Wikiwand AI

1946 Minnesota gubernatorial election

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The 1946 Minnesota gubernatorial election took place on November 5, 1946. Incumbent governor Edward John Thye did not seek reelection and instead ran for the United States Senate.[1] Republican candidate Luther Youngdahl defeated Minnesota Democratic–Farmer–Labor Party challenger Harold H. Barker.

Quick facts Nominee, Party ...
1946 Minnesota gubernatorial election

← 1944
November 5, 1946
1948 →
 
Nominee Luther Youngdahl Harold H. Barker
Party Republican Democratic (DFL)
Popular vote 519,067 349,565
Percentage 58.96% 39.71%

County results
Youngdahl:      40–50%      50–60%      60–70%      70–80%
Barker:      50–60%      60–70%

Governor before election

Edward John Thye
Republican

Elected Governor

Luther Youngdahl
Republican

Close

Republican Primary

Luther Youngdahl was nominated, with his primary opposition being former Farmer-Laborite governor Hjalmar Petersen.

Candidates

Nominated

Eliminated in Primary

Results

More information Party, Candidate ...
Republican Party of Minnesota primary results
Party Candidate Votes %
Republican Luther Youngdahl 261,307 64.61%
Republican Hjalmar Petersen 133,852 33.10%
Republican Ed Hickenlooper 9,254 2.29%
Total votes 404,413 100%
Close

[2]

Democratic-Farmer-Labor Primary

Candidates

Nominated

Eliminated in Primary

Results

More information Party, Candidate ...
Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party of Minnesota primary results
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic (DFL) Harold H. Barker 52,780 44.67%
Democratic (DFL) Francis L. Murphy 21,589 18.27%
Democratic (DFL) Victor E. Johnson 15,357 13.00%
Democratic (DFL) John J. McDonough 14,377 12.17%
Democratic (DFL) Thomas P. Duffy 7,375 6.24%
Democratic (DFL) Edgard Bernard 6,673 5.65%
Total votes 118,151 100%
Close

[3]

Candidates

Campaigns

Early in his campaign, Youngdahl received an endorsement from former Governor Harold Stassen.[4]

Youngdahl led an ambitious campaign. One of his major plans was an expansion to welfare, to meet the incredible rise in post-war demand for basic services. His focus was "...to prevent distress among dependent children, the blind, and the aged.”[5] Youngdahl also campaigned on funding for education, citing underpaid teachers and the need for new school buildings.[6] His most ambitious plan was what was called the 5-Point Housing Plan. It was as follows:

1. Establishment of a state housing commission with full time executive staff working with an advisory citizens' volunteer group.

2. Deferment of all but the most essential public construction until housing shortage is over.

3. Passage of enabling legislation to permit the state and municipalities to take advantage of present and future federal housing acts.

4. Provision for state rent control if federal control should be removed while need for such regulation still exists.

5. Enactment of neighborhood redevelopment laws permitting public acquisition of blighted areas which could thus be cleared of obsolete structures and the lots resold to citizens for private home construction.[7]

Barker criticized Youngdahl's housing plans, stating that since Republicans retook the governorship in 1939 there have been plans to expand housing, and a lot of committee and organizations have been founded, yet actual housing development was minimal. He further criticized that the committees in charge of overseeing housing construction had no veterans, union representatives, or farmers present, and that the funding for the plans were reliant on sales tax.[8] Barker and Youngdahl generally agreed on focusing more resources of the state towards education. Barker did not directly attack Youngdahl's plans, instead arguing that the Republicans were responsible for the underserving of rural schools, citing a 1945 decision by the Republican-led government diverting $25 million from funding from rural schools.[9] Barker further criticized Republicans firing education officials around the state due to affiliation with the DFL, notably State Education Commissioner Dr. John G. Rockwell, and Winona State Teachers' College President Oscar Myking Mehus in 1944.[10]

Barker campaigned on tax reform. He planned to raise taxes on corporations, notably those involved in mining in the Mesabi Range, in order to lessen the tax burden on the people. Barker also advocated for enacting regulation on the rapidly expanding businesses of suburbia, notably department stores and chain stores that were detrimental to local small businesses.[11]

Youngdahl, a devout Lutheran, called for 'spiritual progress', which he described as a moral and spiritual advance that allows for the establishment of permanent peace and representative government.[12]

Results

More information Party, Candidate ...
1946 Gubernatorial Election, Minnesota
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Republican Luther Youngdahl 519,067 58.96% −2.63%
Democratic (DFL) Harold H. Barker 349,565 39.71% +1.93%
Industrial Government Rudolph Gustafson 11,716 1.33% +0.70%
Majority 169,502 19.25%
Turnout 880,348
Republican hold Swing
Close

See also

References

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks