Wikipedia:WikiProject Trains/Assessment

Quality scale

More information Class, Criteria ...

Class	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editing suggestions	Example
FA	The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured article criteria: A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes. It is: well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard; comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context; well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate; neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias; stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of: a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections; appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style where appropriate.	Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.	Niagara Falls Suspension Bridge
FL	The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured list criteria: Prose. It features professional standards of writing. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria. Comprehensiveness. (a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items. (b) statements are sourced where they appear, and they provide inline citations if they contain any of the four kinds of material absolutely required to have citations. (c) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for stand-alone lists and includes at minimum eight items; does not violate the content-forking guideline, does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages. (a) Visual appeal. It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting, tables, and colour; and a minimal proportion of items are redlinked. (b) Media files. It has images and other media, if appropriate to the topic, that follow Wikipedia's usage policies, with succinct captions. Non-free images and other media satisfy the criteria for the inclusion of non-free content and are labeled accordingly. (c) Accessibility. It uses proper formatting to be accessible to all readers. Bulleted and unbulleted lists and tables are structured correctly. Visual media, if included, utilize alternative (alt) text. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.	Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.	List of London Underground stations
A	The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria The article meets the A-Class criteria: Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).	Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting.	Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help.	Brian Robertson, 1st Baron Robertson of Oakridge
GA	The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria A good article is: Well-written: the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Verifiable with no original research: it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); it contains no original research; and it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. Broad in its coverage: it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication.	Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.	190th Street station
B	The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but does not need to be of the standard of featured articles. The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.	Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.	A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines.	South Shore Line
C	The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.	Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.	Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems.	London and North Eastern Railway
Start	An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following: A useful picture or graphic Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article	Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more.	Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Improve the grammar, spelling, and writing style; decrease the use of jargon.	Rail transport operations
Stub	A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria.	Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant.	Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant.	14WE
List	Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area.	There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader.	Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized.	750 mm gauge railways
???	Article quality has not yet been assessed.	Articles for which a valid quality rating has not yet been provided are listed in this category.	A quality parameter should be assigned according to the assessment department of the WikiProject.

Close

Importance scale

Renamed

• Airport line, Brisbane renamed to Brisbane Airport line.
• Draft:DB Class 105 renamed to DB Class 105.
• Gold Coast line renamed to Varsity Lakes line.
• Redcliffe Peninsula line renamed to Kippa-Ring line.
• Springfield line renamed to Springfield Central line.
• Sunshine Coast line, Queensland renamed to Nambour/Gympie North line.

Reassessed

• York railway station (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Achilles Schucan (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
• Naples–Bagnoli–Pozzuoli Tramway (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Rail transport in Bytów County (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Rail transport in Chojnice County (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Rail transport in Człuchów County (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Rail transport in Edirne (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Rail transport in Gdańsk County (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Rail transport in Greater Poland Voivodeship (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Rail transport in Greater Poland Voivodeship by county (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Rail transport in Kartuzy County (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Rail transport in Kościerzyna County (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Rail transport in Lower Silesian Voivodeship (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Rail transport in Lower Silesian Voivodeship by county (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Rail transport in Lubusz Voivodeship (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Rail transport in Lubusz Voivodeship by county (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Rail transport in Lębork County (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Rail transport in Opole Voivodeship (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Rail transport in Opole Voivodeship by county (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Rail transport in Pomeranian Voivodeship (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Rail transport in Pomeranian Voivodeship by county (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Rail transport in Puck County (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Rail transport in Rail transport in Kościerzyna County (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Rail transport in Słupsk County (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Rail transport in Tczew County (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Rail transport in Wejherowo County (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Rail transport in West Pomeranian Voivodeship (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Rail transport in West Pomeranian Voivodeship by county (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Rail transportation in the Philippines by city (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Railway stations in Taiwan by city (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Ulanqab–Datong high-speed railway (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• Template:Urumqi–Datong high-speed railway RDT (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)

Removed

• File:Karlovasi harbour tram.jpg (talk) removed.
• List of defunct Mumbai Suburban Railway stations (talk) removed.

Renamed

• Nova América/Del Castilho Station renamed to Del Castilho Station (Metrô Rio).

