Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States History/Archive 2

A requested move discussion has been initiated for History of the United States (1776–89) to be moved to History of the United States (1776–1789). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 01:00, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Samuel Lightfoot Flournoy (West Virginia senator) to be moved to Samuel Lightfoot Flournoy (politician, born 1846). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 20:19, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

I have created a stubby new article on the Engagements Clause of the Constitution of the United States. Naturally it needs further work. Michael Hardy (talk) 01:29, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Housing discrimination (United States) to be moved to Housing discrimination in the United States. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 22:47, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.

– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Efficiency Movement to be moved to Efficiency movement. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 19:46, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A requested move discussion has been initiated for One man, one vote to be moved to One person, one vote. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 20:30, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Civil War to be moved to Civil war (disambiguation). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 11:15, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Template:History of the United States to be moved to Template:US history sidebar. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 06:29, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A requested move discussion has been initiated for War hawk to be moved to Hawk (foreign policy). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 17:29, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

If anyone here is interested, we are looking for volunteers at WikiProject Genealogy. Thanks! Tea and crumpets (talk) 01:18, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Frank Morris (lynch victim) to be moved to Murder of Frank Morris. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 18:03, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Penn's Creek massacre to be moved to Penns Creek massacre. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 06:16, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

I need some help at 2018 in the United States & 2019 in the United States. In the birth/death sections, individuals are being described as American, which isn't necessary giving the article title. Note, the description isn't used in any of the preceding 'Year in the United States' articles. GoodDay (talk) 18:59, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Philippine resistance against Japan . RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 00:35, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello! It's Audrey at Mayo Clinic. On behalf of my employer, I am working to update Mayo Clinic. I have worked with two other editors, Trantorian and Jonathunder, who offered great feedback to develop and improve the History section of the article. Since the request focuses on the history of a major American medical institution, I thought WikiProject United States History members might care to review and implement my request if it is approved. I have also reached out to other WikiProjects to notify editors.

Thanks! Audrey at Mayo Clinic (talk) 16:42, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

FYI

 – Pointer to relevant discussion elsewhere.

Please see: Talk:Forced into Glory § Balance: Conflict between Lincoln critics like Bennett, and critics of those critics.

The article (on a somewhat controversial biography of Abraham Lincoln) rarely has editors or even talk-page comments, so additional input is requested. PoV issues with our article have been pointed out since 2009, and the off-site academic controversy involving the book's notable author, Lerone Bennett Jr., and his views about Lincoln and the Emancipation Proclamation goes back to the 1960s.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  23:01, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Harriet Ann Jacobs to be moved to Harriet Jacobs. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 20:46, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Hello, I started a discussion section on Talk:History_of_the_United_States_(1776–1789)#Article_Clean_up_/_Rewrite about improving the article History_of_the_United_States_(1776–1789). — Preceding unsigned comment added by TimothyBlue (talk • contribs) 11:28, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Command Module Columbia to be moved to Apollo CSM Columbia. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 08:19, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Chinese boycott of 1905 to be moved to 1905 Chinese boycott. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 09:47, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Hi everyone. I am the new coordinator for WikiProject History. we need people there!! right now the project seems to be semi-inactive. I am going to various WikiProjects whose topics overlap with ours, to request volunteers.

• If you have any experience at all with standard WikiProject processes such as quality assessment, article help, asking questions, feel free to come by and get involved.

• and if you have NO Experience, but just want to come by and get involved, feel free to do so!!!

• For anyone who wants to get involved, please come by and add your name at our talk page, at our talk page section: WikiProject History needs you!!!!

• Alternately, if you have any interest at all, feel free to reply right here, on this talk page. please ping me when you do so, by typing {{ping|sm8900}} in your reply.

