography, it's a résumé. I find no sources to suggest WP:GNG or another notability criterion is met. --Kinu ^t/_c 19:04, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, Artificial intelligence, Computing, Internet, California, and Michigan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:45, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

Greg Panos

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to meet WP:GNG. Entire article contains no citations for information and reads rather like a resume or article written by the subject himself. None of the sources address the information included within the article and do not appear to be WP:RS either. General reference 1 is ImDB, 2 hardly could even be described as a biography and is written by the subject's company, 3 is not independent of the subject, 4 does not mention the subject in the actual article, and 5 is unavailable and from its title, hardly seems like it would contain WP:SIGCOV. A quick google search doesn't appear to yield any promising sources. Neither do searches of google books and google news. Bungle491 (talk) 00:29, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related AfD discussions. Bungle491 (talk) 00:29, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Journalism, Television, Computing, California, New York, and Ohio. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:29, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

delete I didn't see anything else in my search. The external links that are there wouldn't pass for WP:RS imo. Yojo98 (talk) 02:58, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

**Keep** - I am the subject of this article and am declaring a COI. I understand that recent edits adding primary

links raised concerns about sourcing. However, the subject meets WP:NBIOGRAPHY / WP:GNG based on significant coverage

in independent secondary sources covering early VR development, SIGGRAPH leadership, and historical publications.

Here are reliable, independent secondary sources for evaluation:

1. Kent Bye, "AWE Hall of Famer Gregory Panos's Journey into VR," *Voices of VR Podcast* (#1612, August 2025). Detailed biographical oral history covering SIGGRAPH leadership and early VR work.

2. XR Hall of Fame (2025 Inductee coverage honoring VR/AR pioneers).

3. Panos, Greg, "Whose Data Is That Anyway?" *Animation World Magazine*, Issue 2.11 (1998).

4. *Virtual Reality Sourcebook* (1991–1998) - cited historical industry reference directory.

I welcome neutral editors to help remove any non-compliant primary links and integrate these independent secondary references. GregPanos (talk) 01:40, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Dipo Faloyin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO and WP:NAUTHOR. No significant coverage of this author and journalist in reliable sources. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 23:37, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, and Journalism. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 23:37, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Nigeria, England, and Illinois. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:44, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Delete. Author is quite possibly notable, but this page looks like LLM slop so should be deleted. pburka (talk) 03:19, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Agree that title should be redirected. LLM content should not be merged, though. pburka (talk) 16:03, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Delete author is not notable and the book may barely pass itself. Jerod Lycett (talk) 18:48, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete Author is only notable for the book, and the book is notable enough to have its own page. However, he has not written anything notable enough beyond his one book to have his own page as an author. AGibberishUsername (talk) 04:51, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

As long as the book has a page, the author should be Redirected to Africa Is Not a Country instead of deleted surely? Fram (talk) 09:33, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Redirect to Africa Is Not a Country as WP:ATD. Aneirinn (talk) 15:27, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

Guy Clapperton

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not see a clear WP:NBIO/WP:BASIC or WP:NAUTHOR pass. oNline sources found on Google mostly verify that he is a working journalist, author and speaker, but they are largely bylines, profiles, podcast listings, database pages, or primary sources rather than significant independent coverage of the subject himself. ‌Nor has he written any books that has been the primary subject of multiple substantial independent reviews. Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:32, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Journalism, and United Kingdom. Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:32, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Technology, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:08, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Delete - for lack of significant coverage. Bearian (talk) 10:19, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Sujata Madhok

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not see a pass of WP:NBIO, WP:BASIC or WP:NAUTHOR. The available sourcing I could find on Google as well as listed in the article is mainly bylines, routine DUJ office-holder/election mentions, report credits, and quotes in articles about other topics, rather than significant independent coverage of Madhok herself. The article also has long-standing BLP sourcing problems. Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:14, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete: The article has not seen any sourcing since two decades and there is no independent WP:SIGCOV as well. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 19:40, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Women, Journalism, and India. Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:14, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Delete Fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 02:57, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Delete: Most of the cited references are 'Not Found'. Of the few that remain available, none appear to provide significant coverage. Last of The Time (talk) 06:33, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Delete - poorly sourced; zero inline citations are not enough for a BLP. Ping me if you add more. Bearian (talk) 10:04, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Lorne Honickman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person only has WP:SIGCOV in the following two new pieces: and . The first seems to be a blog. Thus, he fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG HerrHeulsuse (talk) 16:54, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Law, Judaism, and Canada. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 16:54, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:06, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Naser Gholami Hojghan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability cannot be established. Neither the sources nor the article explains why he is a notable rescue guard or journalist. Article created by a cross-Wiki spamming effort and is deleted on dozen other Wikis. Pirehelo (talk) 19:00, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related AfD discussions. Pirehelo (talk) 19:00, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and Iran. Shellwood (talk) 19:25, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Delete – Per WP:NOTCV. Svartner (talk) 23:37, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Delete - we are not LinkedIn. Bearian (talk) 04:28, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Verena Metze-Mangold