Reassessed

• Gainesville–Hawthorne State Trail (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)

Removed

• Commonwealth Corridor (talk) removed.

Renamed

• 2019 railway strike in Sri Lanka renamed to 2019 Sri Lanka Railway strike.
• Amritsar–Jammu main line renamed to Amritsar–Shri Mata Vaishno Devi Katra railway line.
• Delhi–Fazilka line renamed to New Delhi–Firozpur main line.
• Delhi–Kalka line renamed to New Delhi–Kalka line.
• Delhi–Meerut–Saharanpur line renamed to Delhi–Saharanpur main line.
• Delhi–Moradabad line renamed to New Delhi–Moradabad main line.
• Down the Mine (pilot) renamed to Down the Mine.
• Firozpur Cantonment railway station renamed to Firozpur Junction.
• Gwalior Light Railway renamed to Gwalior–Kota railway line.
• Howrah–Gaya–Delhi line renamed to New Delhi–Gaya–Howrah main line.
• Indore–Gwalior line renamed to Gwalior–Indore line.
• Jalandhar–Jammu line renamed to Jalandhar–Shri Mata Vaishno Devi Katra railway line.
• Lavan Satyagrah Smarak railway station renamed to Lavan Satyagraha Smarak railway station.
• Lucknow–Moradabad line renamed to Lucknow–Moradabad main line.
• Ludhiana–Fazilka line renamed to Ludhiana–Firozpur–Fazilka line.
• Moradabad–Ambala line renamed to Moradabad–Ambala main line.
• Nilma railway station, Victoria renamed to Nilma railway station.
• Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Junction – Kanpur section renamed to Kanpur–Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Junction section.
• Patna–Mughalsarai section renamed to Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Junction–Patna section.
• Vande Bharat (trainset) renamed to Vande Bharat (Indian Railways).
• Vande Bharat Sleeper (trainset) renamed to Vande Bharat Sleeper.

Reassessed

• AFRAY (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
• Aalborg Airport railway line (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
• Achiet–Marcoing railway (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
• Ahmedabad–Bhuj Namo Bharat Rapid Rail (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
• Ahmedabad–Dholera high-speed rail corridor (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
• Cantonment MRT station (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from B-Class to GA-Class. (rev · t)
• Gaya–Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Junction section (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
• Houxijie railway station (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Huazhou railway station (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• River Street station (Erie Railroad) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• Tallong railway station (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Wynyard railway station, Sydney (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Category:Articles using Infobox station with markup inside system (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Bielawa Zachodnia railway station (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• Costigliole–Venasca Tramway (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
• Dundas station (disambiguation) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Disambig-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Draft:Future projects of the Singapore MRT (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Loftus station (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Disambig-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Marshall Road tram stop (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• Penrith Station (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Draft:Proposed expansion of the Chicago "L" (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Railway stations in Poland closed in 2018 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Vineyard station (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Disambig-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)

Removed

• Category:Articles using Infobox station with markup inside type (talk) removed.
• Template:Jverk SE rail line start (talk) removed.
• Draft:William John Maurer (talk) removed.