we welcome your input. thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 20:37, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Nullification Crisis to be moved to Nullification crisis. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 15:15, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Republican Party (United States)#RfC: Racial and geographical realignment after the Civil Rights Act. Sdkb (talk) 06:13, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Diamond hoax of 1872 to be moved to Great Diamond Hoax. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 05:45, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Manifest destiny to be moved to Manifest Destiny. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 14:06, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A requested move discussion has been initiated for History of the Poles in the United States to be moved to History of Poles in the United states. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 00:03, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A requested move discussion has been initiated for History of the Central Americans in Houston to be moved to History of Central Americans in Houston. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 01:03, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A requested move discussion has been initiated for John Brown (abolitionist) to be moved to John Brown. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 02:46, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A requested move discussion has been initiated for An American Anarchist: The Life of Voltairine de Cleyre to be moved to An American Anarchist. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 08:22, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Minor party and independent candidates for the 2020 United States presidential election to be moved to Third-party and independent candidates for the 2016 United States presidential election. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 03:50, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Command module Columbia to be moved to Command Module Columbia. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 15:35, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Please join us on 13 December 2020, 12:00-14:00 EST, as we update and improve articles in Wikipedia related to housing in the United States of America. Sign up here. -- M2545 (talk) 11:19, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

I am planning a new article on white supremacy in US curriculum, and I am wondering if it would fit within this project? The current outline includes an overview of racist narratives in education throughout US history, prominent historical figures in the critique of these narratives, and the effects of historical racism on the modern education system (more information on my user page). I would appreciate any feedback. --MBJAnderson (talk) 04:22, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

I'd prefer the title White supremacy in US education. A school and the experience of education is more than just a curriculum, and the article would be fuller with descriptions of educational activities outside the classroom. Such an article should summarize other topics such as School segregation in the United States. Wikinights (talk) 16:05, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Red Tail Squadron, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm _Bacon 19:40, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Please see this discussion and comment there:

• Talk:Cornstalk#Burial_marker

--David Tornheim (talk) 08:00, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

American Revolutionary War, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has an RFC for value. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 23:26, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Comments:

If anyone for whatever article needs more photos, check out my page under this username at Wikimedia Commons and feel free to apply them wherever. I'm prioritizing getting the direct storming ones up first, then later will upload photos from Trump's speech on the Ellipse, some of which include people who later stormed the Capitol.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/TapTheForwardAssist

TapTheForwardAssist (talk) 04:16, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

United States and the Holocaust has recently been created with content split from another article. It could really use some attention if anyone knows anything about the subject? Thanks! —Brigade Piron (talk) 18:25, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Denver, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm _Talk 05:19, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi everyone. I was wondering if anyone could help me in filling in the fourth column that I recently added about addresses to the nation. On opening the page, I was surprised that there was no column pertaining to the topics of each national address, which contain historic significance. I took to adding the column and filling it with important events that each president addresses in their speeches.

I am also considering to delete the third column, as it is almost ompletely blank top to bottom (with a few entries for the most recent speeches) and I'm not exactly sure that detailing where the president made the address is necessary. If anyone can help me the article, I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks! Phillip Samuel (talk) 00:54, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

I have nominated Yosemite National Park for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 07:33, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Protests in Minneapolis regarding the trial of Derek Chauvin#Requested move 15 November 2021 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. SkyWarrior 02:07, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello everyone,

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 15:28, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

I created Stephen H. Long's Expedition of 1820 because the content in Stephen Harriman Long's article is specific to him and is limited in scope.

Then, I found Yellowstone expedition which seems to conflate the Yellowstone and Long's expedition. It looks like the Sixth Infantry Regiment was assigned to establish military posts in the region. The Panic of 1819 led to budget cuts so that only one fort was established. Then, it seems like the Yellowstone expedition was cancelled - and Long led the expedition through Nebraska, Colorado, and Oklahoma.

Currently, the Yellowstone expedition article includes information about the Long expedition. It seems that it should be edited to be specific just to the Yellowstone expedition information. Well, that's the way it seems to me, but it would really, really help to get input from others if I am seeing this correctly before I prune the Yellowstone article and perhaps move some of the Long specific info to Stephen Harriman Long.

