1860 United States presidential election in Texas
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The 1860 United States presidential election in Texas was held on November 6, 1860. State voters chose four electors to represent the state in the Electoral College, which chose the president and vice president. Soon after this election, Texas seceded from the United States in March 1861 and joined the Confederate States of America. It would not participate in the following elections in 1864 and 1868. The state would not be readmitted into the Union until 1870 and would not participate in another presidential election until 1872. This would stand as the best performance of any Presidential candidate in Texas history for over 65 years, until Woodrow Wilson (76.92%) surpassed it in 1916. Other than Wilson, only Franklin D. Roosevelt exceeded Breckenridge's percent of the vote, though he did so in three of his four runs: in 1932 (88.06%), 1936 (87.08%), and 1940 (80.92%). This leaves Breckinridge's performance as the overall 5th best performance in Texas presidential history.
November 6, 1860
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
County results
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Background
Before candidates were even nominated, Texas, as the frontier of slavery in the United States, was always recognized as extremely important to the extension of slavery,[1] and nefarious tales of abolition plots there were common in the Southern media.[1] Texas delegates to the first Democratic National Convention refused to accept âNorthern Democratâ Stephen A. Douglasâ² platform of âpopular sovereigntyâ â locally called âsquatter sovereigntyâ â because they believed that it would prevent the expansion of slavery in the same manner as the Republicansâ âfree soilâ policy.[2] Texas was among the most insistent states upon a platform that guaranteed expansion of slavery into the territories and consequently the state Democratic party unanimously supported the nomination of Southern Democrat nominee John C. Breckinridge. Douglas, indeed, had so little support amongst the Texas electorate that his supporters had agreed to transfer their allegiance to Constitutional Union candidate John Bell,[3] although their ultimate goal was to support whomever stood the best chance of beating Republican candidate Abraham Lincoln, who did not have significant ballot distribution in Texas.[4]
Analysis
With the state media overwhelmingly behind him,[2] Texas overwhelmingly voted for Breckinridge by a margin of 50.97 points. Breckinridge won 75.47 percent of the vote, making Texas his strongest state.[5] Despite the allegiance of Douglas supporters, Bell carried only three counties in the state and it is sometimes thought that the German-American abolitionists in such counties as Gillespie refrained from visiting the polls.[6] Besides the counties he won, Bell only exceeded forty percent of the vote in six other counties. Douglas gained a mere 18 votes as a write-in candidate.
Results
| 1860 United States presidential election in Texas[7] | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party | Candidate | Votes | Percentage | Electoral votes | |
| Southern Democratic | John C. Breckinridge | 47,548 | 75.47% | 4 | |