Renamed

• A-class Melbourne tram renamed to A class Melbourne tram.
• A-class Melbourne tram (1910) renamed to A class Melbourne tram (1910).
• B-class Melbourne tram renamed to B class Melbourne tram.
• B-class Melbourne tram (1917) renamed to B class Melbourne tram (1917).
• C-class Melbourne tram renamed to C class Melbourne tram.
• C-class Melbourne tram (1913) renamed to C class Melbourne tram (1913).
• C2-class Melbourne tram renamed to C2 class Melbourne tram.
• D-class Melbourne tram renamed to D class Melbourne tram.
• D-class Melbourne tram (1914) renamed to D class Melbourne tram (1914).
• E-class Melbourne tram renamed to E class Melbourne tram.
• E-class Melbourne tram (1914) renamed to E class Melbourne tram (1914).
• F-class Melbourne tram renamed to F class Melbourne tram.
• G-class Melbourne tram renamed to G class Melbourne tram.
• G-class Melbourne tram (1913) renamed to G class Melbourne tram (1913).
• H-class Melbourne tram renamed to H class Melbourne tram.
• J-class Melbourne tram renamed to J class Melbourne tram.
• K-class Melbourne tram renamed to K class Melbourne tram.
• L-class Melbourne tram renamed to L class Melbourne tram.
• M-class Melbourne tram renamed to M class Melbourne tram.
• N-class Melbourne tram renamed to N class Melbourne tram.
• Draft:NS James River Trestle renamed to NS James River Trestle.
• O-class Melbourne tram renamed to O class Melbourne tram.
• P-class Melbourne tram renamed to P class Melbourne tram.
• Q-class Melbourne tram renamed to Q class Melbourne tram.
• R-class Melbourne tram renamed to R class Melbourne tram.
• S-class Melbourne tram renamed to S class Melbourne tram.
• T-class Melbourne tram renamed to T class Melbourne tram.
• Thomas Allen (representative) renamed to Thomas Allen (Missouri politician).
• U-class Melbourne tram renamed to U class Melbourne tram.
• V-class Melbourne tram renamed to V class Melbourne tram.
• W-class Melbourne tram renamed to W class Melbourne tram.
• Template:WESTbahn renamed to Template:Westbahn.
• X-class Melbourne tram renamed to X class Melbourne tram.
• X1-class Melbourne tram renamed to X1 class Melbourne tram.
• X2-class Melbourne tram renamed to X2 class Melbourne tram.
• Y-class Melbourne tram renamed to Y class Melbourne tram.
• Z-class Melbourne tram renamed to Z class Melbourne tram.
• Draft:Škoda 21Ev renamed to Škoda 21Ev.

Reassessed

• Dhalpukhuri railway station (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Diyawan Halt railway station (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Gangayapalle railway station (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Gunji railway station (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Hastavaramu railway station (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Kedunggedeh railway station (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Airport West tram stop (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• Bielawa Góry Sowie railway station (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• Bielawa Jezioro railway station (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• Cleveland & Cuyahoga Railway (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• Gotland Hesselby Railway (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
• Mexicali (train) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• Norfolk Southern James River Trestle (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Rail transport in Dzierżoniów County (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Railway stations in Poland opened in 2026 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Draft:William John Maurer (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)

Renamed

• Bulgarian Railway Company A.D. renamed to Bulgarian Railway Company.

Reassessed

• Abraham Lincoln (train) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• E (underground car) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Skyline (Honolulu) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Redirect-Class to GA-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Biella–Cossato Tramway (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
• CRRC Zhuzhou Locomotive (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
• Charlapalli–Gorakhpur Amrit Bharat Express (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
• Down the Mine (pilot) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Mid-Class. (rev · t)
• Mokronos Górny railway station (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• Quebrada de Humahuaca tourist train (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• Tornio railway station (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• William Edward Woodard (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• Wrocław Grabiszyn railway station (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)

Renamed

• Template:FormerVictorianRailCompanies renamed to Template:VictorianRailCompanies.
• NZR DF class (1954) renamed to New Zealand DF class (1954).
• Sohsarai railway station renamed to Sohsarai Halt railway station.
• WESTbahn renamed to Westbahn (company).

Reassessed

• Aungaridham railway station (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Bhakarapet railway station (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• CFL Class 2400 and 2450 (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Challavaripalle railway station (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Desur railway station (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Johor Bahru–Singapore Rapid Transit System (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
• KTM Komuter Southern Sector (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
• Kollam–Tirupati Express (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Draft:Kutno-Brodnica railway (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Melbourne tram route 69 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)

Removed

• Pacific Gas and Electric Company (talk) removed.

Renamed

• Dergaon Halt railway station renamed to Derhgaon Halt railway station.
• Karota Patri Halt railway station renamed to Kurauta Patner Halt railway station.

Reassessed

• London and Blackwall Railway (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
• Skyline (Honolulu) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from GA-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• 19th Avenue station (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Disambig-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• 19th Street station (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Disambig-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Canandaigua and Niagara Falls Railroad (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• Draft:Moors Valley Railway Horace (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Template:WP Trains in Japan (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Template:WP UK Railways (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Template:WP Washington Metro (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)

Removed

• Three Notch Trail (talk) removed.