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of the sources are primary and merely confirm she held roles. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 02:15, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Journalism, Politics, and Germany. LibStar (talk) 02:15, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 05:28, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Brexitcast

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging this article to Newscast (podcast) because I have found this merge proposal on the talk page for Newscast, this discussion will provide due process and a formal decision on that proposal as a template has never been used to formally propose a merger.

I personally oppose this proposal as per point one of WP:NOMERGE, it would make the target article very unwieldy. RogueScholar mentions technical details (such as both podcasts being in the same feed) mean that the articles should be merged, but I have never known that technical considerations should be made in these types of discussions, rather, they should be focused on the notability of content. Some parts of this article could be included in the Newscast article, but it would not be wise to merge the whole article as there is content exclusive to this iteration of the show. Qwerty123M (talk) 11:18, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, News media, Radio, Television, Politics, Internet, Europe, and United Kingdom. Qwerty123M (talk) 11:18, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Comment: A merger of some kind seems sensible, as long as they're one and the same. I remember having a discussion about this at the time Brexitcast was replaced by Newscast, and whether a separate article was needed. I was advised they were two separate podcasts. However, there's an argument for Newscast being a continuation of its predecessor, because they have the same presenting team and format. The podcast was launched to provide analysis of the 2017 general election and titled Electioncast, becoming Brexitcast afterwards. Apart from a couple of special editions, Brexitcast stopped airing regularly after the UK left the European Union on 31 January 2020, but the format continued to air as a podcast, as well as a television programme in the same BBC One timeslot with Newscast. And basically, that format is a dive into the week's political events, which had been dominated by Brexit up to that point. I also seem to remember the podcast being retitled The Coronavirus Newscast or something similar to that for a while at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic. So we have four separate names for what is arguably the same podcast, and two separate articles covering its history. Television and radio programmes have previously undergone name changes, the one that springs to mind being Loose Women, which was Live Talk for a time. But we don't have separate articles for Loose Women and Live Talk. Clearly, a straight cut and paste from Brexitcast to Newscast wouldn't be appropriate, but elements of the former could be merged into the latter to create a more comprehensive article covering both topics. Brexitcast would then become a redirect to the expanded article. I suppose it depends whether the BBC and other media regard the podcasts as separate entities as to whether we should do the same. This is Paul (talk) 14:33, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:17, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Support merge. It's one podcast, it makes no sense to have two articles about it. That they periodically change the name to reflect the top ongoing news item is not a reason to have a separate article. Samuelshraga (talk) 05:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Tim Lake

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the WP:GNG. No in-depth significant coverage of the subject. Article looks to have been extensively edited by an SPA. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 02:39, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Journalism, Radio, Television, New York, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, and Texas. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 02:39, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep: His notability is met by being a member of The Broadcast Pioneers of Philadelphia Hall of Fame. Hampsh1 (talk) 12:46, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 04:09, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Kenneth Baer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. Has placed some op-eds, but is a mid-level political appointee and roving spokeman in U.S. politics. Provides cookie cutter quotes to news media on behalf of his clients. Lacks the WP:SIGCOV or impact to establish notability. Longhornsg (talk) 22:52, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, News media, Politics, and United States of America. Longhornsg (talk) 22:52, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, Journalism, England, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Washington, D.C.. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:39, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Comment: I was doing a search for sources and discovered that we are two degrees of separation, which isn't surprising because I was a Democratic committee person for over a decade. Therefore as is my practice I won't "vote" on this matter, and will trust the process. Bearian (talk) 03:27, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Weak Keep Profile seems notable, have few notable news sources too, yet i want more editors to cast theiur vote to make the clarity.Rainfixer (talk) 05:22, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
This is a passing mention in an op-ed from 20 years ago. The other WaPo source is a photo. The other sources are a marriage announcement and a geneology website. None of these are WP:RS that establish WP:NBIO. Longhornsg (talk) 18:58, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Delete sources are OPEDs and not used for proving notability HerrHeulsuse (talk) 14:40, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:35, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Weak Keep. While he may not meet WP:NJournalist, but the coverage generated by his published work shows enough depth to establish notability Brodska213 (talk) 09:18, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