As an aside, I live in Colorado and Long's expedition figures prominently in the state's history. I have not heard of the Yellowstone expedition until yesterday. Beidelman's article The 1820 Long Expedition clearly differentiates the two expeditions.–CaroleHenson (talk) 17:48, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Please see Stephen H. Long's Expedition of 1820#Background and preparation that differentiates the two expeditions... and the map in the Yellowstone expedition shows a very different trek north and west of Council Bluff vs. the South and west trek of Long's expedition.–CaroleHenson (talk) 18:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

I went back to the article and realized that no changes are needed. Sorry for the confusion.–CaroleHenson (talk) 05:50, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

I have nominated History of Minnesota for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:45, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Federal Aid Highway Act of 1956#Requested move 10 March 2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. 🐶 EpicPupper ^{(he/him | talk)} 03:05, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

This may be of interest. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:30, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

If anyone is interested, the Ole Miss riot of 1962 is currently nominated for promotion to Featured Article status. Thanks, ~ HAL333 21:47, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Battle of Gettysburg has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 17:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

For those of you interested in early American literature and/or the Revolutionary War, you may be interested in reviewing Brother Jonathan by John Neal. Here's the nomination page. Dugan Murphy (talk) 17:01, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Bracero Program needs editing/rewrite help. I've done some work on the lead by the rest of the article is difficult. Coretheapple (talk) 18:18, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

I'm requesting editor assistance here: Talk:Perpetual Union#Unsupported attribution - far too weak

Thanks! (sdsds - talk) 03:12, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

I suggest some eyes on Manifest Destiny. --David Tornheim (talk) 00:26, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Quick facts Andrew Jackson ...

Andrew Jackson
Portrait c. 1835

Close

Quick facts Andrew Jackson ...

Andrew Jackson
Photograph c. 1845

Close

Discussion at Talk:Andrew Jackson#Photograph has not achieved consensus over what image to use as the lead image in the infobox for Andrew Jackson. Both are visible to the right: the upper (and current) image is a painting of him created in 1835; the lower (proposed to replace the former) is a photograph of Jackson taken in 1845.

Proponents of the painting have pointed to earlier talk page discussions as a consensus in favor of a painting of Jackson for the lead image. Those in favor of the painting have said that the painting depicts him as a man of vigor and at the height of his powers. It was argued that the painting depicts Jackson as he was during the presidency that made him notable. It's also been argued that readers are unlikely to recognize the photograph as being of Jackson, and that MOS:LEADIMAGE favors an image that can give readers visual confirmation that they've arrived at the right page, which they say is more the case with the painting than the photograph. Editors favoring the painting say they do not consider it a hagiographic image.

Proponents of the photograph have said consensus can change and argue that since Lead images should be natural and appropriate representations of the topic (MOS:LEADIMAGE), What is more natural than a photograph?. Editors in favor of the painting have pointed to Wikipedia articles about other presidents around this time period that use post-presidential photographs as lead images (John Quincy Adams, Martin Van Buren). It was argued that the photograph is recognizable as Jackson, with his characteristically tousled hair and the distinctive shape of his face, and that the painting's smoothed over features and hair aren't as obviously Jackson. Some concern was expressed that the painting may be hagiographic.

For clarity, there is a different photograph of Andrew Jackson that was brought up early in the thread, but which no editors any longer favor.

Courtesy pinging editors involved in the talk page thread: Ccole2006, Carlstak, Wtfiv, Shearonink, ARoseWolf

P-Makoto (she/her) (talk) 21:27, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Despite the consensus seeming to be in favour of keeping "internment" as the title of Internment of Japanese Americans, the article's text now solely uses the term "incarceration". Consistency between the two would be preferred, especially since the change to the article's text seems to have been made recently without discussion. Eldomtom2 (talk) 14:48, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

The text should use the term "incarceration". That's the phrase used in current scholarship—for examples:

• Roger Daniels, "Incarceration of the Japanese Americans: A Sixty-Year Perspective", History Teacher 35, no. 3 (May 2002): 297–310, DOI:10.2307/3054440
• Alice George, "Eighty Years After the U.S. Incarcerated 120,000 Japanese Americans, Trauma and Scars Still Remain", Smithsonian Magazine (February 11, 2022)
• Susan H. Kamei, When Can We Go Back to America? Voices of Japanese American Incarceration during WWII (Simon & Schuster, 2022).
• National WWII Museum, "Japanese American Incarceration"
• National Park Service, "Terminology and the Mass Incarceration of Japanese Americans during World War II"

As the last of these sources states, It is important to accurately describe the history of the mass incarceration of Japanese Americans during World War II without perpetuating euphemistic terms. P-Makoto (she/her) (talk) 20:42, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Then you should argue for a change in the article's name. As I stated, there is presently not a consensus in favour of "incarceration".--Eldomtom2 (talk) 21:40, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