| Constitutional Union | John Bell | 15,438 | 24.50% | 0 | |
| Democratic | Stephen A. Douglas (write-in) | 18[a] | 0.03% | 0 | |
| Total | 63,004 | 100.00% | 4 | ||
Results by county
| County | John C. Breckinridge
Southern Democratic |
John Bell
Constitutional Union |
Total Votes Cast | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | % | # | % | ||
| Anderson | 853 | 88.30% | 113 | 11.70% | 966 |
| Angelina | 213 | 63.58% | 122 | 36.42% | 335 |
| Atascosa | 194 | 90.23% | 21 | 9.77% | 215 |
| Austin | 395 | 74.53% | 135 | 25.47% | 530 |
| Bandera | 6 | 15.79% | 32 | 84.21% | 38 |
| Bastrop | 433 | 70.18% | 184 | 29.82% | 617 |
| Bee | 121 | 83.45% | 24 | 16.55% | 145 |
| Bell | 486 | 71.68% | 192 | 28.32% | 678 |
| Bexar | 986 | 77.09% | 293 | 22.91% | 1,279 |
| Blanco | 136 | 82.93% | 28 | 17.07% | 164 |
| Bosque | 218 | 82.58% | 46 | 17.42% | 264 |
| Bowie | 324 | 72.00% | 126 | 28.00% | 450 |
| Brazoria | 390 | 85.71% | 65 | 14.29% | 455 |
| Brazos | 253 | 95.11% | 13 | 4.89% | 266 |
| Brown | 39 | 81.25% | 9 | 18.75% | 48 |
| Burleson | 506 | 82.14% | 110 | 17.86% | 616 |
| Burnet | 148 | 52.11% | 136 | 47.89% | 284 |
| Caldwell | 423 | 76.77% | 128 | 23.23% | 551 |
| Calhoun | 350 | 74.15% | 122 | 25.85% | 472 |
| Cameron | 335 | 80.34% | 82 | 19.66% | 417 |
| Cass | 536 | 69.61% | 234 | 30.39% | 770 |
| Chambers | 106 | 84.80% | 19 | 15.20% | 125 |
| Cherokee | 905 | 85.14% | 158 | 14.86% | 1,063 |
| Collin | 667 | 62.39% | 402 | 37.61% | 1,069 |
| Colorado | 569 | 59.15% | 393 | 40.85% | 962 |
| Comal | 201 | 90.95% | 20 | 9.05% | 221 |
| Comanche[c] | 104 | 92.04% | 9 | 7.96% | 113 |
| Cooke | 264 | 66.00% | 136 | 34.00% | 400 |
| Coryell | 249 | 77.57% | 72 | 22.43% | 321 |
| Dallas | 868 | 75.81% | 277 | 24.19% | 1,145 |
| Denton | 586 | 75.61% | 189 | 24.39% | 775 |
| DeWitt | 490 | 85.51% | 83 | 14.49% | 573 |
| Ellis | 416 | 66.88% | 206 | 33.12% | 622 |
| El Paso | 1,042 | 98.96% | 11 | 1.04% | 1,053 |
| Erath | 214 | 91.85% | 19 | 8.15% | 233 |
| Falls | 161 | 65.45% | 85 | 34.55% | 246 |
| Fannin | 778 | 67.36% | 377 | 32.64% | 1,155 |
| Fayette | 744 | 62.78% | 441 | 37.22% | 1,185 |
| Fort Bend | 362 | 92.11% | 31 | 7.89% | 393 |
| Freestone | 569 | 89.18% | 69 | 10.82% | 638 |
| Galveston | 730 | 72.06% | 283 | 27.94% | 1,013 |
| Gillespie | 66 | 48.53% | 70 | 51.47% | 136 |
| Goliad | 243 | 64.12% | 136 | 35.88% | 379 |
| Gonzales | 646 | 75.12% | 214 | 24.88% | 860 |
| Grayson | 776 | 63.76% | 441 | 36.24% | 1,217 |
| Grimes | 604 | 74.85% | 203 | 25.15% | 807 |
| Guadalupe | 244 | 63.54% | 140 | 36.46% | 384 |
| Hamilton | 108 | 93.10% | 8 | 6.90% | 116 |
| Hardin | 231 | 93.52% | 16 | 6.48% | 247 |
| Harris | 990 | 72.16% | 382 | 27.84% | 1,372 |
| Harrison | 681 | 63.70% | 388 | 36.30% | 1,069 |
| Hays | 164 | 55.41% | 132 | 44.59% | 296 |
| Henderson | 464 | 79.45% | 120 | 20.55% | 584 |
| Hidalgo[c] | 64 | 100.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 64 |
| Hill | 389 | 74.95% | 130 | 25.05% | 519 |
| Hopkins | 812 | 74.98% | 271 | 25.02% | 1,083 |
| Houston | 431 | 77.10% | 128 | 22.90% | 559 |
| Hunt | 712 | 75.18% | 235 | 24.82% | 947 |
| Jack | 100 | 74.07% | 35 | 25.93% | 135 |
| Jackson | 181 | 61.15% | 115 | 38.85% | 296 |