weak keep More than a few reviews for the "Reinventing Democrats:" book, , , , although the book might be more notable than the author. A redirect to the book perhaps might suffice? Oaktree b (talk) 00:43, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
The book may be notable per WP:NBOOK, but the author isn't. So we could delete the author page and have one for the book. Longhornsg (talk) 15:21, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep - He is notable per WP:NAUTHOR and I think in general as well. Dcpoliticaljunkie (talk) 16:54, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete as we haven't kept anyone as notable for one book. His book might meet notability criteria, but he fails WP:NAUTHOR as well as WP:NJOURNALIST. DylanMReed (talk) 06:07, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Pentagon rapid response operation

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS. Short-lived media relations initiative within a government office that existed for only about five months two decades ago. Coverage consists primarily of contemporary reports announcing its creation, with no significant independent secondary coverage documenting lasting impact, historical importance, or broader notability. A brief mention in Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs would adequately cover any relevance, but a standalone article is not warranted based on RS. Longhornsg (talk) 00:41, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, News media, Military, Organizations, Politics, and United States of America. Longhornsg (talk) 00:41, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Merge to Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs per nom. A media relations unit that existed for roughly five months two decades ago, with coverage confined to its creation, fails WP:SUSTAINED and reads as WP:NOTNEWS. A couple of sentences at the parent article is the appropriate weight. Onatic (talk) 11:18, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 02:52, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Jomana Alrashid

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am very skeptical this person meets either WP:GNG or WP:NBIO. I do not believe being named to the "Time 100 Next" list is counts as a significant award under WP:ANYBIO; it is a "rising star" kind of award, and Time has diluted the brand of the Time 100 by creating many subsidiary lists. In any event, her "Time 100 Next" writeup is a single paragraph and not WP:SIGCOV. Other sources are limited to:

Another single-paragraph blurb in a Forbes Middle East list.
Press release-driven promotional coverage, often unbylined, of "awards" she has received (,
Primary source Q&A WP:INTERVIEWs (, , , )
WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs (, , , , , , ) (Several of these are Arab News, which per RSN is not a reliable source for coverage of Saudi state enterprises like Al-Rashid's company.)
Sources that do not mention her at all (,
Primary source bios (, )

I can't view whether she's discussed in the Ankler article with its very hard paywall but even if she is, we still don't have independent, reliable source WP:SIGCOV elsewhere for a WP:GNG pass. In my WP:BEFORE search, I found more of the same but no qualifying coverage. As an alternative to deletion, I would accept a redirect to Saudi Research and Media Group, where the subject is mentioned, which would preserve the page history should qualifying SIGCOV emerge in the future. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:05, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Journalism, and Saudi Arabia. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:05, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

I vote Keep (full disclosure: I am this GA article's creator). Alrashid has significant coverage in the Ankler article (which should be counted as WP:PAYWALL says you can't limit a source by its difficulty of access, including paywalling). She also received a full-length, 489-word profile in Communicate Middle East, where she was named #5th-ranking Leader of 2021. She is also significantly covered in this Springer-published book on business leaders in the Gulf, and the Deadline interview, which tilts closer to the critical/prepared interview discussed in WP:INTERVIEW as it appears to include criticalness (for example, stating that it appears women are still struggling in the Saudi cinema scene "It feels like they’re struggling to progress to features").

She was also named to the Time 100 Next in 2025 with a profile on her activities. She was named to the Forbes Middle East Most Powerful Businesswomen three times (2023, 2024, 2025), each time including a short profile on her and her activities over the relevant year, and to a leaders list Fast Company Middle East, and has also been discussed by this paper about Western and Arab media portrayals of arab women. Jishara (talk) 16:35, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Can you describe how much text the Ankler article gives to her and the nature of it for those of us who can't access and review it? Meanwhile, to address the added sources:

The Springer book you cite gives her less than one paragraph (four sentences) - hardly SIGCOV in the context of a book.
Communicate a trade magazine, coverage in which is generally not considered independent.
The journal article you cite includes two brief quotations from AlRashid and four sentences of summmary, not even close to SIGCOV: Table 8 reveals that Arab News presented a news discourse that states that there are many stories that demonstrate the significant role played by Arab women in daily life. The speaker is a Saudi Arabian female, Jomana Al-Rashid, who works as the CEO of the SRMG. She is considered one of the most successful women in Saudi Arabia; she illustrates that many women are also successful like her.... The newspaper quoted from the speech of Jomana Alrashid, written in Table 10 above, informs the readers that Arab women have their rights protected.
The Deadline material is solely based on its interview with her and appears to incorporate virtually no independent reporting.
The other sources you added are trivial mentions (, , ).
The Fast Company Middle East mention (nota bene - not Fast Company but a Middle Eastern outlet that has licensed the brand) is a single paragraph.