There's no need to argue for a change in the article's name. There were persuasive comments on the talk page about why using "internment" is suitable for the name of the article. My comments are about the appropriate language to use in the text of the article. P-Makoto (she/her) (talk) 21:46, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

If the article is named something that the text of the article does not use (not even in the lede or infobox!) and indeed effectively calls a euphemism, I would say that the article and title are in disjoint with one another and thus present an issue.--Eldomtom2 (talk) 21:52, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello! On behalf of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, I have drafted a replacement Wikipedia entry for editor review. On the article's Talk page, I have outlined how the current entry is problematic and shared how I think the draft is a significant improvement. I do not edit the main space because of my conflict of interest, so I'm seeking assistance from other editors to implement the improved text on my behalf. Are any WikiProject US History members willing to take a look? Thanks for your consideration, Inkian Jason (talk) 16:37, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

 Done The draft has been reviewed. Thanks! Inkian Jason (talk) 14:42, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

See here. Thanks! KlayCax (talk) 23:15, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Seen this many times - Denial of genocides of Indigenous peoples#North America 100.43.104.116 (talk) 00:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

I have nominated The Slave Community for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 23:38, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Timeline of the Donald Trump presidency#Requested move 26 May 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Prosecution of Donald Trump in New York#Requested move 31 May 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 18:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

I have been reviewing all birth article years by year going backwards. I started in 1927 and moved back. I did more recent years. At another point I started with 2023 and moved back. I only got to 1998 or so. It was less interesting to me. Anyway now I am to 1771. I am starting to see "People from Colonial Pennsylvania" and categories for other colonies in British America. My thought is this seeks excessive for a person born in 1771. Although there are some issues. I do not think we can make a hard and fast rule. If someone was born in 1771, but did something that made them well known in 1775. Thry would clearly fit. If someone was born in 1701, but only came to public attention by writing a pamphlet that got published in 1785, I still think they go in the People from colonial X category. I think a reasonable rule is anyone we know lived in X polity up until age, I am not sure what age though, Elsewhere I went with 21, but I am not sure I would impose that high an age in removing categories. I would also make exceptions for people we know were publicly active at a younger age. One does not have to be notable to fit, but it is excessive to categorize infants in most cases. The other issue is do we consider Colonial Oennsylvania to end in 1776, 1783, or do we punt and go for fuzzy lines. I would say clearly anyone born after 1776 does not go in such categories, unleas we can clearly show a good reason to place them. They wpuld only be 7 when the British fully recognize independence. However enen if we are going with 1783, I think a bitvearlier date is needed. If these were Writers, Artists, lawyers, musicians from Colonial Pennsylvania I would push for an older age and evidence of having been a writer, lawyer, musician etc while axsubject of the colony, but the People from Colonial Pennsylvania category would seem to have an easier cutoff. Mere birth in a place is not defining, so someone birn in December 1782 let alone in the part of 1783 before the treaty was signed clearly would not belong. I am thinking we need to condider each case. I guess a key question is what is the function of these caregories. Is it to rag every article we have on a person who lived in say Colonisl Pennsylvania, or is it to aid peiple trying to learn about colonial Pennsylvania? If it is the later we probably should go for an earlier last birth year than if the goal is the former.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:21, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

This is going to be an issue I will have to grapple with soon. I believe we have a few categories in the form of say Scientiest from. The Thirteen Colonies. I have to admit I hate the name. The 13 Colonies were not an actual political unit. I am tempted to say better would be Scientists from Massachusetts Bay Colony. SCientiests from Colonial Pennsylvania, etc. I have doubts we have enough articles to populate such categories. We have some "Colonial American" categories which at times have said thry should include people from anywhere in the US during Colonial times regardless of if they were under Swedish, British, Dutch, Russian Empire, Spanish, French or other control. This might make sense if there was an American nation invaded by European colonizers. However there was not a nation that got broken up. In fact for Calufornia, New Mexico and Texas there is a 25 plus year gap from the end of Colonial rule until they become part of the United States of America. For Utah, Arizona and Nevada there is in almost all their area never Colonial rule at all. I think a better approach is to look at the historical reality. We have an article on British America which covers the Thirteen Colonies, but avoids imposing the present on the past. I live in Detroit. Detroit pre-1763 is part of New France, and to call Cadillac a colonial American is non-asnsical. In 1773 Detroit is not part of the 13 colonies. It is part of the Privince of Quebec. The fact that Quebec would not go with the other colonies is not pre-determined. Florida is British from 1763 until 1783, but not in the 13 colonies, but someone who moves from Charleston, South Carolina to St. Augustine in 1772 no more sees themselves as going somewhere new than if thry moved to New York City or Boston or Richmond. Leaving a Colony means more than leaving a modern US state. Still we have Artists from ancient Greece, musicians from ancient Greece etc and those are categories grouping people from a set of oolities that had no political unity at all. I think People from British America and its subcats work in dome cases. However I think we could maybe do by Colony categories for politicians, lawyers and maybe some other categories. Does anyone else have thoughts?John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:38, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

We already have Category:Politicians from the Thirteen Colonies. Dimadick (talk) 18:05, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

An editor has requested that History of the United States (1776–1789) be moved to History of the United States from 1776 to 1789, which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You are invited to participate in the move discussion. CMD (talk) 01:50, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2024 shooting at a Donald Trump rally#Requested move 13 July 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 23:13, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:United States and the Russian invasion of Ukraine#Requested move 12 July 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:56, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

Would anyone be interested in joining a sub project of WP:Anthropology on oral tradition? WP's coverage of this is quite poor atm imo Kowal2701 (talk) 17:15, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Reeves AN/MSQ-77 Bomb Directing Central#Requested move 16 August 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Reading Beans 12:02, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

See Talk:Flying car#RfC on the inclusion of Whitehead's No. 21 machine in this article. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:06, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Martin Van Buren has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Emiya1980 (talk) 00:54, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Attempted assassination of Donald Trump#Requested move 15 September 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 02:05, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2019 El Paso shooting#Requested move 15 September 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 01:48, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi everyone,

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apolo1991 (talk • contribs) 09:05, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi everyone I made this new article could someone review it. Thanks. Draft:The Battle of Muddy Flat Historyguy1138 (talk) 23:34, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Civilian Public Service has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:16, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

FYI, the article U.S. Automobile Production Figures has been proposed for deletion (WP:PROD). The first sentences summarize the subject this way:

• "Automobile experimentation and design in the US started a few years after Carl Benz patented and produced his original gasoline-powered motor car in 1886, and a handful of companies were producing them in the US by the turn of the century. The table below shows the annual unit volumes for the top US producers in each year from 1899 to 2000."

The nominator wrote this summary of their concerns:

• "Essay without inline citations"

Note that the article mostly consists of tables of production data by brand dating back to 1899. These table do not use inline references.

If you agree or disagree with deletion, there are instructions on the deletion notice for what to do.

Thanks, A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 23:25, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

History of Indiana has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 18:48, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Anti-Federalism#Requested move 7 May 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 15:57, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

There is a new WikiProject over Wikipedia's sister-project Wikisource for the JFK Assassination Files release/being released by the U.S. government.

The goal of the project is to transcribe the documents released related to the assassination, so the information present in them is readable and easily accessible to everyone. If you are interested in joining or checking it out, please see WikiProject JFK Assassination Files. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 17:07, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

This is an ongoing discussion and !vote to decide if James Bevel should be added back to the level 5 Vital articles list (he was removed in early 2024). Randy Kryn (talk) 12:42, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Battles of Lexington and Concord has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:14, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I’d like to request a reassessment of the article Charles Thau, currently rated as C-class.

The article has undergone substantial expansion and improvement, including:

• Reliable, secondary sourcing from international and U.S. publications (e.g., *Freie Presse*, *Der Spiegel*, *The Forward*, *Military History Now*, *Milwaukee Journal*).
• A well-organized structure with clear sectioning (Early life, Partisan activity, Red Army service, Postwar, Recognition).
• Use of historical photographs with proper attribution.
• Compliance with WP:NPOV and WP:V, with personal connection declared.

I believe the article now satisfies the six B-class criteria: 1. **Well-written:** Article is grammatically correct and professionally presented. 2. **Verifiable with no original research:** All major claims are supported by citations from verifiable sources. 3. **Broad in coverage:** Covers key aspects of Thau’s life and significance. 4. **Neutral:** Written from a neutral point of view, with COI declared. 5. **Stable:** No ongoing edit wars or significant content disputes. 6. **Illustrated:** Images are used appropriately and enhance the article.