| Jasper | 268 | 75.28% | 88 | 24.72% | 356 |
| Jefferson | 257 | 75.15% | 85 | 24.85% | 342 |
| Johnson | 446 | 88.32% | 59 | 11.68% | 505 |
| Karnes | 160 | 71.75% | 63 | 28.25% | 223 |
| Kaufman | 663 | 79.69% | 169 | 20.31% | 832 |
| Kerr | 86 | 73.50% | 31 | 26.50% | 117 |
| Lamar | 791 | 70.44% | 332 | 29.56% | 1,123 |
| Lampasas | 80 | 52.63% | 72 | 47.37% | 152 |
| Lavaca | 596 | 84.42% | 110 | 15.58% | 706 |
| Leon | 576 | 80.67% | 138 | 19.33% | 714 |
| Liberty | 345 | 98.29% | 6 | 1.71% | 351 |
| Limestone | 482 | 92.34% | 40 | 7.66% | 522 |
| Live Oak | 133 | 92.36% | 11 | 7.64% | 144 |
| Llano | 153 | 76.12% | 48 | 23.88% | 201 |
| Madison | 232 | 89.92% | 26 | 10.08% | 258 |
| Marion | 446 | 70.79% | 184 | 29.21% | 630 |
| Mason | 17 | 94.44% | 1 | 5.56% | 18 |
| Matagorda | 195 | 96.06% | 8 | 3.94% | 203 |
| McLennan | 524 | 72.18% | 202 | 27.82% | 726 |
| Medina | 146 | 80.22% | 36 | 19.78% | 182 |
| Milam | 474 | 73.15% | 174 | 26.85% | 648 |
| Montague | 120 | 78.95% | 32 | 21.05% | 152 |
| Montgomery | 263 | 69.95% | 113 | 30.05% | 376 |
| Nacogdoches | 381 | 66.61% | 191 | 33.39% | 572 |
| Navarro | 491 | 74.17% | 171 | 25.83% | 662 |
| Newton[c] | 100 | 89.29% | 12 | 10.71% | 112 |
| Nueces | 128 | 74.42% | 44 | 25.58% | 172 |
| Orange | 129 | 95.56% | 6 | 4.44% | 135 |
| Palo Pinto | 152 | 96.20% | 6 | 3.80% | 158 |
| Panola | 518 | 79.94% | 130 | 20.06% | 648 |
| Parker | 775 | 82.36% | 166 | 17.64% | 941 |
| Polk | 562 | 90.06% | 62 | 9.94% | 624 |
| Red River | 514 | 62.30% | 311 | 37.70% | 825 |
| Refugio | 155 | 81.15% | 36 | 18.85% | 191 |
| Robertson | 341 | 78.03% | 96 | 21.97% | 437 |
| Rusk | 1,149 | 68.93% | 518 | 31.07% | 1,667 |
| Sabine | 232 | 95.47% | 11 | 4.53% | 243 |
| San Augustine | 219 | 86.56% | 34 | 13.44% | 253 |
| San Patricio | 64 | 95.52% | 3 | 4.48% | 67 |
| San Saba | 115 | 74.68% | 39 | 25.32% | 154 |
| Shelby | 425 | 84.49% | 78 | 15.51% | 503 |
| Smith | 1,155 | 76.85% | 348 | 23.15% | 1,503 |
| Starr | 40 | 27.40% | 106 | 72.60% | 146 |
| Tarrant | 618 | 74.82% | 208 | 25.18% | 826 |
| Titus | 884 | 76.08% | 278 | 23.92% | 1,162 |
| Travis | 556 | 56.91% | 421 | 43.09% | 977 |
| Trinity | 218 | 88.98% | 27 | 11.02% | 245 |
| Tyler | 496 | 98.41% | 8 | 1.59% | 504 |
| Upshur | 945 | 73.89% | 334 | 26.11% | 1,279 |
| Uvalde | 81 | 80.20% | 20 | 19.80% | 101 |
| Van Zandt | 335 | 92.03% | 29 | 7.97% | 364 |
| Victoria | 235 | 71.65% | 93 | 28.35% | 328 |
| Walker | 499 | 75.61% | 161 | 24.39% | 660 |
| Washington | 908 | 84.23% | 170 | 15.77% | 1,078 |
| Webb | 76 | 98.70% | 1 | 1.30% | 77 |
| Wharton | 215 | 91.10% | 21 | 8.90% | 236 |
| Williamson | 487 | 68.40% | 225 | 31.60% | 712 |
| Wilson | 47 | 54.02% | 40 | 45.98% | 87 |
| Wise | 169 | 65.50% | 89 | 34.50% | 258 |
| Wood | 515 | 67.14% | 252 | 32.86% | 767 |
| Young | 98 | 89.91% | 11 | 10.09% | 109 |
| Zapata | 151 | 100.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 151 |
| Total | 47,639 | 75.54% | 15,422 | 24.46% | 63,061 |
See also
Notes
- The write-in votes for Stephen A. Douglas are only given as a state total, as they are not included in most county data.
- No returns have been located for this election for Clay County.
- Not included in the official returns as they arrived after the deadline.