None of these would count toward a WP:GNG/WP:NBIO pass. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:17, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your response. I agree that some of the sources are trivial, but my rationale for Keep is not based on those sources alone:

The book is independent and reliable: as for significance, it passes the WP:100WORDS.

Trade magazines are not automatically considered non-independent, just leaning that way, and this is 1) a leading trade mag for a relevant but not directly associated to her field trade and 2) a 489-word source profiling her journey in the context of an award granted - I'd argue that this does in fact pass independence.

In addition, Time 100 Next included a profile of her that's fully independent reporting from an independent, reliable, bylined source and passes WP:100WORDS. Each of the Forbes Middle East profiles do, as well, pass WP:100WORDS, showing the coverage is in fact significant. Jishara (talk) 17:51, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

100WORDS is an essay, not a guideline. SIGCOV is determined in large part through context, and 100 words of coverage in a single paragraph of a full-length book would constitute a passing mention in the context of the book. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:57, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

I agree that WP:100WORDS is not solely dispositive. However, the ~180 words spent on her trends towards the overall conclusion here that the book does include substantive coverage - it details her present and former work, and also includes individualized discussion you would be unlikely to see in coverage that's less substantive and requires its own research: ex, discussion of her use of head coverings. This is also just one part of a larger picture of significant coverage. I appreciate your thoughtful discussion on this. Jishara (talk) 18:23, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Adding my source assessment table below for the convenience of participants; I'll bow out here and let others have their say. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:51, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
Oppose (i.e., Keep). I recognize the sourcing here isn't as clean as we'd like, but I think there's a real risk of applying GNG more strictly here than we would to a comparable subject with English-language, Western trade press coverage. Alrashid runs one of the largest media groups in the MENA region and chairs a major film festival, yet a lot of the coverage of executives in her position, regardless of gender or nationality, tends to run through regional trade press and Q&A-style interviews, simply because that's how business journalism works in that market. That's a structural feature of how Gulf business figures (and Arab women executives especially) get covered, not necessarily evidence that she's non-notable. Applying a rigid SIGCOV test without accounting for how sourcing patterns differ by region and language risks systematically under-representing subjects like this one. That said, I don't think this needs to rest on that argument alone. The Springer-published book gives her two pages (pp. 71–72) of independent, non-interview discussion ;not a trivial mention, regardless of what WP:100WORDS' exact word count says. She's also the subject of independent reporting in Time's profile, which by itself is a reasonably strong plank. Combined with the Ankler piece which per WP:PAYWALL can't be discounted just because it's hard to access...I think there's enough to clear GNG even before we get to the interview-heavy or trade-press sources, which I agree are weaker and shouldn't be leaned on too heavily.

el.ziade (talkallam) 09:45, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

More information Source, Independent? ...