Any feedback from reviewers is welcome. Thank you! Milwaukee911 (talk) 14:53, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi there! An IP user is actively adjusting quite a few dates of US Attorneys General, which I think is being done in good faith. However, it's causing a number of inconsistencies across the articles of each person, and with the United States Attorney General page.

I wanted to check in with folks who might know more than me: are dates of service often unclear? Perhaps I'm misunderstanding resources reference to 'appointed', whether that's referencing nomination, confirmation, etc. It's surprising how much sources disagree and how many existing dates have been corrected.

Any insight would be helpful! Mad Jim Bey talk 17:42, 7 August 2025 (UTC)

P. G. T. Beauregard has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 04:19, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

Siege of Yorktown has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 14:57, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:U.S.–Japan Alliance#Requested move 6 October 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 12:03, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2020 Trump Israel–Palestine plan#Requested move 4 October 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. WhatADrag07 (talk) 02:34, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

I am trying to understand when a source can be considered biased since we often see it in older history books.

For example, "Parson" Mason Locke Weems is known for inventing some stories. But aside from that he uses the phrase "Cornwallis, Rawdon, Tarleton, Balfour, and Weymies, and their Tory and negro friends." To me, he is clearly biased, but that's my opinion. If I find a reliable source which says he is biased, I can write that and cite it.

Is there a less restrictive approach ?Humpster (talk) 04:41, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

"for inventing some stories" That is not bias. That is factual inaccuracy at the best case scenario, disinformation at the worst case scenario. Remember, Wikipedia's reliable sources should have "a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy". Inventing tall tales would exclude Weems as a reliable source. Dimadick (talk) 08:02, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

The framework is built around review and quality of scholarship with a tier list of some sources being better than others. The best are recent academic historical books, since they are written by Phds and given rigorous peer review. Check the quality of the publisher, and the date as well. What may have been mainstream in 1965 might not be anymore. Some fields advance faster than others. In some cases, I've used newspaper articles from the late 19th century for instance. Harizotoh9 (talk) 21:39, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:History of the socialist movement in the United States#Requested move 3 December 2025 2 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 09:46, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Meeker Massacre#Requested move 20 December 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 10:19, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Lockheed Martin shooting#Requested move 10 January 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vestrian24Bio 09:31, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Prominent individuals mentioned in the Epstein files#Requested move 5 February 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 03:19, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2020 Nashville tornado outbreak#Requested move 18 February 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 10:01, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:US-Iran War#Requested move 28 February 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Abesca (talk) 16:09, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:January 23, 2026 Minnesota protests against ICE#Requested move 11 March 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 09:31, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:United States strikes on Iran#Requested move 23 March 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 09:18, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Florence, South Carolina shooting#Requested move 4 March 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 08:23, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Powers of the president of the United States#Requested move 8 April 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Qwerty123M (talk) 13:01, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

An editor has requested that Anti-miscegenation laws be moved to Laws against interracial relationships, which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You are invited to participate in the move discussion. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 20:52, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Note: This RM impacts multiple pages.

—Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 20:52, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Roman Polanski sexual abuse case#Requested move 19 March 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 12:47, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:1991 Austin yogurt shop murders#Requested move 30 March 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 04:06, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Thousand Oaks shooting#Requested move 8 April 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 01:03, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iran–United States war. –Gluonz ^{talk contribs} 05:06, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Persecution of transgender people under the second Trump administration#Requested move 1 May 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Qwerty123M (talk) 13:04, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Free Negro#Requested move 2 May 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Jacksonvil (talk|contribs) 06:41, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:1993 Aurora, Colorado shooting#Requested move 7 May 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Robloxguest3 (talk) 20:16, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

For WikiProjects that participate in rating articles, the banners for talk pages usually say something like:

• "This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale."

There is a proposal to change the default wording on the banners to say "priority" instead of "importance". This could affect the template for your group. Please join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council#Proposal to update wording on WikiProject banners. Stefen 𝕋ower ^{Huddle • Handiwerk} 19:52, 6 December 2025 (UTC) (on behalf of the WikiProject Council)