Source assessment table
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://time.com/collections/time100-next-2025/7318840/jomana-r-alrashid/			Single paragraph as part of 100-person list	✘ No
https://www.forbesmiddleeast.com/lists/top-100-most-powerful-businesswomen-2023/jomana-alrashid/	Forbes Middle East licenses the Forbes brand; uncertain independence	Forbes Middle East licenses the Forbes brand; uncertain reliability	Single paragraph as part of 100-person list	✘ No
https://cairoscene.com/News/State-Media-Chief-Jomana-Alrashid-Selected-for-TIME100-s-2025-List	Reads as if based on a press release	Unbylined coverage		✘ No
https://www.arabisklondon.com/9639	Reads as if based on a press release	Unbylined coverage		✘ No
https://variety.com/2024/film/festivals/red-sea-film-foundation-jomana-al-rashid-saudi-arabia-cinematic-1236126767/	Primary source Q&A WP:INTERVIEW			✘ No
https://www.arabnews.com/node/2631195/business-economy	Primary source Q&A WP:INTERVIEW	Arab News is unreliable for coverage of Saudi state-owned businesses per WP:RSN		✘ No
https://english.aawsat.com/home/article/3078571/jomana-al-rashid-we-have-ambitious-growth-plans-saudi-research-media-group	Primary source Q&A WP:INTERVIEW			✘ No
https://deadline.com/2024/11/red-sea-film-jomana-al-rashid-shivani-pandya-talk-2024-edition-1236172354/	Primary source Q&A WP:INTERVIEW			✘ No
https://web.archive.org/web/20260712210706/https://theankler.com/hwood-saudi-pivot-the-players-and/			Article has a hard paywall; page creator has not provided details to help us assess it.	? Unknown
https://www.google.com/books/edition/Business_Success_in_the_Gulf_Region/a8q9EQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=jomana+alrashid&pg=PA71&printsec=frontcover			Less than one paragraph (four sentences) - hardly SIGCOV in the context of a book	✘ No
https://communicateonline.me/news/top-30-leaders-2021-5-jomana-al-rashed/	WP:TRADES magazines are considered independent only in exceptional cases and this appears to be routine coverage of her in trade press			✘ No
https://immi.se/index.php/intercultural/article/view/Sabah-et-al-2023-4/679			The journal article includes two brief quotations from AlRashid and four sentences of summmary, not even close to SIGCOV	✘ No
https://fastcompanyme.com/most-creative-people/jomana-al-rashed/	Uncertain independence - not the reliable US-based magazine Fast Company but a Middle Eastern outlet that has licensed the brand	Uncertain reliability - not the reliable US-based magazine Fast Company but a Middle Eastern outlet that has licensed the brand	A single paragraph of coverage	✘ No
https://www.movieguide.org/reviews/in-the-grey.html			WP:TRIVIALMENTION	✘ No
https://www.metacritic.com/movie/the-ministry-of-ungentlemanly-warfare/credits/		WP:PRIMARYSOURCE	WP:TRIVIALMENTION	✘ No
https://www.hbomax.com/lt/en/movies/ferrari/a8e55f43-d465-4572-8c91-1c7acaf881f1		WP:PRIMARYSOURCE	WP:TRIVIALMENTION	✘ No
https://campaignme.com/srmg-launches-new-saudi-based-travel-magazine/	Appears to be based on a press release		WP:TRIVIALMENTION	✘ No
https://campaignme.com/srmg-labs-wins-gold-and-silver-at-cannes-lions/	Appears to be based on a press release		WP:TRIVIALMENTION	✘ No
https://aeworld.com/lifestyle/art/saudi-arabias-rsiff-hosts-women-in-cinema-gala-at-the-cannes-film-festival/	Appears to be based on a press release		WP:TRIVIALMENTION	✘ No
https://statemediamonitor.com/2026/06/saudi-research-and-media-group-srmg			WP:TRIVIALMENTION	✘ No
https://deadline.com/2023/12/gwyneth-paltrow-avengers-endgame-wes-anderson-paul-thomas-anderson-goop-red-sea-film-festival-1235655489/			WP:TRIVIALMENTION	✘ No
https://www.arabnews.com/node/1893936/media	Reads like a press release	Arab News is unreliable for coverage of Saudi state-owned businesses per WP:RSN	WP:TRIVIALMENTION	✘ No
https://www.arabnews.com/node/2609754/amp	Reads like a press release	Arab News is unreliable for coverage of Saudi state-owned businesses per WP:RSN	WP:TRIVIALMENTION	✘ No
https://variety.com/2024/film/global/red-sea-film-festival-hq-arab-cinema-1236211273/			Article does not even mention AlRashid	✘ No
https://entarabi.com/en/2026/05/srmg-increases-stake-in-thmanyah-to-75-and-commits-sar-200m/			Article does not even mention AlRashid	✘ No
https://kscdr.org.sa/en/node/3592, https://mei.edu/person/jomana-r-al-rashid/	Primary source, non-independent bios			✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Keep I disagree that these all passing mentions - 180 words is not a brief mention in my view, and still counts as SIGCOV. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 10:30, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 08:18, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:10, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep She should pass WP:BASIC where it says that "If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability". Even if I cannot read the firewalled article either.-Deamonpen (talk)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Journalism

Journalism

Kate Egan

Chris Minnick

Greg Panos

Dipo Faloyin

Guy Clapperton

Sujata Madhok

Lorne Honickman

Naser Gholami Hojghan

Verena Metze-Mangold

Brexitcast

Tim Lake

Kenneth Baer

Pentagon rapid response operation

Jomana Alrashid

Proposed deletions

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks